Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 468-710-7 | CAS number: 754-12-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 Feb - 15 Mar 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guidance Document No. 23 "Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures" (September 2000)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 10706, 2000
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 468-710-7
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 754-12-1
- Molecular formula:
- C3H2F4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- During the study duplicate samples for analyses were taken at the beginning and at the end of three intervals of 48hours (nominal days 0 and 2, 6 and 8, 14 and 16). In addition, samples were taken from freshly prepared solutions on days 2, 8, 16 and 20. Samples from the saturated stock solutions were taken and analysed on days 0, 2, 6, 8, 14, 16 and 20. From the test concentrations 10 mL and the saturated stock solutions 5 mL were taken. The samples were taken in a 20 mL GC-vial that already contained 0.5 mL acetone.
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The standard test procedures required generation of test solutions, which should contain completely dissolved test substance concentrations or stable and homogeneous mixtures or dispersions. 2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoroprop-1-ene HFO-1234yf is soluble in water (solubility = 160 mg/L at 25.5°C). Saturated stock solutions were prepared daily by loading two 10 litre Tedlar® gas sampling bags each with 7 or 7.5 litres of ISO medium followed by addition of ~3.5 or 3.75 grams gas (500 mg/L). The gas sampling bags were closed immediately after addition and then shaken carefully for 4 hours on a platform shaker. Subsequently, the bags were left to settle overnight. The two saturated media (expected concentration ~160 mg/L) were mixed and then used for preparing the test concentrations by serial dilution. The time frames for preparation were kept as short as practically possible and the stock and test solutions that were prepared were immediately closed as to prevent volatilisation as much as possible. The final test solutions were all clear and colourless. Note that preparation of the saturated stock solution was performed in combination with NOTOX Project 495933 „Fish juvenile growth test‟. A sufficient volume of the daily prepared stock solutions was used for the two-day renewals of the reproduction test with Daphnia. Trace elements, macro nutrients and vitamins were added to the ISO medium before exposure of the organisms as to make M7 medium.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Source: In-house laboratory culture with a known history
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): at least third generation, obtained by acyclical parthenogenesis under specified breeding conditions.
- Age of test individuals: neonate (<24h old), from parental daphnids more than two weeks old
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: Chlorella pyrenoidosa suspension
- Amount: 0.25 mL of suspension containing 1.46 x 10^8 cells. This daily ration corresponds to 0.2 mg C/Daphnia/day
- Frequency: daily
BREEDING
- Start of each batch: With newborn daphnids, i.e. less than 3 days old, by placing about 250 of them into 5 litres of medium in an all-glass culture vessel
- Maximum age of the cultures: 4 weeks
- Renewal of the cultures: After 7 days of cultivation half of the medium twice a week
- Temperature of medium: 18 - 22 °C
- Feeding: Daily, a suspension of fresh water algae
- Validity of the cultures: Historical data on the reproductive capacity are based on the numbers of living young counted three times a week in individual cultures and tested to meet the validity criteria for survival and reproduction
- Medium: M7, as prescribed by Dr. Elendt-Schneider (Elendt, B.-P., 1990: Selenium deficiency in Crustacea. An ultrastructural approach to antennal damage in Daphnia magna Straus. Protoplasma 154, 25-33)
Study design
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
Test conditions
- Hardness:
- 143 - 196 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 19.3 - 20.4 °C
- pH:
- 7.4 - 9.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.7 - 10.8 mg O2/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- control, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12 and 24 mg/L (nominal)
control, 1.1, 1.9, 4.1, 8.3 and 15.2 mg/L (mean measured) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: All-glass, 50 mL, no headspace and closed with a screw-cap, filled with 50 mL test medium
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): renewed every 48 hours
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 20
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Total organic carbon: 0.17 mg/L
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Temperature, oxygen and pH were checked at the start of the test and just before and after each renewal in one of the vessels of each test group with surviving daphnids. Hardness was checked once a week in fresh and old media from the control and the
highest test concentration, light at the start and the end of the test.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light, 8 hours dark
- Light intensity: at the start: 652-700 lux (8.92-9.57µE x m-2 x s-1), at the end: 656-741 lux (9.46-10.27 µE x m-2 x s-1)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable):
Parental generation: Every workday and upon renewal on non-workdays, the number of living, immobile and dead parental daphnids was recorded. Dead daphnids were removed when observed. The presence of eggs was checked every workday and upon renewal on non-workdays. Body lenght was measured at the end of the test.
