Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 293-263-8 | CAS number: 91053-01-9 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from distillation of the butadiene-free C4 fraction of a naphtha steam-cracking process. It consists predominantly of olefinic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers of C8, C12, C16 and C20 and boiling in the range of approximately 170°C to 185°C (338°F to 365°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guideance on QSARs
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 12 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not Required
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 5 862 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 1 123 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 5862 and 1123 mg/kg soil dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Eisenia fetida were 5862 and 1123 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guideance on QSARs
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 16 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not Required
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 1 271 117 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 243 509 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 1271117 and 243509 mg/kg soil dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Eisenia fetida were 1271117 and 243509 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guideance on QSARs
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 20 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not Required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 1 271 117 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 243 509 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 1271117 and 243509 mg/kg soil dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Eisenia fetida were1271117 and 243509 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guideance on QSARs
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 8 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not Required
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 217 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 41.5 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 217 and 41.5 mg/kg soil dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Eisenia fetida were 217 and 41.5 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1st October 2008 - 29th Janurary 2009
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant, guideline study, available as an unpublished report, reliable with restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 11268-1 (Effects of Pollutants on Earthworms. 1. Determination of Acute Toxicity Using Artificial Soil Substrate)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
No data - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Live weight of earthworms was measured individually on the day of application (day 0) and on day 14. Mortality, behaviour and morphological changes of earthworms were recorded 7 and 14 days after application.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Test item was weighed and mixed with quartz sand (10g quartz sand per replicate). Treated quartz sand was added to artificial soil. Demineralised water was added to adjust the humidity of the artificial soil to 44% of the maximum water holding capacity. Test medium was mixed for > 3minutes and added to test vessels.
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- Source: Eisena fetida are bred at the test facility.
Holding conditions prior to use: Kept in covered plastic vessels (Volume 60 L) containing potting compost. Kept at 20 +/- 2°C in the dark and fed with dried litter of stinging nettles and porridge oats
Individual weight of test organisms: between 0.30 and 0.60g - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 14 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- 18 - 22°C
- pH:
- Day 0: 5.10 - 5.27
Day 14: 4.90 - 5.19 - Moisture:
- Day 0: 30.2 - 31.6 % of dry weight
30.7 - 31.6% of dry weight - Details on test conditions:
- Photoperiod: 16 hours
Light intensity: 400 - 800 lx
Feeding: No feeding during the toxicity test - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 mg/kg soil dry weight
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-chloroacetamide
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- Mortality, loss of body weight and other symptoms (behaviour and pathological symptoms) were all tested
- Details on results:
- No significant mortality, loss of body weight or pathological or bahavioural symptoms were observed in any test concentration over the course of the exposure period. Therefore the lowest test item concentartion with significant effects is > 1000 mg/kg soil dw.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No data
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No data
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Mortality in the control group did not exceed 10%. Average loss of biomass in the control group did not exceed 20%.
- Conclusions:
- The 14 day toxicity study with the earthworm Eisenia fetida measured a NOEC of 1000 mg/kg soil dw for 9003-26-6. No significant mortality, loss of body weight or pathological ot behavioural symptoms were measured at any of the tested concentrations.
- Executive summary:
This is a GLP, guideline study and is considered reliable and suitable for use for this endpoint. The 14 day toxicity study with the earthworm Eisenia fetida measured a NOEC of 1000 mg/kg soil dw for 9003 -26 -6. No significant mortality, loss of body weight or pathological ot behavioural symptoms were measured at any of the tested concentrations.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
In a proprietary, GLP compliant, guideline study the 14 day NOEC of Polybutene (CAS 9003-29-6) to Eisenia fetida was found to be 1000 mg/kg soil. Polybutene is a representative of Category B.
In addition to the experimental data, the terrestrial toxicity was predicted by a QSAR, the PETROTOX v4.0 computer model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. The predicted LL50 values for Eisenia fetida ranged from 217 to 1271117 mg/kg soil dw. The predicted EL10 values for Eisenia fetida ranged from 41.5 to 243509 mg/kg soil dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Experimental data:
CAS 9003-29-6: the 14 day NOEC of Polybutene to Eisenia fetida was found to be 1000 mg/kg soil.
QSAR predictions:
Species | Carbon No. | LL50 / EL50 (mg/kg_dw) | EL10 (mg/kg_dw) |
Eisenia fetida | C8 | 217 | 41.5 |
Eisenia fetida | C12 | 5862 | 1123 |
Eisenia fetida | C16 | 1271117 | 243509 |
Eisenia fetida | C20 | 1271117 | 243509 |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.