Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-979-2 | CAS number: 26761-45-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- See Section 1.2 and 1.4.
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Species: Rat
Strain: Wistar HanTM
Sub-strain: RccHanTMzWIST
Source of supply: Envigo RMS (UK) Ltd., Oxon, UK
Number: 80
Sex: Males and females
Age: Approximately 7 weeks on arrival
Weight Range: Males 188 — 235 g and Females 143 — 186 g - Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Environmental conditions will be maintained within the following target parameters:
Target temperature: 22 +/- 3 °C
Target humidity: 30 to 70%
Lighting: Twelve hours of continuous artificial light in each twenty-four hour
period
Ventilation: At least fifteen air changes per hour
Animals will be housed in accordance with the ‘Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of
Animals Used in Scientific Procedures’ and in alignment with the United Kingdom Home
Office recommendations and requirements.
Animals were gang-housed in groups of up to four by sex in polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and furnished with softwood flake bedding (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK).
Certificates of analysis for the bedding will be provided by the supplier.
The bedding is considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity ofthe study.
Diet and Water
The animals were provided with Rodent 2014C Teklad Global Certified Pelleted Diet (Envigo RMS (UK) Ltd., Oxon, UK) and tap water ad libitum.
Drinking water is routinely analyzed (at least annually) and certificates of analysis for diet will be provided by the supplier.
The diet and drinking water are considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity ofthe study.
Environmental Enrichment
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items: wooden chew blocks and cardboard fun tunnels (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK) or suitable alternatives. Any alternatives used will be documented in the raw data for the study.
Certificates of analysis for the environmental enrichment items will be provided by the supplier.
These enrichment items are considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity ofthe study.
Pre—Test Procedures
Acclimatization Period
From arrival to the start of treatment was nine days A proportion ofthe animals will be weighed to confirm arrival body weights are ofthe correct specification.
Allocation
Animals were allocated to dose groups using a randomization procedure based on body weight at least five days prior to the start oftreatment. Animals were weighed on Day — 2 to ensure group mean are within an acceptable range.
Identification
Each animal was uniquely identified within the study by ear-punch. A color-coded cage card will be prepared with details of test item, study number, dose level, sex, numbers of animals, route of administration and Study Director responsible for the study. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Details on route of administration:
- Once daily, by gavage, using a stainless steel dosing cannula attached to a graduated syringe for ninety consecutive days.
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- Animals will be allocated to test groups as follows:
Dose groups Group Size Animal Numbers Treatment Necropsy
& Sex Males Females period Day
1. Control 10 male & 10 female 1-10 11-20 90 days 91
2. 100 mg/kg bw/d 10 male & 10 female 21-30 31-40 90 days 91
3. 300 mg/kg bw/d 10 male & 10 female 41-50 51-60 90 days 91
4. 1000 mg/kg bw/d 10 male & 10 female 61-70 71-80 90 days 91 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- For the purpose of this study the test item was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a solution in Arachis oil BP. The stability and homogeneity of the test item formulations were determined by Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK, Analytical Services as part of this study. Results from the previous study show the formulations to be stable for at least 23 days when stored at approximately 4 °C in the dark. Formulations were therefore prepared fortnightly and stored at approximately 4 °C in the dark.
Samples of each test item formulation were taken on two occasions during the study and analyzed for concentration of 2,3-epoxypropyl neodecanoate at Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK, Analytical Services. The method used for analysis of formulations and the results obtained are given in Annex 2. The results indicate that the prepared formulations were within 95-100% of the nominal concentration. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once per day
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Morbidity/Mortality Inspection
Twice daily, early and late during the working period.
Clinical Observations
All animals were examined for overt signs of toxicity, ill-health or behavioral change immediately before dosing, up to thirty minutes post dosing and one hour after dosing. All observations were recorded.
Body Weights
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and at weekly intervals thereafter. Body weights were also recorded at terminal kill.
Food Consumption
Food consumption was recorded for each cage group at weekly intervals throughout the study. Food conversion efficiency was calculated retrospectively.
Water Consumption
Water intake was measured and recorded daily for each cage group during the first two weeks of the study and during Weeks 10 to 11.
Specialist Evaluations
Functional Observations
Prior to the start of treatment and at weekly intervals thereafter, all animals were observed for signs of functional/behavioral toxicity. During Week 12 functional performance tests were also performed on all animals together with an assessment of sensory reactivity to different stimuli.
Behavioral Assessment
Detailed individual clinical observations were performed for each animal using a purpose built arena. The following parameters were observed:
Gait Hyper/Hypothermia
Tremors Skin color
Twitches Respiration
Convulsions Palpebral closure
Bizarre/Abnormal/Stereotypic behavior Urination
Salivation Defecation
Pilo-erection Transfer arousal
Exophthalmia Tail elevation
Lachrymation
This test was developed from the methods used by Irwin (1968) and Moser et al (1988). The scoring system used is outlined in The Key to Scoring System and Explanation for Behavioral Assessments and Sensory Reactivity Tests.
