Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-315-5 | CAS number: 57-13-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was carried out at the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kafr El-Sheikh University, during growing season of Jasmine (March- December, 2004).
The selected area for carrying out the present investigation was grown up with Jasminum grandiflorum shrubs of six years old at experiment time and was planted in rows of 2m apart and at a distance of 1.5 m between plants. The area (160m2) is divided into four plots.
The first plot was fertilizer – free plot which is considered as control plot. The second plot was fertilized by urea (46 % N) spraying over the green part of the plant (150 kg/fed.) and the third one was fertilized by NPK, N= ammonium sulphate(40 %), P=super phosphate(40 %) and K= potassium sulphate (60 %) added to the soil. The recommended fertilizer with NPK at the rate of 40 + 40 + 20 g/plant (64, 64, and 32 kg/fed.). The fourth plot was fertilized by the two fertilizers, urea spaying on the foliage plant and NPK added to the soil. The ratio between urea: N: P: K (150: 64: 64: 32 kg/fed.).
Urea was applied at the beginning of March 10th 2004 during the tested season. At the same time (NPK) was added to the second plot and to the third plot once during the experimental time. All of the tested treatments were replicated four times.
Sampling was carried out by the aid of steel quadrangular (10 x 10 x 5 cm). Soil samples were kept in plastic bags tightly closed and was carried directly to the laboratory. Soil samples were taken during three periods, April, August and December (early vegetative growth, vegetative growth/ blooming and blooming season, respectively).
The early vegetative growth is the period after the burning of the plant and ploughing the soil. The second period is the growing of the vegetation. The third period is the blooming growth.
Extraction of oribatid mites and Collembola took place by using modified Berlese funnels for 5 days, and were received in tubes containing fixative, oribatid mites and Collembola were sorted from other soil fauna using binocular microscope and preserved in a mixture of ethanol and lactic acid (1:1) then identified under high magnification.
Identification of mite was done in accordance with Balogh (1972) and Balogh and Mahunka (1983). Identification of Collembola was done using determination key of Hopkin (2007). - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- No information on GLP compliance provided.
- Application method:
- spray
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: various collembola species
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Details on test organisms:
- field study (list of species found: see Table 2 of the publication)
- Study type:
- field study
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 9 mo
- Remarks:
- Urea was applied at the beginning of March 10th 2004 during the tested season. Soil samples were taken during three periods, April, August and December (early vegetative growth, vegetative growth/ blooming and blooming season, respectively).
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- control; 150 kg urea/fed. (equals 357 kg urea/ha)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 36 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOED
- Remarks:
- NOAEL
- Effect conc.:
- >= 357 000 g/ha
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: abundance
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Fertilized plots with 357 kg urea/ha recorded the higher abundance of Collembola and mites than the controls.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- Colembola NOAEC >= 357 kg/ha
- Executive summary:
Fertilized plots (planted with Jasminum grandiflorum) with 357 kg urea/ha recorded the higher abundance of Collembola and mites than the controls.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was carried out at the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kafr El-Sheikh University, during growing season of Jasmine (March- December, 2004).
The selected area for carrying out the present investigation was grown up with Jasminum grandiflorum shrubs of six years old at experiment time and was planted in rows of 2m apart and at a distance of 1.5 m between plants. The area (160m2) is divided into four plots.
The first plot was fertilizer – free plot which is considered as control plot. The second plot was fertilized by urea (46 % N) spraying over the green part of the plant (150 kg/fed.) and the third one was fertilized by NPK, N= ammonium sulphate(40 %), P=super phosphate(40 %) and K= potassium sulphate (60 %) added to the soil. The recommended fertilizer with NPK at the rate of 40 + 40 + 20 g/plant (64, 64, and 32 kg/fed.). The fourth plot was fertilized by the two fertilizers, urea spaying on the foliage plant and NPK added to the soil. The ratio between urea: N: P: K (150: 64: 64: 32 kg/fed.).
Urea was applied at the beginning of March 10th 2004 during the tested season. At the same time (NPK) was added to the second plot and to the third plot once during the experimental time. All of the tested treatments were replicated four times.
Sampling was carried out by the aid of steel quadrangular (10 x 10 x 5 cm). Soil samples were kept in plastic bags tightly closed and was carried directly to the laboratory. Soil samples were taken during three periods, April, August and December (early vegetative growth, vegetative growth/ blooming and blooming season, respectively).
The early vegetative growth is the period after the burning of the plant and ploughing the soil. The second period is the growing of the vegetation. The third period is the blooming growth.
Extraction of oribatid mites and Collembola took place by using modified Berlese funnels for 5 days, and were received in tubes containing fixative, oribatid mites and Collembola were sorted from other soil fauna using binocular microscope and preserved in a mixture of ethanol and lactic acid (1:1) then identified under high magnification.
Identification of mite was done in accordance with Balogh (1972) and Balogh and Mahunka (1983). Identification of Collembola was done using determination key of Hopkin (2007). - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- No information on GLP compliance provided.
- Application method:
- spray
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: various mite species
- Animal group:
- Acari (soil-dwelling predatory mite)
- Details on test organisms:
- field study (list of species found: see Table 1 of the publication)
- Study type:
- field study
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 9 mo
- Remarks:
- Urea was applied at the beginning of March 10th 2004 during the tested season. Soil samples were taken during three periods, April, August and December (early vegetative growth, vegetative growth/ blooming and blooming season, respectively).
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- control; 150 kg urea/fed. (equals 357 kg urea/ha)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 36 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOED
- Remarks:
- NOAEL
- Effect conc.:
- >= 357 000 g/ha
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: abundance
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Fertilized plots with 357 kg urea/ha recorded the higher abundance of Collembola and mites than the controls.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- Colembola NOAEC >= 357 kg/ha
- Executive summary:
Fertilized plots (planted with Jasminum grandiflorum) with 357 kg urea/ha recorded the higher abundance of Collembola and mites than the controls.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
NOEC field studies > 640 mg/kg dw (collembola, mites, acari and bees)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil dwelling arthropods:
- 640 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
Several long-term field studies demonstrates that terrestrial arthropods are not sensitive to urea, i.e., the highest application rates had no adverse effect on this organism group. investigated groups were collembola, mites, acari and bees.
The highest application rate was 960 kg urea/ha corresponding to 640 mg/kg dw assuming that the upper 10 cm were treated since the studies were performed mainly in forests or during the growing season and hence, soil turn-over is unlikely. However, even if it is - more conservatively - assumed that urea has been distributed within the upper 20 cm, this would correspond to 320 mg/kg dw which indicates that these taxonomic groups are less sensitive than earthworms. Hence, from the regulatory aspect this group if less relevant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.