Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: gene mutation
Type of information:
other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
not yet defined
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Justification for type of information:
NON-CONFIDENTIAL NAME OF SUBSTANCE:
- Name of the substance on which testing is proposed to be carried out: analogue substance 01

CONSIDERATIONS THAT THE GENERAL ADAPTATION POSSIBILITIES OF ANNEX XI OF THE REACH REGULATION ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO GENERATE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION
- Available GLP studies: not available.
- Available non-GLP studies: not available.
- Historical human data: not available.
- (Q)SAR: not available.
- Weight of evidence: not available.
- Grouping and read-across:
• In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria (Ames test) – OECD TG 471 – RA on analogue substance 03.
• In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria (Ames test) – OECD TG 471 – RA on analogue substance 03.
• In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria (Ames test) – OECD TG 471 – NR deficient strains – RA on analogue substance 01.
• In vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity/erythrocyte micronucleus – OECD TG 474 – RA on analogue substance 03.

CONSIDERATIONS THAT THE SPECIFIC ADAPTATION POSSIBILITIES OF ANNEXES VI TO X (AND COLUMN 2 THEREOF) OF THE REACH REGULATION ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO GENERATE THE NECESSARY INFORMATION:
Under Annex VIII Section 8.4., column 2 of REACH, further mutagenicity studies must be considered in case of a positive result in an in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria.
Guidance on information requirements R7a, section 7.7.6 (2017), states that regarding Annex VIII, when both the mammalian cell tests are negative but there was a positive result in the bacterial test, it will be necessary to decide whether any further testing is needed on a case-by-case basis. For example, suspicion that a unique positive response observed in the bacterial test was due to a specific bacterial metabolism of the test substance could be explored further by investigation in vitro. Alternatively, an in vivo test may be required.
The present dossier contains positive results for the in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria, following OECD TG 471 and conducted on analogue substance 03, which raises the concern for gene mutation.
As presented in the attached document regarding genotoxicity, a fist attempt on elucidating the effect of mechanism of the nitroreductase in the positivity of the Ames test was evaluated on the analogue substance 01. The analogue substance was tested in a modified Ames test following OECD TG 471 with NR deficient strains, namely TA 98 and TA 100, in a Prival method. The results really support the major role played by the nitroreductase and a great decrease on the number of revertants with the respect to the control was obtained for TA 98NR and TA 100NR. However, the modified Ames test cannot be finalised as totally negative.
Annex VIII, Column 2 requires the registrant to consider appropriate mutagenicity in vivo studies already at the Annex VIII tonnage level, in cases where positive results in genotoxicity studies have been obtained, which involves studies mentioned in Annex IX (as first step OECD TG 474, Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus test, OECD TG 488, Transgenic Rodent Mutation Assay, OECD TG 489, in vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay and OECD TG 486, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis).

CONSIDERATIONS ON THE STUDIES INSERTED IN THE PRESENT DOSSIER AND EXPERT ASSESSMENT ON TESTING PROPOSAL
In the present dossier, an OECD TG 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte micronucleus test) in vivo study is available on the analogue substance 03, with negative results, which is adequate to cover the chromosomal aberration potential of the substance.
However, to completely assess the gene mutation properties of the substance in different tissues of the animal, a Comet Assay, OECD TG 489, on the analogue substance 01 is presented as testing proposal.
OECD TG 489 allows to measure DNA strand breaks, that may result from direct interactions with DNA, alkali labile sites or as a consequence of incomplete excision repair. Therefore, the alkaline comet assay recognises primary DNA damage that would lead to gene mutations and/or chromosome aberrations, but will also detect DNA damage that may be effectively repaired or lead to cell death. The comet assay can be applied to almost every tissue of an animal from which single cell or nuclei suspensions can be made, including specific site of contact tissues.
OECD TG 488 is not considered the first choice for assessing the gene mutation in vivo for this substance, since preliminary data for gene mutation in vivo (OECD TG 474) already indicates negativity in the somatic bone marrow cells. A confirmation by the Comet assay performed over other tissues (and for azo dyes the intestinal tract is the site of major metabolism and dye/metabolites absorption) would be sufficient to assess the genotoxic potential of the substance.
Finally, as reported in literature, from the analysis of 91 chemicals with published data from Comet Assay and Transgenic rodent mutation assay (TGR), the comet assay appears to yield similar results to the TGR assay in liver and gastrointestinal tract (predominantly stomach and colon data) and, hence, can be confidently performed to confirm in vivo gene mutation activity in terms of genotoxicity in general.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2023

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 489 (In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian comet assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Similar Substance 01
IUPAC Name:
Similar Substance 01

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
not specified
Genotoxicity:
other: to be performed
Remarks on result:
other: the test is in read-across from a submitted testing proposal still under evaluation.

Applicant's summary and conclusion