Ophthalmoscopy
The eyes of all animals were examined pre-treatment and before termination of treatment (during Week 12). The eyes of all surviving control and high dose animals were examined before termination of treatment (during Week 12). Examinations included observation of the anterior structures of the eye, pupillary and corneal blink reflex. Following pupil dilation with 0.5% Tropicamide solution (Mydriacyl® 0.5%, Alcon Laboratories (UK) Ltd., Pentagon Park, Boundary Way, Hemel Hampstead, Hertfordshire), detailed examination of the internal structure of the eye using a direct ophthalmoscope was performed.
In-life Sampling and Analysis
Hematological and blood chemical investigations were performed on all surviving animals from each test and control group at the end of the study (Day 90). Blood samples were obtained from the lateral tail vein. Where necessary repeat samples were obtained by cardiac puncture prior to necropsy on Day 91. Animals were not fasted prior to sampling.
Hematology
Hemoglobin (Hb)
Erythrocyte count (RBC)
Hematocrit (Hot)
Erythrocyte indices
- mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH)
- mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
- mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
Total leucocyte count (WBC)
Differential leucocyte count
- neutrophils (Neut)
- lymphocytes (Lymph)
- monocytes (Mono)
- eosinophils (Eos)
- basophils (Bas)
Prothrombin time (CT)
Platelet count (PLT)
Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)
Reticulocyte count* (Retic)
*Blood film will be prepared but only examined at Study Director’s discretion
Blood Chemistry
Urea Inorganic phosphorus (P)
Glucose Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)
Total protein (Tot.Prot.) Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT)
Albumin Alkaline phosphatase (AP)
Albumin/Globulin (A/G) ratio (by calculation) Creatinine (Creat)
Sodium (Na+) Total cholesterol (Chol)
Potassium (K+) Total bilirubin (Bili)
Chloride (Cl-) Bile acids
Calcium (CaH) - Sacrifice and pathology:
- On completion of the dosing period all surviving animals were killed by intravenous overdose of a suitable barbiturate agent followed by exsanguination.
All animals were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
Gross Examination
Full external and internal macroscopic examination of all animals.
Organ Weights
The following organs, removed from animals that were killed at the end of the study, were dissected free from fat and weighed before fixation:
Adrenals Ovaries
Brain Spleen
Epididymides Testes
Heart Thymus
Kidneys Uterus
Liver
Histopathology
Samples of the following tissues were removed from all animals and preserved in buffered 10% formalin, except where stated:
Adrenals Ovaries
Aorta (thoracic) Pancreas
Bone & bone marrow (femur including stifle joint)• Pituitary
Bone & bone marrow (sternum) Prostate
Brain (including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons) Rectum
Caecum Salivary glands (submaxillary)
Colon Sciatic nerve
Duodenum Seminal vesicles
Epididymides ♦ Skin
Esophagus Spinal cord (cervical, mid-thoracic
Eyes* and lumbar)
Gross lesions Spleen
Heart Stomach
Ileum (including Peyer’s patches) Testes ♦
Jejunum Thymus
Kidneys Thyroid/Parathyroid
Liver Tongue•
Lungs (with bronchi) # Trachea
Lymph nodes (mandibular and mesenteric) Urinary bladder
Mammary glands Uterus (with cervix)
Muscle (skeletal)• Vagina
• Retained only and not processed
* Eyes fixed in Davidson’s fluid
♦ Preserved in Modified Davidson’s fluid
# Lungs were inflated to approximately normal inspiratory volume with buffered 10% formalin before immersion in fixative
• Retained only and not processed
All tissues were dispatched to the Test Site (Propath UK Ltd, Willow Court, Netherwood Road, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JU) for processing (Principal Investigator: N Fower). All tissues from control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose group animals were prepared as paraffin blocks, sectioned at a nominal thickness of 5 µm and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin for subsequent microscopic examination. Any macroscopically observed lesions were also processed.
Since there were indications of treatment-related changes, examination was subsequently extended to include similarly prepared sections of liver and thyroid gland (both sexes), kidney (males only) from animals in the low and intermediate groups.
Pathology
Microscopic examination was conducted by the Study Pathologist (W Henderson). A peer review of the findings observed was conducted by V Mowat at Envigo CRS Limited, Woolley Road, Alconbury, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE28 4HS. A complete histopathology phase report is presented in Annex 1 and represents the consensus view of both pathologists. - Statistics:
- Data Evaluation
Data were processed to give summary incidence or group mean and standard deviation values where appropriate. All data were summarized in tabular form.
Statistical Analysis
Where considered appropriate, quantitative data was subjected to statistical analysis to detect the significance of intergroup differences from control; statistical significance was achieved at a level of p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters:
Grip Strength, Motor Activity, Body Weight Change, Hematology, Blood Chemistry, Absolute Organ Weights, Body Weight-Relative Organ Weights.
