Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

A key study for sensitisation was performed in 51 humans with Terphenyl, hydrogenated according to Shelanski repeat insult method, this method was considered to be reliable, adequate and relevant (Product investigations Inc., 1979). There was no evidence that the test material acted as a sensitizer in any of the individuals. Further, a supportive study was available according to the same method in 50 individuals. There was no evidence that the test material acted as a sensitizer. It is therefore unlikely that this material would present a danger of irritation or sensitization in normal intended use.


Justification for classification or non-classification

The endpoint does not meet classification criteria according to EU and/or CLP criteria.