Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-552-8 | CAS number: 2809-21-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In a skin irritation study (Younger Laboratories, 1965), undiluted Dequest 2010 was applied to the intact skin or abraded skin of rabbits for 24 hours under an occlusive dressing (the report does not describe how the intact and abraded sites were positioned on the rabbits). The skin reactions were then observed for up to 168 hours. Well-defined redness with one instance of very slight oedema was noted after one hour. Overnight there was moderate erythema and slight oedema with an average score of 3.6. Following removal of the test substance after 24 hours, inflammation gradually reduced to two instances of very slight redness in 7 days. Tissue necrosis occurred when the test substance was in contact with abraded areas for 24 hours. Therefore it was concluded that Dequest 2010 was moderately irritating to the skin of rabbits.
In an eye irritation study (Younger Laboratories, 1965), undiluted Dequest 2010 was instilled into the eyes of 3 rabbits. The eyes of animals 1 and 2 were rinsed after 24 hours. The eye of animal 3 was washed after 4 seconds. After 24 hours exposure there was copious discharge, translucent cornea with iris details moderately obscured, particularly the lower half, moderately severe erythema, and swelling with partial eversion of the lids developed within 1 hour of instillation. After 24 and 48 hours corneal opacity increased and the conjunctivae became bright red. The lower half of the cornea became opaque within 72 hours and remained so throughout the 7 day observation period. With the lower portion of the iris invisible and not responding to light, it was evident that sight had been destroyed. After a 4 second exposure moderate lacrimation, mild oedema and erythema, and mild corneal cloudiness with iris details clearly visible were observed within an hour. Congestion increased slightly by 24 hours, but decreased thereafter with only very slight redness remaining after 7 days. Dequest 2010 was considered to be corrosive to eyes of rabbits.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Only an summary report was available for review.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- Conducted prior to adoption of OECD test guidelines.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Limited information on test material, methodology and environmental conditions. Guideline exposure period is 4 hours, not 24.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: Insufficient detail to fully assess comparability with OECD guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted prior to adoption of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: No data
- Age at study initiation: No data
- Weight at study initiation: No data
- Housing: No data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): No data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): No data
- Acclimation period: No data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): No data
- Humidity (%): No data
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): No data
IN-LIFE DATES: No data - Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Preparation of test site:
- other: Intact and abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml (equivalent to 435 mg active acid. Although the recommended dose of 0.5 ml was achieved for the formulation, this means that the limit dose for the active acid was not attained. The level of irritation of the anhydrous active acid may therefore be underestimated by this study). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- Seven days (at 4, 24, 48, 72 and 168 hours)
- Number of animals:
- Six
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: No data
- % coverage: No data
- Type of wrap if used: No data
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No data
- Time after start of exposure: No data
SCORING SYSTEM: No data - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: All
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 8
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No oedema or erythema in any animal, at any time point.
- Other effects:
- None reported.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In a briefly summarised skin irritation study (reliability score 4), conducted prior to the adoption of OECD test guidelines and GLP, undiluted Dequest 2010 was not irritating to the skin of rabbits.
- Executive summary:
Undiluted Dequest 2010 (0.5 ml) was applied to the skin (summary table not clear, but appears that test was conducted on intact and abraded skin) of six New Zealand white rabbits for 24 hours (type of dressing not specified). The skin was then observed for signs of irritation for seven days. No signs of irritation were observed in any of the animals tested, and it was concluded that Dequest 2010 was not irritating to the skin of rabbits.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study did not meet current guideline requirements for testing potential for skin irritation. It does, however, add weight of evidence for skin irritation.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: Insufficient detail to fully assess comparability with OECD guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted prior to adoption of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped intact or abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- Seven days (1, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 hours)
- Number of animals:
- Three
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 3.6
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: seven days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Intact skin: only very slight redness on Day 7. Individual scores for erythema and oedema not reported.
- Other effects:
- Tissue necrosis occurred when the test substance was in contact with abraded areas for 24 hours.
