Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 228-544-6 | CAS number: 6291-84-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation toxicity study for target chemical was performed by Michael Murphey-Corb et al.( Environmental Mutagenesis , 1983)to determine the mutagenic nature of N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine (6291-84-5).Genetic toxicity in vitro study for N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was assessed for its possible mutagenic potential. For this purpose Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46. No mutagenic effect were observed .Therefore N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was considered to be non mutagenic. Hence the test substance cannot be classified as gene mutant in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mention below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To evaluate the mutagenic potential of N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material : (3-aminopropyl)(methyl)amine; 3-Amino-1-methylaminopropane
- Molecular formula : C4H12N2
- Molecular weight : 88.1528 g/mol
- Smiles notation : N(CCCN)C
- InChl : 1S/C4H12N2/c1-6-4-2-3-5/h6H,2-5H2,1H3
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Liquid - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Not specified
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Not specified
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Not specified
- Rationale for test conditions:
- Not specified
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation was done considering a dose dependent increase in the number of revertants/plate.
- Statistics:
- Not specified
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- The test substance result was considered to be negative when tested seprately.While oligoamine-nitrate reaction mixtures produce mutagenic effect in all strain tested for mutagenicity.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic effect were observed.
- Conclusions:
- N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine (6291-84-5)was evaluated for its mutagenic potential inSalmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46. The test result was observed to be negative.
- Executive summary:
Genetic toxicity in vitro study for N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was assessed for its possible mutagenic potential. For this purpose Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46. No mutagenic effect were observed .Therefore N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was considered to be non mutagenic. Hence the test substance cannot be classified as gene mutant in vitro.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutation - in vitro
Various publications were reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of (3-aminopropyl) (methyl) amine; 3-Amino-1-methylaminopropane Other name; N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine (6291-84-5). The studies are as summarised below:
Gene mutation toxicity study for target chemical was performed by Michael Murphey-Corb et al.( Environmental Mutagenesis , 1983)to determine the mutagenic nature of N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine (6291-84-5).Genetic toxicity in vitro study for N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was assessed for its possible mutagenic potential. For this purpose Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains TA 1950 (hisG46, uvrB} ; TS24 (hisG46,recA); TA1537 (hisC3076, uvrB, $a); TA1538 (hisD3052, uvrB, $a}; TA1952(hisC3076, uvrB); and mutant hisG46. No mutagenic effect were observed .Therefore N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine was considered to be non mutagenic. Hence the test substance cannot be classified as gene mutant in vitro.
In a study for structurally and functionally similar read across chemical, Gene mutation toxicity study was performed by Errol Zeiger et al.( Environmental Mutagenesis, 1987)to determine the mutagenic nature of Iminobis 3isopropylamine (56-18-8). The read across substances share high similarity in structure and log kow .Therefore, it is acceptable to derive information on mutation from the analogue substance. Genetic toxicity study for Iminobis 3isopropylamine was assessed for its mutagenic potential .For this purpose Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed on Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537.The test material was exposed at the concentration of 0,33,100,333,1000 and1666µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9.No mutagenic effect were observed. Therefore Iminobis 3 isopropylamine was considered to be non mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 in the presence and absence of S9. Hence the substance cannot classify as gene mutant in vitro.
In a study for structurally and functionally similar read across chemical, Gene mutation toxicity study was performed by Errol Zeiger et al.( Environmental Mutagenesis, 1987)to determine the mutagenic nature of Dimethylamine (124-40-3). The read across substances share high similarity in structure and log kow .Therefore, it is acceptable to derive information on mutation from the analogue substance. Genetic toxicity study for Dimethylamine was assessed for its mutagenic potential .For this purpose Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed on Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537.The test material was exposed at the concentration of -S9;0,33,100,333,1000 and 3333µg/plate in the absence of S9 while 0,10,100,333,1000,2000,3333 and 4500 µg/plate in the presence of S9.No mutagenic effect were observed.Therefore Dimethylamine was considered to be non mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 in the presence and absence of S9. Hence the substance cannot classify as gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across substance and applying weight of evidence (3-aminopropyl) (methyl) amine; 3-Amino-1- methylaminopropane Other name; N-Methyl-1,3-propanediamine (6291-84-5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Thus based on the above annotation and CLP criteria for the target chemical . (3-aminopropyl) (methyl) amine; 3-Amino-1- methylaminopropane Other name; N-Methyl- 1,3- propanediamine (6291-84-5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.