Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
From October 12, 2009 to November 20, 2009
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Occlusive repeated insult patch study in humans
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Good Clinical Practice

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
cis-2- Pentylcyclopentanol
Cas Number:
157357-30-7
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
cis-2- Pentylcyclopentanol
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
- Test material: ST 11 C 09 @ 10% in 75% DEP / 25% ethanol
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Storage conditions: ambient

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 112 subject enrolled, 101 completed
- Sex: 32 males, 80 females
- Age: 21-68 years
- Race: Asian: 24, Black: 9, Caucasian: 62, Hispanic
Clinical history:
Inclusion criteria:
- were males or females, 18 years of age or older, in general good health,
- were free of any systemic or dermatologic disorder which, in the opinion of the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the study results
- were of any skin type or race providing the skin pigmentation would allow discernment of erythema.
- had completed a medical screening procedure
- had read, understood and signed an informed consent agreement.

Exclusion criteria:
- had any visible skin disease at the study site which, in the opinion if the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the evaluation
- were receiving systemic or topical drugs or medication which, in the opinion if the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the study results
- had psoriasis and/or active atopic dermatitis/eczema
- were females who were pregnant, planning a pregnancy or nursing a child
- had a known sensitivity to cosmetics fragrances, skin care products or topical drugs as related to products being evaluated.
Controls:
none
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: occlusive
- Description of patch: Material was evaluated under an occlusive model plastic chamber patch (25 mm Hilltop Chamber) lined with a non-woven cotton pad. The patch was secured with hypoallergenic tape (Micropore), as needed.
- Vehicle / solvent: diethyl phtalate / ethanol
- Concentrations: 75% DEP / 25% ethanol
- Volume applied: 0.3 mL
- Testing/scoring schedule:
Induction phase: Patches were applied on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for 3 consecutive weeks.
Rest period: 10-15 days
Challenge phase: during the 6th week of the study
- Removal of patches: approximately 24 hours after each application
- Other: patches applied to the infrascapular area of the back, either to the right or left of the midline

Subjects who missed the ninth evaluation (N9G) but have had 9 patch applications and 8 evaluations were considered to have completed the induction phase.
Following a negative induction, a 48/72-hour sequence of “-/+”, “?/+” or “+/+” resulted in an additional reading being performed at the 96-hour interval.


EXAMINATIONS
During induction sites were evaluated at 48-hour intervals (72-hour if weekend). After challenge, evaluations were done after 48 and 72 hours.
- Grading/Scoring system:
- = No reaction
? = Minimal or doubtful response, slightly different from surrounding normal skin
+ = Definite erythema. No oedema
++ = Definite erythema. Definite oedema.
+++ = Definite erythema. Definite oedema and vesiculation.
- Statistical analysis: none

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
SYMPTOMS
- Frequency, level, duration of symptoms observed: none

NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with negative reactions: 101
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions: 0

Any other information on results incl. tables

None

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the condition of the study, the test material is not a skin sensitizer at 10% in 75% DEDP / 25% EtOH.
Executive summary:

A panel of 101 male and female human volunteers completed a repeat insult patch test in which a 10% solution of test material in 75% Diethyl phthalate / 25% Ethanol applied to the back of the subjects under occlusive patches. During the induction phase nine patch were applied, separated by a 48-hour interval. The patches were removed 24 hours after application. Following a 14-day rest period, a challenge patch was applied and the sites scored 48 and 72 hours after application.

None of the subjects exhibited skin irritation reactions or positive reactions.

Under the conditions employed in this study, there was no evidence of sensitisation to the test material at 10%.