Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 228-055-8 | CAS number: 6104-30-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Though not specifically mentioned in the publication, it seems that no replicates were used in this study.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- pot experiments (2-liter pots, sandy loam, 1.0 kg of wet soil, 2.34 % organic matter content, incubation in the dark)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 wk
- Moisture:
- 70%
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 550 other: mg/kg soil w.w.
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: number of microbial populations
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No appropriate negative control was used to evaluate IBDU effects. Summary lacking experimental details. The use of sand and peat topdressing material may have masked effects.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Field test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Remarks:
- 2 years
Referenceopen allclose all
Of the populations studied, none were significantly inhibited, but stimulations were noticed after 2 and 7 weeks with nitrite-forming microbes and with the fungi and cellulolytic microbes by isobutylidenediurea (IBDU) when applied at a rate of 1550 mg/kg wet soil (equivalent to about 1215 kg N / ha). The increase of the fungal population and of the number of cellulolytic propagules in the soil suggests that these groups might be directly involved in the degradation of IBDU. No significant increase of the Nitrobacter-population could be detected. IBDU did not significantly enhance the ammonifying microorganisms. All fertilizers reduced slightly and temporarily the urease, phosphatase and saccharase activity of the treated soils even when applied at the low dose. However, these reductions never surpassed 35 percent of the corresponding control values and the enzymatic activities gradually increased to control values at the twentieth week. Only 38 percent of the amount of carbon added, was recuperated as carbon dioxide. This indicated that IBDU was hydrolyzed into two urea molecules and one molecule of isobutyraldehyde and that this latter compound is not rapidly further metabolised. IBDU liberated immediately a small amount of ammonium and after 7 weeks about 72 percent of the amount of N added were detected as ammonium and, mainly, as nitrate (urea: 98 percent). Nitrite concentrations in soil were never increased. As to the pH, no significant shifts were observed with the low dose. When added at the high dose, a slow increase of 1.5 units followed by a return to the pH of the control soil was observed (no further details given in the publication).
Four natural organic fertilizers, alone or in combination with isobutylidenediurea (IBDU) were compared with IBDU alone for their effect on soil/root microbial populations associated with bermudagrass grown on a golf course putting green in southern Florida/USA. No significant differences in microbial populations were observed over a 2-year period.
Description of key information
NOEC (7 wks): 1550 mg IBDU/kg wet soil
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Vertraete et al. (1974) studied the influence of different slow-release fertilizers on some natural soil microbiological populations and compared the effect to those of urea. The influence of the fertilizers was evaluated by applying the compounds at a low and at a high dose, corresponding respectively with the application of 173 kg N/ha and 1215 kg N/ha (222 and 1550 mg IBDU/kg wet soil). Of the populations studied, none were significantly inhibited, but stimulations were noticed with Fungi, and with ammonifying- and nitrite-forming microorganisms.
Four natural organic fertilizers, alone or in combination with isobutylidenediurea (IBDU) were compared with IBDU alone for their effect on soil/root microbial populations associated with bermudagrass (Cynodon sp.) grown on a golf course putting green in southern Florida/USA. No significant differences in microbial populations were observed over a 2-year period (Elliott and Des Jardin 1999).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.