Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-546-1 | CAS number: 5422-34-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 Aug - 07 Sep 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Department of Health -The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N-2-hydroxyethyllactamide
- EC Number:
- 226-546-1
- EC Name:
- N-2-hydroxyethyllactamide
- Cas Number:
- 5422-34-4
- Molecular formula:
- C5H11NO3
- IUPAC Name:
- N-2-hydroxyethyllactamide
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Control and 100 mg/L from the bulk test preparation
- Sampling method: duplicate samples were taken at test start and from the pooled replicates at 72 hours for quantitative analysis. An additional non-inoculated 100 mg/L test sample that had been incubated alongside the inoculated test preparations was taken for analysis at 72 hours to determine the stability of the test item under experimental conditions
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All samples were stored frozen prior to analysis.
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: 100 mg were dissolved directly in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 1 liter. An aliquot (950 mL) of this stock solution was inoculated with algal suspension (5.1 mL) to give the required test concentration of 100 mg/L.
- Controls: yes
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): At the start of the test all control and test cultures were observed to be clear colorless solutions. After the 72-Hour test period all control and test cultures were observed to be pale green dispersions.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Green algae
- Strain: strain CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
- Method of cultivation: Master cultures were maintained in the laboratory by the periodic replenishment of culture medium. The master cultures were maintained in the laboratory under constant aeration and illumination at 21 ± 2 °C. Prior to the start of the test sufficient master culture was added to approximately 100 mL volumes of culture media contained in conical flasks to give an initial cell density of approximately 103 cells/mL. The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam stoppers and kept under constant agitation by orbital shaker (100 – 150 rpm) and constant illumination at 24 ± 1 °C until the algal cell density was approximately 10^4 – 10^5 cells/mL.
ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: There were no abnormalities detected in any of the control or test cultures.
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 24 ± 1 ºC
- pH:
- test start 7.4
test end 7.7 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: control and 100 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
Test vessel
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 250 mL glass conical flasks plugged with polyurethane foam bungs
- Initial cells density: 5 x 10^3 cells per mL
- Control end cells density: 6.71 x 10^5 cells per mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: test medium was prepared with reverse osmosis purified deionized water Elga Optima 15+ or Elga Purelab Option R-15 BP
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: The pH was determined at itest start and test end. The temperature was recorded daily. The appearance of the test media was recorded daily.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: adjusted to 7.5 with 0.1N NaOH or HCl.
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: (intensity approximately 7000 lux) provided by warm white lighting (380 – 730 nm)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: cell density determined using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter
- Chlorophyll measurement: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
Range finding study:
- Test concentrations: 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: the concentration of the definitive is based on the results of the range-finding test. Results in detail are summarized within table 1 in section "Any other information on material and methods incl. tables" - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): There were no abnormalities detected in any of the control or test cultures.
- Colour differences: At the start of the test all control and test cultures were observed to be clear colorless solutions. After the 72-Hour test period all control and test cultures were observed to be pale green dispersions.
- Other: Results of the range-finding test and the definitive test are summarized in tables 1 - 4 in section "Any other information on results incl. tables"
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Reference: ErC50 (0 – 72 h) : 1.5 mg/L; 95% confidence limits 1.3 – 1.7 mg/L; No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) based on growth rate: 0.50 mg/L
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- A Student’s t-test incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981) was carried out on the growth rate and yield data after 72 hours for the control and the 100 mg/L test concentration to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS computer software package (SAS, 1999 - 2001).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Cell Densities and Percentage Inhibition of Growth from the Range-finding Test
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
|
Cell Densities* (cells per mL) |
|
Inhibition Values (%) |
|
|
|
0 Hours |
72 Hours |
Growth Rate |
Yield |
Control |
R1 |
5.14E+03 |
6.24E+05 |
- |
- |
|
R2 |
5.95E+03 |
6.22E+05 |
|
|
|
Mean |
5.54E+03 |
6.23E+05 |
|
|
0.10 |
R1 |
6.14E+03 |
6.74E+05 |
2 |
[9] |
|
R2 |
6.26E+03 |
6.82E+05 |
|
|
|
Mean |
6.20E+03 |
6.78E+05 |
|
|
1.0 |
R1 |
5.90E+03 |
6.48E+05 |
2 |
[5] |
|
R2 |
6.34E+03 |
6.61E+05 |
|
|
|
Mean |
6.12E+03 |
6.54E+05 |
|
|
10 |
R1 |
6.08E+03 |
7.35E+05 |
0 |
[19] |
|
R2 |
6.51E+03 |
7.53E+05 |
|
|
|
Mean |
6.30E+03 |
7.44E+05 |
|
|
100 |
R1 |
6.03E+03 |
6.58E+05 |
2 |
[5] |
|
R2 |
6.08E+03 |
6.47E+05 |
|
|
|
Mean |
6.06E+03 |
6.53E+05 |
|
|
* Cell densities represent the mean number of cells per mL calculated from the mean of the cell counts from 3 counts for each of the replicate flasks.
R1 and R2 = Replicates 1 and 2
[Increase in growth compared to controls ]
Analytical results:
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 97% to 99% of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only (Table 3).
Validation Criteria:
The cell concentration of the control cultures increased by a factor of 134 after 72 hours. The mean coefficient of variation for section by section specific growth rate for the control cultures was 7% and the coefficient of variation for average specific growth rate for the control cultures over the test period (0 – 72 h) was 3%.
Table 2 : Inhibition of Growth Rate and Yield in the Definitive Test
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
|
Growth Rate (cells/mL/hour) |
|
Yield (cells/mL) |
|
|
|
0 – 72 h |
% Inhibition |
0 – 72 h |
% Inhibition* |
Control |
R1 |
0.071 |
|
8.15E+05 |
|
|
R2 |
0.068 |
|
6.49E+05 |
|
|
R3 |
0.068 |
|
6.79E+05 |
|
|
R4 |
0.068 |
- |
6.79E+05 |
- |
|
R5 |
0.064 |
|
5.01E+05 |
|
|
R6 |
0.068 |
|
6.75E+05 |
|
|
Mean |
0.068 |
|
6.66E+05 |
|
|
SD |
0.002 |
|
1.00E+05 |
|
100 |
R1 |
0.068 |
0 |
6.58E+05 |
|
|
R2 |
0.068 |
0 |
6.60E+05 |
|
|
R3 |
0.069 |
[1] |
7.01E+05 |
|
|
R4 |
0.068 |
0 |
6.69E+05 |
|
|
R5 |
0.067 |
1 |
6.12E+05 |
|
|
R6 |
0.067 |
1 |
6.10E+05 |
|
|
Mean |
0.068 |
0 |
6.52E+05 |
2 |
|
SD |
0.001 |
|
3.51E+04 |
|
* In accordance with the OECD test guideline only the mean value for yield is calculated
R1 -R6 = Replicates 1 to 6
SD = Standard Deviation
[Increase in growth as compared to controls]
Table 3: Analytical Results for Test Samples
Time point [hours] |
Nominal Concentration of Test Item in Test Sample cnom [mg/L] |
Sample Preparation Factor F |
Determined Concentration of Test Item in Test Sample c [mg/L] |
Percentage of Nominal Concentration [%] |
0 |
Control |
1 |
<LOQ |
- |
|
100 |
100 |
97.8 |
98 |
72 |
Control |
1 |
<LOQ |
- |
|
100 |
100 |
99.1 |
99 |
|
100 no algae |
100 |
97.2 |
97 |
LOQ = Limit of Quantification
- = not applicable
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
