Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 277-381-7 | CAS number: 73324-01-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation: not irritant
Eye irritation: not irritant
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From December 17 to January 9, 1980
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The test was conducted by means of Read Across approach. The reliability of the source study report is 2. Further information was attached at section 13
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-5 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: IVANOVAS
- Age at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Weight at study initiation:
- Housing: metal cage
- Diet: standard rabbit food - NAFAG ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10 %
- Photoperiod : 10 hours light cycle dark/light - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and scarified
- Vehicle:
- other: propylene glycol + saline (70 : 30 parts)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 g of the test material
- Concentration: 50 % - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour
- Observation period:
- 7 days
- Number of animals:
- 3 male and 3 female
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used:The patches were covered with an impermeable material and were fastened to the body of the rabbit with adhesive tape. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 164, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 165, 166, 167, 168
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: No signs of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 164, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 165, 166, 167, 168
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: No signs of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Non irritant
- Executive summary:
The substance has been tested According to EPA OPP 81 -5 guideline. Under the conditions of the present experiment the test item was found to cause no irritation when applied to intact and abraded rabbit skin according to the Regulation EC n. 1272/2008.
Reference
Due to intensive staining by the test compound erythema was not assessable. For the purpose of calculating the primary irritation index erythema was assumed to be equal to edema based on the correlation existing (Marzulli and Maibach, Fol. Cosm. Tox. 13, 355, 1975).
Evaluation of the skin reactions
TIME | After 24 h | After 49 h | After 72 h | ||||||||||||||||
SEX | MALE | FEMALE | MALE | FEMALE | MALE | FEMALE | |||||||||||||
Animal N° | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | |
Erythema | a | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Edema | a | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | a | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Mean | a | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Group mean | a | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
TIME | After 4 days | After 7 days | |||||||||||||||||
SEX | MALE | FEMALE | MALE | FEMALE | |||||||||||||||
Animal N° | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | |||||||
Erythema | a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Edema | a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Total | a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Mean | a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Group mean | a | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
b | 0 | 0 |
mean reaction score | |||||
time after exposure | erythema | edema | |||
intact skin |
abraded skin |
intact skin |
abraded skin |
||
24 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
total | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.6 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- October 3, 1979
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The test was conducted by means of Read Across approach. The reliability of the source study report is 2. Further information was attached at section 13
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-4 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- - Source: IVANOVAS
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Housing:individually in metal cages
- Diet: rabbit food - NAFAG, No. 814, Gossau SG ad libitum.
- Water: Sterile filtered water was available at all times.
- Acclimation period: 4 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 1°C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 10 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 10 hour light cycle day. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 g
After 30 seconds the compound was, as far as possible, flushed out of the eyes of three of the rabbits with approximately 10 ml. of physiological saline - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- After 30 seconds the compound was, as far as possible, flushed out of the eyes of three of the rabbits with approximately 10 ml. of physiological saline
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The rabbits were examined 1, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- The test was performed on 3 male and 3 female adult rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
The eye irritation was appraised with a slit-lamp on day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: 167, 168, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no signs of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: 167, 168, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no signs of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal: 167
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal: 168, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no signs of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: 167, 168, 169
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no signs of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Non irritant
- Executive summary:
The substance has been tested for eye irritation according to (EPA) § 163.81-4 "Primary eye irritation study". According to the Regulation EC n. 1272/2008 the test material was found to cause no irritation when applied to the rabbit eye mucosa.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
SKIN IRRITATION/CORROSION
A corrosive substance is a substance that produces destruction of skin tissue, namely, visible necrosis through the epidermis and into the dermis, in at least 1 tested animal after exposure up to 4 hour duration.
Three subcategories are provided within the corrosive category 1:
Subcategory 1A where responses are noted following up to 3 minutes exposure and up to 1 hour observation;
Subcategory 1B where responses are described following exposure between 3 minutes and 1 hour and observations up to 14 days;
Subcategory 1C where responses occur after exposures between 1 hour and 4 hours and observations up to 14 days
To classify a substance as irritant, the major criterion is that at least 2 of 3 tested animals have a mean score of ≥ 2,3 - ≤ 4,0.
Category 2:
- Mean value of ≥ 2,3 - ≤ 4,0 for erythema/ eschar or for oedema in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal or, if reactions are delayed, from grades on 3 consecutive days after the onset of skin reactions; or
- Inflammation that persists to the end of the observation period normally 14 days in at least 2 animals, particularly taking into account alopecia (limited area), hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, and scaling; or
- In some cases where there is pronounced variability of response among animals, with very definite positive effects related to chemical eposure in a single animal but less than the criteria above.
EYE IRRITATION
Serious eye damage means the production of tissue damage in the eye, or serious physical decay of vision, following application of a test substance to the anterior surface of the eye, which is not fully reversible within 21 days of application.
Eye irritation means the production of changes in the eye following the application of test substance to the anterior surface of the eye, which are fully reversible within 21 days of application.
Irreversible effects on the eye (Category 1):
If, when applied to the eye of an animal, a substance produces:
- at least in one animal effects on the cornea, iris or conjunctiva that are not expected to reverse or have not fully reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days; and/ or
- at least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of corneal opacity ≥ 3 and/or iritis > 1,5 calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material.
These observations include animals with grade 4 cornea lesions and other severe reactions (e.g., destruction of cornea) observed at any time during the test, as well as persistent corneal opacity, discoloration of the cornea by a dye substance, adhesion, pannus, and interference with the function of the iris or other effects that impair sight. In this context, persistent lesions are considered those which are not fully reversible within an observation period of normally 21 days. Substances are also classified in Category 1 if they fulfil the criteria of corneal opacity ≥ 3 or iritis > 1,5 detected in a Draize eye test with rabbits, recognising that such severe lesions usually do not reverse within a 21-day observation period.
The substance does not meet the requirements to be classified in Category 1.
Irritating to eyes (Category 2)
when applied to the eye of an animal, a substance produces:
- at least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of: corneal opacity ≥ 1 and/or iritis ≥ 1, and/or conjunctival redness ≥ 2 and/or conjunctival oedema (chemosis) ≥ 2
calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material, and which fully reverses within an observation period of 21 days.
Based on the results obtained in the skin and eye irritation studies, the test substance does not need to be classified for skin and eye irritation according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.