Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Body responsible for the test

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
(Magnusson a. Kligman)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Body responsible for the test
IUPAC Name:
Body responsible for the test

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright white, Bor: DHPW(SPF)
Sex:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
a) 2,5 % intradermal in corn oil
b) 50 % in corn oil
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge
a) 25 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
a) 2,5 % intradermal in corn oil
b) 50 % in corn oil
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge
a) 25 %
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 20
Number of animals in negative control group: 20

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
18
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 18.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Signs of irritation during induction: yes

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: 20 animals

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: irritant
Conclusions:
Based on the positive results observed in animals induced intradermally, the substance was sensitising to the skin of guinea pigs