Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-728-8 | CAS number: 860-22-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on generations indicated in Effect levels (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity study of FD & C Blue NO. 2 in Rats
- Author:
- J. F. BORZELLECA, G. K. HOGAN, A. KOESTNER
- Year:
- 1 985
- Bibliographic source:
- Fd Chem. Toxic. Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 551-558, 1985
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity study.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity study of FD & C Blue NO. 2 in rats
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Disodium 5,5'-(2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indazol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-3H-indol-3-one)disulphonate
- EC Number:
- 212-728-8
- EC Name:
- Disodium 5,5'-(2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indazol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-3H-indol-3-one)disulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 860-22-0
- Molecular formula:
- C16H10N2O8S2.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- disodium 3,3'-dioxo-1,1',3,3'-tetrahydro-2,2'-biindole-5,5'-disulfonate
- Reference substance name:
- FD & C Blue NO. 2
- IUPAC Name:
- FD & C Blue NO. 2
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): FD & C Blue NO. 2 - Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C16H8N2O8S2.2Na- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 466.3572 g/mole - Substance type: Organic - Physical state: Powder - Impurities (identity and concentrations): 7% volatile matter
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Details on test animalTEST ANIMALS- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA- Age at study initiation: (P) x wks; (F1) x wks: P- 63-70 days old - Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g; (F1) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g: No data available - Fasting period before study: No data available - Housing: Animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages except during the mating, lactation and post-weaning periods of the in utero phase. Each rat was identified with a metal ear tag. If the tag was lost, the animal was re-tagged and/or toe-clipped.- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Basal diet (Purina Rodent Chow from Ralston Purina Co., Inc., St Louis, MO), ad libitum- Water (e.g. ad libitum): No data available - Acclimation period: No data available ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- Temperature (°C): 20-21 °C - Humidity (%):40-60 % - Air changes (per hr): No data available - Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hrlight/dark cycle
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: Basal diet
- Details on exposure:
- The F0 rats received FD & C Blue No. 2 in the diet for a minimum of 8 wk before the start of the mating period and F1 males received for 29 months; females for 30 months.
- Details on mating procedure:
- Details on study schedule- F1 parental animals not mated until [...] weeks after selected from the F1 litters.- Selection of parents from F1 generation when pups were [...] days of age.- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: [...] weeks(Explain how study was performed on perents and offspring separately whatever information we have): A maximum of two rats of each sex from each litter were randomly selected for the chronic phase following completion of the in utero phase. There were 70 rats of each sex in each group at the outset of the chronic phase. Offspring were exposed to the same dietary levels of colouring as their parents. Exposure continued for approximately 29 months in males and 30 months in females. The study protocol required exposure for 30 months or to the point where survival decreased to ten rats of a sex in any group, at which point all animals of that sex were killed.- M/F ratio per cage: No data available - Length of cohabitation: No data available - Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancyNo data available - After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.: No data available - Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)]: No data available - After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): Individually - Any other deviations from standard protocol: No data available
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Assays of the homogeneity and stability of FD & C Blue No. 2 in the prepared diets were carried out before the start of the study. The concentrations of the test compound in the diets were analysed weekly during the first 13 wk of study, and monthly thereafter. In addition, all lots of the basic feed used during the study were analysed for heavy metals, chlorinated hydrocarbons and aflatoxin. These analyses demonstrated that the basic feed contained acceptably low levels of contaminants, that the diets were accurately prepared and that the dietary content of the test material was stable.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 30 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0% (0, 304, 632 and 1282 mg/kg/day for male and 0, 363, 775 and 1592 mg/kg/day for female)Basis:actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total: 1300F0 generation:0 mg/kg bw/day: 120 male, 120 female 250 mg/kg bw/day: 60 male, 60 female500 mg/kg bw/day: 60 male, 60 female1000 mg/kg bw/day: 60 male, 60 femaleF1 generation:0 mg/kg bw/day: 140 male, 140 female 250 mg/kg bw/day: 70 male, 70 female500 mg/kg bw/day: 70 male, 70 female1000 mg/kg bw/day: 70 male, 70 female
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No data available
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Mortality, morbidity and gross signs of toxic effects and Ophthalmoscopic examinations were examined.
