Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 695-243-8 | CAS number: 500731-87-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation/Corrosion
Two studies to assess skin irritation have been carried out. The key study was carried out to determine the primary skin irritation potential of "Galaxy Sunbetaine" in rabbits following the Gaitonde Committee protocol.
Theremaining study was carried out to determine the Cumulative Dermal Irritation of "Galaxy-Sunbetaine-MM-30" in rabits, following the IS 1324: 1992 Protocol.
Both studies were assigned a reliability rating of 2.
An additional two studies were included as supporting information only as these were assigned a reliability ratig of 4. These studies were as follows:
A study was performed as described in Galaxy Surfactants Protocol 01 and was designed to assess the skin irritancy of seven sunscreen products and a marketed comparator product after repeated application to the skin of healthy volunteer subjects. The study design was that of a repeat insult patch test consisting of 3 applications over a 7 day period. This technique maximises the cutaneous stimulus from a topical preparation.
A study on Galaxy-SUnbeat-MM-30 for Photoirritation and photo allergy tests in albino guinea pigs.
The substance was considered to be non-irritant in all studies.
Eye Irritation
The objective of the study was reported here was to determine the mucous membrane irritation potential of "Galaxy Sunbetaine" in rabbits following the Gaitonde Committee Protocol.
The test material "Galaxy Sunbetaine" caused no irritation to the eye in rabbits.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 27 August to 17 September 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Meets generally accepted scientific standards, well documented and acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: IS 13424: 1992 Specifications
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Type of coverage:
- open
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Applied daily for 5 days a week for three weeks.
- Observation period:
- 24 hours after each exposure and then daily for a total of 16 readings.
- Number of animals:
- Six rabits, 3 male, 3 female
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 - 16 days
- Score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No skin reactions noted in any animal at any timepoint.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The cumulative irritation index of the test material, in albino rabbits by the dermal route was found to be 0.00. The test material is termed as non-irritant.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 August 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles, possibly with incomplete or methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Gaitonde Committee Annexure III
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species: Albino rabbits
Source: National Toxicology Centre
Weight range: 1.8 to 2.0 kg
Age: 6 to 9 weeks
Sex: male and female
Number: 3 per sex
Housing: The animals were housed singly.
Diet: Pelleted feed
Water: Community tap water ad libitum
Room temperature: 19 - 22°C
Relative humidity: 35% - 75%
Light cycle: 12 hours light, 12 hours dark. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Test substance used directly in 0.5 ml quantity.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Once the test material was applied the animals were housed singly with a plastic collar around their neck to avoid ingestion of test material. After 24 hours any unabsorbed test material was removed.
- Observation period:
- Each site of application was carefully examined, observed and the reaction evaluated according to Draize's method at 24, 48 and 72 hours post application.
- Number of animals:
- Six rabbits, three per sex were used for this study.
- Details on study design:
- The hair of the back on both sides of the vertebral column was removed with the help of electric clippers, one day before the treatment. The test material in the amount of 0.50 ml was applied to the intact and abraded skin sites of each test animal. Care was taken to note that the abrasions penetrate the Stratum correum but not the dermis. A gauze patch was secured over each treated area by means of an adhesive tape.
The animals were house singly with a plastic collar around their neck for 24 hours to avoid the ingestion of the test material. The patch and the unabsorbed test material were removed after 24 hours. - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: test substance was non-irritant
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No eryhema or odema observed in an animal at any timepoint.
Primary skin irritation score: 0.00 - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test substance caused no irritation to thh skin in rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The test material was applied in the amount of 0.5 ml to the shaven back skin, both intact and abraded skin sites, of six rabbits (three per sex). Each site of application was carefully observed and the reaction evaluated according to Draize's method at 24, 48 and 72 hours post application.
The test material caused no irritation to the skin in rabbits till the end of the observation period.
The primary skin irritation index was 0.00.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 31 March 2003 to 07 April 2003
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study is well conducted but its design not sufficient to cover the endpoint
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Galaxy Surfactants Protocol 01
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Guidelines for Medical Experiments in no-patient human volunteers,
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- human
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 1: Material applied under occlusion.
Day 3: Patch removed for a period of 10 minutes then re-applied.
Day 5: Patch removed for a period of 10 minutes then re-applied.
Day 8: Patch removed for a period of 10 minutes and sites assessed. Patch not re-applied. - Observation period:
- Day 3, day 5 and day 8.
