Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-056-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 Aug - 26 Sep 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Health Care Inspectorate of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Type of assay:
- other: In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the thymidine kinase gene
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexanedioic acid, di-C16-18-alkyl esters
- EC Number:
- 296-703-7
- EC Name:
- Hexanedioic acid, di-C16-18-alkyl esters
- Cas Number:
- 92969-90-9
- Molecular formula:
- not applicable, substance is UVCB
- IUPAC Name:
- Hexanedioic acid, di-C16-18 (even numbered)-alkyl esters
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- L5178Y/TK(+/-)-3.7.2C
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, USA)
- Suitability of cells: The cell line is the recommended test system in international guidelines.
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Per culture 8 x 10E6 cells (10E6 cells/mL for 3 hour treatment) or 6 x 10E6 cells (1.25 x 10E5 cells/mL for 24 hour treatment) were used. The cell cultures for the 3 hour treatment were placed in sterile 30 mL centrifuge tubes, and incubated in a shaking incubator at 37.0 ± 1.0°C and 145 rpm. The cell cultures for the 24 hour treatment were placed in sterile 75 cm² culture flasks at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C.
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively), 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 2 mM L-glutamin. The growth and exposure medium contained 10 and 5% inactivated horse serum in addition, respectively.
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: Prior to dose range finding and mutagenicity testing the mouse lymphoma cells were grown for 1 day in growth medium containing 10E-4 M hypoxanthine (Sigma), 2 x 10E-7 M aminopterine (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland) and 1.6 x 10E-5 M thymidine (Merck) (HAT-medium) to reduce the amount of spontaneous mutants, followed by a recovery period of 2 days on growth medium containing hypoxanthine and thymidine only. After this period cells were returned to growth medium for at least 1 day before starting the experiment.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
With and without S9 mix: 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512 and 1600 µg/mL (3 h)
Experiment II
Without S9 mix: 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512 and 1600 µg/mL (24 h) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: 10E6 cells /mL for 3 h treatment and 1.25 x 10E5 cells/mL for 24 h treatment
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h with and without metabolic activation and 24 h without metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time: 11 or 12 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Trifluorothymidine (5 µg/mL)
STAIN: MTT (0.5 µg/mL)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1 replications each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative suspension growth, cloning efficiency, relative survival and relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency (MF) should be evaluated for its biological relevance including comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126 x 10E-6.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner (significant in a trend test). A Cochran Armitage trend test (p < 0.05) was performed to test whether there is a significant trend in the induction (ToxRat Professional v 3.2.1). An observed increase should be biologically relevant and was compared with the historical control data range.
A test item is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if: none of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126. - Statistics:
- A Cochran Armitage trend test (p < 0.05) was performed to test whether there is a significant trend in the induction (ToxRat Professional v 3.2.1).
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- at 1600 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- at 52 µg/mL after 24 h treatment
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- observed at 1600 µg/mL (3 h treatment); and observed at 164, 512 and 1600 µg/mL (24 h treatment)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH at a concentration of 512 µg/mL was 7.27 and in the solvent control 7.29. Therefore pH was not considered to have interfered with the results.
- Effects of osmolality: The osmolality at a concentration of 512 µg/mL was 0.440 Osm/kg and in the solvent control 0.449 Osm/kg. Therefore the osmolality was not considered to have interfered with the results.
- Precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 1600 µg/mL and above for the 3 h treatment and at concentrations ≥ 164 µg/mL for the 24 h treatment.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the dose range-finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with test substance concentrations of 17, 52, 164, 512 and 1600 μg/mL in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24 hour treatment periods; and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3-hour treatment period (see Table 1-2 under' Any other information on results incl. tables'). Both in the absence and presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test item concentration of 1600 μg/mL, compared with the suspension growth of the solvent control, as measured after 3 and 24 hours of treatment. Based on this range-finding study, test substance concentrations of 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512 and 1600 µg/mL were chosen for the mutation experiments.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The mutation frequency of 710 (3 h, -S9), 1916 (3 h, +S9) and 681 (24 h, -S9) found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database.
3 h treatment without metabolic activation: Mean = 857; SD = 246; n = 110; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 1425; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = 289
24 h treatment without metabolic activation: Mean = 688; SD = 187; n = 102; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 1124; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = 253
3 h treatment with metabolic activation: Mean = 1710; SD = 815; n = 139; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 4214; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = -793
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The mutation frequency of the solvent control cultures in the 3 h-treatment experiment observed in the absence of S9-mix (MF of 137) and in the presence of S9-mix (MF of 146) were just above the upper control limits. These limits are 95% control limits and a slightly higher response is within the expected response ranges, according to the author of the study report. Furthermore, the solvent control was tested in duplicates and the mean of the MF was within the historical control range and considered to be valid. The mutation frequency of 125 and 113 in the 24 h-treatment experiment was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical control database, and valid.
3 h treatment without metabolic activation: Mean = 86; SD = 23; n = 220; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 135; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = 37
24 h treatment without metabolic activation: Mean = 81; SD = 26; n = 202; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 135; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = 28
3 h treatment with metabolic activation: Mean = 87; SD = 28; n = 273; Upper control limit (95% control limits) = 145; Lower control limit (95% control limits) = 28
OTHER:
Results
In the second mutation experiment (24 h treatment), the test substance induced an up to 2.3-fold increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus at the non-precipitating dose level of 52 μg/mL (MF = 272). This result was above the global evaluation factor (GEF) of (245 x 10E6), and therefore indicative of a positive result. The test item showed up to 2.6- and 1.6-fold increases in the mutation frequency of the small and large colonies, respectively, compared with the mean mutation frequency of the small and large colonies of the respective solvent controls. At the precipitating dose levels from 164 μg/mL, an increase in the mutation frequency was observed. However, the MF was 176 x 10E6 at 164 μg/mL, 194 x 10E6 at 512 µg/mL and 192 x 10E6 at 1600 µg/mL, which is below the GEF. A statistical significant dose related trend (p<0.001) was observed following the 24-h treatment, and considered to be biologically relevant (the concentrations for which this trend was observed were not given in the study report) (see Table 3-4 under' Any other information on results incl. tables').
