Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-572-1 | CAS number: 108-32-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
One reliable AMES test was available (Klimisch 2), covering bacterial reverse mutation assay. One reliable study was available (Klimisch 1) for DNA damage and repair assay and unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro was available (Klimisch 2). None of the available genotoxicity studies (Two in vitro ( Ames test and DNA damage and repair assay)) indicated any genotoxic or mutagenic effects.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
One reliable micronucleus test was available (Klimisch 2). The erythrocyte micronucleus test indicated no genotoxic or mutagenic effects.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
Bacterial reverse mutation assay:
Huntsman performed an AMES (liquid pre-incubation) test with S typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA1538 with and without metabolic activation (Pharmakon Research International, 1985).
Following test concentrations were applied: 50, 167, 500, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate (in duplicate). Solvent control and positive controls were run in triplicate. There were no observed increases in mutation frequency with and without metabolic activation at the tested dose levels. All solvent and positive controls used induced mutant frequency values which were within the acceptable limits of mean historical data. Cytotoxicity was not determined in this study.
DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro:
Barfknecht (1985) studied the gene mutation potential in rat hepatocytes (adult male F344 rats) without metabolic activation. Following doses were evaluated in triplicate: 40, 133, 400, 1333 and 4000 µg/well. A negative control (WME medium), vehicle control (water) and a positive control (1E-05 molar 2 -acetamidofluorene) were scored as well. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance was not genotoxic in the hepatocyte primary culture/DNA repair test. This conclusion is based upon the finding of the inability of the test substance to produce a mean nuclear grain count of 5 or greater than the vehicle control mean net nuclear grain count at any level of concentration.
Cytogenicity test:
An in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells does not usually need to be conducted if adequate data from an in vivo cytogenicity test are available. Sorg (1986) performed an in vivo micronucleus test on CD1 mice (IUCLID section 7.6.2). Therefore, it is not necessary to perform an in vitro cytogenicity test for propylene carbonate.
Mammalian cell gene mutation assay:
An in vitro UDS and in-vivo micronucleus test were performed which gave negative results in mammalian cells.Therefore, no mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed with propylene carbonate.
Genetic toxicity in vivo:
In vivo micronucleus test:
Sorg (1986) performed an in vivo micronucleus test in male and female
CD1 -mice via single intraperitoneal administration of 1666 mg/kg
propylene carbonate (nominal concentration). Concurrent vehicle
(distilled water) was used as a control. Triethylenemelamine (0.5 mg/kg)
was used as a positive control substance. 5 animals per sex and per dose
were tested. Bone marrow of the femur was evaluated. Results in the
initial micronucleus test indicated a statistically significant increase
in the incidence of micronuclei in animals administered 1666 mg/kg bw
and sacrificed at 72 hours. The results of an additional re-test with 10
males and 10 females (with concurrent controls) were negative in the
micronucleus test at a dose level of 1666 mg/kg at all of the time
intervals evaluated. The findings are based on the inability of the test
article to give a reproducible statistically significant increase in the
incidence of micronuclei per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal
in the treated group versus the negative control group under the
conditions of this assay. Based on the overall results, the test article
was negative in the micronucleus test at a dose level of 1666 mg/kg
administered in single intraperitoneal doses with sacrifice times of 30,
48 and 72 hours.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data and according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, propylene carbonate should not be classified for mutagenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.