Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-442-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 August - 19 October 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study performed according to OECD Guideline 439 without any deviation.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Version / remarks:
- dated 23 July 2009
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 27 April 2017
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Resinoid of Cistus ladaniferus (Cistaceae) obtained from labdanum gum by organic solvents extraction
- EC Number:
- 946-442-6
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- Resinoid of Cistus ladaniferus (Cistaceae) obtained from labdanum gum by organic solvents extraction
- Test material form:
- solid
- Remarks:
- brown to brown-red paste
- Details on test material:
- - Name (as cited in study report): LABDANUM RESINOID / F
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, darkness, closed container
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: foreskin
- Justification for test system used:
- Following the REACH bottom-up strategy described in the ECHA R.7a guidance, the SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model method was used to assess skin irritation.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model, SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France (RHE/S/17)
- Tissue batch number(s): 17-RHE-091
- Expiration date: September 11, 2017
- Date of testing: between 31 August 2017 and 07 September 2017
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 42 minutes at room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 41 hours and 15 minutes at 37°C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: 25 x 1 mL of DPBS (Dutscher - Batch No. 9130617).
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: none, but residual test item with brown coloration was noted on all Reconstructed Human epidermis after the rinse
- Modifications to validated SOP: none
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1.0 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours at 37°C
- Spectrophotometer: ELx800 absorbance microplate reader (controlled every year and calibrated if necessary) supplied by BioTek and the validated software Gen5 ELISA V1.05.11 supplied by BioTek.
- Wavelength: 570 nm
The optical density was measured after a 1:2 dilution of the formazan extracts in isopropanol : the acceptability criteria should be in the range ≥ 0.4 and ≤1.5 for the negative control.
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: O.D. = 1.2 (CV = 1.9%) (O.D. > 0.7)
- Barrier function: 4.8 h (4.0h < ET50 < 10.0 h)
- Morphology: 6 cells layers (> 4). Absence of significant histological abnormalities. Satisfactory (Well differentiated epidermis consisting of basal, spinous, granular layers and a stratum corneum)
- Contamination: absence of HIV1 & 2 antibodies, hepatitis C and antibodies, hepatitis C and antigen HBsp on blood; absence of mycoplasma on epidermal cells
- Reproducibility: All of the values for the negative and positive control groups fell within or very close to the historical ranges of the testing laboratory obtained in the previous year. This was taken to show the correct functioning of the test system.
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
The direct interaction of MTT with the test item was checked by adding approximately 50 mg of the test item applied on a nylon mesh to 1 mL of solution of MTT at 1 mg/mL. A yellow to brown solution was observed after 3 hours of incubation between 36.5°C and 37.8°C, 5% CO2.
> Therefore, there is no direct interaction between the test item and MTT.
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 2
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive or irritant to skin if the mean percent viability after 42 minutes exposure and 42 hours of post-treatment incubation is < 50% and in the absence of information on a skin corrosion test.
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin if the mean percent tissue viability after 42 minutes exposure and 42 hours of post-treatment incubation is > 50%. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 16 mg
- Concentration (if solution): Undiluted
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 16 µL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 16 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 5 % in distilled water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 42 minutes at room temperature
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 41 hours and 25 minutes post-incubation period at 37°C, 5% CO2
- Number of replicates:
- 3
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- mean
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 58.9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 1.6%
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- 1/3 epidermis has a% viability < 50%
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- mean
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 9.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 2.3%
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- MTT VIABILITY ASSAY RESULTS
- In the first run, the mean percent viability of the treated tissues was 58.9%, versus 1.6% in the positive control (5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate).
- In the second run, the mean percent viability of the treated tissues was 9.4%, versus 2.3% in the positive control (5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate).
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: none but residual test item with brown coloration was noted on all Reconstructed Human epidermis after the rinse
- Direct-MTT reduction: none.
- Colour interference with MTT: none.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: Proficiency chemicals were tested according to the OECD TG 439.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
FIRST RUN:
As the percentage of viability of 1/3 of RHE are ≤ 50% it’s not possible to conclude for the test item.
The acceptability criteria defined in OECD 439 are not respected. A second run is necessary.
SECOND RUN:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the negative control OD of the 3 replicates is > 0.4 and < 1.5 (values between 0.623 and 1.226). [The optical density was measured after a 1:2 dilution of the formazan extracts in isopropanol : the acceptability criteria should be in the range ≥ 0.4 and ≤1.5 for the negative control.]
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, the positive control is classified as irritant
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: no, the SD value of the % viability for the negative control is > 18 (31.2%). However, this deviation has no impact of the overall conclusion of the study. Other SDs values are ≤ 18% (values between 2.3and 9.4%).
