Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 308-208-6 | CAS number: 97925-95-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Atmer 163 showed neither mutagenic nor clastogenic activity in the in vitro assays of bacterial and mammalian cell cultures.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
An Ames test was performed according to OECD guideline 471 with the S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and the E. coli strain WP2 uvrA (pKM101). The strains were treated with 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation with rat liver S9-Mix. Positive and solvent controls were valid and Atmer 163 showed no mutagenic activity in any of the tested strains at any concentration with and without metabolic activation.
A mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed with mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells according to OECD guideline 476 (CTL/VV0318). The cells were treated with 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/mL without and 1, 2, 4, 10, 15, 20 µg/mL with S9-mix in the first experiment and with 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 µg/mL without and 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 µg/mL with S9-mix in the second experiment. In each case Atmer 163 was found to be biologically active in the test system, causing concentration related reductions in survival down to a value of 11% in both the presence and absence of S9-mix. No reproducible increases in mutant frequency, above the solvent control values, were recorded for cultures treated with Atmer 163 in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. The data obtained in this study therefore show that the test sample of Atmer 163 is not mutagenic in L5178Y TK+/- cells following in vitro treatment in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
A chromosome aberration assay was performed according to OECD guideline 473 in primary human peripheral blood cultures (CTL/SV1280). The cells were treated in two independent experiments: In experiment 1 with S9-mix for 3h with 5, 10, 20 µg/mL, without S9-mix for 3h with 7.5, 10, 13 µg/mL and in experiment 2 with S9-mix for 3h with 5, 7.5, 10 µg/mL and without S9-mix for 20h with 0.5, 2.5, 5 µg/mL. A small, but statistically significant increase in the percentage of aberrant cells, compared to the solvent control, was observed in Experiment 2 in the absence of S9 -mix. As this value is only just outside of the historical control range it is considered to be of no biological significance. No other statistically significant increases in the percentage of aberrant cells, compared to the solvent control values, were recorded. The sensitivity of the test system, and the metabolic activity of the S9-mix employed, were clearly demonstrated by the increases in the frequencies of aberrant cells induced by the positive control agents, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. The data obtained in this study therefore show that the test sample of Atmer 163 did not induce chromosomal damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes following in vitro treatment in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Ames test, gene mutation test in mouse lymphoma cells and chromosome aberration test in human primary lymphocytes showed negative results after application of Atmer 163, but had valid positive controls.
Based on the available data, Atmer 163 does not meet the classification criteria to classify for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and therefore the data is conclusive, but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.