Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-127-1 | CAS number: 7440-18-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 9277:2010(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: AA_LP_814_BET_08
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 14488:2007(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 13320:2009(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: SAA_Troken_DISP, SAA LB2000
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- Laser scattering/diffraction
- Type of particle tested:
- primary particle
- Type of distribution:
- volumetric distribution
- Percentile:
- D10
- Mean:
- 0.126 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 0.125 - 0.127 µm
- Percentile:
- D50
- Mean:
- 2.3 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 2.3 µm
- Percentile:
- D90
- Mean:
- 8.7 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 8.7 - 8.8 µm
- Conclusions:
- The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium black were 0.126, 2.3 and 8.7 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 23.6 ± 0.1 m2/g.
- Executive summary:
Potthoff (2012) is a non-GLP study but follows a standard method and is considered suitable for use as the key study for this endpoint. The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium black are 0.126, 2.3 and 8.7 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 23.6 ± 0.1 m2/g.
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 9277:2010(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: AA_LP_814_BET_08
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 14488:2007(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO 13320:2009(E)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: SAA_Troken_DISP, SAA LB2000
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- Laser scattering/diffraction
- Type of particle tested:
- primary particle
- Type of distribution:
- volumetric distribution
- Percentile:
- D10
- Mean:
- 1.85 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 1.85 - 1.86 µm
- Percentile:
- D50
- Mean:
- 6.1 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 6.1 µm
- Percentile:
- D90
- Mean:
- 17.9 µm
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range; 17.8 - 18.0 µm
- Conclusions:
- The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium powder were 1.85, 6.1 and 17.9 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 0.44 ± 0.02 m2/g.
- Executive summary:
Potthoff (2012) is a non-GLP study but follows a standard method and is considered suitable for use as the key study for this endpoint. The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium powder were 1.85, 6.1 and 17.9 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 0.44 ± 0.02 m2/g.
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Non-GLP, guideline study, well reported, reliable without restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- DIN 55992-1 (Determination of a parameter for the dust formation of pigments and extenders - Part 1: Rotation method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- rotating drum method
- Remarks:
- modified Heubach procedure
- Type of particle tested:
- other: dust particles
- Type of distribution:
- mass based distribution
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter:
- 21.7 µm
- Geometric standard deviation:
- 2.8
- Conclusions:
- The total dustiness of Ruthenium black was determined to be 401.12 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 265.11 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 265.11 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 33.36 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 21.7 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm.
- Executive summary:
The dustiness of Ruthenium black was tested in a modified Heubach procedure according to the guideline DIN 55992-1:2006 'Determination of a parameter for the dust formation of pigments and extenders - Part 1: Rotation method'. The substance was mechanically stressed in a rotating drum and the airborne dust was fed into a seven-stage cascade impactor. The dust masses collected at each cascade stage were weighed to determine total dustiness. Dust from 1.00 g of sample was generated for 5 min at a temperature of 22.3 ºC, 35.4 % relative humidity and 1014.0 hPa atmosphere. The dustiness values in accordance with DIN EN 481 were calculated from the particle size distribution determined (cumulative frequency distribution) with the help of an excel macro. The study is non-GLP, but follows a standard guideline and is considered to be reliable. The total dustiness of Ruthenium black was determined to be 401.12 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 265.11 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 119.36 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 33.36 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 21.7 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm.
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Non-GLP, guideline study, well reported, reliable without restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- DIN 55992-1 (Determination of a parameter for the dust formation of pigments and extenders - Part 1: Rotation method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- rotating drum method
- Remarks:
- modified Heubach procedure
- Type of particle tested:
- other: dust particles
- Type of distribution:
- mass based distribution
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter:
- 20.1 µm
- Geometric standard deviation:
- 2.8
- Conclusions:
- The total dustiness of Ruthenium powder was determined to be 48.48 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 32.8 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 16.60 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 5.32 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 20.1 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm.
- Executive summary:
The dustiness of Ruthenium powder was tested in a modified Heubach procedure according to the guideline DIN 55992-1:2006 'Determination of a parameter for the dust formation of pigments and extenders - Part 1: Rotation method'. The substance was mechanically stressed in a rotating drum and the airborne dust was fed into a seven-stage cascade impactor. The dust masses collected at each cascade stage were weighed to determine total dustiness. Dust from 1.00 g of sample was generated for 5 min at a temperature of 22.7 ºC, 28.7 % relative humidity and 1018.0 hPa atmosphere. The dustiness values in accordance with DIN EN 481 were calculated from the particle size distribution determined (cumulative frequency distribution) with the help of an excel macro. The study is non-GLP, but follows a standard guideline and is considered to be reliable. The total dustiness of Ruthenium powder was determined to be 48.48 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 32.8 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 16.6 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 5.32 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 20.1 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm.
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1 November 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
- Version / remarks:
- Screening Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The method used is based on a procedure designed to comply with that given in 'Particle size distribution, fibre length and diameter distribution', June 1996 European Commission technical guidance document, which satisfies the requirements of OECD Guideline 110
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- sieving
- Type of particle tested:
- primary particle
- Type of distribution:
- mass based distribution
- No.:
- #1
- Size:
- < 100 µm
- Distribution:
- 83.5 %
- Conclusions:
- The proportion of ruthenium <100 μm was 83.5%.