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: TO BE COMPLETED
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.3.1/1: First run - Individual and mean OD values and tissue viabilities for the test item, the negative and positive controls
Skin |
OD |
Mean OD / disc (#) |
Mean OD / product |
Viability % |
Mean viability % |
Standard deviation (SD) |
|
Negative control |
1 |
0.573 |
0.613 |
0.759 |
80.8 |
100.0 |
16.7 |
0.626 |
|||||||
0.641 |
|||||||
2 |
0.818 |
0.824 |
108.6 |
||||
0.827 |
|||||||
0.826 |
|||||||
3 |
0.826 |
0.839 |
110.6 |
||||
0.831 |
|||||||
0.860 |
|||||||
Positive control |
1 |
0.012 |
0.013 |
0.012 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
0.013 |
|||||||
0.013 |
|||||||
2 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
1.4 |
||||
0.011 |
|||||||
0.011 |
|||||||
3 |
0.013 |
0.012 |
1.8 |
||||
0.011 |
|||||||
0.011 |
|||||||
Test item |
1 |
0.102 |
0.102 |
0.447 |
13.4 |
58.9 |
39.8 |
0.102 |
|||||||
0.103 |
|||||||
2 |
0.576 |
0.574 |
75.7 |
||||
0.559 |
|||||||
0.586 |
|||||||
3 |
0.729 |
0.665 |
87.7 |
||||
0.609 |
|||||||
0.657 |
#: mean of 3 values (triplicate of the same extract)
OD: optical density
Table 7.3.1/12: Second run - Individual and mean OD values and tissue viabilities for the test item, the negative and positive controls
Skin |
OD |
Mean OD / disc (#) |
Mean OD / product |
Viability % |
Mean viability % |
Standard deviation (SD) |
|
Negative control |
1 |
0.629 |
0.628 |
0.919 |
68.3 |
100.0 |
31.2 |
0.633 |
|||||||
0.623 |
|||||||
2 |
0.843 |
0.929 |
101.1 |
||||
1.007 |
|||||||
0.938 |
|||||||
3 |
1.126 |
1.201 |
130.6 |
||||
1.190 |
|||||||
1.189 |
|||||||
Positive control |
1 |
0.026 |
0.025 |
0.021 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
0.3 |
0.025 |
|||||||
0.024 |
|||||||
2 |
0.021 |
0.019 |
2.1 |
||||
0.019 |
|||||||
0.018 |
|||||||
3 |
0.024 |
0.020 |
2.2 |
||||
0.020 |
|||||||
0.018 |
|||||||
Test item |
1 |
0.079 |
0.080 |
0.087 |
8.7 |
9.4 |
2.0 |
0.079 |
|||||||
0.084 |
|||||||
2 |
0.077 |
0.073 |
7.9 |
||||
0.073 |
|||||||
0.070 |
|||||||
3 |
0.111 |
0.107 |
11.6 |
||||
0.107 |
|||||||
0.105 |
#: mean of 3 values (triplicate of the same extract)
OD: optical density
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Category 1 (corrosive) or Category 2 (irritant) base don GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of this study, in the absence of information on skin corrosion, the test substance has to be classified in Category 2 "Irritating to skin" or Category 1 "Corrosive" according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro skin irritation study was performed according to the OECD Guideline 439 and in compliance with GLP, using the SkinEthic reconstructed human epidermis model.
As the test item LABDANUM CTE RES SUPER INDE was a paste considered as a solid, it was administered after being directly applied on a nylon mesh (corresponding to 16 mg) in order to cover the entire surface of 3 living Reconstructed Human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE® model) during 42 minutes, followed by a rinse with 25 mL of PBS and a 41 hours 15 minutes post-incubation period at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cell viability was then measured by enzymatic conversion of the vital dye MTT into a blue formazan salt that was quantitatively measured after extraction from tissues.
The mean percent viability of the treated tissues was 58.9%, versus 1.6% in the positive control (5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate).
As the percentage of viability of 1/3 of RHE are ≤ 50% it’s not possible to conclude for the test item. The acceptability criteria define in OECD 439 are not respected. A second run was necessary.
During the second run, the mean percent viability of the treated tissues was 9.4%, versus 2.3% in the positive control (5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate).
Concerning acceptability criteria of this second run:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the negative control OD of the 3 replicates is > 0.4 and < 1.5 (values between 0.623 and 1.226). [The optical density was measured after a 1:2 dilution of the formazan extracts in isopropanol : the acceptability criteria should be in the range ≥ 0.4 and ≤1.5 for the negative control.]
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, the positive control is classified as irritant
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: no, the SD value of the % viability for the negative control is > 18 (31.2%). However, this deviation has no impact of the overall conclusion of the study. Other SDs values are ≤ 18% (values between 2.3and 9.4%).
The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were therefore considered to be satisfied.
Under the experimental conditions of this study, in the absence of information on skin corrosion, the test substance has to be classified in Category 2 "Irritating to skin" or Category 1 "Corrosive" according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for skin irritation endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.