Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Jun. 15, 1984 to Sep. 5, 1984
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted similar to OECD 471 and according to GLP. Only 4 tester strains instead of 5 were used.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
(1997)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Only four instead of five strains tested (either TA102 or E. coli WP2 is missing)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
A mixture of: α-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyl-ω-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene); α-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyl-ω-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyloxypoly(oxyethylene)
EC Number:
400-830-7
EC Name:
A mixture of: α-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyl-ω-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene); α-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyl-ω-3-(3-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionyloxypoly(oxyethylene)
Cas Number:
104810-48-2
IUPAC Name:
14-({3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoyl}oxy)-3,6,9,12-tetraoxatetradecan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 14-hydroxy-3,6,9,12-tetraoxatetradecan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; tris(17-({3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoyl}oxy)-3,6,9,12,15-pentaoxaheptadecan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate); tris(17-hydroxy-3,6,9,12,15-pentaoxaheptadecan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate); 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethan-1-ol; 2-({3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoyl}oxy)ethyl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 2-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethan-1-ol; 2-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 2-hydroxyethyl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 2-methoxyethan-1-ol; 2-{2-[2-({3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoyl}oxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}ethyl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 20-({3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoyl}oxy)-3,6,9,12,15,18-hexaoxaicosan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 20-hydroxy-3,6,9,12,15,18-hexaoxaicosan-1-yl 3-[3-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]propanoate; 3,6,9,12,15,18,21-heptaoxatricosane-1,23-diol; 3,6,9,12,15-pentaoxaheptadecane-1,17-diol; 3,6,9,12-tetraoxatetradecane-1,14-diol; bis(ethane-1,2-diol)
Details on test material:
- Purity: pilot sample, stability and validity of test article was ensured by sponsor
- Lot/batch No.: B

Method

Target gene:
All Salmonella Typhimurium strains are histidine auxotrophic mutants.
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Mixture of co-factors with S9 fraction of liver from Wistar rats induced with Aroclor 1254.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
20, 80, 320, 1280, and 5120 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: acetone
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Acetone was used
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: See Table 1
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
The plate incorporation method was used. Test article or vehicle (0.1 ml) and bacteria (0.1 ml) were added to 20 ml minimum agar and 2 ml soft agar (including 0.5 mM histidine). In experiments with metabolic activation 0.5 ml S9-mix was added additionally. Plates were incubated for 48 hours at 37 ºC in the dark. All experiments were performed twice in triplicate.
Evaluation criteria:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. The test substance is generally considered to be nonmutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
Statistics:
No statistics were performed. The colonies were counted and the arithmetic mean was calculated.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Remarks:
However, a slight decrease in the number of revertants was seen at 5120 µg/plate with S9 mix.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
At the concentrations of 320 µg/plate and above the substance precipitated in soft agar.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative