Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
2.35 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
150
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
352.63 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

NOAEL = 200 mg/kg bw/d from a sub-acute oral repeated dose / reprotox tox study in rats.

--> 200 mg/kg bw/d / 0.38 m3/kg bw * 6.7 m3/ 10 m3

NOAEC = 352.63 mg/m3

AF for dose response relationship:
2
Justification:
default value for route-to-route extrapolation according to R.8.4.2.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for sub-acute to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Included in route-to-route extrapolation.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for "differences not related to calorimetric differences"
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
default value according to R.8.4.3.1
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues with the quality of the data base
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no remaining uncertainties identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.667 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

No specific information on dermal absorption taken into account.

This approach starts from the assumption that dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for sub-acute to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for rat to human extrapolation
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for "differences not related to calorimetric differences"
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for intraspecies differences to workers
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues with the quality of the data base
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no remaining uncertainties identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.58 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
173.91 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

NOAEL = 200 mg/kg bw/d from a sub-acute oral repeated dose tox study in rats.

--> 200 mg/kg bw/d / 1.15 m3/kg bw

NOAEC = 173.91 mg/m3

AF for dose response relationship:
2
Justification:
default value for route-to-route extrapolation according to R.8.4.2.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for sub-acute to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Included in route-to-route extrapolation.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
differences not related to calorimetric differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
default value according to R.8.4.3.1
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues with the quality of the data base
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no remaining uncertainties identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.333 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

No specific information on dermal absorption taken into account.

This approach starts from the assumption that dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for sub-acute to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for rat to human extrapolation
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for "differences not related to calorimetric differences"
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
ECHA REACH default AF for the general population
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues with the quality of the data base
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no remaining uncertainties identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.333 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
effect on fertility
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Oral absorption by rat and human are assumed to be equal.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for sub-acute to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for rat to human extrapolation
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for "differences not related to calorimetric differences"
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
ECHA REACH standard AF for the general population
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
no issues with the quality of the data base
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no remaining uncertainties identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

The test item is not eye irritant.