Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-555-8 | CAS number: 4926-55-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 19 March 2004 to 19 April 2004
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- This study was a Dose Range Finding Study for a Main teratology study. Only 8 females per conditions were used. Fetuses examination was not complete, only external observation was performed.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- This study was a Dose Range Finding Study for a Main teratology study. Only 8 females per conditions were used
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[(2-nitrophenyl)amino]ethanol
- EC Number:
- 225-555-8
- EC Name:
- 2-[(2-nitrophenyl)amino]ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 4926-55-0
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10N2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[(2-nitrophenyl)amino]ethanol
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Supplied by the Sponsor, Lot No. 17
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 11 December 2005
- Purity test date: 11 December 2002
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: not specified
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Stable at 0.4 and 200 mg/mL during 24 hours at room temperature in vehicle. Stable for 15 days at 5±3 deg Celsius.
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
Formulations (solutions) were prepared at least every two weeks. . Prepared solutions were stored refrigerated; the actual temperature range in the storage refrigerator from the day of the first preparation to the last day of dosage administration was 4 deg Celsius to 8 deg Celsius. No more details
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material)
In solution in PEG-400 polyethylene glycol 400
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories Inc. (USA)
- Age at study initiation: 16 weeks (females) / 73-79 days (at arrival the 14 and 22 September 2003)
- Weight at study initiation: 220-245 g (female) / 483-698g (males)
- Fasting period before study: not specified
- Housing: Rats were individually housed in stainless steel, wire-bottomed cages, except during the cohabitation period. During cohabitation, each pair of male and female rats were housed in the male rat’s cage.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rats were given ad libitum access to Certified Rodent Diet® #5002 (PMI® Nutrition International, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) in individual feeders.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Local water that had been processed by passage through a reverse osmosis membrane was available to the rats ad libitum from an automatic watering access system and/or individual water bottles attached to the cages. Chlorine was added to the processed water as a bacteriostat.
- Acclimation period: 5 Days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 25 deg Celsius
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): a minimum of 10 cycles per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h light / 12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 22 January 2004 To: 19 April 2004
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Formulations (solutions) were prepared at least every two weeks. . Prepared solutions were stored refrigerated; the actual temperature range in the storage refrigerator from the day of the first preparation to the last day of dosage administration was 4 deg Celsius to 8 deg Celsius. No more details
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): No justification
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 5, 15, 40, 100 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg
- Lot/batch no. (if required): T42604 and Y11608
- Purity:100% - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Homogeneity was determined for the low and high concentrations using samples collected from the top, middle and bottom of the dosage formulations on the first day of preparation. Mean concentration results from these samples were calculated, and homogeneity relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated by determining the percent RSD of the three mean values. All of the results were within the acceptable range of ≤5% RSD. The values obtained were 0.7% and 1.8% RSD for the 5 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL formulations, respectively.
Samples collected from dosage formulations prepared on 1 and 14 April 2004 for concentration analysis were within the acceptable limits of ±15% error. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: 5 days (maximum)
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: not specified
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: not specified
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and/or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 to day 20 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily, seven days a week
- Duration of test:
- 21 Days
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8 females per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
The highest dosage level was selected to induce some overt developmental and/or maternal toxicity (clinical signs or a decrease in body weight) but not death or severe suffering. At least one intermediate dosage level was selected to produce minimal observable toxicity. The lowest dosage level should not have produced any evidence of either maternal or developmental toxicity. A descending sequence of dosage levels was selected with the purpose of demonstrating any dosage-related response and to establish a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL).
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random):
Upon arrival, rats were assigned to individual housing on the basis of computer-generated random units. Healthy, mated female rats were assigned to five dosage groups (Groups I through V), eight rats per dosage group, by using a computer-generated (weight-ordered) randomization procedure based on body weights recorded on DG 0.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked : viability
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily and weekly during acclimation period
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were recorded weekly during the acclimation period, on DG 0 and daily during the dosage and postdosage periods.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
Calculated as g food/animal/day
Feed consumption values were recorded on DGs 0, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 20 and 21.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day #21
- Organs examined: the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic viscera
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: The number and distribution of corpora lutea were recorded. The uterus of each rat was excised and weighed (if gravid). The uterus of each rat was examined for pregnancy, number and distribution of implantation sites, live and dead fetuses and early and late resorptions. - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- All data were tabulated, summarized and/or statistically analyzed using the Argus Automated Data Collection and Management System, the Vivarium Temperature and Relative Humidity Monitoring System, Microsoft® Excel (part of Microsoft® Office 97/2000/XP), Quattro Pro 8 and/or The SAS System (version 6.12). Averages and percentages were calculated. Litter values were used where appropriate.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Clinical observations considered to be related to the test substance included discolored (orange) skin, fur and/or urine in all groups administered the test substance and excess salivation which occurred only in the 500 mg/kg/day dosage group.
