Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute oral toxicity

LD50 was estimated to be 4719.44mg/kg bw, when Sprague-Dawley rats male and female were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)orally.

Acute dermal toxicity

LD50 was estimated to be 4309.30mg/kg bw/day.  When male and female New Zealand White rabbits were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7) by dermal application.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: As mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
other: not specified
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name (IUPAC): 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid
- Molecular formula: C16H13NO7S2
- Molecular weight: 395.4107 g/mol
- Smiles notation: c1cc(cc(c1)S(=O)(=O)O)Nc2ccc3cc(cc(c3c2)O)S(=O)(=O)O
- InChl : 1S/C16H13NO7S2/c18-16-9-14(26(22,23)24)6-10-4-5-12(8-15(10)16)17-11-2-1-3-13(7-11)25(19,20)21/h1-9,17-18H,(H,19,20,21)(H,22,23,24)
- Substance type: Organic
-Physical state: light grey coloured crystalline solid
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data available
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Details on oral exposure:
No data available
Doses:
4719.44mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5male and 5 female
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
No data available
Statistics:
No data available
Preliminary study:
No data available
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
4 719.44 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 50% mortality was observed
Mortality:
No data available
Clinical signs:
No data available
Body weight:
No data available
Gross pathology:
No data available
Other findings:
No data available

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

((((((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" )  and ("e" and ( not "f") )  )  and ("g" and ( not "h") )  )  and "i" )  and ("j" and ( not "k") )  )  and "l" )  and ("m" and "n" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Overlapping groups OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, two aromatic attach [-N-] OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] OR Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Amine OR Aromatic compound OR Hydroxy compound OR Phenol OR Secondary amine OR Secondary aromatic amine OR Sulfonic acid OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >>  Michael-type addition, quinoid structures OR AN2 >>  Michael-type addition, quinoid structures >> Quinoneimines OR AN2 >> Nucleophilic addition to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds OR AN2 >> Nucleophilic addition to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds >> alpha, beta-Unsaturated Aldehydes OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation >> alpha, beta-Unsaturated Aldehydes OR Michael addition OR Michael addition >> Quinone type compounds OR Michael addition >> Quinone type compounds >> Quinone methides OR Non-specific OR Non-specific >> Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to structural analogy with  nucleoside bases    OR Non-specific >> Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to structural analogy with  nucleoside bases    >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion (indirect) OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion (indirect) >> Quinoneimines OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion >> Quinone methides OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Alkylation after metabolically formed carbenium ion species OR SN1 >> Alkylation after metabolically formed carbenium ion species >> Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic substitution on diazonium ions OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic substitution on diazonium ions >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related >> Epoxides and Aziridines OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic activation >> Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Michael addition OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Alkyl phenols OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Arenes OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Hydroquinones OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Polycyclic (PAHs) and heterocyclic (HACs) aromatic hydrocarbons-Michael addition OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Secondary aromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary aromatic amine by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Low (Class I) by Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as H-acceptor-path3-H-acceptor by in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS

Domain logical expression index: "k"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic diazo OR No alert found by in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS

Domain logical expression index: "l"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule Oasis ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "m"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.38

Domain logical expression index: "n"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 1.49

Interpretation of results:
other: Not classified
Conclusions:
LD50 was estimated to be 4719.44mg/kg bw, when Sprague-Dawley rats male and female were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)orally.
Executive summary:

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),LD50 was estimated to be 4719.44mg/kg bw, when Sprague-Dawley rats male and female were exposed with4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)orally.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
4 719.44 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: As mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
other: not specified
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name (IUPAC): 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid
- Molecular formula: C16H13NO7S2
- Molecular weight: 395.4107 g/mol
- Smiles notation: c1cc(cc(c1)S(=O)(=O)O)Nc2ccc3cc(cc(c3c2)O)S(=O)(=O)O
- InChl : 1S/C16H13NO7S2/c18-16-9-14(26(22,23)24)6-10-4-5-12(8-15(10)16)17-11-2-1-3-13(7-11)25(19,20)21/h1-9,17-18H,(H,19,20,21)(H,22,23,24)
- Substance type: Organic
-Physical state: light grey coloured crystalline solid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data available
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Details on dermal exposure:
No data available
Duration of exposure:
No data available
Doses:
4309.30 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 male and 10 female
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
No data available
Statistics:
No data available
Preliminary study:
No data available
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
4 309.3 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 50% mortality was observed
Mortality:
No data available
Clinical signs:
No data available
Body weight:
No data available
Gross pathology:
No data available
Other findings:
No data available

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

((((((((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" )  and ("e" and ( not "f") )  )  and ("g" and ( not "h") )  )  and ("i" and ( not "j") )  )  and ("k" and ( not "l") )  )  and ("m" and ( not "n") )  )  and "o" )  and ("p" and ( not "q") )  )  and ("r" and "s" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Overlapping groups OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, two aromatic attach [-N-] OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] OR Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Amine OR Aromatic compound OR Hydroxy compound OR Phenol OR Secondary amine OR Secondary aromatic amine OR Sulfonic acid OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Nucleophilic addition to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds OR AN2 >> Nucleophilic addition to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds >> alpha, beta-Unsaturated Aldehydes OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation >> alpha, beta-Unsaturated Aldehydes OR Michael addition OR Michael addition >> Quinone type compounds OR Michael addition >> Quinone type compounds >> Quinone methides OR Non-specific OR Non-specific >> Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to structural analogy with  nucleoside bases    OR Non-specific >> Incorporation into DNA/RNA, due to structural analogy with  nucleoside bases    >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion >> Quinone methides OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Alkylation after metabolically formed carbenium ion species OR SN1 >> Alkylation after metabolically formed carbenium ion species >> Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic substitution on diazonium ions OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic substitution on diazonium ions >> Specific Imine and Thione Derivatives OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related >> Epoxides and Aziridines OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic activation >> Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Michael addition OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Alkyl phenols OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Arenes OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Hydroquinones OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary aromatic amine by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Not possible to classify according to these rules by DPRA Cysteine peptide depletion

