Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-122-3 | CAS number: 106185-75-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1 to 5 february 1999
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictons. The measured concentrations were outside the 80-120% range. Therefore the results were expressed as means of measured concentrations.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.5400 (Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II) (January 2012)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0 (control and vehicle control), 0.65, 1.3, 2.5, 5, 10
- Sampling method: at 0-hour, 10 mL samples were collected from each parent solution. At 96-hours, composite samples were collected from each test substance and control treatment. The abiotic control flask was also sampled at this time. The 96-hours samples were centrifuged in glass culture tubes to remove the algal biomass. Samples at concentration below 0.300 mg/L were diluted with acetonitrile to a final concentration of 50%; samples above 0.65 mg/L were diluted in 80:20 acetonitrile: ABC reagent water (v:v) such that the concentration of analyte in the final extracts was within the range of the standard reference curve. Quality control fortifications samples (spikes) were prepared by spiking 10.0 mL of control water with Super Radjanol. Spikes were prepared at concentrations braketing the range of nominal concentrations of the test substance treatments. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): DMF
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) including control(s)): 100 µL/L
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): no evidence of undissolved material - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Selenastrum capricornatum
- Strain: 99-A5-SEL
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Departement of Botany, Culture collection of algae, University of Texas, Austin
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 6 days old
- Method of cultivation: the parent stock of algae were received growing on an agar slant contained in a culture tube and was assigned ABC lot 98-1648-4. Periodically, new Selenastrum capricornatum culture was initiated using a portion of this parent stock or cloned for an existing culture derived from the parent stock in 100 mL of autoclaved culture medium.
ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same as test - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- no post exposure obsrvation period.
- Test temperature:
- 22.4 to 22.9 °C at test initiation
23.4 to 24.3 °C at test termination
The test temperature was within the range specified in the protocol (24 ± 2°C) - pH:
- 7.5 to 7.6 at test initiation
8.4 to 8.7 at test termination - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0, 0.65, 1.3, 2.5, 5, 10 mg a.i/L
Measured concentrations (arithmetic means of T=0 and T=96h) : 0, 0.44, 0.8, 1.2, 2.6, 3.6 - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks fitted with foam stoppers
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Continuous agitation, agitation rate = 100 rpm
- Initial cells density: 1x104 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 1.7x106 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 3
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: prepared in ABC reagent water which is defined as reverse osmosis/deionized water passed through carbon, ion exchange and organic adsorption cartridges and filtered through a 0.2 µm hollow fiber final filter to produce a 16-18 megaohms.cm water
- Metals: < 0.1 mg/L
- Pesticides: < 4 µL
- Chlorine: < 0.025 mg/L
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no adjustement
- Light intensity and quality: continuous cool white fluorescent lighting (4000 lux)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: hematocytometer and Olympus Model BH-2 microscope
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0 (control and vehicle control), 0.1, 1, 10, 20 ,40 mg a.i/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: After 96 hours of incubation, percent decrease in cell density as compared to the vehicle control was 10, 76, 82 and 87% at 1, 10, 20 and 40 mg/L respectively. No cells were counted at 0.1 mg/L indicating a possible poor inoculation of this flask.
See table 1: Measured concentrations of Super Radjanol in media sampled during a 96-hour static test with the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 2.1 - 2.8 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.44 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- Table 1: Mean cell numbers (as determined by Hemacytometer) during a 96-hour continuous exposure of the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum, to Super Radjanol under static test conditions
Table 2: Calculated EC50 values based on mean measured concentrations for the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum, exposed to Super Radjanol under static conditions
Table 3: Daily cell counts of the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum, during a 96-hour static exposure to Super Radjanol - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- no positive control
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 96-hour EC50 was estimated to be 2.5 mg a.i/L with 95% confidence limits of 2.1 and 2.8 mg/L
The NOEC was 0.44 mg a.i/L - Executive summary:
In a 96 hour acute toxicity study, the cultures of Selenastrum capricornatum were exposed to the test item at measured concentrations of 0 (control and vehicle control), 0.44, 0.80, 1.2, 2.6, 3.6 mg a.i./L under static conditions in accordance with the EPA OPPTS 850.5400 guideline. The EC50 and NOEC values based on cell density were 2.5 and 0.44 mg a.i./L, respectively. The % growth inhibition in the treated algal culture as compared to the vehicle control ranged from 12 to 56.
There were no compound-related phytotoxic effects.
This toxicity study is considered as acceptable and satisfies with the guidelines requirements for freshwater green alga toxicity study.
Results Synopsis
Test Organism: Freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum
Test Type (Flowthrough, Static, Static Renewal): static
96-hr EC50: 2.5 mg a.i./L 95% C.I.: 2.1 to 2.8 mg a.i./L
96-hr NOEC: 0.44mg a.i./L
Endpoint(s) Effected: inhibition growth
Reference
Table 1: Mean cell numbers (as determined by Hemacytometer) during a 96-hour continuous exposure of the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornatum, to the test item under static test conditions
Measured concentrations (mg/L) |
Mean cell number (x104) /mLa |
Percent inhibitionb |
||||
Day 0 |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
||
Control |
1.11 |
2.00 |
8.62 |
27.7 |
172 |
-- |
Vehicle control |
1.00 |
1.63 |
7.64 |
25.6 |
146 |
-- |
0.44 |
-- |
1.30 |
7.41 |
26.7 |
128 |
12 |
0.80 |
-- |
1.07 |
4.59 |
28.2 |
113 |
23d |
1.2 |
-- |
1.15 |
4.41 |
26.7 |
94.0 |
36d |
2.6 |
-- |
1.18 |
3.41 |
13.1 |
67.3 |
54d |
3.6 |
-- |
0.96 |
2.85 |
7.61 |
64.2c |
56d |
a: Values are mean of triplicate test chambers.