Data were analyzed using the decision tree from the ProvantisTM Tables and Statistics Module as detailed as follows:
Where appropriate, data transformations were performed using the most suitable method. The homogeneity of variance from mean values was analyzed using Bartlett’s test. Intergroup variances were assessed using suitable ANOVA, or if required, ANCOVA with appropriate covariates. Any transformed data were analyzed to find the lowest treatment level that showed a significant effect using the Williams Test for parametric data or the Shirley Test for non-parametric data. If no dose response was found but the data shows non-homogeneity of means, the data were analyzed by a stepwise Dunnett’s (parametric) or Steel (non-parametric) test to determine significant difference from the control group. Where the data were unsuitable for these analyses, pair-wise tests was performed using the Student t-test (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric).
Probability values (p) are presented as follows:
p<0.01 **
p<0.05 *
p>0.05 (not significant) - Description (incidence and severity):
- Incidences of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day throughout the treatment period and, to a lesser extent, in males treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day. Observation of this nature are commonly observed following the oral administration of an unpalatable or slightly irritant test item and, in isolation, are considered not to be associated with systemic toxicity.
Incidental findings included two males and one female treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day, and two males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed sporadic instances of noisy respiration during the treatment period. Isolated instances of hunched posture, staining around the mouth and scab formations followed by fur loss were also evident at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- There were two unscheduled deaths on the study; two control females.
On Day 38 of treatment, one control female (No. 14) was killed in extremis due to a physical injury to the tail (55mm of skin was missing). There were no clinical signs or body weight issues prior to death. There were no further macroscopic findings at necropsy.
A further control female (No. 16) died during the blood sampling procedure on Day 90 of treatment. There were no clinical signs or macroscopic necropsy findings. - Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no adverse effects to body weight development at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Males at 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed comparable body weight gains to controls during the first three weeks of treatment. For the majority of the remaining treatment period these males showed statistically significantly lower (p<0.05 - p<0.01) group mean body weight gains compared to controls, as a number of animals showed low body weight gains during this time. This resulted in overall body weight gains to be 16% lower than controls, as all the animals showed body weight gains this reduction was considered to be associated with biological variation.
At 300 mg/kg bw/day, males also showed some fluctuation in body weight gains during the treatment period. These fluctuations resulted in overall body weight gains to be slightly lower (5%) than controls.
Females treated with 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day generally showed similar body weight gains to controls, however, the overall body weight gain for these animals was 7% and 3% lower than controls.
Animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day generally showed no effects to treatment in relation to controls. On some occasions these animals exceeded the weights gains of the controls. Therefore the overall body weight gains were 15% and 7% higher than controls (males and females respectively). - Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no adverse effects detected for food consumption or food conversion efficiency at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gravimetric measuring of water intake was performed during weeks 1, 2, 10 and 11 of treatment. An increase in water intake was apparent in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day of approximately 25%. This would correlate with the frequency and severity of the increased salivation in these animals.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Ophthalmoscopic examination of surviving animals of both sexes from the control and animals from the 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose group during Week 12 of the treatment period did not indicate any treatment-related differences.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, males showed a statistically significant reduction in hemaglobin (Hb) (p<0.01), erythrocyte count (RBC) (p<0.05) and hematocrit (Hct) (p<0.05) compared to controls. The majority of the individual values for each parameter were below the background control ranges which may indicate hemolytic anemia influenced by the histopathological changes to the liver.
There was considered to be no toxicological significant differences in hematology parameters for both sexes at 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day or for females at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in mean corpuscular hemaglobin concentration (MCHC) compared to controls. All individual values were within the background control ranges; albeit at the upper end of the range which could have influenced the statistical significance and as there were no histopathological correlates, it is considered that this finding is of no toxicological significance. - Description (incidence and severity):
- All treatment dose groups for males and females showed an increase in bilirubin (p<0.05 – p<0.01) with the exception of 100 mg/kg bw/day females. Animals of either sex did not show a dose related response and the majority of individual values were within the background control ranges. Two male and three female control values were actually below historical control values. However, increased bilirubin can be associated with the reductions in Hb, Hct and RBC in the 1000 mg/kg bw/day males.
At 1000 mg/kg bw/day males displayed an increase in alkaline phosphatase (AP) and bile acid (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) when compared to controls. The majority of individual values were within the background control ranges, however, these elevations may be associated to the histopathological changes of the liver.
Males treated with 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in albumin/globulin ratio (p<0.05) without a dose related response. The majority of the individual values were below the background control ranges and without a similar response at the higher dose level, this finding is considered to be of no toxicological significance.
Females treated with 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed a reduction in urea (p<0.05) in a dose related manner. The majority of individual values were within the background control range and with no histopathological correlates this finding was considered to be of no toxicological importance. The 1000 mg/kg bw/day females also had a reduction in phosphorus (p<0.05) in a dose related response, the majority of individual values were within the background control ranges; however, four control values were above these ranges and may influenced the statistical significance attained due to the higher group mean of the controls. Therefore the significance of this finding is considered to be of no toxicological importance. - Description (incidence and severity):
- A number of animals treated at 1000 mg/kgbw/day showed sporadic instances of increased salivation during behavioral assessments in the treatment period with a range of severity from slight to extreme. These observations correlate with the daily clinical observations evident at this dosage. In isolation one female treated at 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed hunched posture during these assessments on Weeks 3 to 6 and exhibited decreased respiratory rate during Week 3.
