Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-870-1 | CAS number: 111-44-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 August 1989 to 5 September 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: dichloroethylether, Lot# 641
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Standard strain / species
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Inc., Frederick, MD.
- Age at study initiation: 8.5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 29.0 - 38.0 grams (males), 22.4 - 30.5 grams (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: Polycarbonate cages, up to 5 animals per cage.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Certified Laboratory Chow® #5002
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least seven days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 72±6°F
- Humidity (%): 50±20%
- Air changes (per hr): not specified
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 15 August 1989 To: 5 September 1989
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Single dose
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single dose
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- The test article dosed animals were euthanised at 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration of the test article. The positive and vehicle control animals were euthanatized 24 hours after the administration of the control articles.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- Vehicle control
- Dose / conc.:
- 18 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Single dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 60 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Single dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 180 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Single dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: dose of 80 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tibial bone marrow PCEs
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: The dose levels used in this assay were based upon the results of a previously conducted dose range finding assay.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): The test article dosed animals were euthanised 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration of the test article. The positive and vehicle control animals were euthanised 24 hours after the administration of the control articles.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: At the appropriate harvest time, the animals were euthanised with CO2 and the adhering soft tissue and epiphyses of both tibiae were removed. The marrow was flushed from the bone and transferred to centrifuge tubes containing 3 mL fetal calf serum (one tube for each animal). Following centrifugation to pellet the tissue, most of the supernatant was drawn off, the cells were resuspended, and the suspension spread on slides and air-dried. The slides were then fixed in methanol, stained in May Gruenwald solution followed by Giemsa, and rinsed in deionized water. After being air-dried, the slides were coverslipped using Depex® mounting medium.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: The coded slides were then scored for micronuclei and the polychromatic (PCE) to normochromatic (NCE) cell ratio. Standard forms were used to record these data. One thousand PCEs per animal were scored. The frequency of micronucleated cells as expressed as percent micronucleated cells based on the total PCEs present in the scored optic field. The normal frequency of micronuclei in this mouse strain is about 0.0-0.4%. The frequency of PCEs versus NCEs was determined by scoring the number of NCEs observed in the optic fields while scoring the 1000 PCEs for micronuclei. - Evaluation criteria:
- The criteria for the identification of micronuclei were those of Schmid (1976). Micronuclei were darkly stained and generally round, although almond and ring-shaped micronuclei occasionally occur. Micronuclei had sharp borders and were generally between 1/20 and 1/5 the size of the PCE. The unit of scoring was the micronucleated cell, not the micronucleus; thus the occasional cell with more than one micronucleus was counted as one micronucleated PCE, not two (or more) micronuclei. The staining procedure permitted the differentiation by colour of PCEs and NCEs (bluish-grey and red, respectively).
The criteria for determining a positive response involved a statistically significant dose-related increase in micronucleated PCEs, or the detection of a reproducible and statistically significant positive response for at least one dose level. A test article that induced neither a statistically significant dose response nor a statistically significant and reproducible increase at one dose level was considered negative. In either case, the final decision was based on scientific judgment. - Statistics:
- Data were tabulated with individual animal results and these data were summarized by sex and dose group at the different time points. The analysis of the data was performed using an Analysis of Variance on the square root arcsine transformation which was performed on the proportion of cells with micronuclei per animal (square root arcsine proportion). Once the Analysis of Variance had been performed, Tukey's Studentized range test (HSD) with adjustment for multiple comparisons was used at each harvest time to determine which dose groups, if any, were significantly different from the vehicle control. Analyses were performed separately for each harvest time and sex combination, and also at each harvest time for the sexes combined.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- All animals were observed immediately after dosing and periodically throughout the duration of the assay for toxic symptoms and/or mortalities. All animals appeared normal after dosing and remained healthy until the appropriate harvest times. The test article, DCEE, induced no significant increases in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes over the levels observed in the vehicle controls in either sex or at any of the harvest times. The positive control, CP, induced significant increases in micronucleated PCEs in both sexes, with means and standard errors of 0.68% ± 0.21% and 0.96% ± 0.28% for the males and females, respectively. The individual animal data are found in Tables 1 through 3 and are summarized by dose group in Table 4.
Any other information on results incl. tables
MICRONUCLEUS DATA SUMMARY TABLE
TREATMENT |
DOSE |
HARVEST TIME (HR) |
% MICRONOCLEATED PCEs |
RATIO PCE:NCE |
|||
MALES |
FEMALES |
TOTAL |
MALES |
FEMALES |
|||
VEHICLE CONTROL |
10.0 ml/kg |
24 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.02 ± 0.02 |
0.03 ± 0.02 |
0.58 ± 0.06 |
0.73 ± 0.08 |
POSITIVE CONTROL |
80.0 mg/kg |
24 |
0.68 ± 0.21* |
0.96 ± 0.28* |
0.82 ± 0.17* |
0.75 ± 0.10 |
0.79 ± 0.14 |
TEST ARTICLE |
18.0 Mg/kg |
24 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.10 ± 0.05 |
0.07 ± 0.03 |
0.50 ± 0.04 |
0.71 ± 0.04 |
48 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.20 ± 0.08 |
0.12 ± 0.05 |
0.48 ± 0.04 |
0.86 ± 0.09 |
||
72 |
0.00 ± 0.00 |
0.06 ± 0.04 |
0.03 ± 0.02 |
0.77 ± 0.07 |
0.68 ± 0.12 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.0 mg/kg |
24 |
0.06 ± 0.04 |
0.02 ± 0.02 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.56 ± 0.07 |
0.78 ± 0.13 |
|
48 |
0.02 ± 0.02 |
0.16 ± 0.07 |
0.09 ± 0.04 |
0.50 ± 0.03 |
0.70 ± 0.13 |
||
72 |
0.08 ± 0.04 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.06 ± 0.02 |
0.51 ± 0.04 |
0.95 ± 0.09 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 mg/kg |
24 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.12 ± 0.06 |
0.08 ± 0.03 |
0.56 ± 0.14 |
0.82 ± 0.15 |
|
48 |
0.12 ± 0.06 |
0.06 ± 0.04 |
0.09 ± 0.03 |
0.51 ± 0.06 |
0.76 ± 0.12 |
||
72 |
0.04 ± 0.02 |
0.10 ± 0.05 |
0.07 ± 0.03 |
0.51 ± 0.08 |
0.75 ± 0.08 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Significantly greater than the corresponding negative control, p<0.05 |
|
|
|
|
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material, DCEE, did not induce a significant increase in micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes under the conditions of this assay and is considered negative in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this in vivo assay was to evaluate the ability of the test article, DCEE, to induce micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes of ICR mice. The test article was solubilized in corn oil and dosed by oral gavage at 18, 60, and 180 mg/kg, based upon the results of a previously conducted dose range finding assay. Ten animals (five males and five females) were randomly assigned to each dose/harvest time group. Vehicle and positive control groups euthanatized 24 hours after dosing were included in the assay. The animals were dosed with the test article and were euthanaised 24, 48 and 72 hours after dosing for extraction of the bone marrow. The test material, DCEE, did not induce a significant increase in micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes under the conditions of this assay and is considered negative in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.