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- Mortality, morbidity and gross signs of toxic effects, Ophthalmoscopic examinations, haematology, clinical chemistry and urine analyses were examined.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Organ weights, Gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Organ weights, Gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis were performed by using F test for the variances of the two control groups. If the variances differed, Welch's t test was used to determined equality of means, using the Smith- Satterthwaite correction for unequal variances. All tests were conducted at the 1.0% two-sided risk level. Bartlett's test was performed to determine whether groups had equal variance. The one-way ANOVA was applied using the F distribution to assess significance. If significant differences among the means were indicated, Dunnet's test was used to determine which means were significantly different from control. If a non-parametric procedure for testing equality of means was indicated, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. If differences from control were indicated, a summed rank test was used to determine which groups differed from control. In the parametric case (equal variance) standard regression techniques were used with a test for trend and lack of fit. In the non-parametric case, Jonckheere's test for monotonic trend was used. The test for equal variance (Bartlett's test) was conducted at the 1.0% two-sided risk level. All other statistical tests were conducted at the 5.0 and 1.0% two-sided risk levels. The statistical analysis of tumour incidence data was performed using contingency table techniques. For each comparison, a 2 x 2 table was constructed from the numbers of animals with and without the event of interest in both the control and treated groups. The table was evaluated by the Fisher exact test. Tests were conducted at the 5.0 and 1.0% two-sided levels. The data on time to neoplastic lesion and the survival data were analysed for each sex separately by the series of programs included in the National Cancer Institute package for histopathologically proven tumours, time to tumour and time to death. Summaries were also prepared of total benign neoplastic lesions, total malignant neoplastic lesions and neoplastic lesion- beating animals by benign-, malignant- a
- Reproductive indices:
- Fertility and Pup viability were examined.
- Offspring viability indices:
- Yes, Pup viability were examined.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 282 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect on survival, body weight, food consumption and Reproductive performance
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 592 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect on survival, body weight, food consumption and Reproductive performance
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
Effect levels (F1)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 282 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect on survival, body weight, food consumption, ophthalmoscopic examinations, hematology, clinical chemistry, urine-analysis, organ weights, gross pathology and histopathology
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 592 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect on survival, body weight, food consumption, ophthalmoscopic examinations, hematology, clinical chemistry, urine-analysis, organ weights, gross pathology and histopathology
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mortality summary for rats fed 0-2% FD & C Blue No. 2 in the diet for up to 30 months
|
| No. of deaths in group | |||||||||
|
| IA | IB | II | III | IV | |||||
| Dietary level (%) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |||||
Category of death |
| M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F |
Unscheduled, up to month 12 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Interim kill, at month 12 |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Unscheduled, after month 12 |
| 45 | 43 | 45 | 39 | 46 | 39 | 49 | 48 | 41 | 44 |
Terminal kill |
| 14 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 12 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 13 |
| Total... | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 71* | 69* |
*One animal originally in the high-dose female group was found during wk 1 to be a male and was therefore transferral to the high-dose male group.
Incidence of neoplams of the urinary bladder, mammary gland and brain in male rats fed 0-2 % FD & C Blue No. 2 in the diet for up to 30 months
|
| No. of rats affected* in group | ||||
|
| IA | IB | II | III | IV |
Organ and turnout | Dietary level (%)... | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Urinary bladder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transitional-cell Carcinoma |
| 0/63 | 1/65 | 0/63 | 2/68 | 2/67 |
Transitional-cell Papilloma |
| 0/63 | 0/65 | 1/63 | 0/68 | 1/67 |
Mammary glandɫ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benign |
| 1/59 | 3/55 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 0/51 |
Malignant |
| 0/59 | 0/55 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 3/51 |
Brain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glioma |
| 2/70 | 2/70 | 2/70 | 2/70 | 7/71 |
*No. affected/no, examined.