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as High reactive OR High reactive >> alpha,beta-carbonyl compounds with polarized multiple bonds OR High reactive >> Vinyl pyridines by DPRA Cysteine peptide depletion

Domain logical expression index: "k"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements

Domain logical expression index: "l"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth OR Halogens OR Metalloids OR Rare Earth OR Transition Metals by Groups of elements

Domain logical expression index: "m"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Group 14 - Carbon C AND Group 15 - Nitrogen N AND Group 16 - Oxygen O AND Group 16 - Sulfur S by Chemical elements

Domain logical expression index: "n"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Group 15 - Phosphorus P by Chemical elements

Domain logical expression index: "o"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule Oasis ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "p"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Not categorized by Repeated dose (HESS)

Domain logical expression index: "q"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as 3-Methylcholantrene (Hepatotoxicity) Alert OR Aromatic hydrocarbons (Liver enzyme induction) Rank C OR Oxyphenistain (Hepatotoxicity) Alert OR Phenols (Mucous membrane irritation) Rank C OR Tamoxifen (Hepatotoxicity) Alert by Repeated dose (HESS)

Domain logical expression index: "r"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.38

Domain logical expression index: "s"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 2.14

Interpretation of results:
other: Not classified
Conclusions:
LD50 was estimated to be 4309.30mg/kg bw/day. When male and female New Zealand White rabbits were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7) by dermal application.
Executive summary:

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated for 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7).LD50 was estimated to be 4309.30mg/kg bw/day. When male and femaleNew Zealand White rabbits were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7) by dermal application.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
4 309.3 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)

Additional information

Acute oral toxicity

In different studies, 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),LD50 was estimated to be 4719.44mg/kg bw, when Sprague-Dawley rats male and female were exposed with4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)orally.

 In another experimental study given by U.S. National Library of Medicine (ChemIDplusA TOXNET Database, 2017) on structurally similar read across substance2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid (120-18-3). Acute oral toxicity study was done in rat using 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid (120-18-3). 50% mortality was observed at dose 4440 mg/kg bw. Hence, LD50 was considered to be 4440mg/kg body weight. When rats were treated with 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid (120-18-3) orally.

 In another experimental study given by IFA GESTIS (GESTIS SUBSTANCE Database (information system in hazardous substance of the Berufsgenossenscheftn),2017) on structurally similar read across substance6-Amino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic Acid (90-51-7).Acute oral toxicity study was done in 10 rat using 6-Amino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic Acid (90-51-7). No mortality was observed in 14 days at dose 5000 mg/kg bw . Hence, LD50was considered to be>5000mg/kgbody weight. When rats were treated with 6-Amino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic Acid (90-51-7) orally.

Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is 4719.44mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7) can be “Not classified” for acute oral toxicity.

 

Acute dermal toxicity

In different studies,4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rabbits for4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated for 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7).LD50 was estimated to be 4309.30mg/kg bw/day. When male and female New Zealand White rabbits were exposed with 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7) by dermal application.

In experimental study given byIFA GESTIS (GESTIS SUBSTANCE Database (information system in hazardous substance of the Berufsgenossenscheftn),2017)on structurally similar read across substance Cyanuric acid (108-80-5). An acute dermal toxicity study of Cyanuric acid(108-80-5) was carried out on New Zealand White rabbits. A group of 5 male and 5 female rabbits were given a single dose of 5000mg/kg bw test material ground with a mortar and pestle and moistened with physiological saline, on the dorsal Surface. Before application the skin on the dorsal surface of each animal was shaved with an electric clipper and abraded with a hypodermic needle. Test material was held in place by means of an occlusive wrap of latex rubber secured by bandaging and elastic tape. The occlusive wrap was removed after approximately 24 hours and the excess material was wiped from the animal. Clinical observations were made three times during the first eight hours following test material administration and twice daily (morning and afternoon) thereafter, with the exceptions of one day when observations were only recorded once and another day when observations were only recorded once for nine of the animals. Body weights were recorded on days a (day of exposure), 7, and 14.No mortality was observed at dose 5000mg/kg bw. At necropsy, one male animal had pale colored kidneys, one female animal had kidneys with pale, mottled exteriors, and another female had tapeworm cysts in the mesentery. None of these effects were attributed to toxicity of the test material. Also no clinical abnormalities were observed. Therefore LD 50 was considered to be >5000 mg/kg .When rabbits treated with Cyanuric acid (108-80-5) by dermal application.

 

In experimental study given byU.S. National Library of Medicine (ChemIDplusA TOXNET Database, 2017)on structurally similar read across substance Methanesulfonic Acid (75-75-2).Acute dermal toxicity study was done in rats using test material Methanesulfonic Acid (75-75-2).No mortality was observed at dose 2000mg/kg bw. Hence LD50 was considered to be >2000mg/kg body weight. When guinea pigs were treated with Methanesulfonic Acid (75-75-2) by dermal application.

 Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7),and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 4309.30value is mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)can be “Not classified” for acute dermal toxicity.

 

 

Justification for classification or non-classification

Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP 4-hydroxy-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid (25251-42-7)can be “Not classified” for acute oral and dermal toxicity.

Categories Display