Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-159-1 | CAS number: 134-84-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- 4-Methylbenzophenone and benzophenone are inactive in the micronucleus assay
- Author:
- Abramsson-Zetterberg L & Svensson K
- Year:
- 2 011
- Bibliographic source:
- Toxicol Letters 201, 235–239
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The in vivo genotoxic effect of benzophenone was determined using the flow cytometer-based micronucleus assay in mice. The study was divided into two experiments. In the first experiment male CBA mice were given high doses of benzophenone. In Experiment 2, based on the result from experiment 1, the administered doses were lower and instead of CBA mice NMRI male mice were used. In both of the two experiments the mice were randomly divided into different groups. All the mice were injected i.p. with a single dose of 10 µL/g bw benzophenone diluted in corn oil just prior to the injection. The positive control mice received injections of colchicine (1 mg/kg bw) or ethylmethylsulphonate (130 mg/kg bw).
In experiment 1, the mice were given the following doses of benzophenone: 500 (3 mice) and 1000 (4 mice), and 2000 (4 mice) mg/kg bw. Three control mice given only the solvent, corn oil, and the positive control (colchicine, three mice), were also included in the study.
In Experiment 2, the doses of benzophenone were: 100, 250, 400, and 600 mg/kg bw with 3 mice/group. The positive and negative control groups where ethyl methanesulfonate and corn oil were used constituted 3 and 4 mice each.
In both of the two experiments the mice were anaesthetised with Fluothane and blood samples were drawn from the orbital vein into heparinised tubes 42 h after injection. Directly after blood sampling the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. The sampling time was based on the knowledge of time between appearance of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow and in peripheral blood.
Purification, fixation and staining of erythrocytes
5 µL of whole blood was layered on a 65% Percol gradient and centrifuged. The pellet, containing cells, was resuspended in PBS and fixed in glutaraldehyde. The samples were coded and stored at 4°C for a few days. A staining solution, containing the fluorescent dyes HO342 (DNA-dye) and TO (RNA-dye) in PBS, was added to the fixed cells. The staining was performed one day prior to analysis.
Flow cytometric analysis and the determination of micronucleus frequency
The analysis was done using a FACSVantage SE flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, Sunnyvale, CA). The cells were automatically analysed when they, in a flow one by one, passed through two laser beams (350 and 488 nm). Information about size and structure was collected and was used to exclude remaining nucleated cells as well as debris in the sample from further analysis. DNA-, and RNA content was detected as fluorescence from the two dyes HO 342 and TO respectively. RNA content, measured as the signal from the TO dye, was used to distinguish between young and old erythrocytes, PCE and NCE (poly- and normochromatic erythrocytes) respectively. The ratio of young to old cells gives an indication of cell proliferation (% PCE). This analysis was based on the information from about 20,000 cells per sample. Furthermore, since erythrocytes normally do not contain any DNA, a signal from the HO 342 dye implies that it contains a micronucleus. Limiting the analysis to only PCE enabled to calculate the frequency of micronucleated PCE. About 100,000 PCE were scored per animal. All analyses were performed using CellQuest software. Scatter plots of the information about DNA content versus RNA content were displayed for each analysed sample. Regions were defined for NCE, PCE, and MNPCE (micronucleated PCE) respectively. On the basis of this, the number of events in each region was determined. Frequencies of PCE and MNPCE were calculated. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- other: micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzophenone
- EC Number:
- 204-337-6
- EC Name:
- Benzophenone
- Cas Number:
- 119-61-9
- Molecular formula:
- C13H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- benzophenone
- Details on test material:
- -Name of test material (as cited in study report): Benzophenone
-Supplier: Sigma Aldrich, Sweden
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA and NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
-Source: Scanbur AB, Sollentuna, Sweden
-Age at study initiation: 6–7 weeks
-Weight at study initiation: ca. 20 - 30 g
-Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
-Diet: ad libitum
-Water: ad libitum
-Acclimation period: one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
-Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application
- Frequency of treatment:
- single application
- Post exposure period:
- Animal were killed 42 h after injection
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Experiment 1: 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg bw
Experiment 2: 100, 250, 400 or 600 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3-4 mice per dose group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- colchicine (1 mg/kg bw) or ethylmethylsulphonate (130 mg/kg bw)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- see above
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- see above
- Evaluation criteria:
- see above
- Statistics:
- not further specified
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The in vivo genotoxic effect of benzophenone was determined using the flow cytometer-based micronucleus assay in mice. No increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was found in the peripheral blood (fMNPCE). Only the mice and cells exposed to the positive controls, showed a significant increase in the mean fMNPCE, neither did the percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes, % PCE, show any change in the cell prolifieration.
- Executive summary:
The in vivo genotoxic effect of benzophenone was determined using the flow cytometer-based micronucleus assay in mice. The study was divided into two experiments. In the first experiment male CBA mice were given high doses of benzophenone. In Experiment 2, based on the result from experiment 1, the administered doses were lower and instead of CBA mice NMRI male mice were used. In both of the two experiments the mice were randomly divided into different groups. All the mice were injected i.p. with a single dose of 10 µL/g bw benzophenone diluted in corn oil just prior to the injection. The positive control mice received injections of colchicine (1 mg/kg bw) or ethylmethylsulphonate (130 mg/kg bw). In experiment 1, the mice were given the following doses of benzophenone: 500 (3 mice) and 1000 (4 mice), and 2000 (4 mice) mg/kg bw. Three control mice given only the solvent, corn oil, and the positive control (colchicine, three mice), were also included in the study. In Experiment 2, the doses of benzophenone were: 100, 250, 400, and 600 mg/kg bw with 3 mice/group. The positive and negative control groups where ethyl methanesulfonate and corn oil were used constituted 3 and 4 mice each. In both of the two experiments the mice were anaesthetised with Fluothane and blood samples were drawn from the orbital vein into heparinised tubes 42 h after injection. Directly after blood sampling the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. The sampling time was based on the knowledge of time between appearance of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow and in peripheral blood. No increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was found in the peripheral blood (fMNPCE). Only the mice and cells exposed to the positive controls showed a significant increase in the mean fMNPCE, neither did the percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes, % PCE, show any change in the cell prolifieration. At the very highest dose of benzophenone (2000 mg/kg bw) all 4 injected CBA-mice died within 2 h of injection. One of the four mice given a dose of 1000 mg/kg bw of benzophenone died shortly after injection. An inspection of the bodies of the other three CBA-mice receiving 1000 mg/kg bw had pale livers. In experiment 2, with lower administered doses, all NMRI-mice survived, but one of the three mice given 600 mg/kg bw benzophenone showed a pale liver (granular). None of the other dosed mice showed any visible adverse effect to the organs.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.