Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-112-3 | CAS number: 13170-23-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From February 5 to February 27, 2012.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Test method according to OECD Guideline 476. GLP study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Propyltriacetoxysilane
- EC Number:
- 241-816-9
- EC Name:
- Propyltriacetoxysilane
- Cas Number:
- 17865-07-5
- IUPAC Name:
- propylsilanetriyl triacetate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thyamidine kinase locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver microsome preparations (S9 mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
With metabolic activation: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0 mM
without metabolic activation: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 5.5 mM.
Experiment II:
With metabolic activation: 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 8.5 mM
without metabolic activation: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0 mM. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: RPMI cell culture was used as solvent (RPMI + 5% HS). The pH of cell culture medium as adjusted to physiological range with NaOH. The solvent was compatible with the survival of the cells and the activity of the S9 mix.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (treatment medium)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Short-term exposure (4h): 1x10E+07 cells were suspended in 11 mL RPMI medium with 5% horse serum (25 cm2 flasks) and exposed to designated concentrations of the test item either in the presence of absence of metabolic activation. After exposure, test item was removed by centrifugation (200 x g, 10 min) and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Subsequently the cells were suspended in 30 mL complete culture medium and incubated for an expression and growth period. The cell density was determined each day and adjusted to 3x10E+05 cells/mL in a total culture volume of 20 mL, if necessary.
Long-term exposure (24h): 5x10E+06 cells were suspended in 25 mL RPMI medium with 7.5% horse serum (75 cm2 flasks) and exposed to designated concentrations of the test item in the absence of metabolic activation. After exposure, test item was removed by centrifugation (200 x g, 10 min) and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Subsequently 3x10E+05 cells were suspended in 14 mL complete culture medium and incubated for an expression and growth period. The cell density was determined each day and adjusted to 3x10E+05 cells/mL in a total culture volume of 20 mL, if necessary.
After the expression period cloning efficiency and mutant frequency were analysed (see below).
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1: 4 hours (with and without metabolic activation)
Experiment II: 4 hours (with metabolic acitvation) and 24 hours (without metabolic activation)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days, at 37 ºC in 5% Co2/95% humidified air.
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): ~ 14 days at 37 ºC in 5% CO2/95% humidified air
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): TFT.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1 replicate per dose (negative control, 2 replicates).
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 cells/well
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
Method: Retalive total growth and relative cloning efficiency:
- Relative total growth (RTG): The RTG is the product of the relative suspension growth and the relative cloning efficiency for each culture.
- Suspention growht (SG): The SG reflects the number of times the cell number increases from the starting cell density.
- Cloning efficiency (CE): After the expression period the CE of the cells was determined by seeding a statistical number of 1.6 cells/well in two 96-well plated. The cells were incubated for at least 6 days at 37 ºC in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Analysis of the results was based on the number of cultures with cell growth (positive wells) and those without cell growth (negative wells) compared to the total number of cultures seeded.
- Mutant frequency: Cultures were seed in selective medium. Cells from each experimental grow were seeded in four 96-well plates and were scored after incubation period. The mutant frequency was calculated dividing the number of TFT resistant colonies by the number of cells plated for selection, corrected for the plating efficiency of cells from the same culture grown in the absence of TFT. The mutant frequencies were compared with the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF= 126).
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
Clastogenicity: Colony sizing was performed for the highest concentrations of the test item and for the negative and positive controls. Small colonies were defined by slow growth and/or morphological alteration of the cell close. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is considered mutagenic if following criteria are met: the inducing mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 per 10E+06 cells, and a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.
Combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (>=40% of total colonies) is an indicative for potential clastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations. - Statistics:
- The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test is applied to the mutation data to prove the dose groups for any significant difference in mutant frequency compared to the negative controls.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH detected with the test item was within the physiological range.
- Water solubility: a solubility test was performed with different solvents and vehicles up to the maximum recommended concentration of 10 mM. Based on the results of the solubility test RPMI cell culture was used as solvent (RPMI + 5% HS). The solvent was compatible with the survival of the cells and the activity of the S9 mix.
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item was noted in pre-experiment I and II and experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Pre-experiment for toxicity: The toxicity of the test item was determined in pre-experiments up to a maximum concentration of 10.0 mM. In pre-experiment I six concentrations [0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mM] were tested with and without metabolic activation for 4h exposure. In the pre-experiment II (24h long-term exposure without metabolic activation) six concentrations [0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 5.0 mM] were tested. The experimental conditions were the same as described below in the experimental performance. In experiment I 10.0 mM (with metabolic activation) and 5.5 mM (without metabolic activation) were selected as the highest concentrations. In experiment II 8.5 mM (with metabolic activation) and 5.0 mM (without metabolic activation were selected as the highest concentrations.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
No toxicity was observed in the pre-experiment I. However, this was not reproducible in the main experiments. In experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation growht inhibition was observed. In experiment I with metabolic activation to relative total growth (RTG) as 23.1% for the highest concentration (10.0 mM) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated without metabolic activation was 5.5 mM with RTG of 10.1%. In experiment II with metabolic activation the relative total growth (RTG) was 10.5% for the highest concentration (8.5 mM) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated without metabolic activation was 5.0 with a RTG of 10.3%.
