Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-282-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
skin irritation/corrosion (OECD 404): not irritating
eye irritation (OECD 437): not irritating
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in Apr 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004/73/EC
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Behörde für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales, Hamburg, Germany
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Himalayan
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: approx. 5.5 - 6.5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2 - 2.5 kg
- Housing: animals were kept singly in cages (400 mm x 500 mm x 370 mm) before and after exposure, singly in restrainers during exposure
- Diet: ssniff K-H V233 (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 14 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 4 to 14 days - Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² on the dorsal area of the trunk
- Type of wrap: The treated skin was covered with a gauze patch, which was held in place with a non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 12 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 12 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- of 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- An erythema (grade 1) was observed in animal #1 and #2 from 24 h to 11 and 13 days, respectively, after patch removal. An erythema (grade 1) was observed in animal #3 from 1 h to 11 days after patch removal.
- Other effects:
- Induration of the skin was observed in animal #1 7 to 9 days after patch removal.
There were no systemic intolerance reactions. - Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this skin irritation study in rabbits the test substance was not irritating to the skin.
- Executive summary:
The skin irritation potential of the test substance was determined by an in vivo skin irritation test in rabbits according to OECD Guideline 404 and in compliance with GLP (2004). A dose of 0.5 mL of the test substance was applied to the skin of three rabbits under semi-occlusive conditions for 4 hours. After the exposure period the patch was removed and the skin sites were evaluated. Scores were taken 60 minutes, 24, 48, 72 hours and 4 to 14 days after patch removal. An erythema (grade 1) was observed in two animals (no. 1 and 2) from 24 h to 11 and 13 days, respectively, after patch removal. An erythema (grade 1) was observed in animal no. 3 from 1 h to 11 days after patch removal. In addition, induration of the skin was observed in animal no. 1 from Day 7 to 9. No systemic intolerance reactions were observed. Based on the results, the test substance was not irritating to the skin under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Table 1. Results of the skin irritation study.
Observation time |
Rabbit no. |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
|
1 h |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
24 h |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
48 h |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
72 h |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Mean value |
1.00 |
0 |
1.00 |
0 |
1.00 |
0 |
4 days |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 days |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 days |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 days |
1 |
0# |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
8 days |
1 |
0# |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
9 days |
1 |
0# |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
10 days |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
11 days |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
12 days |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 days |
- |
- |
1 |
0 |
- |
- |
14 days |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 Feb 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hess. Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Species:
- other: cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Schlachthof Bensheim, Bensheim, Germany
- Characteristics of donor animals: at least 9 month old
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: The isolated eyes were transported in Hank's Buffered Salt Solution (HBSS) with streptomycin / penicillin at ambient temperature.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: The corneae were isolated on the same day after delivery of the eyes and directly used in the BCOP test on the same day.
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: All eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity and scratches were discarded. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL
POSITIVE SUBSTANCE
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Applied volume: 0.75 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 min at 32 ± 1 °C
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 2 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- triplicates for each treatment and control group
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS:
The cornea was carefully removed from the eye using scalpel and rounded scissors. A rim of about 2 mm of tissue (sclera) was left for stability and handling of the isolated cornea. Each cornea was mounted in a specially designed cornea holder.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS:
At the end of the equilibration period, the basal opacity was determined (t0). Each cornea with a value of a basal opacity >7 was discarded.
TREATMENT METHOD:
The cornea holder consists of anterior and posterior compartments, which interface with the epithelial and endothelial sides of the cornea, respectively. The endothelial side of the cornea was positioned against the sealing ring (O-ring) of the posterior part of the holder. The cornea was gently flattened over the O-ring but stretching was avoided. The anterior part of the holder was positioned on the top of the cornea and fixed in place with screws. Both compartments of the holder were filled with incubation medium. The posterior compartment was filled first to return the cornea to its natural convex position. After equilibration for about 1 hour, the anterior compartment received the test substance or the controls on the surface of the corneae. The corneae were incubated in a horizontal position at 32 ± 1 °C in the water-bath for 10 minutes.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3 corneae per test group
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE:
The test substance was rinsed off from the application side with saline.
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: 2 h in a vertical position
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Corneal opacity was determined by the amount of light transmission through the cornea via an opacitometer (OP_KiT opacitometer, Electro Design, France).
- Corneal permeability: The passage of sodium fluorescein dye was measured with the aid of a microplate reader (Versamax Molecular Devices) at 490 nm (OD490).
