Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 261-406-3 | CAS number: 58725-33-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15.Nov.2007-19.Nov.2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- On demand of the sponsor, evaluation of the biodegradation behaviour of the test item was made without consideration of the 10-day-window.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test item
Name Palmitoyl proline
Batch no. 1184 JGO
Appearance Solid, white
Composition Palmitoyl proline, palmitic acid (8.6%), salts
CAS NO. 5944 1-32-6
ENECS-NO. 2617-63-5
Molecular formula unknown
Molecular weight unknown
Purity approx. 90%
Homogeneity homogeneous
Vapour pressure unkown
Stability H2O, EtOH, acetone, acetonitrile, DMSO unknown
Solubility H2O, EtOH, acetone, acetonitrile, DMSO unknown
Production date 12/2006
Expiry date 12/2007
Storage room temperature 20 +/- 5 C
Hazard information none stated
R-phrases none stated
S-phrases none stated
Storage
The test item was stored in a closed vessel at room temperature
Preparation
The organic carbon content of 71.4% was determined by elemental analysis. The test item was used directly.
Reference item
Aniline (Phenylamine, C6H5NH2, CAS-Nr. 62-53-3) was used as reference item. A stock solution containing 2.1 g/L (nominal) in deionised water was prepared and its organic carbon content was measured with 1638 ppm, resulting in an organic carbon content of the reference item of 77.9%. - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- Test System
Specification Activated sludge from a biologic sewage treatment plant was used. The chosen plant is treating mostly domestic sewage.
Source and Pre-Treatment
The sludge was taken from the activation basin of the ESN (Stadtentsorgung Neustadt) sewage treatment plant, Im Altenschemel, NW-Lachen-Speyerdorf. Date of Collection: 09. Nov. 2007, batch no: O911 2007.
The sludge was filtrated, washed with tap water twice, then washed with and re-suspended in test medium. It was then aerated for > 12 hours. The dry matter was determined with 4180 mg suspended solids/litre. - Duration of test (contact time):
- ca. 29 d
- Initial conc.:
- ca. 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: organic carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- Preparations
The medium was prepared from the stock solutions. The inoculum was taken from its Source, washed, aerated and the dry matter was determined.
The test vessels were filled with medium and inoculum. Then all flasks were aerated for more than 24 hours with purified, CO2-free, moistened air to purge the system of CO2.
Experimental parameters
Flask Volume 1 500 mL
Controls 2, containing mineral medium and inoculum
Reference flaskS 2, containing reference item, mineral medium and inoculum
Test flaskS 2, containing test item, mineral medium and inoculum
Abiotic Control 1, containing test item, mineral medium and HgCl2
Toxicity control 1, containing test item, reference item, mineral medium and inoculum
Inoculum concentration: 25.1 mg/L
Temperature 22 +/- 2 °C
Duration 28 days
The test was performed with a nominal start concentration of 20 mg organic carbon/L.
Apparatus
The test vessels were aerated with CO2-scrubbed air. Magnetic stirrers were used to prevent deposition of inoculum.
The emitted CO2 was trapped in 0.25-m-NaOH. Two scrubbers containing 100 mL each Were Connected in Series to the test vessels. The initial C value of the 0.25 m-NaOH was determined as 6.85 ppm.
Sampling
From each front scrubber flask, nine samples were taken in order to determine the emitted CO2. (on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22 and 29). The sample volume was 1 mL. The resulting change in the volume of the front flask was considered in the calculation of emitted CO2.
On day 28, 5 mL HCI 2-m. were added to each test flask in order to drive off dissolved CO2. On day 29, samples from both scrubber flasks were taken.