Any other information on results incl. tables
MUTAGENICITY: All dose groups with and without metabolic activation were considered non-mutagenic under test conditions.
Experiment I and II with metabolic activation:
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
RCE [%] |
RTG [%] |
MF [mutants /106cells] |
IMF [mutants /106cells] |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
C1 |
0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
82.0 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
C2 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
2 |
0.5 |
95.0 |
91.4 |
87.9 |
5.9 |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
1.0 |
102.1 |
100.5 |
91.7 |
9.7 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
2.0 |
113.2 |
114.9 |
91.0 |
9.1 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
4.0 |
91.0 |
80.4 |
96.7 |
14.7 |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
6.0 |
96.4 |
94.6 |
104.9 |
23.0 |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
8.0 |
116.7 |
77.9 |
83.7 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
9.0 |
106.7 |
36.6 |
99.0 |
17.0 |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
10.0 |
103.6 |
23.1 |
153.8 |
71.8 |
- |
+ |
- |
B[a]P |
2.5 |
77.9 |
42.1 |
949.9 |
867.9 |
+ |
+ |
- |
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
RCE [%] |
RTG [%] |
MF [mutants /106cells] |
IMF [mutants /106cells] |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
C1 |
0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
82.0 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
C2 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
1 |
0.1 |
101.5 |
89.9 |
77.1 |
-4.4 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
0.3 |
114.5 |
106.7 |
79.5 |
-1.9 |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
0.6 |
97.1 |
77.7 |
73.4 |
-8.1 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
1.2 |
122.0 |
107.4 |
69.0 |
-12.5 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
2.5 |
94.3 |
83.6 |
73.7 |
-7.7 |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
5.0 |
106.1 |
96.0 |
112.7 |
31.2 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
7.5 |
87.8 |
23.5 |
90.0 |
8.5 |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
8.5 |
91.6 |
10.5 |
91.7 |
10.3 |
- |
- |
- |
B[a]P |
3.5 |
77.2 |
46.8 |
601.3 |
519.9 |
+ |
+ |
- |
Experiment I and II without metabolic activation:
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
RCE [%] |
RTG [%] |
MF [mutants /106cells] |
IMF [mutants /106cells] |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
C1 |
0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
82.0 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
C2 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
1 |
0.1 |
93.4 |
95.4 |
97.4 |
13.2 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
0.5 |
102.1 |
108.3 |
105.5 |
21.3 |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
1.0 |
93.4 |
97.7 |
105.2 |
21.0 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
2.0 |
96.2 |
90.6 |
115.6 |
31.4 |
- |
+ |
- |
5 |
3.0 |
88.2 |
60.2 |
134.9 |
50.7 |
- |
+ |
- |
6 |
4.0 |
92.1 |
35.1 |
187.0 |
102.8 |
- |
+ |
- |
7 |
5.0 |
93.4 |
16.2 |
177.5 |
93.3 |
- |
+ |
- |
8 |
5.5 |
90.8 |
10.1 |
167.1 |
82.9 |
- |
+ |
- |
EMS |
300 |
70.2 |
48.8 |
664.8 |
580.7 |
+ |
+ |
- |
MMS |
10 |
64.5 |
43.6 |
531.3 |
447.2 |
+ |
+ |
- |
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
RCE [%] |
RTG [%] |
MF [mutants /106cells] |
IMF [mutants /106cells] |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
C1 |
0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
82.0 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
C2 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
5 |
0.5 |
109.6 |
143.6 |
85.7 |
11.7 |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
1.0 |
114.6 |
145.7 |
98.6 |
24.6 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
2.0 |
116.3 |
148.5 |
81.3 |
7.3 |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
3.0 |
109.6 |
109.6 |
65.6 |
-8.3 |
- |
+ |
- |
9 |
3.5 |
111.2 |
85.7 |
119.9 |
46.0 |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
4.0 |
112.9 |
57.0 |
79.8 |
5.9 |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
4.5 |
118.1 |
27.8 |
66.0 |
-8.0 |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
5.0 |
97.6 |
10.3 |
71.8 |
-2.1 |
- |
- |
- |
EMS |
200 |
52.3 |
33.6 |
2628.9 |
2554.9 |
+ |
+ |
- |
MMS |
10 |
49.1 |
35.4 |
1088.4 |
1014.5 |
+ |
+ |
- |
C: Negative controls
RCE: Relative cloning efficiency = [(mean value positive cultures/mean value positive cultures of corresponding controls)*100]
RTG: Relative total growth = (RSG*RCE/100)
MF: Mutant frequency = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selected medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}*800
IMF: Induced mutatn frequency = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls
GEF: Global evaluation factor (126); +: GEF exceeded, -: GEF not exceeded
Statistical significance difference in mutant frequency compared to negative controls (Mann Whitney test, p<0.05). +: signficant; -: not significant.
