Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Classification & Labelling & PBT assessment

PBT assessment

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

PBT assessment: overall result

PBT status:
the substance is not PBT / vPvB
Justification:

Classification of (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate for effects in the environment:

 

The chemical (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate (CAS no. 104-65-4) is used as a flavouring agent in foods and as a fragrances indecorative cosmetics, fine fragrances, shampoos, toilet soaps and other toiletries as well as in non-cosmetic products such as household cleaners and detergents.. The aim was to assess whether the PBT criterion within Annex XIII was fulfilled for (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate. The PBT criterion was herein assessed based on experimental data in conjunction with standardized environmental fate models. Here follows a description of the PBT assessment.

 

Persistence assessment

The tested substance does not fulfil the P criterion within Annex XIII based on the assessment that here follows:

 

Biotic degradation

Biodegradability of test chemical (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate (CAS no. 104 -65 -4) was determined by using OECD QSAR tool box v3.3 with log Kow as primary descriptor. The test chemical (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate showed 92.40 % degradation by considering BOD as parameter and Microorganisms as inoculum in aerobic condition in 28 days. On the basis of percent degradation value in 28 days it is concluded that this test chemical is readily biodegradable.

 

Estimation Programs Interface Suite (EPI suite, 2017) was run to predict the biodegradation potential of the test compound (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate (CAS no. 104 -65 -4) in the presence of mixed populations of environmental microorganisms. The biodegradability of the substance was calculated using seven different models such as Linear Model, Non-Linear Model, Ultimate Biodegradation Timeframe, Primary Biodegradation Timeframe, MITI Linear Model, MITI Non-Linear Model and Anaerobic Model (called Biowin 1-7, respectively) of the BIOWIN v4.10 software. The results indicate that chemical (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate is expected to be readily biodegradable.

 

Experimental results from the similar substances (CAS: 122-40-7 and 122-70-3) also indicate that they are readily biodegradable.

 

Environmental fate

According to the fugacity model levels III, the most likely environmental fate for this test chemical is soil (i.e.estimated to 73.5%). In soil,(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formatewas expected to have moderate to slow mobility based upon a Log KOC value ranging from 2.0 to 2.6389. The half-life in soil (30 days estimated by EPI suite) indicates that the chemical is not persistent in soil and the exposure risk to soil dwelling animals is moderate to low.

 

If released in to the environment, 26.0% of the chemical will partition into water according to the Mackay fugacity model level III in EPI suite version 4.1 (2017). However, the half-life (15 days estimated by EPI suite) indicates that the chemical is not persistent in water and the exposure risk to aquatic animals is moderate to low.

 

Moreover, its persistent characteristic is only observed in the sediment compartment but Fugacity modelling shows that sediment is not an important environmental fate (less than 1% when estimated by EPI Suite version 4.1).

 

Hence it has been concluded thatchemical(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formateis not persistent in nature.

 

Bioaccumulation assessment

The tested substance does not fulfil the B criterion within Annex XIII based on the assessment that here follows:

 

Theestimated BCF value from authoritative database was determined to be in the range from 13.5 to 34.12, respectively and theoctanol water partition coefficient of the test chemical is 2.3 which is less than the threshold of 4.5. If this chemical is released into the aquatic environment, there should be a low risk for the chemical to bioaccumulate in fish and food chains.

 

Toxicity assessment

The tested substance does not fulfil the T criterion within Annex XIII based on the assessment that here follows:

 

Mammals

The tested chemical is regarded to be not classified for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and reprotoxicity, Further, there is no evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the classifications STOT (repeated exposure), category 1(oral, dermal, inhalation of gases/vapours, inhalation of dust/mist/fume) or category 2 (oral, dermal, inhalation of gases/vapours, inhalation of dust/mist/fume).

 

Aquatic organisms

All of the available short-term eco-toxicity estimations for invertebrates and algae for the substance indicates the LC50/EC50 value to be in the range 148.28 – 228.17 mg/L. These value suggest that the substance is not likely to be hazardous to Aquatic organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and can be considered to be ‘not classified’ as per the CLP regulation.

 

There are no available long-term toxicity evaluations for (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl formate. By speculation, long-term NOEC for aquatic organisms were not expected for the substance at concentration below 0.01 mg/L based on the data mentioned above.

 

The chemical was therefore not considered as hazardous to aquatic environments as per the criteria set out in Annex XIII.

 

 

Conclusion

Based on critical, independent and collective evaluation of information summarized herein, the tested compound does not fulfil the P, B and T criterion and has therefore not been classified as a PBT compound within Annex XIII.