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS), IVIS = opacity value + (15x OD490 value)
DECISION CRITERIA:
Test substance with an IVIS > 55 was regarded as serious eye damage and labelled Category 1according to CLP/EPS/GHS.
Test substance with an IVIS ≤ 3 was regarded as non-irritant and labelled in no category.
Test substance with an IVIS > 3; ≤ 55: no prediction can be made. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- mean value of 3 corneae
- Value:
- 0
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- With the negative control (saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed (mean IVIS = 0.38).
The positive control (2-ethoxyethanol) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae (mean IVIS = 77.72) corresponding to a classification as serious eye damaging.
Relative to the negative control, the test item did not cause an increase of the corneal opacity or permeability (mean IVIS = 0.0) and thus the test substance is not categorized.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The negative control resulted in opacity and permeability values that were less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The positive control resulted in an IVIS which was within two standard deviations of the current historical mean. - Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the BCOP assay the test substance was not irritating to the eye. Application of the test substance to bovine corneae resulted in a calculated mean IVIS of 0.00.
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined in a bovine corneal opacity and permeability test (BCOP test) according to OECD Guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP (2015). After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae, the neat test substance was applied directly to the epithelial surface of three cattle corneae in an incubation chamber in horizontal position for 10 min at 32 ± 1 °C. After the incubation phase the test substance was rinsed from the corneae. Further, the corneae were incubated for another 120 min at 32 ± 1 °C in a vertical position, while the anterior chamber contained incubation medium as well. Afterwards, opacity was measured a second time. In addition, the permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of sodium fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 min at 32 ± 1 °C. The results of the opacity and permeability measurement of the test substance were used to calculate an in vitro irritation score (IVIS) of 0.00. With the negative control saline neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be served. The mean IVIS of the negative control was 0.38. The mean IVIS of the positive control (2-ethoxyethanol) was 77.72. Based on the results, the test substance was not irritating to the eye under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Table 2. Results after 10 min incubation time.
Test group |
Opacity value = |
Permeability at 490 nm (OD490) |
IVIS |
Mean IVIS |
||
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
Negative control |
0 |
-0.33 |
0.049 |
0.048 |
0.74 |
0.38 |
0 |
0.048 |
0.72 |
||||
-1 |
0.046 |
-0.31 |
||||
Positive control |
67.33* |
0.950* |
81.59 |
77.72 |
||
70.33* |
0.754* |
81.65 |
||||
56.33* |
0.906* |
69.93 |
||||
Test substance |
0.33* |
0.001* |
0.35 |
0.00 |
||
-0.67* |
-0.001* |
-0.68 |
||||
-0.67* |
-0.005* |
-0.74 |
*: corrected values
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin
The skin irritation potential of the test substance was determined by an in vivo skin irritation test in rabbits according to OECD Guideline 404 and in compliance with GLP (2004). A dose of 0.5 mL of the test substance was applied to the skin of three rabbits under semi-occlusive conditions for 4 hours. After the exposure period the patch was removed and the skin sites were evaluated. Scores were taken 60 minutes, 24, 48, 72 hours and 4 to 14 days after patch removal. An erythema (grade 1) was observed in two animals (no. 1 and 2) from 24 h to 11 and 13 days, respectively, after patch removal. An erythema (grade 1) was observed in animal no. 3 from 1 h to 11 days after patch removal. In addition, induration of the skin was observed in animal no. 1 from Day 7 to 9. No systemic intolerance reactions were observed. Based on the results, the test substance was not irritating to the skin under the conditions of the test.
Eye
The eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined in a bovine corneal opacity and permeability test (BCOP test) according to OECD Guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP (2015). After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae, the neat test substance was applied directly to the epithelial surface of three cattle corneae in an incubation chamber in horizontal position for 10 min at 32 ± 1 °C. After the incubation phase the test substance was rinsed from the corneae. Further, the corneae were incubated for another 120 min at 32 ± 1 °C in a vertical position, while the anterior chamber contained incubation medium as well. Afterwards, opacity was measured a second time. In addition, the permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of sodium fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 min at 32 ± 1 °C. The results of the opacity and permeability measurement of the test substance were used to calculate an in vitro irritation score (IVIS) of 0.00. With the negative control saline neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be served. The mean IVIS of the negative control was 0.38. The mean IVIS of the positive control (2-ethoxyethanol) was 77.72. Based on the results, the test substance was not irritating to the eye under the conditions of the test.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on skin and eye irritation of the test substance do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