- Executive summary:
Tremain and Atwal (2011) is a GLP compliant study following OECD guideline 110 (Screening method) and is considered suitable for use as a supporting study for this endpoint. The proportion of ruthenium <100 μm is 83.5%.
- Endpoint:
- particle size distribution (granulometry)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not reported
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Ultrasonic: 60 s(+M), Concentration: 245
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of method:
- other: ultrasonic shaking
- Percentile:
- D50
- Mean:
- 5.47 µm
- Percentile:
- D10
- Mean:
- 1.25 µm
- Percentile:
- D90
- Mean:
- 15.59 µm
- Conclusions:
- The 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium are 1.25 µm, 5.47 µm and 15.59 µm, respectively.
- Executive summary:
This study is considered to be suitable for use as a supporting study for this endpoint. The 10th, 50thand 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium are 1.25 µm, 5.47 µm and 15.59 µm, respectively.
Referenceopen allclose all
Mean specific surface area N-BET = 23.6 ± 0.1 m2/g. Range = 23.5 ± 0.02 to 23.6 ± 0.03 m2/g.
Table 1: N-BET analysis data and percentiles calculated from the particle size distribution for ruthenium black
Analysis 1 | Analysis 2 | Analysis 3 | Average | |
Specific surface area N-BET (m2/g) | 23.6 ± 0.03 | 23.5 ± 0.02 | 23.6 ± 0.1 | |
X10;3 (μm) | 0.125 | 0.127 | 0.126 | 0.126 |
X50;3 (μm) | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
X90;3 (μm) | 8.7 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 8.7 |
Mean specific surface area N-BET = 0.44 ± 0.02 m2/g. Range = 0.431 ± 0.001 to 0.459 ± 0.002 m2/g.
Table 1: N-BET analysis data and percentiles calculated from the particle size distribution for ruthenium powder
Analysis 1 | Analysis 2 | Analysis 3 | Average | |
Specific surface area N-BET (m2/g) | 0.431 +- 0.001 | 0.459 +- 0.002 | 0.44 +- 0.02 | |
X10;3 (μm) | 1.85 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 1.85 |
X50;3 (μm) | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
X90;3 (μm) | 17.8 | 18.0 | 17.9 | 17.9 |
Experimental results
Quantity of substance used [g]: 1
Total dust mass in impactor [mg]: 401.12
Dust concentration in impactor [mg/m³]: 1996.05
Total dustiness [mg/g]: 401.12
Inhalable fraction [mg/g]: 265.11
Thoracic fraction [mg/g]: 119.36
Respirable fraction [mg/g]: 33.36
Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) [μm]: 21.7
Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) [μm]: 2.8
Experimental results
Quantity of substance used [g]: 1
Total dust mass in impactor [mg]: 48.48
Dust concentration in impactor [mg/m³]: 241.08
Total dustiness [mg/g]: 48.48
Inhalable fraction [mg/g]: 32.80
Thoracic fraction [mg/g]: 16.60
Respirable fraction [mg/g]: 5.32
Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) [μm]: 20.1
Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) [μm]: 2.8
The results of the sieving procedure are shown below:
Measurement |
Result |
Mass of test item transferred to sieve |
10.03g |
Mass of test item passed through sieve |
8.37g |
Proportion of test item <100µm |
83.5% |
10% diameter = 1.25µm. 50% diameter = 5.47µm. 90% diameter = 15.59µm
Description of key information
The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium powder were 1.85, 6.1 and 17.9 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 0.44 ± 0.02 m2/g. The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium black are 0.126, 2.3 and 8.7 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 23.6 ± 0.1 m2/g.
Additional information
Particle size distribution and specific surface area were assessed for both ruthenium powder and ruthenium black. Potthoff (2012) is a non-GLP study but follows standard methods. Particle size was assessed by laserlight diffraction following dry dispersion and specific surface area was assessed by N-BET. This study is considered suitable for use as the key study for this endpoint. The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium powder were 1.85, 6.1 and 17.9 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 0.44 ± 0.02 m2/g. The average 10th, 50th and 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium black are 0.126, 2.3 and 8.7 μm, respectively. The average specific surface area was determined as 23.6 ± 0.1 m2/g.
A screening study is available that used a sieving method to assess the particle size of ruthenium powder. Tremain and Atwal (2011) is a GLP compliant study following OECD guideline 110 (Screening method) and is considered suitable for use as a supporting study for this endpoint. The proportion of ruthenium <100 μm is 83.5%.
A second supporting study is also available (CILAS 2006). Although limited details are available, the study used a standard method and is considered to be reliable with restrictions. The 10th, 50thand 90th percentile particle sizes for ruthenium are 1.25 µm, 5.47 µm and 15.59 µm, respectively.
The dustiness of ruthenium powder and ruthenium black was tested in a modified Heubach procedure according to the guideline DIN 55992-1:2006 (Selck and Parr 2012). The studies are non-GLP, but follow a standard guideline and are considered to be reliable. The total dustiness of ruthenium powder was determined to be 48.48 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 32.8 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 16.6 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 5.32 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 20.1 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm. The total dustiness of ruthenium black was determined to be 401.12 mg/g. The inhalable fraction was 265.11 mg/g, the thoracic fraction was 119.36 mg/g and the respirable fraction was 33.36 mg/g. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined to be 21.7 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.8 μm.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.