ɫ Only grossly visible lesions or masses were examined histologically in groups II and III.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL for F0 and F1 generation was considered to be 1282 mg/kg/day for male and 1592 mg/kg/day for female rats when CD male and female rats were treated with FD & C Blue No. 2
- Executive summary:
In long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity study study, CD male and female rats were treated with FD & C Blue No. 2 in the concnetration of 0, 304, 632 and 1282 mg/kg/day for male and 0, 363, 775 and 1592 mg/kg/day for female in basal diet. No effect on survival, body weight and food consumption of treated rats were observed as compared to control in F0 generation. No effect on numbers of pregnant females per group and pup viability at birth were observed in treated rats as compared to control. No effect on pup viability at birth were observed although pup mortality were increased at 1282 for male and 1592 mg/kg/day for female during lactation and weaning period and at 632 mg/kg/day for male and 1592 mg/kgday for female during weaning period as compared to control. Sufficient pups were available in F1 generation. Hair loss (apparently due to friction against the cage), nasal and ocular discharge, staining of the hair in the anogenital region and soft stools were observed in treated pups but these random observations are not uncommon in the CD rat and therefore were not considered to be related to compound administration. Slightly decreased body weight were observed at 1282 mg/kg/day for male and 1592 mg/kg/day for female and 632 mg/kg/day for male and 1592 mg/kg/day for female as compared to control. This was due to low number of pups prior to the random selection of pups for the F1 generation.Dose-related increase in food consumption was observed in treated rats as compared to control. The increased food consumption was probably due to the influence of the non-nutritive character of the test compound at these high concentrations in F1 generation. Similarly,Focal and diffuse retinopathy, conjunctivitis, uveitis and cataracts were observed in treated rats but observed changes were not related to compound administration. No significant effect on hematology, Clinical chemistry and urine-analysis of treated rats were observed as compared to control in F1 generation.At 1592 mg/kg/day decrase in relative thyroid and kidney weight at 12 month and increased mean relative spleen and liver weights at 30 month and at 363 mg/kg/day decrase in relative thyroid at 12 month in female were observed as compared to control. Blue discoloration of the gastro-intestinal tract was noted in the treated groups. In addition, Increase in grossly visible abnormalities in urinary bladders of treateed male rats at 1282 mg/kg/day were observed as compared to control in F1 ganaration. The observed findings were consistent with those reported in the literature for aged rats of this strain. Non-neoplastic mycoplasma pulmonis, infection by Corynebacterium kutcheri, Periarteritis nodosa, characterized by fibrinoid necrosis of the arterial walls, occurred most commonly in the arteries of the pancreas, mesentery and testes and atrophy of the seminiferous tubules, accompanied by oligospermia or aspermia. All non-neoplastic lesions were randomly distributed in treated and control animals and were not dose related. In male rats at 1282 mg/kg/day Neoplastic Pituitary-gland neoplasms, carcinomas/adenocarcinomas of mammary-gland and transitional-cell neoplasms of the urinary bladder were observed in treated rats as compared to control. The observed effect were not statistically significant as compared to control. Statistically significant increase in carcinomas/adenocarcinomas of mammary-gland and gliomas were observed in treated rats as compared to control. In female rats, Pituitary-gland neoplasms and malignant mammary-gland neoplasms (carcinoma, adenocarcinoma) observed in treated rats as compared to control. The observed effect were not statistically significant as compared to control. Therefore, NOAEL for F0 and F1 generation was considered to be 1282 mg/kg/day for male and 1592 mg/kg/day for female rats when CD male and female rats were treated with FD & C Blue No. 2 orally for 30 months.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.