No observations were detected for animals treated with 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day.
There were no toxicological changes in the functional parameters measured at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in overall motor activity. Without similar effects at the higher dose levels and in the absence of any clinical signs of neurotoxicity, the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological importance.
Intergroup differences observed in the scores for sensory reactivity did not indicate any effect of treatment for either sex at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. - Description (incidence and severity):
- Kidney: Males treated with 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed an increase (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) in both absolute and relative kidney weights compared to controls. The individual values for one and eight males (300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively) showed absolute kidneys weights were above the background control ranges. The values for relative kidney weights showed that two and all ten males treated with 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively were above the background control ranges.
An increase was also evident in the corresponding female kidney weights at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (p<0.01) compared to controls. The individual absolute values showed that 2/10 kidneys weights from each dose group were above the background control ranges, showing a dose related response. Relative values also showed a dose related increase with four and eight females exceeding the background control ranges. The increase may be related to the increase of water intake but with no histopathological correlates this finding is considered to be of no toxicological significance.
Liver: All male treated dose groups showed an increase (p<0.05 - p<0.01) in absolute liver weight compared to controls, without a dose relationship present. The individual values of five, four and seven males (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively) showed their liver weights were above the background control ranges. A further review of these liver weights relative to terminal body weight indicated six, eight and all ten males exceeded the background control ranges (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively) although one control male value was also above historical control values. The corresponding females treated with 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day also showed an increase (p<0.05 - p<0.01) in liver weights both absolute and relative to terminal body weight in a dose related response. Absolute individual values for females treated with 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day were all within the background control ranges and all 1000 mg/kg bw/day values were above this range. The relative individual values showed that two, five and all ten females (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively). The increase in liver weight for both males and females at 1000 mg/kg bw/day is considered to be associated with the histopathological changes.
Testes: At 1000 mg/kg bw/day males showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in testis weights compared to controls for both absolute and relative organ weights. The individual values indicated that 3/10 and 6/10 values were above the normal background ranges for absolute and relative weights, respectively and with no histopathological correlates this finding was considered to be of no toxicological significance. It is also noted that 3/10 control absolute testis weights were above historical control values. - Description (incidence and severity):
- Kidney
Increased hyaline droplets, granular casts and multifocal basophilic tubules or nephropathy were present in all males treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The hyaline droplet formation extended to all males at 300 mg/kg bw/day with 5/10 males also showing granular casts and tubular basophilia. Hyaline droplet formation was seen in 4/10 males at 100 mg/kg bw/day. Hyaline droplet accumulation is specific to the male rat and is not generally considered to be significant in man. However, multifocal basophilic tubules/nephropathy and granular casts, generally considered to be associated with the hyaline droplet accumulation, are considered to be adverse.
Liver
Hepatocellular hypertrophy, mainly in the centrilobular area was present in 4/10 males and 5/10 females treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day. One male at 100 mg/kg bw/day was also found to have this condition. These changes are suggestive of an adaptive response to mixed function oxidase induction in the liver and correlates with the increase in organ weights
Thyroid Glands
Hypertrophy of the follicular epithelium was present in 6/10 males and 5/10 females treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day. It was also observed amongst 6/10 males and 1/10 females at 300 mg/kg bw/day and 3/10 males and 1/10 females at 100 mg/kg bw/day. The hypertrophy was considered likely to be linked to the histopathological change in the liver where the underlying mechanism is considered to be increased hepatic clearance of thyroid hormones, causing compensatory hypertrophy of follicular cells. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effect
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
KEY TO TABLES AND APPENDICES
M Male
F Female
Pre Immediately before dosing
Post Post dosing (up to 30 minutes)
1h One hour post dosing
A.M. ante meridiem
S.D. Standard deviation
N Number of animals
Abs Gain Absolute body weight gain between base period and end of the analysis period
% Gain Percentage body weight gain between base period and end of the analysis period
% Food Efficiency
Statistical Footnotes:
* Significantly different from control group p<0.05
** Significantly different from control group p<0.01
n Data not appropriate for statistical analysis
Organ Weights Footnotes:
Epididys Epididymides
Bodywt Body weight
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS
1. NEUROLOGIC
These parameters are the first to be evaluated when the animal is placed in the arena:
1.1 Transfer Arousal (Time to Movement) and Locomotion
-2 = animal stays in one place
-1 = slow, deliberate movement
0 = moderate, undisturbed investigation of environment
1 = active progression around arena
2 = darting movements
1.2 Tail Elevation
0 = flattened
1 = rigidly horizontally extended
2 = rigidly diagonally elevated
3 = rigidly vertical
4 = diagonally retrograde (past vertical)
2. GAIT AND CO-ORDINATION
Tiptoe Hindlimbs raised on tiptoe during movement
High stepping Forelimbs lifted high during movement
Spastic Shuffling of limbs
Waddling Lateral movements
Dysmetric Unco-ordinated movement with tremors
Splayed Thighs splayed outwards, animal appears crouched
Scissor Forelimbs cross over when extended
Ataxic
Lack of co-ordinated movement of trunk, pelvis and limbs.
