Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-714-7 | CAS number: 86-98-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- data is from peer reviewed journals
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Teratologic assessment of the test chemical in rats
- Author:
- K.S. Khera et.al
- Year:
- 1 979
- Bibliographic source:
- Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 1979
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Teratogenicity studies were conducted in rats treated orally from days 6-15 of gestation with single daily doses of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethoxyquin
- EC Number:
- 202-075-7
- EC Name:
- Ethoxyquin
- Cas Number:
- 91-53-2
- Molecular formula:
- C14H19NO
- IUPAC Name:
- 6-ethoxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Name of the test chemica: Ethoxyquin
IUPAC: 6-ethoxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline
Molecular Formula: C14H19NO
Molecular Weight: 217.307 g/mol
Substance Type: Organic
Physical State: Liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g; (F1) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g : females: 175-225 g in body weight
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: test doses, representing the levels of the composite samples and not the active ingredients, on a per kg basis were 125, 250 or 500 mg of the test chemical suspended in corn oil
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water):
- Concentration in vehicle: The volume of vehicle or vehicle plus chemical was 10 ml/kg body weight.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): The volume of vehicle or vehicle plus chemical was 10 ml/kg body weight. - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: Female Wistar rats were paired overnight with proven males, and the morning that a positive vaginal smear was observed was counted as day 1 of gestation.
- Length of cohabitation:
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy: Female Wistar rats were paired overnight with proven males, and the morning that a positive vaginal smear was observed was counted as day 1 of gestation. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- day 6- day 15 of gestation,
- Frequency of treatment:
- single time daily
- Details on study schedule:
- no data available
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Twenty mated females, randomly selected, were assigned to each experimental group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- no data available
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes / No / No data: yes
- Time schedule:
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule:
BODY WEIGHT: Yes / No / No data: yes
- Time schedule for examinations:Females were weighed at frequent intervals during gestation.
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: [yes/no]
- If yes, maximum of [...] pups/litter ([...]/sex/litter as nearly as possible); excess pups were killed and discarded.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1 / F2 / F3] offspring:
[number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities, anogenital distance (AGD), pup weight on the day of AGD, presence of nipples/areolae in male pups, other. Particular attention should be paid to the external reproductive genitals which should be examined for signs of altered development; gross evaluation of external genitalia]
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
[no / yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was/was not determined for pups born or found dead]
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY:
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. as soon as possible after the last litters in each generation were produced.]
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. after the last litter of each generation was weaned.]: On the 22nd day of gestation, each dam was killed, its uterine contents removed, its
number of corpora lutea determined, and was then necropsied.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]: On the 22nd day of gestation, each
dam was killed, its uterine contents removed, its number of corpora lutea determined, and was then necropsied.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals and all F2 offspring were sacrificed at [#?] days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows:
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively.: The fetuses were weighed and examined for viabilitand external malformations. Early resorptions
or implantation sites and fetuses dying at a late stage in their development, were recorded. Two-thirds of the live fetuses from each litter were examined for skeletal development after alizarin red staining. The remainder, fixed in Bouin's fluid, were dissected to study visceral anomalies. - Statistics:
- To determine effects on maternal body weight, the mean and standard error were calculated for each experimental group, and values of t_ were obtained for test and control group differences in means. Fetal values were analysed with the litter as the basic unit. The proportion (p_) of litter having a particular attribute was calculated and transformed to a normally distributed variable arc sin/p_ value . The mean and standard error of these values for various.test groups were then derived . The t_ test was used for comparison of test and the respective control values.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No sign of toxicity was noticed during pregnancy, in any treatment or control group
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Any adverse effect on maternal body weight was noticed during pregnancy, in any treatment or control group
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No adverse effect was related to any treatment were observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Number of females pregnant in the different test groups varied within the control range and was unrelated to treatment.Resorption of fetuses at 125 mg/kg was increased, although not significantly .
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive performance
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence of anomalous fetuses in the 250 mg/kg group was borderline significant (p--0 .05). The was noted that this was most likely not significant in relation to the absence of significant findings in the 500mg/kg dose group
- Other effects:
- not specified
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No signs of toxicity or any adverse effects were seen in the dams . Resorption of fetuses at 125 mg/kg was increased, although not significantly. The incidence of anomalous fetuses in the 250 mg/kg group was borderline significant (p--0 .05). It was noted that this was most likely not significant in relation to the absence of significant findings in the 500 mg/kg dose group. Hence, the NOAEL can be considered to be 500 mg/kg/day for maternal rats and fetus.
- Executive summary:
Teratogenicity studies were conducted in rats treated orally from days 6-15 of gestation with single daily doses of the test chemical. Pregnant female Wistar rats (20 per group) received the following test doses of the test chemical suspended in com oil once per day by esophageal intubation: 0, 125, 250, or 500 mg/kg from day 6 to 15 of gestation. On the 22nd day of gestation, dams were killed and uterine contents were removed and analyzed . Females were weighed at frequent intervals during gestation. On the 22nd day of gestation, each dam was killed, its uterine contents removed, its number of corpora lutea determined, and was then necropsied. The fetuses were weighed and examined for viability nd external malformations. Early resorptions or implantation sites and fetuses dying at a late stage in their development, were recorded. Two-thirds of the live fetuses from each litter were examined for skeletal development after alizarin red staining. The remainder, fixed in Bouin's fluid, were dissected to study visceral anomalies. No signs of toxicity or any adverse effects were seen in the dams . Resorption of fetuses at 125 mg/kg was increased, although not significantly. The incidence of anomalous fetuses in the 250 mg/kg group was borderline significant (p--0 .05). It was noted that this was most likely not significant in relation to the absence of significant findings in the 500 mg/kg dose group. Hence, the NOAEL can be considered to be 500 mg/kg/day for maternal rats and fetus.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.