Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-925-7 | CAS number: 1453-58-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in soil
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil: simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021-08-11 - 2021-12-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 307 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Soil)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- laboratory
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-methylpyrazole
- EC Number:
- 215-925-7
- EC Name:
- 3-methylpyrazole
- Cas Number:
- 1453-58-3
- Molecular formula:
- C4H6N2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-methyl-1H-pyrazole
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Radiolabelling:
- no
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Soil classification:
- DIN 19863 (Deutsche Industrie-Norm)
Soil propertiesopen allclose all
- Soil no.:
- #3
- Soil type:
- other: silty sand
- % Org. C:
- 0.66
- pH:
- 6.2
- CEC:
- 6
- % Moisture content:
- 45
- Soil no.:
- #2
- Soil type:
- loamy sand
- % Org. C:
- 1.77
- pH:
- 5.6
- CEC:
- 8.5
- % Moisture content:
- 45
- Soil no.:
- #1
- Soil type:
- sand
- % Org. C:
- 0.61
- pH:
- 4.7
- CEC:
- 3.1
- % Moisture content:
- 45
- Details on soil characteristics:
- see below
Duration of test (contact time)open allclose all
- Soil No.:
- #3
- Duration:
- 18 d
- Soil No.:
- #2
- Duration:
- 240 h
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Duration:
- 14 d
Initial test substance concentrationopen allclose all
- Soil No.:
- #3
- Initial conc.:
- 0.3 mg/kg soil d.w.
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Soil No.:
- #2
- Initial conc.:
- 0.3 mg/kg soil d.w.
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Initial conc.:
- 0.3 mg/kg soil d.w.
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- test mat. analysis
Experimental conditionsopen allclose all
- Soil No.:
- #3
- Temp.:
- 20°C
- Humidity:
- 45 % MWHC
- Microbial biomass:
- 11.2 mg C/100 g
- Soil No.:
- #2
- Temp.:
- 20°C
- Humidity:
- 45 % MWHC
- Microbial biomass:
- 37.4 mg C/100 g
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Humidity:
- 45 % MWHC
- Microbial biomass:
- 15.1 mg C/100 g
- Details on experimental conditions:
- The microbial biomass of the soils at start and end of the experiment was determined by for the batches of LUFA 2.1, LUFA 2.2 and LUFA 2.3 soils used in this study. The microbial biomass was determined at LUFA Speyer, Obere Langgasse 40, 67346 Speyer. The biomass determination was done in a separate GLP study (Study Number at LUFA Speyer: BP 06/21, see Reference (3)).
The experimental soils LUFA 2.1, LUFA 2.2 and LUFA 2.3 were stored at 2-8°C for 24 days, until the start of the pre-incubation period (27 August 2021) for the definitive test. The quality of the soils was proved by the determination of their microbial biomass (see Appendix 2: soil certificates).
The soils were moistened to 45 % maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) prior to the start of the pre-incubation period (17 September 2021).
The soils were maintained at this moisture level (± 1 % based on dry weight) throughout the study and maintained at a constant temperature of 20 ± 2 °C in the dark.
The application of the test item (3-Methylpyrazole, purity of 98.8 %) was made to the soil surface by solvent application on 20 September 2021. The treated soils were thoroughly mixed, by manual shaking, to incorporate the test item into soil.
Amounts of conditioned soil at 45 % MWHC, equivalent to 100 g dry weight were bottled into 1000 mL all glass metabolism flasks (conical shoulder bottles of 10 cm inner diameter) and maintained under a dynamic atmosphere of air by passing a continous airflow through the system in order to keep aerobic conditions, in the dark, at 20 ± 2 °C (see experimental section 8.3). Air entering the system was passed through a washing bottle to reduce the water loss of soil. The metabolism flasks were connected via tubing and good humidification maintained (clearly visible bubbles). A flow meter was used to measure the air flow.
Each test vessel was allocated a number that was used internally during the experimental phase.