Observation graded: Slight
Moderate (does not fall)
Extreme (falls repeatedly)
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS (CONTINUED)
3. CNS EXCITATION
3.1 Tremors
These are general involuntary movements of the muscles
Exertion only occurs during movement
Rest only occurs when animal is resting
Whole body
Head only
Body only
Tail only
When present, any observation is also graded:
Slight
Moderate
Extreme
3.2 Twitches
Identified as brief, coarse jerks of body or limbs - observation graded:
Slight
Moderate
Extreme
3.3 Convulsions
Clonic Convulsions with alternate contraction and relaxation of muscles
Running excitement Often accompanied by clonic convulsions
Champing Clonus of the paws only
Hopping Animal repeatedly “hops” into the air
Asphyxeal Terminal convulsion, results in death from respiratory failure
Tonic Seizure in which the head, body and limbs are arched backwards
Emprosthotonus Seizure where the head, body and limbs are arched forwards
3.4 Bizarre Behavior
Any bizarre behavior is recorded using a unique code.
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS (CONTINUED)
4. AUTONOMIC
Salivation* Excessive visible wetness around the mouth
Pilo-erection* Fur stands up - marked cases are described as “puff ball” appearance
Exophthalmia Bulging eyes
Lachrymation Tear staining (clear fluid)
Chromodacryorrhea (red/pink fluid)
Hyperthermia
Hypothermia
Skin color* Blue (cyanotic)
Redness of extremities
Skin pallor
Respiration Decreased respiratory rate
Gasping
Increased rate
Labored
Noisy
Palpebral closure Degree of eyelid closure e.g. ptosis - observation is graded:
Slight
Moderate
Severe
Urination and defecation During the study this can only be observed as urogenital wetness and/or diarrhoea. In the open arena, the number of occasions that the animal defecates/urinates is recorded
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS (CONTINUED)
5. MANIPULATIVE TESTS
Performed in the open arena:
5.1 Grasp Response
The animal is grasped around the body and its reaction is scored:
0 = no response
1 = animal struggles slightly but becomes passive
2 = animal repeatedly struggles with/without vocalization
3 = animal struggles violently with/without vocalization
4 = animal attempts to bite operator
5.2 Vocalization
The number of vocalizations exhibited by the animal during handling.
5.3 Toe Pinch
On handling one toe of a hindfoot is lightly pressed with a pair of forceps:
-3 = no response
-2 = animal shows awareness of actions
-1 = withdrawal
0 = rapid withdrawal with single vocalization
1 = rapid withdrawal with multiple vocalizations
5.4 Tail Pinch
Whilst animal is in the arena, the end of the tail is lightly pressed with forceps:
-2 = no response
-1 = animal freezes/shows awareness of grasping
0 = animal attempts to escape/struggles with none or single vocalization
1 = animal struggles violently with multiple vocalizations
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS (CONTINUED)
5.5 Finger Approach
Whilst animal is in the arena the operator moves one finger towards the animal:
-1 = animal is oblivious to approach
0 = animal is aware of finger but is unmoved
1 = head sways from side to side
2 = moves towards finger
3 = investigates finger by moving onto it
5.6 Touch Escape
Whilst animal is in the arena the operator runs his finger down the body of the animal:
-2 = no response
-1 = animal twitches ears, investigates finger
0 = animal crouches
1 = animal moves away but is unhurried
2 = animal moves away as if startled
5.7 Pupil Reflex
The animal is placed in a darkened area to allow the pupils to dilate. A light beam is shone into each eye separately and the pupil is observed for immediate constriction.
The response recorded:
-2 = no response
-1 = sluggish
0 = normal
KEY TO SCORING SYSTEM AND EXPLANATION FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTS AND SENSORY REACTIVITY TESTS (CONTINUED)
5.8 Blink Reflex (Palpebral Closure)
The operator attempts to touch the eye of the rat, the response is recorded:
-2 = no response
-1 = sluggish
0 = normal blink reflex
1 = rapid or repeated eye blink
5.9 Startle Reflex
A sharp sudden noise is produced by a noise generator or finger snap or similar. Each animal is held lightly but firmly facing the origin of the noise. The response is recorded:
-1 = no response
0 = normal
1 = hyper-responsive
FIGURES
Figure 1 Group Mean Body Weights for Males
Figure 2 Group Mean Body Weights for Females
Figure 3 Group Mean Food Consumptions for Males
Figure 4 Group Mean Food Consumptions for Females
This page has intentionally been left blank
TABLES
Table 1 Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Sex: Male
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
0(Control) 100 mg/kg bw/day 300 mg/kg bw/day 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Scheduled kill
Number of Animals 10 10 10 10
Days from ƒ to 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Increased salivation
Number of Animals . 9 10 10
Days from ƒ to . 18 90 2 90 1 90
Noisy respiration
Number of Animals . . 2 2
Days from ƒ to . . 56 78 80 89
Hunched posture
Number of Animals . . . 1
Days from ƒ to . . . 40 40
Table 1 (continued) Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Sex: Female
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
0(Control) 100 mg/kg bw/day 300 mg/kg bw/day 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Damaged Tail
Number of Animals 1 . . .