CO2 determination
Analyses of the emitted CO2 were made by IC measurement using the carbon analyser TOC 5050A (Shimadzu). Each sample was diluted as necessary and then measured at least three times. The carbon analyser was calibrated with freshly prepared reference solutions (containing a mixture of Na2CO3 and NaHCO3) after every start. - Reference substance:
- aniline
- Test performance:
- The IC content of the test item solution in medium was higher than demanded in the guideline. This is due to the fact that the test item is very poorly soluble in water: The concentration of the solution was 1.041 g/L, corresponding to an organic carbon content of 743 ppm. The carbon content was measured with 21.02 ppm, with IC (inorganic carbon) content being 3.75 ppm. The measured IC corresponds to 0.5% of nominal TC. Therefore, the result is considered valid.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- ca. 99
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The test item palmitoyl proline is considered as biodegradable.
The degree of biodegradation reached 99% after 28 days.
The abiotic degradation reached 16%. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Remarks:
- without consideration of the 10 day-window
- Conclusions:
- All validity criteria were met.
Degradation values of more than 100% were calculated. This is due to the fact that the measurement errors of test flasks and control flasks add up when using the equation proposed in the guideline.
lf degradation in the toxicity flask is below 25% after 14 days, the test item can be considered as toxic towards the inoculum. As degradation in the toxicity flask was 86% after 14 days, the test item can be stated as "not toxic towards the inoculum in a concentration of 28 mg/L".
The test item showed biodegradation, but not the typical behaviour of a readily biodegradable Substance with exponential phase and plateau, but rather a continuous degradation within 28 days. Biodegradability is given, as the test item showed complete biodegradation within 28 days.
Both replicates of the test item showed good correspondence at the end of the test, whereas the difference between replicates was high from day 4 to day 22. The measured values in the back scrubber flasks showed significant variation, leading to the good Correspondence on day 29. Unfortunately, the IC in the back scrubber flasks is measured on day 29 only, so that it can not be stated when the CO2 was absorbed in the back scrubber. Normally, CO2 doesn't pass the front scrubber flask; only if emission is very high, part of the CO2 reaches the back scrubber. It may be that fast emission took place at the begin of the test, but in Test 1, all CO2 could be absorbed in the front scrubber flask, whereas in Test 2, part of the CO2 was caught in the back scrubber only. This could be an explanation for the difference within replicates. - Executive summary:
The test item was tested using a concentration of nominally 20 mg organic carbon/L (corresponding to 28 mg Palmitoyl proline/L) in test medium following OECD 301 B and EU-Method C4-C. Aniline was chosen as reference item. Activated sludge was used as inoculum (concentration in the test 25.1 mg dry matter/L). The test was left running for 28 days. All validity criteria were met. Degradation of the reference item was 75% after six days.
The following data were determined for the test item: degradation at the end of the test 99% pass level: 60%
Therefore Palmitoyl proline is biodegradable following OECD 301 B/EU C.4-C.
Reference
Description of key information
All validity criteria were met.
Degradation values of more than 100% were calculated. This is due to the fact that the measurement errors of test flasks and control flasks add up when using the equation proposed in the guideline.
lf degradation in the toxicity flask is below 25% after 14 days, the test item can be considered as toxic towards the inoculum. As degradation in the toxicity flask was 86% after 14 days, the test item can be stated as "not toxic towards the inoculum in a concentration of 28 mg/L".
The test item showed biodegradation, but not the typical behaviour of a readily biodegradable Substance with exponential phase and plateau, but rather a continuous degradation within 28 days. Biodegradability is given, as the test item showed complete biodegradation within 28 days.
Both replicates of the test item showed good correspondence at the end of the test, whereas the difference between replicates was high from day 4 to day 22. The measured values in the back scrubber flasks showed significant variation, leading to the good Correspondence on day 29. Unfortunately, the IC in the back scrubber flasks is measured on day 29 only, so that it can not be stated when the CO2 was absorbed in the back scrubber. Normally, CO2 doesn't pass the front scrubber flask; only if emission is very high, part of the CO2 reaches the back scrubber. It may be that fast emission took place at the begin of the test, but in Test 1, all CO2 could be absorbed in the front scrubber flask, whereas in Test 2, part of the CO2 was caught in the back scrubber only. This could be an explanation for the difference within replicates.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.