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Conclusions:
- In a limited skin irritation study (reliability score 4) conducted prior to the adoption of OECD test guidelines and GLP, Dequest 2010 was moderately irritating to rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
In a limited skin irritation study (reliability score 4) conducted prior to the adoption of OECD test guidelines and GLP, undiluted Dequest 2010 was applied to the clipped intact skin or abraded skin of three rabbits for 24 hours under an occlusive dressing (the report does not describe how the intact and abraded sites were positioned on the rabbits). The skin reactions were then observed at 1, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 hours. Well-defined redness with one instance of very slight oedema was noted after one hour. Overnight there was moderate erythema and slight oedema with an average score of 3.6. Following removal of the test substance after 24 hours, inflammation gradually reduced to two instances of very slight redness in seven days. Tissue necrosis occurred when the test substance was in contact with abraded areas for 24 hours. Therefore it was concluded that Dequest 2010 was moderately irritating to the skin of rabbits.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1 Irritation scores for three test animals for intact skin
Animal | Numerical Evaluation at time point (h) | |||||
1 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 120 | 168 | |
1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Average | 2.3 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
Results do not show responses from intact and abraded skin separately and do not distinguish between erythema/eschar formation and oedema formation.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study meets generally accepted scientific principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: Insufficient detail to fully assess comparability with OECD guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted prior to adoption of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: No data
- Age at study initiation: No data
- Weight at study initiation: No data
- Housing: No data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): No data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): No data
- Acclimation period: No data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): No data
- Humidity (%): No data
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): No data
IN-LIFE DATES: No data - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Amount applied: 0.1 ml (although the recommended dose of 0.1 ml was achieved for the formulation, this means that the limit dose for the active
acid was not attained). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- up to 24 hour(s)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Seven days (skin reactions scored at 1, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 hours)
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes, all animals with warm isotonic saline
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours for animals 1 and 2, and four seconds for animal 3.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: No data - Irritation parameter:
- other: maximum irritation score
- Basis:
- animal: average of1 and 2
- Time point:
- other: from all time points
- Score:
- ca. 90
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: 24 hours exposure
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- 24 hour exposure: Copious discharge, translucent cornea with iris details moderately obscured, particularly the lower half, moderately severe erythema, and swelling with partial eversion of the lids developed within one hour of instillation. After 24 and 48 hours corneal opacity increased and the conjunctivae became bright red. The lower half of the cornea became opaque within 72 hours and remained so throughout the seven day observation period. With the lower portion of the iris invisible and not responding to light, it was evident that sight had been destroyed. The upper half of the eye was only moderately affected due to the fact that the dose was concentrated in the conjunctival sac.
4 second exposure: After one hour there was moderate lacrimation, mild oedema and erythema, and mild corneal cloudiness with iris details clearly visible. Congestion increased slightly by 24 hours, but decreased thereafter with only very slight redness remaining after seven days. - Other effects:
- Discomfort immediately following instillation.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- In an eye irritation study (reliability score 2) conducted prior to the adoption of OECD test guidelines and GLP, Dequest 2010 was corrosive to the eyes of rabbits.
- Executive summary:
In an eye irritation study (reliability score 2) conducted prior to the adoption of OECD test guidelines and GLP, 0.1 ml undiluted Dequest 2010 was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each of three albino rabbits. The eyes of animals 1 and 2 were rinsed with warm isotonic saline after 24 hours exposure. The eye of animal 3 was washed after four seconds. Observations were made for seven days, and reactions scored according to the method of Draize. After 24 hours exposure there was copious discharge, translucent cornea with iris details moderately obscured, particularly the lower half, moderately severe erythema, and swelling with partial eversion of the lids developed within one hour of instillation. After 24 and 48 hours corneal opacity increased and the conjunctivae became bright red. The lower half of the cornea became opaque within 72 hours and remained so throughout the seven day observation period. With the lower portion of the iris invisible and not responding to light, it was evident that sight had been destroyed. The upper half of the eye was only moderately affected due to the fact that the dose was concentrated in the conjunctival sac. After a four second exposure moderate lacrimation, mild oedema and erythema, and mild corneal cloudiness with iris details clearly visible were observed within an hour. Congestion increased slightly by 24 hours, but decreased thereafter with only very slight redness remaining after seven days. Dequest 2010 was considered to be corrosive to the eyes of rabbits.
Reference
Table 1 Summary of Eye Irritation
Animal | Evaluation time point | |||||
1 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 120 | 168 | |
24 hour exposure | ||||||
1 | 42 | 57 | 75 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
2 | 49 | 69 | 83 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
Average | 45.5 | 63 | 79 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
4 second exposure | ||||||
3 | 31 | 36 | 29 | 22 | 13 | 4 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
With a pH <2, the acid would be predicted to be severely irritating, if not corrosive to the skin. However, based on the available data, the acid is not expected to be significantly irritating to the skin. However, the limit dose for the active acid was not achieved and therefore the irritation might have been underestimated.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data no classification for skin irritation is required for HEDP-H. Classification for irreversible eye damage Category 1 'H318: Causes serious eye damage' is required according to Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.