Days from ƒ to 38 38 . . .
Scab#
Number of Animals . . . 2
Days from ƒ to . . . 63 68
Killed `in extremis'
Number of Animals 1 . . .
Days from ƒ to 38 38 . . .
Scheduled kill
Number of Animals 8 10 10 10
Days from ƒ to 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Found dead
Number of Animals 1 . . .
Days from ƒ to 90 90 . . .
Staining around the mouth
Number of Animals . . . 1
Days from ƒ to . . . 63 63
Increased salivation
Number of Animals . . 10 10
Days from ƒ to . . 6 90 1 90
# = Scab on back or dorsal surface
Table 1 (continued) Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Sex: Female
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
0(Control) 100 mg/kg bw/day 300 mg/kg bw/day 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Noisy respiration
Number of Observations . . . 4
Number of Animals . . . 2
Days from ƒ to . . . 20 74
Generalised fur loss
Number of Observations . . . 14
Number of Animals . . . 2
Days from ƒ to . . . 69 75
Table 2 Summary Incidence of Behavioral Assessments (Observations)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) Clinical Sign Severity -1 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 89
1(M) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
1(F) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 2 (continued) Summary Incidence of Behavioral Assessments (Observations)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) Clinical Sign Severity -1 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 89
2(M) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
2(F) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 2 (continued) Summary Incidence of Behavioral Assessments (Observations)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) Clinical Sign Severity -1 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 89
3(M) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(F) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 2 (continued) Summary Incidence of Behavioral Assessments (Observations)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) Clinical Sign Severity -1 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 89
4(M) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 10
Autonomic ƒ Salivation Slight . . 2 . . . . . . 1 . . . .
TOTAL . . 2 . . . . . . 1 . . . .
4(F) ANIMALS ALIVE 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANIMALS NORMAL 10 10 10 5 6 7 8 8 8 9 9 10 10 10
Respiration ƒ Decreased Rate Present . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . .
Autonomic ƒ Salivation Slight . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 . . . . .
Moderate . . . 1 1 . . . 1 1 1 . . .
Extreme . . . 4 2 2 1 1 . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . 5 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 . . .
Hunched posture Present . . . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . .
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: ƒ1 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: ƒ1 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 7 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 7 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 14 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 14 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 21 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 21 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 28 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 28 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 35 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 35 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 42 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 42 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 49 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 49 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 56 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 56 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 63 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 63 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 70 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 70 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 77 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 77 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 84 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 84 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 89 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 3 (continued) Group Mean Behavioral Assessments (Scores)
Day: 89 Relative to Start Date
Transfer Urinƒ Defƒ Tail elƒ
Group arousal ation ecation evation
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 4 Group Mean Functional Test Values and Standard Deviations
Test 1 Test 1 Test 2 Test 2 Test 3 Test 3 Overall Overall Last 20% Last 20%
Group Forelimb Hindlimb Forelimb Hindlimb Forelimb Hindlimb activity mobile activity mobile
(Sex) g g g g g g
1(M) Mean 588.8 333.9 788.2 358.3 831.7 253.1 452.2 0.0n 12.0 0.0n