All other clinical observations were considered to be unrelated to the test substance because:
1) the clinical observation was observed in only one rat in any dosage group; 2) the incidences were not dosage dependent; and/or 3) the observations occurred in the rat that was sacrificed due to moribund condition. These observations included gasping, dyspnea, soft or liquid feces, localized alopecia (underside) and dehydration. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Rat 8393 in the 500 mg/kg/day dosage group was sacrificed due to moribund condition approximately two hours after the 13th dosage of test substance on DG 18. Necropsy revealed yellow discoloration of the intestines, pancreas, stomach, mesentery and abdominal adipose tissue. All other tissues appeared normal. The litter consisted of 12 fetuses and one early resorption. Based on the examination that was conducted one hour post-dosage that indicated open-mouthed breathing, increased breathing and the rat maintaining an extended neck, the moribund condition probably resulted from an intubation accident. All other rats survived to scheduled sacrifice.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights were comparable among the five dosage groups through DG 21. Gravid uterine weights were increased in the groups administered the test substance, in comparison with the control group value; however, the increases were not dosage dependent. Corrected maternal body weights (DG 21 body weight minus the gravid uterine weight) were comparable among the dosage groups.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Absolute and relative feed consumption values were generally comparable among the five dosage groups during the dosage period (calculated as DGs 6 to 21) and the gestation period (DGs 0 to 21).
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): no effects observed - Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- No Caesarean-sectioning or litter parameters were affected by dosages of the test substance as high as 500 mg/kg/day. The litter averages for corpora lutea, implantations, litter sizes, live fetuses, early and late resorptions, fetal body weights, percent resorbed conceptuses, and percent live male fetuses were comparable among the five dosage groups. No dam had a litter consisting of only resorbed conceptuses, and there were no dead fetuses.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- maternal abnormalities
- mortality
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): not examined - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- not examined
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- not examined
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- not examined
- Visceral malformations:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- All fetuses appeared normal at gross external examination.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall observations
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
TABLE 1 : CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS - SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAXIMUMPOSSIBLEINCIDENCE 128/8 128/8 128/8 128/8 125/8
MORIBUNDSACRIFICED 0 0 0 0 1b
ORANGE URINE |
0/ |
0 |
85/ |
8 |
109/ |
8 |
114/ |
8 |
119/ |
8b |
ORANGE FUR |
0/ |
0 |
17/ |
6 |
110/ |
8 |
117/ |
8 |
121/ |
8b |
ORANGE SKIN |
0/ |
0 |
6/ |
1 |
10/ |
4 |
18/ |
7 |
42/ |
8b |
EXCESS SALIVATION |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
3/ |
3b |
GASPING |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
1/ |
1b |
DYSPNEA |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
1/ |
1b |
SOFT OR LIQUID FECES |
3/ |
1 |
5/ |
3 |
1/ |
1 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
LOCALIZED ALOPECIA:UNDERSIDE |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
9/ |
1 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
DEHYDRATION |
1/ |
1 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
0/ |
0 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAXIMUM POSSIBLE INCIDENCE = (DAYS x RATS)/NUMBER OF RATS EXAMINED PER GROUP ON DAYS 6 THROUGH 21 OF PRESUMED GESTATION.
N/N = TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS/NUMBER OF RATS WITH OBSERVATION.
a. Dosage occurred on days 6 through 20 ofgestation.
b. Dam 8393 was moribund sacrificed on day 18 ofgestation.
ORAL (GAVAGE) DOSAGE-RANGE DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY STUDY OF GTS03975 IN RATS (SPONSOR'S STUDY NUMBER:2747-53983)
TABLE 2 : NECROPSY OBSERVATIONS - SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOSAGE GROUP |
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
DOSAGE (MG/KG/DAY)a |
0 |
25 |
75 |
200 |
500 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RATS EXAMINED
MORIBUND SACRIFICED N 8 8 8 8 8
N 0 0 0 0 1c
APPEARED NORMAL N 0 0 0 0 7
INTESTINE, PANCREAS, STOMACH, MESENTERY AND ABDOMINAL ADIPOSE:
YELLOW
N 8 8 8 8 1c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Dosage occurred on days 6 through 20 ofgestation.
b. Refer to the individual clinical observations table (Table 9) for external observations confirmed atnecropsy.
c. Dam 8393 was moribund sacrificed on day 18 ofgestation.
