Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-993-5 | CAS number: 90-43-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Non-GLP, in principle similar to guideline, basic data given
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Micronuclei and cell proliferation as early biological markers of orthto-phenylphenol-induced changes in the bladder of male F344 rats
- Author:
- Balakrishnan, S. and Eastmond, D.A.
- Year:
- 2 006
- Bibliographic source:
- Food Chem. Toxicol. 44:1340-1347
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (additional examination on bladder epithelial cells, data on animal number only given for test in urothelium, only one dose group for test in bone marrow , no individual animal data given, no justification for test item administration via diet)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Biphenyl-2-ol
- EC Number:
- 201-993-5
- EC Name:
- Biphenyl-2-ol
- Cas Number:
- 90-43-7
- Molecular formula:
- C12H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- [1,1'-biphenyl]-2-ol
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-Phenylphenol, OPP
- Analytical purity: >99%
- Supplier: Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, USA
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratory, Raleigh, NC, USA
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Housing: in polycarbonate cages
- Diet: Lab diet 5001 (PMI Nutrition International, Richmond, IN, USA), ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22
- Humidity (%): 50
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle used: none
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- none
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
8000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet
for micronucleus test in bone marrow cells
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000, 4000, 8000, and 12,500 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet
for micronucleus test in urinary bladder epithelial cells
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
148±14, 320±28, 644±74, and 1114±150 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
for micronucleus test in urinary bladder epithelial cells
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- - 4 males per dose for the micronucleus test in urinary bladder epithelial cells
- no data given for the micronucleus test in bone marrow - Control animals:
- yes
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- 1. Tissue: bone marrow; cell type: bone marrow cells
2. Tissue: urinary bladder; cell type: bladder epithelial cells - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
- data from earlier Japanese studies and more recent data from Dow and Bayer Chemical Companies
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields):
Animals were fed for 15 days and sacrificed on Day 15. 24 h before sacrifice, animals were injected 50 mg/kg bw BrdU in DMSO/saline (2:1).
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Bladder cells:
Bladder cells were removed by scraping the luminal epithelial cells. The cells were then subjected to hypotonic treatment (0.075 M KCl) for 15 min at room temperature prior to fixing with Carnoy's fixative (methanol:acetic acid 3:1). The fixed cells were dropped onto slides, allowed to air-dry, and stored at -20 °C unter nitrogen atmosphere.
The cells were stained with DAPI in phenylenediamine antifade mounting medium.
Bone marrow cells:
At sacrifice, the femoral bone marrow cells were harvested using standard procedures (Hayashi, M. et al., 1983). The slides were fixed in 100% methanol at -20 °C for 20 min, air dried and stored at -20 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere until use.
Bone marrow preparations were stained with acridine orange (acridine orange solution, 0.1% aqueous stock diluted 1:30 with Sorenson's phosphate buffer, pH 6.8) for 2 min and rinsed twice for 3 min each in phosphate buffer (pH 8.0).
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Analysis was conducted by means of fluorescence microscopy.
For each bladder 2000 nuclei were scored for micronuclei. A number of binucleated cells were seen. Due to the difficulty in distinguishing binucleated cells from two adjactent cells, each nucleus was scored individually.
Each slide with bone marrow cells was scored for the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE). The ratio of PCE to normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) was determined for each rat on the basis of the number of mature cells (NCE) encountered while accumulating 200 PCE.
OTHER:
Animals examined for OPP-induced micronuclei formation in urinary bladder epithelial cells received BrdU (50 mg/kg bw) 24 h prior to sacrifice. Using BrdU incorporation and the labelling index*, replicating cells were identified, indicating cytotoxicity in the target tissue.
* ratio of BUdR-positive nuclei to the total number of cells counted
Hayashi, M. et al. (1983). Mutat Res 120:241-247. - Statistics:
- The frequencies of micronuclei, PCE/NCE ratios and MNPCE per treatment group were compared by analysis of variance with the Fischers protected least significant difference (PLSD) being used as a post-hoc test. Critical values were determined using a 0.05 probability of Type I error.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- in bone marrow cells
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- in urinary bladder epithelial cells
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Additional information on results:
- MICRONUCLEI IN BLADDER EPITHELIAL CELLS
Based on the food consumption of the animals, the daily intake of OPP at dietary concentracions of 2000, 4000, 8000, and 12,500 ppm OPP was 148±14, 320±28, 644±74 and 1114±150 mg/kg bw/day.
- Systemic toxicity: Animals fed with 8000 ppm OPP and above lost weight, initially seen at day 2 of treatment. By Day 8 all animals gained weight at a similar rate regardless of treatment. At termination, mean body weights were comparable to the control.
- Genetic toxicity: The frequencies of micronuclei in bladder epithelial cells in controls was 0.19±0.02%, whereas the frequencies in the 8000 and 12,500 ppm OPP groups were significantly increased to 0.77±0.02% and 0.56±0.14%, respectively (n=4). The micronucleus frequencies in the rats fed with 8000 ppm OPP were modestly higher than those in the rats fed with with 12,500 ppm. Animals treated with 2000 and 4000 ppm OPP did not show an increase in micronuclei in the bladder epithelial cells over the control animals.
BrdU labelling revealed a 11-14 fold increase in cell proliferation in urinary bladder epithelial cells on animals treated with 8000 and 12,500 ppm OPP. No increase in in cell proliferation was noted in animals treated with 2000 and 4000 ppm OPP. The authors concluded that the increased cell proliferation noted at 8000 and 12,500 ppm is the result of OPP-induced superficial cytotoxicity of the urothelium with regenerative hyperplasia.
MICRONUCLEI IN BONE MARROW CELLS
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): MNPCE frequencies in the bone marrow of control animals were 0.04±0.05% and did not differ significantly from those of animals fed 8000 ppm OPP (0.05±0.07%).
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: OPP treatment did not reduce the PCE:NCE ratio in bone marrow cells as compared to the control animals.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
Increased micronuclei formation in urinary bladder epithelial cells of male F344 rats was observed only at dietary doses of 8000 and 12,500 ppm, which were shown to produce cytotoxic effects in the target tissue. At the same time, bone marrow cells of animals treated with 8000 ppm OPP did not show increased micronuclei formation. No positive control group was included into the test to clarify whether the test item reaches the bone marrow. However, Bomhard, E.M. et al. (2002) report, that there are toxicokinetic data, allowing the conclusion that OPP, as well as ist sodium salt SOPP and their metabolites, reach the bone marrow in sufficient quantities. Under the conditions of the test, the test item was considered positive for induction of micronuclei in the target organ urinary bladder and negative for clastogenicity in bone marrow in vivo.
Bomhard, E. M. et al. (2002). Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 32(6):551-626.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.