B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene (µg/mL)
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate (µg/mL)
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate (µg/mL)
CLASTOGENICITY: All dose groups with and without metabolic activation were considered as not clastogenic under test conditions.
Main Experiment I and II – Colony sizing, with metabolic activation
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
Wells with at least 1 colony |
Large colonies |
Small colonies |
% small colonies |
C1 |
0 |
45 |
40 |
5 |
11.1 |
C2 |
0 |
45 |
43 |
2 |
4.4 |
8 |
8.0 |
53 |
48 |
5 |
9.8 |
9 |
9.0 |
57 |
44 |
13 |
22.8 |
10 |
10.0 |
83 |
67 |
16 |
19.3 |
B[a]P |
2.5 |
259 |
149 |
110 |
42.5 |
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
Wells with at least 1 colony |
Large colonies |
Small colonies |
% small colonies |
C1 |
0 |
49 |
45 |
4 |
8.2 |
C2 |
0 |
46 |
37 |
9 |
19.6 |
6 |
5.0 |
68 |
59 |
9 |
13.2 |
7 |
7.5 |
46 |
39 |
7 |
15.2 |
8 |
8.5 |
49 |
37 |
12 |
24.5 |
B[a]P |
3.5 |
204 |
106 |
98 |
48.0 |
Main Experiment I and II – Colony sizing, without metabolic activation
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
Wells with at least 1 colony |
Large colonies |
Small colonies |
% small colonies |
C1 |
0 |
51 |
42 |
9 |
17.6 |
C2 |
0 |
48 |
39 |
6 |
18.8 |
6 |
4.0 |
96 |
77 |
19 |
19.8 |
7 |
5.0 |
93 |
86 |
7 |
7.5 |
9 |
5.5 |
86 |
69 |
17 |
19.8 |
MMS |
10 |
166 |
92 |
74 |
44.6 |
Test Group |
Conc. [mM] |
Wells with at least 1 colony |
Large colonies |
Small colonies |
% small colonies |
C1 |
0 |
38 |
30 |
8 |
21.1 |
C2 |
0 |
41 |
34 |
4 |
17.1 |
10 |
4.0 |
48 |
40 |
8 |
16.7 |
11 |
4.5 |
42 |
34 |
8 |
19.0 |
12 |
5.0 |
38 |
33 |
5 |
13.2 |
MMS |
10 |
210 |
93 |
117 |
55.7 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Propyl Triacetoxy Silane (PTA) was considered to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells under test conditions.
- Executive summary:
The test item Propyl Triacetoxy Silane PTA was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thyamidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y according to OECD Guideline 476.
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiments was based on data from the toxicity pre-test. The Experiment I was performed as a 4h short-term exposure assay up to 10.0 mM with metabolic activation and up to 5.5 mM without metabolic activation test substance concentration. The Experiment II was performed as a 4h short-term exposure with metabolic activation up to 8.5 mM and as a 24h long-term exposure without metabolic activation up to 5.0 mM test concentration. No precipitation of the test item was noted in pre-experiment I and II and experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation. No toxicity was observed in pre-experiment I. However, this was not confirmed in the main test. In experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation growth inhibition was noted at highest doses. In experiment I and II no biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after treatment with the test item with and without metabolic activation. The Global Evaluation Factor (GEF, defined as the mean of the negative/vehicle mutant frequency plus one standard deviation) was not exceeded by the induced mutant frequency at any concentration. In experiment I without metabolic activation a dose dependent effect was observed. Additionally, in experiment I and II colony sizing showed no clastogenic effects induced by the test item under the experimental conditions (with and without metabolic activation). EMS, MMS and B[a]P were used as positive controls and showed distinct and biologically relevant effects in mutation frequency. Additionally, MMS and B[a]P significantly increased the number of small colonies, thus provind the efficiency of the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects.
In the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Propyl Triacetoxy Silane PTA is considered to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.