Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-487-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 December 2019 - 16 January 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- EC10 value could not be accurately determined due to a non-monotonic dose response curve.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- AMENDMENT OF SOIL
- Type of organic substrate: Natural Speyer 2.3 soil
- Other:
APPLICATION OF TEST SUBSTANCE TO SOIL
- Method: The control sample was treated the same way as the dosed samples but without being dosed. Six 1.0-kg (dry weight equivalent) batches of soil were weighed out into beakers. Starting with the control, each batch of soil was dosed and mixed as follows. Approximately half of the soil batch was transferred to a 4-L jar. An appropriate amount of the test substance was dosed dropwise across the soil surface using a pipette. The remaining half of the soil batch was then added to the 4-L jar. The soil was mixed by rolling the capped jar for approximately 3 hours at approximately 15 rpm on a rolling mill. The fortified soil was transferred to the bowl of a food mixer and mechanically mixed for 10 minutes at low speed. During this mechanical mixing, the soil was amended with 5.0 g of lucerne meal (i.e. alfalfa). Also, during this mechanical mixing, a volume of purified reagent water was added to the soil in order to bring the moisture content to 45 ± 5% of the soil’s maximum water holding capacity. After dosing and mixing, each batch of soil was divided equally into three replicate test samples in 1-L glass bottle test vessels.
VEHICLE: no vehicle used. - Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Test temperature:
- 18.6 - 21.2 degrees C
- Moisture:
- approximately 45% of the maximum water holding capacity
- Organic carbon content (% dry weight):
- 0.5
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Testing facility: Smithers, 790 Main Street, Wareham, Massachusetts 02571-1037
- Test container (type, material, size): 1L glass bottles covered with perforated parafilm to allow for air exchange while reducing water loss
- Amount of soil: Approximately 333g
- No. of replicates per concentration: 3
- No. of replicates per control: 3
- No. of replicates per vehicle control: not applicable
SOIL INCUBATION
- Method: bulk. Test samples were incubated in the dark in an environmental chamber.
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Geographical reference of sampling site (latitude, longitude): Offenbach, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, "rechts der Landauer Str." No. 826/7
- History of site: No pesticides or organic fertilizers were used within 4 years before collection
- Vegetation cover: Not reported
- Treatments with pesticides or fertilizers: No pesticides or organic fertilizers were used within 4 years before collection
- Accidental contamination: Not reported
- Other:
- Depth of sampling: top 20 cm
- Soil texture
- % sand: 61
- % silt: 26
- % clay: 13
- Soil taxonomic classification: Not reported
- Soil classification system: not reported
- pH (in water): 6.0
- Initial nitrate concentration for nitrogen transformation test (mg nitrate/kg dry weight): Mean across all treatments = 107.6
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weight): 28.6%
- Cation exchange capacity (mmol/kg): 6.1%
- Pretreatment of soil: Lucerne meal (alfalfa) was added to the test soil. The alfalfa had a carbon content of 39.9% and nitrogen content of 3.01%.
- Storage (condition, duration): Before use, the soil was transferred to an environmental chamber set to maintain a temperature of 20 degrees C and allowed to equilibrate to incubation conditions for 2-28 days (3 days actual).
- Initial microbial biomass as % of total organic C: 1.75%
DETAILS OF PREINCUBATION OF SOIL (if any):Before use, the soil was transferred to an environmental chamber set to maintain a temperature of 20 degrees C and allowed to equilibrate to incubation conditions for 2-28 days (3 days actual).
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : A subsample from each test sample was analyzed for the determination of the concentration of nitrate after 0 and 28 days of incubation.
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: not necessary as no vehicle used.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: untreated control, 1.2, 3.7, 11, 33, 100 mg/kg
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC25
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.2 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: All test concentrations had significantly reduced nitrogen formation rates
- Details on results:
- - Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: None reported
- Other: Due to the lowest treatment exhibiting a >10% reduction in NO3 formation rates, an EC10 could not be accurately determined. It is not possible to extrapolate an EC10 due to the non-monotonic (flat) dose response curve and this response suggests the effects to be due to a non-toxic mechanism. In addition, no long-term influence on nitrogen transformation in soils is anticipated as the difference in the rates of nitrate formation between the treatments and the controls were below 25%. It is expected that phenyl silsesquioxanes has no long-term effects on the nitrogen transformation rates of soil microflora at environmentally relevant concentrations. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Inhibition between the untreated control and the treated soils were tested for significance using the ANOVA and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test statistical programs.
The nitrate formation rates were analyzed using the linear interpolation (ICPIN) statistical program in CETIS to determine EC10, EC25, and EC50 values (the concentrations at which nitrate formation is affected by 10, 25, and 50% relative to the untreated control, respectively). The results were investigated for outliers using the Grubbs Extreme Value Test statistical program in CETIS. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Relative standard deviation for the untreated control group ranged from 0.85-4.47% which is less than the 15% outlined in the OECD TG 216 validity criteria
- Conclusions:
- 28-day EC25 and EC50 values of >100 mg/kg were reported for the effects of the test substance on the nitrate formation rate of soil microorganisms, based on nominal concentrations. Nitrate formation rates were significantly reduced in all treatment groups compared to the control, which gives a 28-day LOEC of 1.2 mg/kg dwt. However, a dose response relationship was not observed, suggesting the effects to be due to a non-toxic mechanism. The EC25, EC50 and LOEC values are equivalent to >400 , >400 and 4.8 mg/kg dwt when normalised to 2% organic carbon.
Reference
Table 1. Nitrogen formation rates of soil microorganisms after exposure of phenyl silsesquioxanes
Nominal concentration (mg/kg) |
Mean Day 0 nitrate concentration (mg/kg) |
Mean day 28 nitrate concentration (mg/kg) |
Mean nitrate formation rate (mg/kg/day) |
Rate difference from untreated control |
Untreated control |
107 |
275 |
6.03 |
N/a |
1.2 |
105 |
233 |
4.56 |
-24.3 |
3.7 |
111 |
248 |
4.90 |
-18.76 |
11 |
110 |
252 |
5.05 |
-16.26 |
33 |
107 |
242 |
4.83 |
-19.86 |
100 |
106 |
244 |
4.94 |
-18.05 |
Description of key information
EC25 and EC50 (28-day) >100 mg/kg dwt (nominal), nitrate formation rate, soil microorganisms
These values are equivalent to >400 mg/kg dwt when normalised to 2% organic carbon.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
An OECD TG 216 soil microorganisms (nitrogen transformation) is available for the registration substances.
28-day EC25 and EC50 values of >100 mg/kg dwt were reported for the effects on the nitrate formation rate of soil microorganisms, based on nominal concentrations. Nitrate formation rates were significantly reduced in all treatment groups compared to the control, which gives a 28-day LOEC of 1.2 mg/kg dwt. However, a dose response relationship was not observed, suggesting the effects to be due to a non-toxic mechanism. The EC25, EC50 and LOEC values are equivalent to >400, >400 and 4.8 mg/kg dwt when normalised to 2% organic carbon.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