S.D. 187.8 109.2 453.9 104.0 392.6 113.3 99.5 0.0 20.9 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 777.4 402.5 817.4 351.6 665.6 299.8 535.1 0.0n 25.3 0.0n
S.D. 300.4 140.8 429.3 162.5 252.2 156.1 141.3 0.0 33.3 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 558.4 371.1 731.0 345.9 707.1 270.2 522.2 0.0n 17.7 0.0n
S.D. 207.2 217.1 386.7 183.2 345.2 84.0 109.7 0.0 15.4 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 604.7 271.5 636.3 291.6 687.8 213.3 460.4 0.0n 53.3 0.0n
S.D. 342.9 122.4 262.0 124.1 357.7 96.2 107.7 0.0 63.5 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
General Footnote: Unit = Time (seconds) for Motor Activity Assessments
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 4 (continued) Group Mean Functional Test Values and Standard Deviations
Test 1 Test 1 Test 2 Test 2 Test 3 Test 3 Overall Overall Last 20% Last 20%
Group Forelimb Hindlimb Forelimb Hindlimb Forelimb Hindlimb activity mobile activity mobile
(Sex) g g g g g g
1(F) Mean 905.9 215.4 892.6 368.6 945.1 280.6 531.3 0.0n 53.3 0.0n
S.D. 225.9 126.3 331.8 167.6 351.0 184.4 116.2 0.0 48.4 0.0
N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 957.7 332.1 940.8 372.8 957.7 378.0 701.6* 0.0n 50.7 0.0n
S.D. 205.8 116.8 292.1 213.7 352.7 100.3 131.4 0.0 79.4 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 963.4 236.6 989.2 406.2 1001.7 374.4 564.4 0.0n 47.6 0.0n
S.D. 279.7 121.1 293.2 134.6 240.4 189.0 100.8 0.0 68.3 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 761.4 272.1 940.4 360.9 782.3 275.4 480.4 0.0n 51.5 0.0n
S.D. 324.0 118.9 178.0 202.8 229.3 103.0 126.8 0.0 74.9 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
General Footnote: Unit = Time (seconds) for Motor Activity Assessments
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 5 Summary Incidence of Sensory Reactivity Assessments (Scores)
Grasp Vocalƒ Toe Tail Finger Touch Pupil Blink Startle
Group response isation pinch pinch approach escape reflex reflex reflex
(Sex)
1(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 5 (continued) Summary Incidence of Sensory Reactivity Assessments (Scores)
Grasp Vocalƒ Toe Tail Finger Touch Pupil Blink Startle
Group response isation pinch pinch approach escape reflex reflex reflex
(Sex)
1(F) Mean 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S.D. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 6 Group Mean Body Weight Values
Body Weights (g)
ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(M) Mean 205.5 236.7 260.6 282.5 303.2 319.7 335.5 349.3 360.8 369.7 381.9 392.1 397.5 404.8
S.D. 9.6 12.3 14.3 14.8 16.9 18.3 20.8 22.2 21.6 23.2 21.2 23.9 24.2 25.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 204.7 242.5 270.7 297.9 321.4 338.3 358.7 373.4 386.2 397.1 408.8 418.8 426.0 435.1
S.D. 12.7 15.5 17.1 18.5 20.8 25.2 24.8 25.0 26.3 26.4 26.2 28.1 29.9 31.1
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 203.9 235.1 257.4 279.2 293.9 311.5 325.1 339.1 349.9 360.8 370.4 377.9 384.7 392.9
S.D. 7.5 10.9 14.8 14.9 19.2 18.2 18.8 18.8 19.0 20.7 21.2 22.9 26.0 26.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 203.2 233.8 258.2 278.1 295.4 310.1 320.8 332.8 341.2 348.4 356.9 362.4 366.4 371.6
S.D. 7.2 12.2 17.5 21.2 25.6 26.5 28.0 30.8 30.9 32.6 33.2 34.5 37.4 37.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 6 (continued) Group Mean Body Weight Values
Body Weights (g)
ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group
(Sex) 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(F) Mean 165.1 179.7 185.9 196.4 204.8 209.3 213.7 218.1 222.2 226.3 228.3 225.3 229.0 236.1
S.D. 11.6 13.7 14.9 16.0 20.1 17.4 19.0 19.5 23.3 22.9 20.0 20.3 22.0 17.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 166.3 182.8 188.5 200.1 207.2 214.1 219.3 224.6 229.0 231.5 236.0 237.8 239.7 240.0
S.D. 9.4 8.9 12.7 12.7 14.8 14.1 14.9 15.1 18.2 17.8 16.3 16.5 18.8 15.5
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 165.2 178.2 188.0 198.0 203.5 207.3 212.4 216.8 219.6 223.3 226.1 224.3 228.1 229.6
S.D. 7.9 11.5 15.0 16.6 16.7 17.6 16.1 17.0 18.1 19.1 17.9 19.2 19.0 19.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 162.8 176.1 187.2 200.3 205.4 207.8 214.0 220.0 220.4 224.9 226.5 226.3 229.5 229.9
S.D. 8.0 10.7 11.8 12.8 16.3 14.4 15.2 13.8 16.9 15.8 16.8 15.4 18.1 17.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 7 Group Mean Body Weight Gains
Increase in Body Weight (g)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Abs %
Gain Gain
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 1 1
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91 91 91
1(M) Mean 31.2 23.9 21.9 20.7 16.5 15.8 13.8 11.5 8.9 12.2 10.2 5.4 7.3 199.3 97.0
S.D. 4.0 3.8 3.8 2.9 2.5 3.9 3.6 1.8 2.1 4.4 3.4 4.6 2.8 18.9 8.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
2(M) Mean 37.8* 28.2 27.2* 23.5 16.9 20.4 14.7 12.8 10.9 11.7 10.0 7.2 9.1 230.4 112.6
