Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-587-6 | CAS number: 122-97-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay and in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (HPRT). The test item did not induce micronuclei in the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-09-20 to 2017-11-17
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- July 2016
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Principles of method if other than guideline'
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A series of in-house non-GLP validation experiments was performed to get distinct responses of statistical significance when using the specified positive controls. To achieve such response the test design, specifically for the treatment, the recovery phase and harvest time, was slightly modified comparing the current proposal given in the OECD Guideline 487.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human (primary culture)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Blood samples were drawn from healthy non-smoking donors not receiving medication. For this study, blood was collected from a male donor (27 years old) for Experiment I and from a male donor (24 years old) for Experiment II.
- Suitability of cells: The lymphocytes of the respective donors have been shown to respond well to stimulation of proliferation with PHA and to positive control substances. All donors had a previously established low incidence of micronuclei in their peripheral blood lymphocytes.
- Cell culture conditions: Blood cultures were established by preparing an 11 % mixture of whole blood in medium within 30 hrs after blood collection. The culture medium was Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium/Ham's F12 (DMEM/F12, mixture 1:1) already supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMAX™. Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 µg/mL), the mitogen PHA (3 µg/mL), 10 % FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10 mM HEPES and the anticoagulant heparin (125 U.S.P.-U/mL).
All incubations were done at 37 °C with 5.5 % CO2 in humidified air. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experimtent I (4 h exposure): 8.8, 15.5, 27.1, 47.4, 83.0, 145, 254, 445, 778, 1362 µg/mL, with and without S9 mix
Experiment II (40 h exposure): 8.8, 15.5, 27.1, 47.4, 83.0, 145, 254, 445, 778, 1362 µg/mL, with S9 mix - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: Demecolcine (without metabolic activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h (pulse exposure), 20 h (continuous exposure, without S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 16 h recovery period followed by another 20 h (4 h group), and 20 h (20 h exposure group)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 40 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: Cytochalasin B
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: The slides were prepared by dropping the cell suspension in fresh fixative onto a clean microscope slide.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 500 cells per culture
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: Evaluation of the slides was performed using microscopes with 40 x objectives. The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle (1976). The micronuclei have to be stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus should not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: see below
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
To describe a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis. A CBPI (Cytokinesis-block proliferation index) of 1 (all cells are mononucleate) is equivalent to 100 % cytostasis.
Cytostasis % = 100 – 100 [(CBPI(test item) – 1) / (CBPI(solvent control) – 1)]
CBPI = (Mononucleate cells x 1) + (Binucleate cells x 2) + (Multinucleate cells x 3) - Rationale for test conditions:
- according to guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- Providing that all of the acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test item is considered to be clearly negative if, in all of the experimental conditions examined:
- None of the test item concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent solvent control
- There is no concentration-related increase
- The results in all evaluated test item concentrations should be within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data (95% control limit realized as 95% confidence interval)
The test item is then considered unable to induce chromosome breaks and/or gain or loss in this test system.
Providing that all of the acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test item is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
- At least one of the test item concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent solvent control
- The increase is concentration-related in at least one experimental condition
- The results are outside the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data (95% control limit realized as 95% confidence interval)
When all of the criteria are met, the test item is then considered able to induce chromosome breaks and/or gain or loss in this test system. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by the Chi Square Test (α < 0.05), using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics. Within this test script a statistical analysis was conducted for those values that indicated an increase in the number of cells with micronuclei compared to the concurrent solvent control.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- from 778 µg/mL onwards
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
- Precipitation: no precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Dose selection was based on a preliminary test for cytotoxicity (Experiment I).
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data:
Mitomycin C (78 experiments): micronucleated cells mean 12.48 (95 % Ctrl limit): 1.44 - 23.52
Demecolcine (81 experiments): micronucleated cells mean 3.72 (95 % Ctrl limit): 1.43 - 6.01
Cyclophosphamide (165 experiments): micronucleated cells mean 5.16 (95 % Ctrl limit): 0.84 - 9.49
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data:
with metabolic activation: 96 experiments: micronucleated cells mean 0.62 (95 % Ctrl limit): 0.15 - 1.3
without metabolic activation: 78 experiments: micronucleated cells mean 0.60 (95 % Ctrl limit): 0.08 - 1.12
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: CBPI - Conclusions:
- The test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes.
