Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-146-5 | CAS number: 7440-36-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
LD50 (oral ): >20000mg/kg bw/day
LD50 (dermal): >8300mg/kg bw
LC50 (inhalation): >5200mg/m³
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- Five weight of evidence studies available which are old and do not comply with today standards. However, a conclusive statement about the LD is possible using that data, thus the overall quality of the database is therefore sufficient.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- One key study available (according to OECD 403, under GLP) which is reliable without restrictions (RL=1). The overall quality of the database is therefore high.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- One key study available which is reliable with minor restrictions (RL=2). The overall quality of the database is therefore high.
Additional information
Antimony as a semi-metal is subject at its surface to a passivation by the formation of a layer of antimony trioxide. In particular for antimony metal powder because of its large surface area, the oxide layer will form a quantitatively relevant portion of the entire particle. Furthermore, in vitro bioaccessibility testing in various artificial body fluids has shown that antimony metal compared to diantimony trioxide has a similar release rate of antimony ions (please refer to the respective entry under the endpoint toxicokinetics).
In view of this, and since transformation / dissolution testing (CanMet, 2010) has shown that antimony metal may be expected to release trivalent antimony ions upon dissolution, it may be assumed that human exposure towards antimony metal is secondary to that of antimony trioxide. Thus, read-across for reproductive toxicity is considered justified.
For acute inhalation toxicity there is one animal study (Leuschner, 2006) which has been performed according to OECD TG 403 and which shows no signs of acute toxicity after inhalation exposure to diantimony trioxide, indicating a LC50 > 5.20 mg/ L (5200 mg/ m³). The animal studies on acute oral exposure are all old (Fleming, 1938; Gross et al., 1955; Myers et al., 1978), they do not comply with today standards and in most of them mortality was the only parameter investigated as they were designed to determine at what dose level death occurred. Still, they indicate that oral LD50 is in excess of 20000 mg/kg bw in rats. There is one valid study on dermal exposure (Gross et al., 1955), which indicates that the LD50 for dermal exposure is higher than 8300 mg/kg bw. In conclusion, diantimony trioxide (and by read-across also antimony) is of low acute inhalation, oral and dermal toxicity.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Weight of evidence information
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
Key study
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Key study
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute oral toxicity
The animal studies on acute oral exposure are all old, they do not comply with today standards and in most of them mortality was the only parameter investigated as they were designed to determine at what dose level death occurred. Still, they indicate that oral LD50 is in excess of 20,000 mg/kg bw in rats which will be used for classification purposes.
LD50 oral, rat > 20,000 mg/kg bw
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as acutely toxic are not met since the ATE is above 2,000 mg/kg body-weight, hence no classification required.
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: oral
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, oral are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance value, oral for a Category 1 classification of 300 mg/kg bw and at the guidance value, oral for a Category 2 classification of 2000 mg/kg bw. No classification required.
Acute inhalation toxicity
The reference Leuschner (2006) is considered as the key study for acute inhalation toxicity and will be used for classification. Rats were nose only exposed towards diantimony trioxide dust for 4 hours at 5.2 mg/L air. During the conduct of the study no mortalities occurred.
LC50 inhalation, rat > 5.2 mg/L air
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as acutely toxic are not met since the ATE for dusts and mists is above 5.0 mg/L, hence no classification required.
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: inhalation
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, inhalation dust/mist/fume are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance values, inhalation dust/mist/fume for a Category 1 classification of 1.0 mg/L/4 h and at the guidance value or inhalation dust/mist/fume for a Category 2 classification of 5.0 mg/L/4 h. Therefore, no classification is required. However, such classification is also not warranted, since observations on respiratory irritation in test animals were not observed at the highest inhalation exposure level. No relevant pulmonary changes were observed in the 5 localisations of the lung neither in the rats sacrificed 24 hours after exposure nor the rats sacrificed 14 days after exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.