Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-940-8 | CAS number: 598-56-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
DMEA is corrosive for the skin and the eyes and irritating for the respiratory tract.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-Test: Two animals were treated for 1, 5, 15 min and 20 hours using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5x2.5 cm was covered with the liquid test substance. After the application time (1, 5, 15 min) the skin was washed with Lutrol (50%). The animals were observed for 8 days and skin changes were recorded daily. The report describes findings after 24 hours and at the end of the observation period (8 days). For a final evaluation, the findings after 48 and 72 hours from the raw data were taken into account.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.95 ang 3.47 kg - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Skin sites of the same animal served as control
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1, 5, 15 min and 20 h
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm - Irritation parameter:
- other: necrosis
- Basis:
- animal: #1 and 2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 1 min of exposure caused leathery to hard necrosis within 48 h. The 72 h reading is missing.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (corrosive)
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions, DMEA was considered as corrosive when applied topically to rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The acute dermal irritation of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) was evaluated in Vienna White rabbits. Two animals were treated for 1, 5, 15 min and 20 hours using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid test substance.
After the application time (1, 5, 15 min) the skin was washed with Lutrol (50%). The animals were observed for 8 days and skin changes were recorded daily. The report describes findings after 24 hours and at the end of the observation period (8 days). For a final evaluation, the findings after 48 and 72 hours from the raw data were taken into account.
Necrosis was observed at 24 hours that was not fully reversible in 8 days. One minute of exposure caused leathery to hard necrosis within 48 h.
Under the experimental conditions, DMEA was considered as corrosive when applied topically to rabbits.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: BASF-Test. 50 µl of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in 2 animals. The animals were observed after 10 min, 1 and 3 h on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. Findings were recorded daily. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours as specified in OECD Guideline 405.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.58 and 3.28 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: he adjacent eye served as control treated with 0.9 % NaCl (saline).
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 µl - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h - 48 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: 72 h reading is missing
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h - 48 h
- Score:
- 0.25
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: In one animal iritis was induced. 72 h reading is missing.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h - 48 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 72 h reading is missing
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h - 48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: 72 h reading is missing
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under these experimental conditions, DMEA was found to be corrosive when administered by ocular route to rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The potential of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) to induce ocular irritation was evaluated in Vienna White rabbits according to a protocol comparable to the OECD No 405. 50 µl of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in 2 animals. The animals were observed after 10 min, 1 and 3 h on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. Findings were recorded daily. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours. The animals were observed for 8 days.
At 24 and 48 h, the corneal score was 3, the iris score was 2, the chemosis score was 1.5 and the conjunctival score was 0.5. No reversibility was observed for crone and iris.
Under these experimental conditions, DMEA was found to be corrosive when administered by ocular route to rabbits.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: study well documented, meets accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Journal Officiel Francais, arrêté du 5 avril 1971
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: no data - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not rinsed
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 24, 48, 72, 96 hours and 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring scale
cornea: AxBx5
Iris: Ax5
Conjonctiva: (A+B+C)x2 - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not readable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.61
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Histology: DMEA induced an acute uveitis with acute keratitis
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under these experimental conditions, the substance DMEA (dimethylethylamine) has to be considered as corrosive.
- Executive summary:
- The acute eye irritation of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) was evaluated in rabbits according to the “Journal Officiel Français arrêté du 05 avril 1971”. 0,1mL of DMIPA was applied in the right eye and the reaction was observed 24, 48, 72, 96 hours and 7 days after administration.
Iris has never been examined because of the total corneal opacity from 24 hours. Maximal scores are recorded until the day7.
Under these experimental conditions, DMEA has to be classified as corrosive.
Referenceopen allclose all
Findings: animal1/animal2
Time | opacity | iritis | erythema | chemosis | |||||
1 h | 3/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/2 | |||||
24 h | 3/3 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 2/1 | |||||
48 h | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 2/1 | |||||
72 h | -/- | -/- | -/- | -/- | |||||
8 d | 3/- | 0/2 | 0/0 | 2/0 |
The original BASF grading was converted into the numerical grading according the OECD Draize system.
