Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-540-0 | CAS number: 618-03-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute Oral Toxicity:
In Acute oral toxicity ,LD50 value was predicted based on OECD QSAR toolbox for target substance 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) was estimated to be 2307.95 mg/kg bw,and the QSAR prediction done using the Danish (Q)SAR Databasefor target substance 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) was estimated to be 3100 mg/kg bw, and for differentstudies available on the structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5) was considered to be 5000 mg/kg bw, for 4-aminotoluene-3-sulphonic acid(88-44-8) was considered to be 12000 mg/kg bw and for 1,3-Phenylenediamine-4-sulfonic acid(88-63-1) was considered to be 3480 mg/kg bw. All these studies concluded that the LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation,2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) has very low vapor pressure (9.43E-006 Pa.).So the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore the acute inhalation toxicity end point was considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal Toxicity:
In Acute dermal toxicity, LD50 value was predicted based on OECD QSAR toolbox for target substance 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) was estimated to be 2152.55 mg/kg bw ,and for differentstudies available on structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5) was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw.All these studies concluded that the LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- accepted calculation method
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from Danish QSAR
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done by using Danish QSAR database
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC name): 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid
- Molecular formula: C7H9NO3S
- Molecular weight: 187.218 g/mol
- Smiles notation: O=S(=O)(O)c1ccc(c(N)c1)C
- InChl: 1S/C7H9NO3S/c1-5-2-3-6(4-7(5)8)12(9,10)11/h2-4H,8H2,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
- Substance type: Organic - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on oral exposure:
- No data available
- Doses:
- 3100 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No data available
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Preliminary study:
- No data available
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3 100 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% mortality was observed
- Mortality:
- No data available
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available
- Gross pathology:
- No data available
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the QSAR prediction done using the Danish (Q)SAR Database, the LD50 was estimated to be 3100 mg/kg bw on rats for test substance 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) orally.
- Executive summary:
Based on the QSAR prediction done using the Danish (Q)SAR Database, the LD50 was estimated to be 3100 mg/kg bw on rats for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) having Reliability Index: 0.65 (moderate prediction quality)
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 307.95 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from QSAR toolbox 3.3
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is predicted using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction was done by using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3,2018
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: estimated data
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC name): 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid
- Molecular formula: C7H9NO3S
- Molecular weight: 187.218 g/mol
- Smiles notation: O=S(=O)(O)c1ccc(c(N)c1)C
- InChl: 1S/C7H9NO3S/c1-5-2-3-6(4-7(5)8)12(9,10)11/h2-4H,8H2,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid powder (white to pinkish white) - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on dermal exposure:
- No data available
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2152.55 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No data available
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Preliminary study:
- No data available
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 152.55 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% Mortality was observed
- Mortality:
- No data available
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available
- Gross pathology:
- No data available
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified
- Conclusions:
- The LD50 value was estimated to be 2152.55 mg/kg bw,when female wistar rats were occlusively exposed with 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) by dermal application for 24 hours.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1).The LD50 was estimated to be 2152.55 mg/kg bw,when female wistar rats were occlusively exposed with 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1)by dermal application for 24 hours.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
(((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" )
and ("e"
and (
not "f")
)
)
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and ("m"
and "n" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Anilines (Acute toxicity) by
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, NH2 group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acid moiety OR Anilines
(Hindered) by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Radical OR Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) >> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic
Amines OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium
ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium
ion formation >> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic Amines by DNA
binding by OASIS v.1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Halogens by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amines AND Sulfonic
acids or their salts by Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Phenols by Skin
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND Group CNS Melting Point > 50 C by Eye
irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group All Melting Point > 200 C
by Eye irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No Data by Ultimate biodeg
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as 1 to 10 days by Ultimate biodeg
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is >= 107
Da
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is <= 248
Da
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 152.55 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from QSAR toolbox 3.3
Additional information
Acute Oral Toxicity:
In different studies, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often the studies are based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) along with the study available on the structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5), 4-aminotoluene-3-sulphonic acid(88-44-8) and 1,3-Phenylenediamine-4-sulfonic acid(88-63-1). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies. The studies are summarized as below –
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid(618-03-7).The LD50 was estimated to be 2307.95 mg/kg bw,when male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were orally exposed with 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid(618-03-7).
