Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
July 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,4-dioxo-1,3-diazetidine-1,3-bis(methyl-m-phenylene) diisocyanate
EC Number:
247-953-0
EC Name:
2,4-dioxo-1,3-diazetidine-1,3-bis(methyl-m-phenylene) diisocyanate
Cas Number:
26747-90-0
Molecular formula:
C18H12N4O4
IUPAC Name:
bis(3-isocyanato-4-methylphenyl)-1,3-diazetidine-2,4-dione
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Batch No.of test material: 221305
- Purity: > 98.0 %
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2014-07-27

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced male rat liver S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0,10, 25, 50, 160, 500, 1600, 5000 µg/plate (without and with S9 mix)

Vehicle / solvent:
Solvents used: ethylene glycol dimethylether (EGDE) dried with a molecular sieve 0.3nm (test substance), phosphate buffer (sodium azide, mitomycin C, cumene hydroperoxide ), DMSO (2-nitrofluorene, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, 2-aminoanthracene)
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: sodium azide (TA 100, TA 1535), 2-nitrofluorene (TA 98), 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA 1537), mitomycin C (TA 102, plate incorp.), cumene hyd (TA 102, preincub. trials), 2-aminoanthracene (all strains)
Remarks:
The positive controls sodium azide, 2-nitrofluorene, 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine, mitomycin C and cumene hydroperoxide were only used without S9 mix; the positive control 2-aminoanthracene was only used with S9 mix.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD: Standard plate test and preincubation test
Evaluation criteria:
A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice that of negative controls. For TA 102 an increase of about 100 mutants should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these criteria may be overruled by good scientific judgment. In case of questionable results, investigations should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible.
Statistics:
not specified

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of results from the Salmonella mutagenicity assay (plate incorporation test) with Metalink U (mean values of revertants per plate)

Dose (µg per plate)

Without metabolic activation

 

 TA 1535

 TA 100

 TA 1537

 TA 98

 TA 102

Vehicle control (EGDE)

15

140

9

19

178

10

16

142

8

20

196

25

15

142

10

20

172

50

16

129

9

24

189

160

14

139

11

16

169

500

12

134

9

18

204

1600

15

128

8

18

180

5000

11

128

7

18

177

Positive control

210

489

71

771

538

Dose (µg per plate )

With metabolic activation (liver S9 mix)

TA 1535

TA 100

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 102

Vehicle control (EGDE)

17

143

16

42

257

10

15

142

15

43

254

25

16

148

15

45

251

50

17

140

15

49

259

160

17

146

15

42

261

500

15

155

15

37

251

1600

13

153

16

36

230

5000

13

140

12

43

232

Positive control

140

1087

183

1348

379

Table 2: Summary of results from the Salmonella mutagenicity assay (independent preincubation test) with Metalink U (mean values of revertants per plate)

 

Dose (µg per plate)

Without metabolic activation

 

 TA 1535

 TA 100

 TA 1537

 TA 98

 TA 102

Vehicle control (EGDE)

16

95

9

20

190

10

15

85

9

19

218

25

15

96

8

18

180

50

14

93

9

17

188

160

13

97

8

19

170

500

13

95

9

20

184

1600

12

114

6

18

181

5000

11

92

7

17

137

Positive control

703

805

87

919

537

Dose (µg per plate)

With metabolic activation (liver S9 mix)

TA 1535

TA 100

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 102

Vehicle control (EGDE)

18

98

18

37

258

10

15

95

16

38

261

25

16

111

18

35

257

50

15

97

17

43

243

160

15

116

17

36

266

500

16

137

17

37

268

1600

14

126

18

36

255

5000

14

113

17

38

240

Positive control

90

988

209

679

540

 

Metalink U was initially investigated for point mutagenic effects using the Salmonella/microsome plate incorporation test. The test item, dissolved in EGDE dried with a molecular sieve, was administered in doses of up to and including 5000 µg per plate on five Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants. These comprised the histidine-auxotrophic strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102. Doses up to and including 5000 µg per plate did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects. Substance precipitation occurred at the dose of 5000 µg per plate.

Metalink U was investigated in an independent repeat using the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test. Doses up to and including 5000 µg per plate did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects. Substance precipitation occurred at the dose of 5000 µg per plate.

Evidence of mutagenic activity of the test item was not seen. No biologically relevant increase in the mutant count, in comparison to the solvent controls, was observed in any of the strains tested, without and with S9 mix, in the plate incorporation as well in the preincubation modification, under the experimental conditions applied.

In both experiments, the positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, mitomycin C, cumene hydroperoxide and 2-aminoanthracene had a marked mutagenic effect, as was seen by a biologically relevant increase in mutant colonies compared to the corresponding solvent controls.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
negative
Executive summary:

The mutagenic potential of Metalink U was evaluated in a Salmonella/microsome test with the S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 in the presence and absence of S9 mix according to OECD TG 471. Evidence of mutagenic activity was not seen. No biologically relevant increase in the mutant count, in comparison with the solvent controls, was observed. Based on this test, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic without and with S9 mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test.