Mean values over 24 and 48 h (72 h reading is missing).
Animal1: Opacity: 3, Iritis: 0, Erythema: 0, Chemosis: 2;
Animal2: Opacity: 3, Iritis: 1, Erythema: 1, Chemosis: 1;
The substance led to severe corneal opacity. After 5 days heavy purulent exsudate was noted. At the end of the observation period after 8 days, one animal developed iritis. Severe corneal opacity and iritis are considered to be irreversible effects to ophthalmic tissue.
Reading |
|
Rabbit |
Mean |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||
24hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
84.3/100 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
||||||||
48hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
95.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
72hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
96.7/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
96hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
96.7/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
7days |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
95.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation
The acute dermal irritation of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) was evaluated in Vienna White rabbits (BASF 1973). Two animals were treated for 1, 5, 15 min and 20 hours using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid test substance. After the application time (1, 5, 15 min) the skin was washed with Lutrol (50%). The animals were observed for 8 days and skin changes were recorded daily. The report describes findings after 24 hours and at the end of the observation period (8 days). For a final evaluation, the findings after 48 and 72 hours from the raw data were taken into account.
Necrosis was observed at 24 hours that was not fully reversible in 8 days. One minute of exposure caused leathery to hard necrosis within 48 h. Under the experimental conditions, DMEA was considered as corrosive when applied topically to rabbits.
The acute dermal irritation of Dimethyethylamine (DMEA) was also evaluated in rabbits according to the “Journal Officiel Français, arrêté du 05 avril 1971 ” (Truhaut, 1976). 0.5 mL of DMIPA was applied during 24 hours in 6 rabbits on intact or scarified skin. The cutaneous reaction was observed 24 or 72 hours after the beginning of the application.
After application of the substance during 24 hours, the calculated erythema and edema scores were 1 and 0.67 for intact skin and 2.75 and 2.75 for abraded skin, respectively. Under these experimental conditions, DMEA has to be classified as mild irritant.
Eye irritation
The acute eye irritation of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) was evaluated in rabbits according to the "Journal Officiel Français arrêté du 05 avril 1971" (Truhaut 1976). Iris has never been examined because of the total corneal opacity from 24hours. Maximal scores are recorded until the day 7. Under these experimental conditions, DMEA has to be classified as corrosive.
The potential of Dimethylethylamine (DMEA) to induce ocular irritation was also evaluated in Vienna White rabbits according to a protocol comparable to the OECD No 405 (BASF 1973). 50 µl of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in 2 animals. The animals were observed after 10 min, 1 and 3 h on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. Findings were recorded daily. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours. The animals were observed for 8 days.
At 24 and 48 h, the corneal score was 3, the iris score was 2, the chemosis score was 1.5 and the conjunctival score was 0.5. No reversibility was observed for crone and iris.
Under these experimental conditions, DMEA was found to be corrosive when administered by ocular route to rabbits.
Respiratory tract irritation
The nasal irritation produced by Dimethylethylamine was studied using male Swiss OF1mice. Groups of six mice each were exposed to concentrations of DMEA ranging from 84 to 216 ppm in air for 15 min to determine the concentration at which the respiratory rate was decreased by 50% (RD50) (Gagnaire et al., 1989). The head of each mouse was isolated in an inhalation chamber, and the breathing frequency was measured with a pressure transducer before and during the exposure period. The RD50for Diisopropylamine was 161 ppm, and maximal effects were observed within 0.5 to 1 min.The authors also exposed groups of mice to 251 to 610 ppm of DMEA via tracheal cannulation for 120 min. The concentration that caused a 50% decrease in respiratory rate via this route (RD50TC) was 691 ppm.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex VI Table 3.1
Corrosive (category 1B, Causes severe skin burns and eye damage)
Self-classification according to EC Regulation 1272/2008 and GHS criteria
Corrosive (category 1A, Causes severe skin burns and eye damage)
Eye Damage (category 1, Causes serious eye damage.)
Specific target organ toxicity after single exposure (category 3, May cause respiratory irritation)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.