Results and discussion
Half-life / dissipation time of parent compoundopen allclose all
- Key result
- Soil No.:
- #3
- DT50:
- 3.5 d
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Key result
- Soil No.:
- #2
- DT50:
- 1.7 d
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Key result
- Soil No.:
- #1
- DT50:
- 2.9 d
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Transformation products:
- not measured
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results of Definitive Test of 3-Methylpyrazole for LUFA 2.1
LUFA 2.1 | |||
mass transition: | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole |
m/z 83 > m/z 56 | found | found | found |
days | [mg/kg dry weight] | [%] | mean [%] |
0 | 0.270 | 89.6 | 89.7 |
0.271 | 89.7 | ||
1 | 0.226 | 74.9 | 75.5 |
0.230 | 76.2 | ||
2 | 0.201 | 66.6 | 66.1 |
0.198 | 65.6 | ||
3 | 0.178 | 59.1 | 60.5 |
0.187 | 62.0 | ||
5 | 0.068 | 22.6 | 20.4 |
0.055 | 18.1 | ||
7 | 0.020 | 6.6 | 6.4 |
0.018 | 6.1 | ||
10 | 0.0086 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
0.0075 | 2.5 | ||
14 | 0.0040 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
0.0042 | 1.4 |
Results of Definitive Test of 3-Methylpyrazole for LUFA 2.2
LUFA 2.2 | |||
mass transition: | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole |
m/z 83 > m/z 56 | found | found | found |
hours | [mg/kg dry weight] | [%] | mean [%] |
0 | 0.253 | 83.8 | 83.2 |
0.249 | 82.6 | ||
16 | 0.213 | 70.6 | 70.7 |
0.213 | 70.8 | ||
24 | 0.198 | 65.5 | 65.5 |
0.197 | 65.4 | ||
48 | 0.151 | 50.0 | 51.2 |
0.158 | 52.4 | ||
64 | 0.056 | 18.6 | 20.3 |
0.067 | 22.1 | ||
88 | 0.039 | 13.0 | 13.3 |
0.041 | 13.5 | ||
168 | 0.0069 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
0.0066 | 2.2 | ||
240 | 0.0054 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
0.0055 | 1.8 |
Results of Definitive Test of 3-Methylpyrazole for LUFA 2.3
LUFA 2.3 | |||
mass transition: | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole | 3-Methylpyrazole |
m/z 83 > m/z 56 | found | found | found |
days | [mg/kg dry weight] | [%] | mean [%] |
0 | 0.265 | 87.7 | 88.2 |
0.268 | 88.8 | ||
1 | 0.238 | 78.9 | 76.7 |
0.225 | 74.5 | ||
3 | 0.172 | 56.9 | 53.6 |
0.152 | 50.4 | ||
5 | 0.087 | 28.8 | 29.5 |
0.091 | 30.2 | ||
7 | 0.069 | 22.8 | 21.5 |
0.061 | 20.1 | ||
10 | 0.042 | 14.0 | 12.2 |
0.031 | 10.4 | ||
14 | 0.020 | 6.6 | 7.3 |
0.024 | 8.0 | ||
18 | 0.013 | 4.3 | 5.3 |
0.019 | 6.2 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The following DT50 and DT90 values were calculated using FOCUS_DegKin_v2. Single first-order (SFO) and first-order multi compartment (FOMC) kinetic models were tested and the best fit provided:
3-Methylpyrazole
LUFA 2.1: Loamy sand, SFO, DT50: 2.9 days DT90: 9.5 days
LUFA 2.2: Sandy loam, SFO, DT50: 40.9 hours(1.7 days), DT90: 135.9 hours (5.7 days)
LUFA 2.3: Sandy loam, SFO, DT50: 3.5 days DT90: 11.7 days
The results show that no (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol was formed in any of the soils. - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to determine the rate of degradation of 3-Methylpyrazole in aerobic soil systems. The degradation behaviour of 3-Methylpyrazole in three standard soils was investigated following OECD 307 according to GLP.
Additionally, the appearance of (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol was checked.
In order to determine 3-Methylpyrazole and (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol, the validation of an analytical method was additionally required and the same three soils as in the main test were chosen. For method validation, each soil was fortified with 3-Methylpyrazole and (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol at the LOQ (0.015 mg/kg) and 20 x LOQ (0.3 mg/kg).
Results Main Test (OECD 307)
The degradation of 3-Methylpyrazole was investigated under aerobic conditions at 20 ± 2 °C in the dark for a maximum of 18 days (LUFA 2.3) for the German standard soils LUFA 2.1, LUFA 2.2 and LUFA 2.3.
The target rate of 0.3 mg/kg dry soil for 3-Methylpyrazole was selected for the aerobic soil degradation experiments.
The soil systems were acclimatized under a dynamic atmosphere of air to maintain aerobic conditions. The test period consisted of sampling intervals at
- LUFA 2.1: zero-time (initial value), 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 days
- LUFA 2.2: zero-time (initial value), 16, 24, 48, 64, 88, 168 and 240 hours
- LUFA 2.3: zero-time (initial value), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 18 days
Additionally, soil specimens were assayed for (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol at all timepoints.
The mean recoveries 3-Methylpyrazole for the initial time specimens ranged from 83.2 to 89.7 % of the applied test item. The mean recoveries 3-Methylpyrazole decreased with time and accounted for mean values ranging from 1.4 to 5.3 % at experimental end.
The following DT50 and DT90 values were calculated using FOCUS_DegKin_v2. Single first-order (SFO) and first-order multi compartment (FOMC) kinetic models were tested and the best fit provided:
3-Methylpyrazole
Soil
Soil texture USDA
Model
DT50
DT90
Error level Chi2
LUFA 2.1
Loamy sand
SFO
2.9 days
9.5 days
14.4
LUFA 2.2
Sandy loam
SFO
40.9 hours
(1.7 days)135.9 hours
(5.7 days)13.2
LUFA 2.3
Sandy loam
SFO
3.5 days
11.7 days
5.3
The results show that no (1H-Pyrazole-3-yl)methanol was formed in any of the soils.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.