F1 generation: Appearance of first brood when observed. Check for newborn daphnids upon renewals on work and non-workdays, the number of
newborn young was counted and the condition of the young recorded. Thereafter, the young were removed. When observed the presence of unhatched eggs and incidence of immobility were noted. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- parental
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- parental
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: parental body length
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: parental body length
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: overall
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 15.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: overall
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of parent animals: Four out of the twenty parental daphnids died during the test period in the control. Hence, parental mortality did not exceed 20% in the controls. Mortality in the treatment groups was comparable to or below that of the control in 4 of the 5 groups tested (10 - 20%). Only at 8.3 mg/L a higher mortality of 40% was found. However, as the highest test concentration of 15.2 mg/L only induced 10% mortality this was considered not treatment related. Statistical analyses of the mortality data confirmed that the mortality in the treatment groups was not significant (Fisher's exact test, α= 0.05). Hence, the NOEC for survival was set at 15.2 mg/L, the highest concentration tested.
- Reproduction: There were no recordings of immobile young or appearance of unhatched (aborted) eggs at any of the test concentrations throughout the 21-day test period. Statistical analysis on the cumulative reproduction showed that the reproduction of the daphnids was not significantly reduced at any of the concentrations tested (Bonferroni t Test, Tukey's Test, α=0.05).Hence, the NOEC for reproduction was set at 15.2 mg/L, the highest concentration tested.
- Body length: No statistically significant reduction of body length was present in any of the concentrations tested according to the Tukey and Bonferroni t-test (α=0.05). Hence, the NOEC for growth was set at 15.2 mg/L, the highest concentration tested.
- Time to first brood release or time to hatch: In the controls, the presence of eggs in the brood pouch was generally recorded for the first time on day 6 and the first brood appeared on day 8 or 9. The first recording of the presence of eggs in the brood pouch and the appearance of the first brood was similar to the control in each of the treated solutions. Hence, no delay in appearance of the first brood was observed in the treatments when compared to the control. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Total reproduction on day 21 was tested for normality and for homogeneity of variance and statistically tested using an ANOVA test followed by mean comparison tests (Bonferroni t Test and Tukey's Test). Body length was statistically tested using an ANOVA test followed by a Bonferroni t-test and a Tukey test). Survival of parental organisms was tested using the Fisher's exact test. All testing was performed using TOXSTAT Release 3.5, 1996, D.D. Gulley, A.M. Boelter, H.L. Bergman.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Measured concentrations:
The results of analysis of the duplicate samples taken during the reproduction test are given in Tables 1 - 3 below. The results of analyses of the saturated stock solutions showed that measured concentrations generally ranged between 160 and 190 mg/L. This was slightly higher than expected based on the solubility as provided by the sponsor, being 160 mg/L. Measured concentrations in freshly prepared solutions generally ranged between 70 and 90% relative to the target concentrations. On day 0 of the test recoveries were slightly lower with approximately 20 to 50% relative to the targets, while another few concentrations showed slightly lower recoveries on various days. It was unknown why these concentrations were lower than what was generally measured during the 21-day test period. Concentrations measured in the spent solutions were generally maintained within 80% of the initial measured concentrations with only a few exceptions. The exceptions with somewhat lower recoveries were not unexpected considering the fact that the substance tested was a highly volatile gas and that food was provided on a daily basis which required opening the test vessels for a short period. Table 3 below shows the mathematical means of the concentrations measured in the samples taken during the various renewal intervals. The means of all the renewal periods were used to calculate the mean measured concentrations per test group. The means were calculated to correspond to 1.1, 1.9, 4.1, 8.3 and 15.2 mg/L, i.e. 63 to 72% relative to the target concentrations.
