Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 304-661-9 | CAS number: 94277-77-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline study; restriction: non-GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- S. typhimurium and E. coli
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 20 ug - 5000 ug/plate (Standard Plate Test = SPT)
4 ug - 2500 ug/plate (Preincubation Test = PIT) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as the vehicle, which had been demonstrated to be suitable in bacterial reverse mutation tests and for which historical control data are available.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: with metabolic activation: 2-aminoanthracene; without metabolic activation: N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine, 9-aminoacridine and 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Standard Plate Test and Preincubation Test
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: A weak bacteriotoxic effect was observed under all test conditions.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- An increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test either withaut S-9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Accarding to the results of the present study, the test substance Neozapon Blau 807 Typ neu is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay under the experimental cond itions chosen here.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Solvent Blue 70 was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected Ioci of several bacterial strains,
(TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and E. coli WP2 uvrA), in a reverse mutation assay (OECD 471) (BASF 2003). Doses were for the standard plate test between 20 and 5000mg/plate and for the preincubation test between 4 and 2500mg/plate. Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 mix was used for metabolic activation. Precipitation ofthe test substance was found from about 100mg/plate onward. A weak bacteriotoxic effect was observed under all test conditions. The substance did not induce an increase in mutant frequency and was found to be non mutagenic in the Ames test. The tested sample was a commercial product containing 100% of the UVCB substance.
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells in vitro (weight-of-evidence; see also attachment)
No mutagenicity was observed in bacteria. As this substance is of very low solubility in water, testing in mammalian cells in vitro can only be performed at very low doses. Bacteria, that are much less sensitive to the presence of precipitates, were tested with the limit concentration of 5000 µg/plate. Both the main and the remote analogue, which are both of higher water solubility, were tested in GLP-compliant HPRT tests (OECD 476, Klimisch 1) and found to be non mutagenic. The structures are representative for the target as they contain relevant functional groups. Alkylchains are not a structural feature known for association with mutagenic properties. Therefore, the slight difference in length of the alkyl side chain is not considered relevant for the outcome of the in-vitro gene mutation assay.
In addition, as outlined in the toxicokinetic section, the substance is considered too large and too insoluble for cellular uptake.
Solvent Blue 67: An OECD 476 study was performed to investigate the potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster (BASF 2012). The study was performed under GLP and is valid without restrictions.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours.The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation.
The highest concentration applied in the pre-experiment (2500.0 µg/mL) was limited by the solubility properties of the test item in DMSO and aqueous medium. The concentration range of the main experiments was limited by precipitation of the test item.No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed up to the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation. Appropriate reference mutagens (EMS and DMBA), used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system.
Clastogenicity in vitro (weight of evidence, see also attachment)
The main analogue substance was found to be non clastogenic in a valid in vivo micronucleus study in Chinese hamster.
The substance is not skin sensitizing indicating that it lacks the ability to covalently bind to proteins. In addition, as outlined in the toxicokinetic section, the substance is considered too large and too insoluble for cellular uptake.
A study for clastogenicity in Chinese Hamster is available (Ciba-Geigy Ltd. 1982). The study is titled to be a nucleus anomaly test as the term micronucleus assay and its OECD testing guideline were not yet established. The design of the study is however comparable to this guideline with deviations that only 1000 bone marrow cells were scored and that evaluation criteria were given merely as a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with anomalies. The doses of 116, 234 and 468 mg/kg bw given by gavage in peanut oil were based on incidences of mortality in a range-finder study.
The experiment was performed to evaluate any mutagenic effect on somatic interphase cells in vivo. Mutagenic effects present themselves in interphase cells in form of nucleus anomalies of bone marrow cells. These anomalies occur in interphase cells as a consequence of damage during the mitotic process. The increase in anomalies shows a clear dose dependency, comparable to the occurrence of chromosome aberrations in metaphase preparations. Treatment consisted of one daily dose on two consecutive days. The animals were sacrificed 24 h after the second application. From the bone marrow smears were made.
The percentage of anomalies in bone marrow smears from animals treated with various doses of the test substance (range 0 - 0.3) showed no significant difference from the control (range 0.1- 0.2).
The incidence of bone marrow cells with anomalies of nuclei corresponds to the frequency observed in the control group. By contrast, a positive control experiment with cyclophosphamide
(128 mg/kg) yielded 5.6% cells with anomalies of nuclei. This is significantly different from the controls treated with the vehicle alone.
In conclusion, the test substance did not cause clastogenicity in Chinese Hamsters in vivo. Therefore, no experimental data on clastogenicity in vitro was retrieved.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC)
The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for classification purposes under 67/548/EEC. No mutagenicity was observed in bacteria and cultivated mammalian cells. No genotoxicity was observed in a micronucleus assay in vivo. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Directive 67/548/EEC, as amended for the 28th time in Directive 2001/59/EC.
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008.
No mutagenicity was observed in bacteria and cultivated mammalian cells. No genotoxicity was observed in a micronucleus assay in vivo.
As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the fifth time in Directive EC 944/2013.Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.