- Executive summary:
The test item (dissolved in DMSO) was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix. Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix. In Experiment II, the exposure period was 20 hours without S9 mix. The cells were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item. In each experimental group, two parallel cultures were analyzed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. To determine a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostasis. The highest treatment concentration in this study, 1362 µg/mL (approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to the OECD Guideline 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test. In Experiment I in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix after continuous treatment, moderate cytotoxicity of 44.1 % cytostasis was observed at the highest evaluated concentration (778 µg/mL). Due to a steep cytotoxic gradient caused by the test item the exact requested among of cytotoxicity was not met. The next higher tested and highest applied concentration (1362 µg/mL), however, which was separated by a smaller factor than requested by the guideline, showed clear cytotoxic effects and were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage (no cells available). In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying micronuclei was observed. Demecolcine (75 ng/mL), MMC (0.8 µg/mL) and CPA (15.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with micronuclei. In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2002-07-21 to 2002-08-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP and Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: besides being histidine auxotrophic, all strains carry an additional mutation (loss of outer lipopolysaccharide barrier) which increases cell permeability
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9-mix, Aroclor 1254 induced
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: with S9 mix: 2-aminoanthracene (all strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 - 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- The number of spontaneous revertants observed using each of the five strains and the results with the positive controls were compared to historical control data. Differences between the number of revertants in the negative controls and the test plates were tested for significance.
- Statistics:
- Estimation of the statistical significance of the difference between the mean number of revertants in the negative controls and the plates at each dosage level was performed using a X2-test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was observed in strains TA 98, 100, 102 and 1537 at the highest test concentrations without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was observed in strains TA 98, 100, 102 and 1537 at the highest test concentrations without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was observed in strains TA 98, 100, 102 and 1537 at the highest test concentrations without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was observed in strains TA 98, 100, 102 and 1537 at the highest test concentrations without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was observed in strains TA 98, 100, 102 and 1537 at the highest test concentrations without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was tested in the bacterial reverse mutation assay using the five Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and TA 102. The test concentrations were 0, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. The test was carried out in two independent tests using the standard plate incorporation assay with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix from rat livers, Aroclor 1254 induced). Sodium azide, 2-nitrofluorene, 9-aminoacridine, mitomycin C, and 2-aminoanthracene were used as positive controls. At the highest test concentration, bacteriotoxicity was observed in the absence of metabolic activation. Mutagenicity was not observed.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-08-17 to 2017-09-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (HPRT)
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: stocks of the V79 cell line from Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing; Technical University, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
- Suitability of cells: The V79 cell line has been used successfully in in vitro experiments for many years. Recommend cell line for this assay.
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index: doubling time 12 - 16 h in stock cultures, good cloning efficiency of untreated cells (as a rule more than 50%)
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), neomycin (5 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (1%). The cells were sub-cultured once or twice weekly. All incubations were done at 37°C with 1.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) in humidified air.
During treatment no FBS was added to the medium. For the selection of mutant cells the complete medium was supplemented with 11 μg/mL 6-thioguanine. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5% CO2 (98.5% air).
- Properly maintained: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In a pre-experiment relevant cytotoxic effect, indicated by a relative cloning efficiency of 50% or below was observed at 1362.0 μg/mL with and without metabolic activation. The individual concentrations in the main experiment were generally spaced by a factor of 2.0. A narrower spacing was used at the higher concentrations to cover the cytotoxic range more closely. The following concentrations were tested:
in µg/mL: 85.1, 170.3, 340.5, 681.0, 851.25, 1021.5, 1191.75, 1362.0 (both with and without metabolic activation) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: Approximately 0.7 to 1.2×10^7 were seeded in plastic flasks. The cells were grown for 24 hours prior to treatment.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time: 8 days
- Fixation time: The colonies used to determine the cloning efficiency I were fixed and stained 6 to 8 days after treatment.
