Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 1, 2016 - December 20, 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Skinethic skin irritation test -42bis Standard operating procedure (SOP) 2009
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol hydrochloride
EC Number:
214-684-5
EC Name:
2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol hydrochloride
Cas Number:
1185-53-1
Molecular formula:
C4H11NO3.ClH
IUPAC Name:
2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol hydrochloride
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Designation: Art. 108219
Synonym: Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethananhydrochlorid
Trade name: TRIS-HCL Emprove Bio Bulk
CAS-No.: 1185-53-1
Batch: TD16007119
Purity: 100.2% (Titration with perchloric acid)
Appearance: Colourless crystals
Expiry date: June 30, 2021
Storage: +15 to +25°C, store in tightly closed containers, protected from moisture

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
foreskin from a single donor
Justification for test system used:
standard model
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
No vehicle used in this study; The test item was applied neat to the tissues.
Details on test system:
CELL CULTURE
- Supplier: EpiSkin/SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France)
- Source: human keratinocytes cultured on a polycarbonate filter in conditions which permit their terminal differentiation
- Format: 24 well plate
- Batch: 16-RHE-122
- Expires: November 28, 2016

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C

REMOVAL OF THE TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROL
After the end of the treatment interval, the residual test item was removed immediately by gently rinsing with a minimum volume of 25 mL DPBS using a pipette. Excess DPBS was removed by gently shaking the inserts and blotting the bottom with blotting paper.

Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL: 16 mg of solid test material
NEGATIVE CONTROL: 16 µL (Dulbecco`s Phosphate-Buffered Saline)
POSITIVE CONTROL: 16 µL (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate in deionised water)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
42 min (± 1 minute)
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours (± 1 hour)
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment 1 / Run 1
Value:
85.95
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks:
The test item was applied neat to the tissues
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: none
- Direct-MTT reduction: none
- Colour interference with MTT: none

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
Acceptability of the Quality Control Data of the Skin Model with Reference to Historical Batch Data:
The negative control OD values were 2.450, 2.192 and 2.313 and, thus, in the range of ≥0.8 and ≤3.0.

Acceptability of the Positive and Negative Control:
After treatment with the positive control (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) the mean viability value was 1.13% (standard deviation: 2.95%) and, thus, lower than the historically established threshold of 3.12%.
After treatment with the negative control (DPBS-buffer) the mean OD was 2.318 (standard deviation: 5.57%) and, thus, higher than the historically established threshold of 1.436.

Variability of the Data:
The standard deviation between the three tissues replicates treated with the test item was 11.38% and, thus, ≤18%.
The standard deviations between the three tissue replicates of the negative control and the positive control were 5.57% and 2.95%, respectively, and, thus, ≤18%.

The study met all acceptance criteria.


Any other information on results incl. tables

 Group Time / [min]  Mean OD  Mean Relative viability / [%]
 Negative Control 42  2.318 100 
 Positive Control 42

0.026

1.13

 Test Material

42

1.993

85.95

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
This study was performed according to GLP and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 439. Under the conditions of the present study, the test item TRIS-HCL is not considered to possess an irritant potential to skin (UN GHS: No Category).
Executive summary:

This study was performed according to GLP and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 439. Under the conditions of the present study, the test item TRIS-HCl is not considered to possess an irritant potential to skin.