b: Percent inhibition is determined against the vehicle control at 96 -hours as: %inhibition = ((cells/mL of vehicle control - cells/mL of treatment)/ (cells/mL of vehicle control)) x 100
c: Replicate C was an outlier and was not included in the mean calculation
d: Significant reduction in growth compared to the vehicle control (α = 0.05)
Table 2: Calculated EC50values based on mean measured concentrations for the freshwater green alga,Selenastrum capricornatum, exposed to the test item under static conditions
EC50time period |
EC50value (mg a.i/L) |
95% confidence limit (mg a.i/L) |
RMSEb |
R2 |
24 |
26a |
0-191 |
18.2 |
6.80 |
48 |
1.7 |
0.75-2.7 |
16.3 |
37.5 |
96 |
2.7 |
2.2-3.2 |
27.5 |
61.0 |
120 |
2.5 |
2.1-2.8 |
5.93 |
90.1 |
a: greater than the highest concentration tested
b: Root Mean Square Error. Smaller values indicate a better fit of the regression line. The minimum possible value is 0.0
Table 3: Daily cell counts of the freshwater green alga, Selenastrum capricornutum, during a 96-hour static exposure to the test item
Mean measured concentrations (mg/L) |
REP |
Cells per mL (x104) |
||||
0-hour |
24-hour |
48-hour |
72-hour |
96-hour |
||
Control |
A |
1.11 |
1.78 |
8.00 |
30.0 |
172 |
B |
1.00 |
2.11 |
7.67 |
34.0 |
173 |
|
C |
1.22 |
2.11 |
10.2 |
19.0 |
171 |
|
Vehicle control |
A |
1.00 |
1.56 |
3.89 |
27.8 |
157 |
B |
0.89 |
2.11 |
10.7 |
10.8 |
139 |
|
C |
1.11 |
1.22 |
8.33 |
31.0 |
141 |
|
0.437 |
A |
-- |
1.78 |
5.22 |
19.5 |
133 |
B |
-- |
0.67 |
5.67 |
25.5 |
116 |
|
C |
-- |
1.44 |
5.33 |
35.0 |
134 |
|
0.796 |
A |
-- |
1.11 |
2.11 |
39.5 |
106 |
B |
-- |
0.89 |
7.56 |
24.3 |
111 |
|
C |
-- |
1.22 |
4.11 |
20.8 |
123 |
|
1.25 |
A |
-- |
1.11 |
4.67 |
18.8 |
84.8 |
B |
-- |
1.33 |
3.22 |
24.0 |
97.5 |
|
C |
-- |
1.00 |
5.33 |
37.3 |
99.8 |
|
2.6 |
A |
-- |
1.33 |
3.56 |
11.3 |
65.0 |
B |
-- |
0.89 |
3.33 |
13.5 |
59.5 |
|
C |
-- |
1.33 |
3.33 |
14.5 |
77.5 |
|
3.59 |
A |
-- |
1.00 |
3.67 |
13.5 |
66.8 |
B |
-- |
1.22 |
3.22 |
8.33 |
61.5 |
|
C |
-- |
0.76 |
1.67 |
1.00 |
8.00 |
Description of key information
The substance exhibits an 96h-EC50 for freshwater algae of 2.5 mg/L and a 96h-NOEC of 0.44 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 2.5 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 0.44 mg/L
Additional information
One experimental study and one QSAR are available to determine the toxicity to aquatic algae.
Malorin, 1999
In a 96-hour acute toxicity study, cultures of Selenastrum capricornatum were exposed to Super Radjanol at nominal concentrations of 0, 0.65, 1.3, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/L under static conditions in accordance with the EPA OPPTS 850.5400 guideline. The concentrations of the test item (with and without algae) were determined by HPLC at the start and at the end of the test. The NOEC and EC50 values based on growth rate were 0.44 and 2.5 mg/L, respectively.
This toxicity study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirement for growth inhibition of algae study.
Thomas, 2015
A QSAR model was used to predict the inhibition of growth to algae of the test item 2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-(2E)-buten-1-ol. This QSAR has been validated to be compliant with the OECD recommendations for QSAR modeling (OECD, 2004) and predicts the endpoint value which would be expected when testing the substance under experimental conditions in a laboratory following Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test" (1), referenced as Method C.3 of Commission Regulation No. 440/2008 (2). The first criterion predicted was the NOECr (No Observed Effect Concentration for specific growth rate), a tested concentration which is expected to cause no effect on intrinsic rate of growth of the test system within a period of 72 hours. The other predicted criterion was the ErC50(Median Effective Concentration for specific growth rate), a statistically derived concentration which is expected to cause 50% inhibition of intrinsic rate of growth of the test system within a period of 72 hours.
The QSAR models are based on validated data for a training set of 40 chemicals derived from 72-hour ErC50and 31 chemicals derived from 72-hour NOECr test on algae, for which the concentrations of the test item had been determined by chemical analyses over the test period.
The 72h-ErC50 of 2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol to algae was predicted as 1.4 mg/L.
The 72h-NOErC of 2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)but-2-en-1-ol to algae was predicted as 0.49 mg/L.
This toxicity study is considered acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirements for growth inhibition of algae study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.