Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
From 1990-08-14 to 1990-11-09
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Cited from ECHA disseminated dossier Query date: 2015-07-22 For justification of read across please refer to IUCLID section 13.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Species:
guinea pig
Sex:
male/female
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: Oleum arachidis
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injections: 5% with oleum arachidis
Epidermal applications: 75% in vaseline
Challenge: 25% in vaseline
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: Oleum arachidis
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injections: 5% with oleum arachidis
Epidermal applications: 75% in vaseline
Challenge: 25% in vaseline
No. of animals per dose:
Control group: 5 males and 5 females
Test group: 10 males and 10 females
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.1 ml/site
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0.1 ml/site. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.1 ml/site
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0.1 ml/site. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 % in vaseline
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
slight to moderate erythema/Edema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 % in vaseline. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: slight to moderate erythema/Edema.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 % in vaseline
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
slight to moderate erythema/Edema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 % in vaseline. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: slight to moderate erythema/Edema.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 % in oleum arachides
No. with + reactions:
17
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
slight to moderate erythema/Edema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 % in oleum arachides. No with. + reactions: 17.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: slight to moderate erythema/Edema.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 % in oleum arachides
No. with + reactions:
11
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
slight to moderate erythema/Edema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 % in oleum arachides. No with. + reactions: 11.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: slight to moderate erythema/Edema.

Sensitizing effects

Positive erythema reactions after the first challenge procedure

 

after 24 hours

after 48 hours

 

Positive / total

————————

% positive of total

Positive / total

————————

% positive of total

Control group

 

 

ALKYL (C13-C15)- GLYCIOYLETHER

(left flank)

0 / 10

———

0

0 / 10

———

0

vehicle only

(right flank)

0 / 10

———

0

0 / 10

———

0

Test group

 

 

ALKYL (C13-C15)- GLYCIOYLETHER

(left flank)

20 / 20

————

100

20 / 20

————

100

vehicle only

(right flank)

0 / 20

————

0

0 / 20

————

0

 

Positive erythema reactions after the second challenge procedure

 

after 24 hours

after 48 hours

 

Positive / total

————————

% positive of total

Positive / total

————————

% positive of total

Control group

vehicle only

(left flank)

0 / 10

———

0

0 / 10

———

0

Test group

ALKYL (C13-C15)- GLYCIOYLETHER

(right flank)

17 / 20

————

85

11 / 20

————

55

vehicle only

(left flank)

0 / 20

————

0

0 / 20

————

0

Mortality / Viability

No death occurred during the study.

Symptoms, systemic

No systemic symptoms were observed in the animals.

Body weights

The body weight gain of the animals was not affected adversely during the study.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

This study was conducted to evaluate the potential of the test article to induce hypersensitivity in guinea pigs using the Maximization test.

For the intradermal induction phase of the study, three pairs of intradermal injections were made at the scapular skin of test group and control group as above mentioned method in which the test article was diluted to 5% with oleum arachidis. One week later, the epidermal induction started. Scapular skin was clipped and shaved free of hair. A patch was saturated with 75% the test article in vaseline and placed over the injection sites of test group and only vaseline was placed on the skin of control group.

The test and control group were challenged two weeks after the epidermal induction application. Two patches were saturated with a) 25% in Vaseline of the test article and b) with the vehicle only and applied to the left flank and right flank using the same method as for the epidermal application.

A second challenge was performed two weeks after the first challenge. The treatment procedure was similar as described for the first challenge with the exception that vehicle was applied to the left flank and 25% test article in oleum arachides was applied to the right flank.

The challenge site was evaluated 24 and 48 hours after removal of the patch. The reactions were scored on the basis of the Draize score.

The test result of the first challenge in test group showed positive erythema reactions at 24h and 48h when treated with 25% test article in Vaseline. The test result of the second challenge in test group showed positive erythema reactions at 24h and 48h when treated with 25% test article dilution in oleum arachides.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
This study was conducted according to Maximization test and the result indicated that test substance may cause skin sensitization to guinea pigs.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC)

The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for classification purposes under 67/548/EEC. As a result the substance is considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Directive 67/548/EEC.

                               

Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.