The above study was further supported bythe QSAR prediction done using the Danish (Q)SAR Databasefor target substance 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7). Based on the QSAR prediction done using the Danish (Q)SAR Database, the LD50 was estimated to be 3100 mg/kg bw on rats for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) having Reliability Index: 0.65 (moderate prediction quality).
This is further supported by Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB (study number: 19166, 2017-08-10) for the structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5). The acute oral toxicity profile of 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (CAS No. 93-00-5)in Sprague Dawley rats.1% aqueous Tween 80 was used as vehicle. Initially, three female animals were treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight of the test item (Step - I). Administration of the test item at 300 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality at 24 hours after the dosing. As no mortality was observed at 24 hours after the dosing, three female animals were added to the study and treated with the same dose of 300 mg/kg of the test item (Step - II). Administration of the test item at 300 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing. No mortality was observed at 300 mg/kg dose group, hence additional three female animals were treated with the higher dose of 2000 mg/kg of the test item (Step - I). Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing. As no mortality were observed at 24 hours after the dosing, additional three female animals were treated with the higher dose of 2000 mg/kg of the test item (Step - II). Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing.Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg dose groups. Hence,The lethal concentration (LD50) valuefor acute oral toxicity testwas considered to be 5000mg/kg bw,when female Sprague Dawley rats were treated with 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (CAS No. 93-00-5)orally via gavage according to OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method).
Also these results are further supported by Ministry of Health & Welfare, Japan (Ministry of Health & Welfare, Japan (1996a): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals, vol.4 p99-106) and OECD SIDS (SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 16 Paris, 27-30 May 2003) for the structurally similar read across substance 4-aminotoluene-3-sulphonic acid(88-44-8).In acute oral toxicity study,male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with 2-Amino-5-Methylbenzenesulfonic Acid (88-44-8) in the concentration of 12000 mg/kg bw orally. Sesame oil was used as vehicle.50% mortality observed at 12000 mg/kg bw in treated rats. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 12000 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 2-Amino-5-Methylbenzenesulfonic Acid (88-44-8).
This is supported by Richard J Lewis(Sax’s Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 12th Edition); IFA GESTIS (Gestis Substance Database ,2017) and U.S. National Library of Medicine (Chemidplus Database,U.S. National Library of Medicine,2017) for the structurally similar read across substance 1,3-Phenylenediamine-4-sulfonic acid(88-63-1). Acute oral toxicity test of 1,3-Phenylenediamine-4-sulfonic acid (88-63-1) was conducted with rat in the concentration of 3480 mg/kg bw orally. 50 % mortality was observed in treated rat. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 3480 mg/kg,when rats were treated with 2,4-diaminobenzenesulphonic acid (88-63 -1) orally.
Thus, based on the above studies on 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) and it’s structurally similar read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) has very low vapor pressure (9.43E-006 Pa.).So the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore the acute inhalation toxicity end point was considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal Toxicity:
In different studies, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often the studies are based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rabbits for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) along with the study available on structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies. The studies are summarized as below –
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1).The LD50 was estimated to be 2152.55 mg/kg bw,when female wistar rats were occlusively exposed with 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1)by dermal application for 24 hours.
The above study was further supported by Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB (study number: 19167, 2017-08-10) for the structurally similar read across substance 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5). The acute dermal toxicity profile of 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (CAS No. 93-00-5)in Sprague Dawley rats.The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days. Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days.Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. Hence, The LD50 value was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw,when male and female Sprague Dawley rats were semiocclusively treated with 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (CAS No. 93-00-5) by dermal application following 14 days of observation period according to OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity).
Thus, based on the above studies on 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) and it’s structurally similar read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-1) cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and prediction on 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) and it’s structurally similar read across substances 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulphonic acid (93-00-5), 4-aminotoluene-3-sulphonic acid(88-44-8) and 1,3-Phenylenediamine-4-sulfonic acid(88-63-1), it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (618-03-7) cannot be classified for acute oral and dermal toxicity. For Acute inhalation toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.