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Dose range-finding test: Cytotoxicity of the test substance (3 h treatment)
Dose (µg/mL) | Cell count after 24 h of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
Cell count after 48 h of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
Suspension growth (cells/mL x 105) |
Relative suspension growth (%) |
Without metabolic activation | ||||
DMSO | 5.1 | 7.0 | 18 | 100 |
17 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 19 | 105 |
52 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 19 | 108 |
164 P | 6.2 | 6.5 | 20 | 113 |
512 P | 5.6 | 6.5 | 18 | 102 |
1600 P | 5.3 | 6.8 | 18 | 101 |
With metabolic activation | ||||
Solvent control | 3.9 | 6.7 | 13 | 100 |
17 | 4.7 | 6.8 | 16 | 122 |
52 | 4.1 | 7.6 | 16 | 119 |
164 P | 4.7 | 6.1 | 14 | 110 |
512 P | 4.5 | 7.0 | 16 | 121 |
1600 P | 4.0 | 7.4 | 15 | 113 |
P = Precipitation
Table 2: Dose range-finding test: Cytotoxicity of the test substance (24 h)
Dose (µg/mL) | Cell count after 24 h of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
Cell count after 48 h of subculture (cells/mL x 105) |
Suspension growth (cells/mL x 105) |
Relative suspension growth (%) |
Without metabolic activation | ||||
DMSO | 10.5 | 6.2 | 42 | 100 |
17 | 10.1 | 6.5 | 42 | 100 |
52 | 9.8 | 6.4 | 40 | 95 |
164 P | 9.1 | 6.1 | 36 | 86 |
512 P | 9.6 | 6.0 | 37 | 88 |
1600 P | 7.9 | 6.2 | 31 | 74 |
P = Precipitation
Table 3: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of the test substance in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system (3 h treatment)
Dose (µg/mL) | Relative suspension growth (%) |
Cloning efficiency day 2 (%) |
Relative survival day 2 (%) |
Relative total growth (%) |
Mutation frequency per 106survivors total |
Mean MF + GEF (126 x 10-6) | GEF exceeding |
Without metabolic activation | |||||||
DMSO | 100 | 76 | 100 | 100 | 137 | 247.5 | - |
DMSO | 78 | 106 | |||||
0.54 | 95 | 88 | 114 | 108 | 91 | - | no |
1.7 | 79 | 99 | 129 | 102 | 85 | - | no |
5.4 | 75 | 72 | 94 | 71 | 168 | - | no |
17 | 86 | 89 | 115 | 99 | 101 | - | no |
52 | 85 | 85 | 111 | 94 | 118 | - | no |
164 | 84 | 93 | 121 | 101 | 90 | - | no |
512 | 82 | 90 | 117 | 96 | 89 | - | no |
1600 P | 77 | 85 | 111 | 85 | 101 | - | no |
MMS | 78 | 58 | 76 | 59 | 710 | - | yes |
With metabolic activation | |||||||
DMSO | 100 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 144 | 271 | - |
DMSO | 74 | 146 | |||||
0.54 | 60 | 93 | 120 | 73 | 129 | - | no |
1.7 | 104 | 79 | 103 | 107 | 143 | - | no |
5.4 | 106 | 76 | 98 | 104 | 109 | - | no |
17 | 107 | 76 | 98 | 105 | 139 | - | no |
52 | 98 | 101 | 131 | 129 | 122 | - | no |
164 | 96 | 89 | 115 | 111 | 132 | - | no |
512 | 89 | 108 | 141 | 125 | 91 | - | no |
1600 P | 80 | 108 | 141 | 113 | 89 | - | no |
MMS | 36 | 36 | 47 | 17 | 1916 | - | yes |
P = Precipitation
MMS = Methylmethanesulfonate
CP = Cyclophosphamide
Table 4: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of the test susbtance in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system (24 h treatment)
Dose (µg/mL) | Relative suspension growth (%) |
Cloning efficiency day 2 (%) |
Relative survival day 2 (%) |
Relative total growth (%) |
Mutation frequency per 106survivors total |
Mean MF + GEF (126 x 10-6) | GEF exceeding |
Without metabolic activation | |||||||
DMSO | 100 | 97 | 100 | 100 | 125 | 245 | - |
DMSO | 88 | 113 | |||||
0.54 | 89 | 101 | 110 | 97 | 148 | - | no |
1.7 | 96 | 104 | 113 | 108 | 195 | - | no |
5.4 | 93 | 94 | 102 | 95 | 182 | - | no |
17 | 105 | 102 | 111 | 116 | 206 | - | no |
52 | 124 | 83 | 90 | 112 | 272 | - | yes |
164 P | 114 | 88 | 95 | 108 | 176 | - | no |
512 P | 123 | 91 | 99 | 122 | 194 | - | no |
1600 P | 102 | 93 | 101 | 103 | 192 | - | no |
MMS | 123 | 85 | 92 | 113 | 681 | - | yes |
P = Precipitation
MMS = Methylmethanesulfonate
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.