- Number of animals:
- 25 subjects.
18 female and seven male - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Remarks:
- Sunscreen C
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Day 3, day 5 and day 8
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Remarks:
- Sunscreen D
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: Day 3, day 5 and day 8
- Score:
- 0
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 09 October 2001 to 03 November 2001
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study is well conducted but its design not sufficient to cover the endpoint
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: IS 13424, 1992.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Type of coverage:
- open
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- 50%
- Controls:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- To each guinea pig in the control and test group, 0.1 ml of 50% solution of the test substance was applied on one side of the spine. Solution was applied as spcified above. Similarly, 0.1 ml of 5% solution of the positive control was applied on the other side.
Thirty minutes after application each animal in the test group was irradiated with non-erythrogenic radiation from a UV lamp (100 watts) from a distance of about 25 cm for 30 minutes.The animals in the control group did not receive any irradiation. - Observation period:
- The treated sites were examined at 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours after irradiation for dermal reactions viz., erythema, oedema, spots and scaling. The dermal reactions are graded using the following scale.
0: Normal
2: Faint trace of erythema
4: Slight erythema
6: Definite erythema
8: well developed erythema - Number of animals:
- 12 male
6 used in the control group
6 used in the test group - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Treatment of guinea pigs with the substance followed by UV irradiation did not produce any evidence of skin irritation. Following the scoring and evaluation of results, the test substance was considered to be a non-photo irritant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Sunscreen C:
There were no grade 1 or grade 2 of higher reactions recorded with Sunscreen C at any time during the course of the study.
Sunscreen D:
There were no grade 1 or grade 2 of higher reactions recorded with Sunscreen D at any time during the course of the study.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30th July 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles, possibly with incomplete or methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Gaitonde Committee Guidelines
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Test Animal:
Species: Albino rabbits
Strain: New Zealand White
Source: National Toxicology Centre
Weight range: 1.7 to 2.1 kg
Age: 6 to 9 weeks
Sex: male and female
Number: 3 per sex
Housing: The animals were housed singly
Diet: Pelleted feed supplied by Nav Maharasthra Chakan Oil Mills Ltd., Pune
Water: Community tap water ad libitum
Room temperature: 19 to 22 degrees Celsius
Relative humidity: 35 to 75%
Lighty cycle: 12 hours day 12 hours dark - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test material in the amount of 0.10 ml was placed directly into animals eye. The other eye was untreated as a control.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Once the test material was applied the eyelid was held down for two seconds to prevent loss of test substance.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Each eye was carefully examined, observed at 24, 48 and 72 hours and the observations extended to determine the reversibility or irreversibility.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Six rabbits, three per sex were used for this study.
- Details on study design:
- Six rabbits, three per sex, were used for this study. The test material in the amount of 0.10 ml was placed in the conjuctival sac of one eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for approximately two seconds in order to prevent the loss of the test material. The other eye remained untreated and served as a control. The animals were housed singly.
Clinical Observations:
Each eye was carefully examined, observed at 24, 48 and 72 hours and the observations extended to deterimine the reversibility or irreversibility. Any redness, chemosis and discharge was recorded. - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- Not applicable as overall irritation score = 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Irritaion score = 0
- Other effects:
- None observed
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test material "Galaxy Sunbetaine" caused no irritation to the eye in rabbits.
The test material is termed as non-irritant. - Executive summary:
The objective of the study was reported here was to determine the mucous membrane irritation potential of "Galaxy Sunbetaine" in rabbits following the Gaitonde Committee Protocol.
The test material in the amount of 0.10 ml was instilled in the conjuctival sac of one eye of each animal. Each eye was carefully observed and the reaction evaluated at 24, 48 and 72 hours post instillation.
The test material caused no irritation to the eye in rabbits.
Reference
A summary of the individiual irritant response following application of "Galaxy Sunbetaine"
Rabbit No. |
Sex |
Cornea |
Iris |
Conjuctivae |
||
|
|
|
|
Redness |
Chemosis |
Discharge |
1 |
M |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
M |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
M |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hours 24 48 72
SCORE 0 0 0
Grand Total: 0.00
Where 0 = no reaction
Irritation Score: 0.00
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of irritation studies carried out on both the skin and eye, the test material is not considered to be classified as an irritant for either skin or eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.