SELECTION AGENT: 11 μg/mL 6-thioguanine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 10% methylene blue in 0.01% KOH solution
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as clearly mutagenic if, in any of the experimental conditions examined, all of the following criteria are met:
a) at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) the increase is dose-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c) any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data (e.g. Poisson-based 95% control limits).
A test item is classified as clearly non-mutagenic if, in all experimental conditions examined, all of the following criteria are met:
a) none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c) all results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data (based 95% control limits). - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares, calculated using a validated excel spreadsheet) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The numbers of mutant colonies generated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
A t-Test was performed using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics, to evaluate an isolated increase of the mutation frequency at a test point exceeding the 95% confidence interval. Again a t-test is judged as significant if the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
However, both, biological and statistical significance were considered together. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 1021.5 μg/mL with and without metabolic activation, at 851.3 µg/mL with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no effects observed
- Effects of osmolality: no effects observed
- Precipitation/Phase separation: Phase separation occurred at 1362.0 μg/mL after 4 hours treatment in the absence of metabolic activation. - Conclusions:
- An in vitro gene mutation study (HPRT) was conducted in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster. It was concluded that the test substance did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus and therefore was considered to be non-mutagenic.
- Executive summary:
This in vitro experiment was performed to assess the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations using the Chinese hamster cell line V79. Two parallel cultures were used throughout the assay.
The main experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. The maximum test item concentration of the pre-experiment was 1362μg/mL regarding the current OECD guideline 476 (10 mM). The analyzed concentration range of the main experiment was limited by cytotoxicity of the test item. The individual concentrations in the main experiment were generally spaced by a factor of 2.0. A narrower spacing was used at the higher concentrations to cover the cytotoxic range more closely. The following concentrations were tested [µg/mL]: 85.1, 170.3, 340.5, 681.0, 851.25, 1021.5, 1191.75, 1362.0 (both with and without metabolic activation, Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix).
Appropriate reference mutagens, used as positive controls (ethylmethane sulfonate without metabolic activation and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene with metabolic activation), induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in the main experiment. In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore it is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Cytotoxicity indicated as cytokinesis-block proliferation indexand cytostasis; exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix, Experiment I
Treatmentgroup |
Conc.per mL |
S9mix |
Exposure /preparation |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
CBPI |
Cytostasis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mean |
[%] |
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
79 |
374 |
47 |
1.94 |
90 |
365 |
45 |
1.91 |
1.92 |
|
Pos. control## |
0.8 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
147 |
339 |
14 |
1.73 |
157 |
330 |
13 |
1.71 |
1.72 |
21.7 |
Test item |
445 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
97 |
356 |
47 |
1.90 |
112 |
346 |
42 |
1.86 |
1.88 |
4.7 |
² |
778 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
59 |
396 |
45 |
1.97 |
71 |
367 |
62 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
n.c. |
² |
1362 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
48 |
426 |
26 |
1.96 |
107 |
373 |
20 |
1.83 |
1.89 |
3.5 |
* c1: mononucleate cells; c2: binucleate cells; c4-c8: multinucleate cells
# DMSO
## MMC
n.c. Not calculated as the CBPI is equal or higher than the solvent control value
Table 2: Cytotoxicity indicated as cytokinesis-block proliferation index and cytostasis; exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix, Experiment I
Treatmentgroup |
Conc.per mL |
S9mix |
Exposure /preparation |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
CBPI |
Cytostasis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mean |
[%] |
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
70 |
366 |
64 |