TABLE 3: MATERNAL BODY WEIGHTS AND GRAVID UTERINE WEIGHTS - SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOSAGEGROUP
I II III IV V
DOSAGE(MG/KG/DAY)a 0 25 75 200 500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RATSTESTED
N 8 8 8 8 8
PREGNANT N 8 8 8 8 8
MATERNAL BODY WEIGHT (G)
DAY 0 MEAN±S.D. 232.9±7.9 233.6±7.1 233.8±6.7 234.1±8.1 233.8 ±6.5
DAY 6 MEAN±S.D. 266.4±14.2 267.2±12.3 262.8±9.1 269.2±10.0 265.8 ±8.5
DAY 7 MEAN±S.D. 266.4±10.4 267.0±9.2 265.1±8.8 265.8±9.3 268.5 ±9.5
DAY 8 MEAN±S.D. 266.1±12.9 272.4±10.6 268.5±7.3 272.9±11.7 273.0 ±11.0
DAY 9 MEAN±S.D. 274.0±12.3 272.5±15.9 277.9±6.0 275.4±10.5 274.2 ±8.9
DAY10 MEAN±S.D. 281.9±13.6 278.2±14.8 278.8±5.9 282.6±15.2 280.1 ±7.8
DAY11 MEAN±S.D. 289.1±13.0 290.1±15.6 285.4±7.7 293.8±11.3 285.1 ±9.1
DAY12 MEAN±S.D. 294.5±11.1 296.0±14.8 290.9±10.2 297.8±14.3 291.5 ±7.7
DAY13 MEAN±S.D. 299.4±13.3 303.2±14.8 295.2±10.0 302.8±15.4 295.1 ±9.5
DAY14 MEAN±S.D. 305.5±14.2 311.1±16.8 300.8±11.0 307.1±17.8 300.2 ±9.6
DAY15 MEAN±S.D. 311.9±16.8 320.0±15.8 309.9±11.0 313.8±20.5 309.6 ±10.6
DAY16 MEAN±S.D. 321.2±19.0 329.9±17.9 320.4±10.2 321.4±24.4 317.6 ±12.6
DAY17 MEAN±S.D. 335.6±20.3 343.6±18.1 332.2±11.3 332.9±27.2 330.9 ±12.9
DAY18 MEAN±S.D. 350.5±21.4 362.8±18.8 350.0±13.1 348.6±30.2 339.4 ±23.3
DAY19 MEAN±S.D. 365.4±24.6 381.5±17.8 364.6±11.8 366.8±30.6 365.8 ±15.4
[ 7]b
DAY20 MEAN±S.D. 378.9±25.9 397.6±22.3 383.0±9.6 383.0±33.0 382.6 ±20.7
[ 7]b
DAY21 MEAN±S.D. 401.8±25.7 425.8±20.4 414.9±16.6 412.4±37.8 406.8 ±23.9
[7]b
GRAVID UTERINE
WEIGHTS(G) MEAN±S.D. 95.0±20.4 112.8±9.5 108.1±14.5 102.6±17.2 104.3 ±16.2
[6]c [7]c [7]c [6]b,c
DAY21Cd MEAN±S.D. 302.2±23.1 312.9±20.3 305.8±19.1 309.1±27.9 306.7 ±7.2
[6]c [7]c [7]c [6]b,c
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY = DAY OF GESTATION
[ ] = NUMBER OF VALUES AVERAGED
a. Dosage occurred on days 6 through 20 ofgestation.
b. Excludes values for dam 8393, which was moribund sacrificed on day 18 ofgestation.
c. Excludes values that were notrecorded.
d. 21C = Corrected maternal body weight (day 21 of gestation body weight minus the gravid uterineweight).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of the study, there were no test substance related effects on body weights, body weight gains, gravid uterine weights, corrected maternal body weights or corrected maternal body weight gains or absolute or relative feed consumption values. No Caesarean-sectioning or litter parameters were affected by dosages of the test substance as high as 500 mg/kg/day. All fetuses appeared normal at gross external examination. Based on these data, dosages of 0 (Vehicle), 50, 200 and 500 mg/kg/day of the test item were selected for the developmental toxicity study in rats.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this GLP study was to provide information for the selection of dosages to be used in the developmental toxicity (embryo-fetal toxicity and teratogenic potential) study of the Test Item HC Yellow No. 2 administered orally via gavage to Crl:CD(SD) presumed pregnant female rats.
Forty presumed pregnant Crl:CD(SD) rats were randomly assigned to five dosage groups, eight rats per group. Solutions of the test substance or the vehicle, PEG 400, were administered orally (gavage) once daily to these naturally bred female rats on days 6 through 20 of presumed gestation (GD 6 - 20) at dosages of 0, 25, 75, 200 and 500 mg/kg bw/d. Viabilities, clinical observations, body weights and feed consumption values were recorded. All surviving rats were sacrificed on GD 21. The gravid uterus was excised, weighed and subsequently examined for the number and distribution of corpora lutea,
implantation sites and uterine contents. A gross necropsy of the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic viscera was performed. Foetuses were weighed and examined for gross external alterations and sex.
One rat in the 500 mg/kg bw/d dosage group was sacrificed due to moribund condition GD 18. This mortality was non related to treatment and considered the result of an intubation accident. All other rats survived to scheduled sacrifice. Clinical observations considered to be related to the test substance included discoloured (orange) skin, fur and/or urine in all groups administered the test substance and excess salivation in the 500 mg/kg bw/d dosage group. No additional gross lesions were revealed by necropsy examination.
Under the experimental conditions of the study, there were no test substance related effects on body weights, body weight gains, gravid uterine weights, corrected maternal body weights or corrected maternal body weight gains or absolute or relative feed consumption values. No Caesarean-sectioning or litter parameters were affected by dosages of the test substance as high as 500 mg/kg/day. All fetuses appeared normal at gross external examination. Based on these data, dosages of 0 (Vehicle), 50, 200 and 500 mg/kg/day of HC Yellow No. 2 were selected for the developmental toxicity study in rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.