S.D. 3.6 5.4 3.7 4.3 6.5 3.2 4.0 2.7 4.5 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.9 21.9 8.7
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(M) Mean 31.2 22.3 21.8 14.7 17.6 13.6 14.0 10.8 10.9 9.6 7.5 6.8 8.2 189.0 92.7
S.D. 7.9 6.9 5.0 7.6 7.2 4.2 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.0 3.4 6.5 5.7 22.8 10.7
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4(M) Mean 30.6 24.4 19.9 17.3 14.7 10.7** 12.0 8.4* 7.2 8.5* 5.5** 4.0 5.2 168.4 82.7
S.D. 6.3 7.0 5.0 6.5 3.3 2.8 5.1 3.1 4.4 2.0 3.8 5.9 3.2 33.5 15.2
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 7 (continued) Group Mean Body Weight Gains
Increase in Body Weight (g)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Abs %
Gain Gain
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 1 1
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91 91 91
1(F) Mean 14.6 6.2 10.5 8.4 4.5 5.6 4.4 4.1 4.1 2.0 ƒ3.0 3.7 2.9 69.0 41.4
S.D. 5.2 2.7 5.3 7.3 5.3 2.2 5.3 6.7 3.4 4.2 2.9 4.6 3.5 14.4 8.5
N 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8
2(F) Mean 16.5 5.7 11.6 7.1 6.9 5.2 5.3 4.4 2.5 4.5 1.8 1.9 0.3 73.7 44.4
S.D. 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.4 3.9 3.5 5.2 4.0 3.4 4.1 5.8 5.7 6.2 11.2 6.8
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(F) Mean 13.0 9.8 10.0 5.5 3.8 5.1 4.4 2.8 3.7 2.8 ƒ1.8 3.8 1.5 64.4 38.8
S.D. 5.9 7.9 7.8 5.6 4.6 6.0 5.4 3.9 4.7 3.4 5.8 3.7 4.9 14.3 7.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4(F) Mean 13.3 11.1 13.1 5.1 2.4 6.2 6.0 0.4 4.5 1.6 ƒ0.2 3.2 0.4 67.1 41.2
S.D. 7.3 6.5 5.3 5.5 7.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.4 13.8 8.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 8 Group Mean Food Consumptions
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(M) Mean 20.3 18.7 19.6 20.4 20.6 20.5 20.1 19.4 19.6 19.2 19.9 18.6 18.0
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
2(M) Mean 22.7 20.9 21.6 22.0 22.0 21.8 21.3 21.2 21.7 20.7 21.5 20.8 20.5
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(M) Mean 20.4 19.3 20.0 20.7 20.4 20.2 20.0 19.8 20.0 19.3 19.8 19.1 18.8
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4(M) Mean 19.7 19.7 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.4 20.3 19.8 20.4 20.4 19.8 18.6 19.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Food Consumption = g/animal/day.
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 8 (continued) Group Mean Food Consumptions
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(F) Mean 14.5 13.9 15.7 16.3 15.9 15.0 15.1 15.5 15.6 13.5 14.2 14.6 14.4
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
2(F) Mean 14.8 14.4 16.1 15.4 15.9 15.3 15.4 15.0 15.3 14.6 14.9 14.6 14.7
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(F) Mean 14.2 14.2 15.8 16.1 15.1 14.7 14.7 14.6 14.4 13.8 13.9 14.4 14.1
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4(F) Mean 12.8 14.2 15.9 15.9 15.4 14.9 15.1 14.8 14.8 14.1 14.1 14.4 14.2
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Food Consumption = g/animal/day.
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 9 Food Efficiency
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(M) Mean 22.0 18.6 16.0 14.5 11.4 11.0 9.9 8.5 6.5 9.1 7.2 4.2 6.7
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
2(M) Mean 23.8 19.3 18.0 15.3 11.0 13.4 9.9 8.6 7.2 8.1 6.6 4.9 6.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
3(M) Mean 21.8 16.4 15.6 10.1 12.3 9.6 10.0 7.8 7.8 7.1 5.4 4.9 7.4
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
4(M) Mean 22.1 17.5 13.8 12.0 10.3 7.5 8.4 6.1 5.1 6.0 3.9 3.0 4.5
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 9 (continued) Food Efficiency
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 91
1(F) Mean 14.4 6.4 9.5 7.4 4.0 5.3 4.1 3.8 3.8 2.2 ƒ3.1 3.7 3.2
N 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
2(F) Mean 15.9 5.5 10.3 6.6 6.2 4.7 5.0 4.1 2.3 4.4 1.7 1.9 0.3
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
3(F) Mean 13.0 9.4 9.0 4.8 3.6 5.0 4.2 2.8 3.7 2.9 ƒ1.9 3.8 1.6
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
4(F) Mean 14.7 11.2 11.9 4.5 2.2 6.1 5.5 0.3 4.4 1.6 ƒ0.3 3.2 0.4
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ
Dose Levels: Group 1 ƒ 0(Control) Group 2 ƒ 100 mg/kg bw/day Group 3 ƒ 300 mg/kg bw/day Group 4 ƒ 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Table 10 Group Mean Daily Water Consumptions
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(Sex) To: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1(M) Mean 24.7 22.8 27 24.3 24.9 27.4 25.2 25.1 25.8 24.4
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
2(M) Mean 24.6 22.6 26 24.7 24.3 26.2 25.3 22.8 24.6 24.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
3(M) Mean 23 21.6 24.7 22.2 22.7 25.7 22.5 22.3 22.6 23.2
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
4(M) Mean 29.4 28.9 31.1 26.7 26.6 28.4 26.5 28.7 31.5 31.6
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Water Consumption = g/animal/day.