Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 207-079-2 | CAS number: 431-89-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Exposure related observations in humans: other data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- exposure-related observations in humans: other data
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant study, published in peer reviewed literature, fully adequate for assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
Materials and methods
- Type of study / information:
- Human volunteer pharmacokinetics study
- Endpoint addressed:
- basic toxicokinetics
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The safety and pharmacokinetics of HFC 227ea were assessed in a double-blind study with 8 (4 male and 4 female) healthy volunteers via whole-body exposure
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane
- EC Number:
- 207-079-2
- EC Name:
- 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane
- Cas Number:
- 431-89-0
- Molecular formula:
- C3HF7
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): HFC 227
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): CF3CHFCF3
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: gas
- Analytical purity: 99.99%
Constituent 1
Method
- Ethical approval:
- confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
- Details on study design:
- The study was a within-subject design that compared rising exposure concentrations of HFC227ea versus CFC 12 and air.
HFC 227ea was compared with CFC 12 (dichlorodifluoromethane) as HFC 227 is used to replace chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in refrigerant and aerosol applications, including medical use in metered-dose inhalers. - Exposure assessment:
- measured
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF EXPOSURE: inhalation
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMPER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: air-conditioned exposure chamber constructed from polyurethane and stainless steel panes (volume 13.6 m3, flow rate approx. 500 l/min)
- Source and rate of air: air supply exposure chamber
TYPE OF EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT: Area air sampling
EXPOSURE LEVELS: 0, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppm
EXPOSURE PERIOD: Exposure was for 1 h on eight separate occasions, separated generally by 7 days, two air exposures, two CFC 12 exposures (at 1000 and 4000 ppm), and four exposures (at 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppm) of HFC227. For one volunteer in the HFC227 study the first exposure to air had to be repeated the following week (the Holter failed during the original exposure) and the next exposure (to 4000 ppm CFC 12) was performed 2 days later. Subsequent exposures were according to schedule up to exposure 5. The subject then became ill (not treatment related) and exposures 6, 7 and 8 wer postponed by 1 week. For a second subject in the HFC227 study exposure session 4 (HFC227, 4000 ppm) had to be repeated (the Holter failed during the original exposure) and subsequent exposure sessions were postponed by 1 week. Volunteers were assigned to an exposure schedule such that males and females were exposed equally over morning and afternoon sessions.
DESCRIPTION / DELINEATION OF EXPOSURE GROUPS / CATEGORIES: Eight healthy nonsmoking volunteers, four males and four females, aged between 20 and 24 years, with normal elecrocardiogram, lung function (peak expiratory flow > 80% predicted normal), body fat volume (<30%) and normal clinical laboratory parameters were enrolled for the study. Volunteers were excluded if they were taking chronic medication, were claustrophobic, or had an alcohol intake of more than 21 units/week. Women were exluded if pregnant or lactating and were tested for pregnancy prioir to enrollment and prior to each exposure. All volunteers gave their written informed consent. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and was carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Results and discussion
- Results:
- The blood concentration-time profile shows that HFC227 was rapidly absorbed at each exposure concentration in both males and females.
Blood concentration of HFC 227ea in males and females increased rapidly and at 15 min was either maximum (13% of the cases) or near maximum at each exposure concentrations. Blood concentrations appeared to be at steady state, with maximum blood concentrations generally measured (52% of the cases) prior to the final sample taken during exposure. Both maximum concentrations and total AUC increased in relation to exposure concentration, although the increases were not strictly proportional. At each exposure level, maximum blood concentrations were statistically significantly higher in males (P < 0.05) than females. Maximum concentrations were 37, 50, 39 and 31% higher in males at 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppm, respectively. In accordance with blood concentration, AUC was statistically significantly higher in males (P < 0.05) than females, except at 1000 ppm HFC 227ea. The HFC 227ea AUC was 30, 52, 34 and 41% higher in males at 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppm, respectively. The blood concentration-time profile shows that HFC 227ea was rapidly cleared at each exposure concentration in both males and females. Elimination was predominantly (>83%) biphasic at each exposure level, gender dependent and exposure concentration independent. In the remainder of the population, a single elimination phase was observed. Elimination appeared to be independent of exposure levels. t1/2 alpha was short and tended to be lower in males than females at each exposure level. t1/2 beta was variable in both males and females (see below).
Mean residence time was statistically significantly (P < 0.05) lower in males than females at each exposure level and independent of exposure concentration (a mean of 36 and 42 min for males and females respectively).
Following the final exposure at 24-h, blood samples was analyzed for HFC 227ea. All samples were below the limit of quantification (0.010 g/ml).
Any other information on results incl. tables
The following half-life times were determined in the experiment:
Test # 1: Half-life 1st: 4.7 min (males) and 7.9 min (females)
Test # 1: Half-life 2nd: 22 min (females, 1000 and 8000 ppm) and 42 min (females, 2000 and 4000 ppm); 37 min (males, 1000 and 8000 ppm); 62 min (males, 2000 ppm); 92 min (males, 4000 ppm)
No metabolites were identified.
Exposure of healthy volunteers to exposure levels up to 8000 ppm HFC 227 did not result in any adverse effect on pulse, blood pressure, electrocardiogram or lung function:
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements showed no trend for a change as a result of exposure. At each time point, there were no statistically significant differences between exposure to HFC 227 at any exposure level compared to air (combined) or CFC12 (combined).
Pulse rate showed no trend or change with time as a result of exposure. At each time point, there were no statistically significant differences between exposure to HFC 227 at any exposure level compared to air (combined) or CFC12 (combined).
Peak expiratory flow showed no difference between the pre- and postexposure values. At each time point, there were no statistically significant differences between exposure to HFC 227 at any exposure level compared to air (combined) or CFC12 (combined).
There were no clinically relevant changes in the ECG traces.
There were neither clinically significant changes in any of the laboratory parameters measured nor any notable adverse events recorded. Specifically there were no central nervous system effects reported or observed and there was no indication of upper respiratory tract irritation.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.