1.99 |
73 |
342 |
85 |
2.02 |
2.01 |
|
Pos. control## |
15.0 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
279 |
208 |
13 |
1.47 |
250 |
238 |
12 |
1.52 |
1.50 |
50.7 |
Test item |
445 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
79 |
343 |
78 |
2.00 |
97 |
344 |
59 |
1.92 |
1.96 |
4.5 |
² |
778 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
130 |
334 |
36 |
1.81 |
61 |
402 |
37 |
1.95 |
1.88 |
12.3 |
² |
1362 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
147 |
332 |
21 |
1.75 |
114 |
373 |
13 |
1.80 |
1.77 |
23.2 |
* c1: mononucleate cells; c2: binucleate cells; c4-c8: multinucleate cells
# DMSO
## CPA
Table 3: Number of micronucleated cells; exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix, Experiment I
Treatment |
Conc. |
S9 |
Exposure/ |
Micronucleated cells |
|||||||||
group |
per mL |
mix |
preparation |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 1 |
sum culture 1 |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 2 |
sum culture 2 |
sum in 2000 binucleate cells |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
|
|
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
8 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
16 |
0.80 |
Pos. control## |
0.8 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
136 |
15 |
1 |
152 |
144 |
17 |
2 |
163 |
315 |
15.75 |
Test item |
445 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
8 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
0.55 |
² |
778 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
3 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
0.40 |
² |
1362 µg |
- |
4 / 40 hrs |
3 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
19 |
0.95 |
# DMSO
## MMC
Table 4:Number of micronucleated cells; exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix, Experiment I
Treatment |
Conc. |
S9 |
Exposure/ |
Micronucleated cells |
|||||||||
group |
per mL |
mix |
preparation |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 1 |
sum culture 1 |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 2 |
sum culture 2 |
sum in 2000 binucleate cells |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
|
|
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
0.50 |
Pos. control## |
15.0 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
52 |
6 |
1 |
59 |
54 |
3 |
0 |
57 |
116 |
5.80 |
Test item |
445 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
4 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
0.45 |
² |
778 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0.50 |
² |
1362 µg |
+ |
4 / 40 hrs |
4 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
0.60 |
# DMSO
## CPA
Table 5:Cytotoxicity indicated as cytokinesis-block proliferation index and cytostasis; exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix, Experiment II
Treatmentgroup |
Conc.per mL |
S9mix |
Exposure /preparation |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
Cell proliferation |
ProliferationIndex |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
c1 |
c2 |
c4-c8 |
CBPI |
CBPI |
Cytostasis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mean |
[%] |
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
40 |
397 |
63 |
2.05 |
68 |
380 |
52 |
1.97 |
2.01 |
|
Pos. control## |
75 ng |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
251 |
226 |
23 |
1.54 |
279 |
206 |
15 |
1.47 |
1.51 |
49.6 |
Test item |
254 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
109 |
359 |
32 |
1.85 |
98 |
367 |
35 |
1.87 |
1.86 |
14.6 |
² |
445 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
126 |
340 |
34 |
1.82 |
132 |
342 |
26 |
1.79 |
1.80 |
20.4 |
² |
778 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
200 |
292 |
8 |
1.62 |
250 |
245 |
5 |
1.51 |
1.56 |
44.1 |
* c1: mononucleate cells; c2: binucleate cells; c4-c8: multinucleate cells
# DMSO
## Demecolcine
Table 6: Number of micronucleated cells; exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix, Experiment II
Treatment |
Conc. |
S9 |
Exposure/ |
Micronucleated cells |
|||||||||
group |
per mL |
mix |
preparation |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 1 |
sum culture 1 |
Binucleate cells withnmicronuclei culture 2 |
sum culture 2 |
sum in 2000 binucleate cells |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
1 |
2 |
>2 |
|
|
|
Solv. control# |
0.5 % |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
8 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
0.55 |
Pos. control## |
75 ng |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
36 |
7 |
3 |
46 |
19 |
9 |
3 |
31 |
77 |
3.85 |
Test item |
254 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
0.50 |
² |
445 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0.25 |
² |
778 µg |
- |
20 / 40 hrs |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0.25 |
# DMSO
## Demecolcine
Table 1: Main experiment, 4 hour exposure period, culture I and II
Test group [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Relative cloning efficiency 1 (survival) [%] |
Relative cloning efficiency 2 (viability) [%] |