Table 1: Procedural recovery samples
Date of preparation and analysis [dd-mm-yy] |
Target concentration [mg/L] |
Nominal concentration [mg/L] |
Analysed concentration [mg/L] |
Recovery [%] |
Mean recovery [%] |
22-02-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0864 |
86 |
87 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0881 |
88 |
|
22-02-11 |
100 |
100 |
101 |
101 |
100 |
|
|
100 |
98.9 |
99 |
|
24-02-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0804 |
80 |
80 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0799 |
80 |
|
24-02-11 |
100 |
100 |
111 |
111 |
114 |
|
|
100 |
116 |
116 |
|
24-02-11 |
100 |
100 |
122 |
122 |
119 |
|
|
100 |
115 |
115 |
|
28-02-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0815 |
81 |
81 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0808 |
81 |
|
28-02-11 |
100 |
100 |
109 |
109 |
111 |
|
|
100 |
113 |
113 |
|
02-03-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0989 |
99 |
96 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0921 |
92 |
|
02-03-11 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
101 |
|
|
100 |
103 |
103 |
|
08-03-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0914 |
91 |
91 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0907 |
91 |
|
08-03-11 |
100 |
100 |
107 |
107 |
108 |
|
|
100 |
109 |
109 |
|
10-03-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0932 |
93 |
94 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0957 |
96 |
|
10-03-11 |
100 |
100 |
103 |
103 |
104 |
|
|
100 |
105 |
105 |
|
14-03-11 |
0.1 |
0.100 |
0.0855 |
86 |
85 |
|
|
0.100 |
0.0854 |
85 |
|
14-03-11 |
100 |
100 |
102 |
102 |
102 |
|
|
100 |
101 |
101 |
|
Table 2: Concentrations of the test substance in the stock solutions - final test
Time of sampling [days] |
Date of sampling and analysis [dd-mm-yy] |
Nominal concentration [mg/L] |
Analysed concentration [mg/L] |
0 |
22-02-11 |
500 |
142 |
|
|
500 |
169 |
2 |
24-02-11 |
500 |
192 |
|
|
500 |
186 |
6 |
28-02-11 |
500 |
163 |
|
|
500 |
162 |
8 |
02-03-11 |
500 |
187 |
|
|
500 |
174 |
14 |
08-03-11 |
500 |
182 |
|
|
500 |
171 |
16 |
10-03-11 |
500 |
183 |
|
|
500 |
168 |
20 |
14-03-11 |
500 |
199 |
|
|
500 |
187 |
Table 3: Target and mean measured exposure concentrations
Target Concentration (mg/L) |
Mean exposure concentration during refreshment periods (mg/L) |
Mean day 0-21# (mg/L) |
||||||
Day 0-2 mean |
Day 2-4 mean* |
Day 6-8 mean |
Day 8-10 mean* |
Day 14-16 mean |
Day 16-18 mean* |
Day 20-21 mean* |
||
1.5 |
0.73 |
1.23 |
0.82 |
1.29 |
1.14 |
1.34 |
1.05 |
1.1 (72%) |
3.0 |
0.64 |
2.01 |
1.62 |
1.97 |
2.22 |
2.30 |
2.76 |
1.9 (64%) |
6.0 |
2.00 |
5.06 |
3.81 |
4.33 |
4.33 |
4.95 |
4.28 |
4.1 (68%) |
12 |
4.98 |
8.54 |
8.18 |
9.63 |
9.31 |
8.66 |
8.74 |
8.3 (69%) |
24 |
8.57 |
16.27 |
16.50 |
16.50 |
18.76 |
18.25 |
11.75 |
15.2 (63%) |
#: Between brackets: % recovery relative to nominal
*: Calculated with 24- or 48-hour concentrations set at 85% relative to the freshly analysed concentrations
Table 4: Cumulative mortality of parental daphnids during the 21-day exposure period
Concentration (mg/L) |
Number exposed |
Cumulative number of dead parental daphnids on day: |
Mortality % |
|||||||||||
2 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
20 |
21 |
|||
Control |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
20 |
1.1 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
1.9 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
4.1 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
8.3 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
40 |
15.2 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
Table 5: Average body lengths (mm) of parental daphnids at the end of the test and % reduction of body length relative to the control
Concentration (mg/L) |
Average length (mm) |
SD |
% Reduction |
Control |
4.06 |
0.08 |
- |
1.1 |
4.06 |
0.08 |
0 |
1.9 |
4.09 |
0.09 |
0 |
4.1 |
4.09 |
0.09 |
0 |
8.3 |
4.08 |
0.09 |
0 |
15.2 |
4.02 |
0.11 |
1 |
Table 6: Cumulative mean number of living young per parent at the various mean concentrations (in mg/L)
|
Day 7 |
Day 8 |
Day 10 |
Day 12 |
Day 14 |
Day 16 |
Day 18 |
Day 20 |
Day 21 |
Control |
0.0 |
0.4 |
13.2 |
21.2 |
33.7 |
53.2 |
56.9 |
76.6 |
76.9 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
3.4 |
11.1 |
26.4 |
35.6 |
48.0 |
73.8 |
81.9 |
91.2 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
11.2 |
25.2 |
30.0 |
49.6 |
64.6 |
79.4 |
83.8 |
4.1 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
12.3 |
26.1 |
32.5 |
51.8 |
68.4 |
76.9 |
84.1 |
8.3 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
12.0 |
23.6 |
29.4 |
50.8 |
69.3 |
75.7 |
87.2 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
15.1 |
27.0 |
33.1 |
51.7 |
65.9 |
71.2 |
77.1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.