Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-105-8 | CAS number: 629-73-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Category members with carbon number ranges from C6-24 are considered readily biodegradable. Category members with carbon numbers above C24 are not considered readily biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
A large number of ready biodegradation studies following standard OECD guidelines are available for members of this category. Studies are available for category members with carbon number ranges from C6 to C28. When contradictory results are available from biodegradation screening studies the study which demonstrates the most biodegradation is used in the risk assessment. Therefore, studies demonstrating ready biodegradation have been assigned key study status, in preference to those showing lower rates of degradation. Data has been read across between category members and used to determine the carbon number above which ready biodegradation has not been demonstrated.
Hex-1-ene has been found to be readily biodegradable in a standard biodegradation screening study (MITI, 1989). The biodegradation of the test substance was determined by measuring the oxygen consumption, Total Organic Carbon and concentration of the test substance using GCMS over time. After 28 days >60% biodegradation was observed using each of these measures. The results based on BOD showed a greater than 20% difference between replicates. However, this variability was not observed with the other two measures. Overall, this test demonstrated that hex-1 -ene met the criteria for readily biodegradability. The biodegradation of hex-1 -ene was also investigated by Miller and Watkinson (1985) in a closed bottle test. A maximum of 45% biodegradation was observed, and so the criterion for ready biodegradability was not met in this study.
Decene has been found to be readily biodegradable in a biodegradation screening test (Cidaria, 1995). In this OECD 301F test >80% biodegradation was observed at day 28, and the 10 day window was met.
Olefins with a carbon number range of C10 - 13 have also been found to be readily biodegradable (Turner and Watkinson, 1985). After 28 days 60 -67% biodegradation was observed, indicating that the test substance is readily biodegradable. The same study reports results from a Modified Sturm test which showed 32 -43% biodegradation over 28 days.
Miller and Watkinson (1984) report results from both an OECD 301D and an OECD 301B test with Alkenes C10 - 14. In both cases they found the test item to be readily biodegradable, but failing the ten day window. However, OECD guidance states that the 10 day window is not applicable when testing a mixture of structurally similar chemicals, as here.
Alkenes with a carbon number range of C11 -12 have been found to be readily biodegradable in a biodegradation screening test (Cidaria, 1995). In this OECD 301F test >77% biodegradation was observed at day 28, and the 10 day window was met.
Turner and Watkinson (1985) investigated the biodegradability of tetradec-1 -ene in an OECD 301D closed bottle test. The validity criteria of the test were met, and tetradec-1 -ene was shown to meet the criteria for ready biodegradability.
Battersby (1995) investigated the biodegradability of hexadec-1 -ene in an OECD 301D closed bottle test. The validity criteria of the test were met, and hexadec-1-ene was shown to meet the criteria for ready biodegradability. MITI (1989) report the results of an OECD 301C test with hexadec-1-ene. Biodegradation after 28 days was reported based on BOD or analysed concentrations as 55-77% and 81 -95% respectively. Douglas and Halls (1993) also investigated the biodegradability of hexadec-1-ene in an OECD 301D test. Biodegradation reached a maximum of 31% after 28 days.
Battersby (1995) also reports that C14 -16 alpha olefins was found to be readily biodegradable in an OECD 301D test.
Miller and Watkinson (1984) tested alkenes C15 - 18 in an OECD 301D test. 53 - 66% biodegradation was observed over 28 days. Battersby (1995a) also tested alkenes C15 - 18 in an OECD 301D test and reported 55 - 61% biodegradation over 28 days. In both cases although >60% biodegradation was observed the criteria for ready biodegradability were not met. Miller and Watkinson (1984) also report the results from an OECD 301B study. 39 - 49% biodegradation was measured over 28 days. The study was extended to 41 days, but biodegradation only reached 42 - 52% after this extended period. Taken together, Miller and Watkinson (1984) and Battersby (1995a) indicate that alkenes C15-18 only narrowly miss being considered readily biodegradable.
Miller and Watkinson (1985) investigated the biodegradability of octadec-1 -ene in a test similar to an OECD 301B modified Sturm test and an OECD 301D closed bottle test. The highest level of biodegradation was observed in the modified Sturm test. Although >60% biodegradation was observed within 28 days the 10 -day window criterion was not met. Therefore, despite reaching a high degree of biodegradation octadec-1 -ene was not demonstrated to be readily biodegradable. A maximum of 48% biodegradation was observed in the closed bottle test.
Alkenes with a carbon number range of C20 -24 have been found to be readily biodegradable in a biodegradation screening test (Mead, 1998). After 28 days 92% biodegradation was observed in this modified sturm test. This is supported by another modified Sturm test (Clarke, 2008), where 92% biodegradation was again observed after 28 days. The 10 day window was met in this study therefore the substance is considered readily biodegradable.
These studies demonstrate that C6, C10, C10-13, C10-14, C11-12, C14, C14-16, C16 and C20-24 alkenes have been shown to be readily biodegradable. Alkenes with carbon numbers of C15-18 and C18 have been shown to have >60% degradation within 28 days, but did not meet all the criteria to be considered readily biodegradable. Based on these results any category members with carbon number ranges from C6-24 are considered readily biodegradable. Category members with carbon numbers above C24 are not considered readily biodegradable.
A number of studies are also available showing lower levels of biodegradation for alkenes in the same carbon number ranges, and at higher carbon number ranges. Due to the variability in results from ready biodegradation studies, when a study is available demonstrating ready biodegradation this is reported as the key study. All reliable results are included in the dossier and the table of results for completeness.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.