Mutant Frequency (per 10^6 cells) |
|||
Culture 1 |
Culture 2 |
Culture 1 |
Culture 2 |
Culture 1 |
Culture 2 |
||
Solvent control DMSO |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
39.8 |
8.1 |
Positive control (EMS, 300) |
- |
78.6 |
47.8 |
94.8 |
118.3 |
395.6 |
335.2 |
85.1 |
- |
92.8 |
68.1 |
# |
# |
# |
# |
170.3 |
- |
90.1 |
53.4 |
97.5 |
102.9 |
34.4 |
27.6 |
340.5 |
- |
80.1 |
41.6 |
89.2 |
110.6 |
25.4 |
18.6 |
681.0 |
- |
61.3 |
53 |
72 |
113.1 |
28.5 |
25.5 |
851.25 |
- |
51.1 |
54.8 |
91.2 |
103.3 |
14.8 |
18.1 |
1021.5 |
- |
7.2 |
7.3 |
93.3 |
88.6 |
30.1 |
13.8 |
1191.75 |
- |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
1362 |
- |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
Solvent control DMSO |
+ |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
18.9 |
18 |
Positive control (DMBA, 2.3) |
+ |
89.6 |
111.7 |
105.4 |
67.9 |
115 |
133.2 |
85.1 |
+ |
# |
124.3 |
# |
# |
# |
# |
170.3 |
+ |
83 |
101.4 |
90.2 |
82.7 |
21 |
23.9 |
340.5 |
+ |
86.6 |
89.2 |
100.4 |
91.6 |
22.4 |
17.7 |
681.0 |
+ |
54.4 |
98.1 |
99.7 |
104.4 |
17.3 |
15.3 |
851.25 |
+ |
66.5 |
17.9 |
87.7 |
93.1 |
27.5 |
5.4 |
1021.5 |
+ |
16.3 |
6.6 |
107.4 |
84.2 |
4.1 |
19.6 |
1191.75 |
+ |
8 |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
1362 |
+ |
4.1 |
## |
## |
## |
## |
## |
# culture not continued as a minimum of only four analyzable concentrations are required
## culture not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Ames test
The test substance was tested in the bacterial reverse mutation assay using the five Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and TA102. The test concentrations were 0, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate. The test was carried out in two independent tests using the standard plate incorporation assay with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix from rat livers, Aroclor 1254 induced). Sodium azide, 2-nitrofluorene, 9-aminoacridine, mitomycin C, and 2-aminoanthracene were used as positive controls. At the highest test concentration, bacteriotoxicity was observed in the absence of metabolic activation. Mutagenicity was not observed.
HPRT
An in vitro experiment was performed to assess the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations in mammalian cells using the Chinese hamster cell line V79. Two parallel cultures were used throughout the assay. The main experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. The maximum test item concentration of the pre-experiment was 1362μg/mL regarding the current OECD guideline 476 (10 mM). The analyzed concentration range of the main experiment was limited by cytotoxicity of the test item. The individual concentrations in the main experiment were generally spaced by a factor of 2.0. A narrower spacing was used at the higher concentrations to cover the cytotoxic range more closely. The following concentrations were tested [µg/mL]: 85.1, 170.3, 340.5, 681.0, 851.25, 1021.5, 1191.75, 1362.0 (both with and without metabolic activation, Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix).
Appropriate reference mutagens, used as positive controls (ethylmethane sulfonate without metabolic activation and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene with metabolic activation), induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in the main experiment. In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore it is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
MNT
The test item, dissolved in DMSO, was further assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix. Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix. In Experiment II, the exposure period was 20 hours without S9 mix. The cells were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item. In each experimental group, two parallel cultures were analyzed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. To determine a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostasis. The highest treatment concentration in this study, 1362 µg/mL (approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to the OECD Guideline 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test. In Experiment I in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix after continuous treatment, moderate cytotoxicity of 44.1 % cytostasis was observed at the highest evaluated concentration (778 µg/mL). Due to a steep cytotoxic gradient caused by the test item the exact requested among of cytotoxicity was not met. The next higher tested and highest applied concentration (1362 µg/mL), however, which was separated by a smaller factor than requested by the guideline, showed clear cytotoxic effects and were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage (no cells available). In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying micronuclei was observed. Demecolcine (75 ng/mL), MMC (0.8 µg/mL) and CPA (15.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with micronuclei. In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.