Octasodium 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulphonato[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3-sulphonatonaphthalene-6,2-diyl)azo]]bisnaphthalene-1,5-disulphonate

Endpoint summary

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo[1,1'-biphenyl] -4,4'-diyl) bis [imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl) azo]]bis-, octasodium salt. The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with S9 metabolic activation system. 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo [1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis-, octasodium salt was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

 

Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to be not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria

Remarks:

Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation

Type of information:

(Q)SAR

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification

Justification for type of information:

Data is from OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: Refre below principle

Principles of method if other than guideline:

Prediction is done using OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3, 2018

GLP compliance:

not specified

Type of assay:

bacterial reverse mutation assay

Specific details on test material used for the study:

Name of the test chemical: Octasodium 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulphonato[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulphonatonaphthalene-6,2-diyl)azo]]bisnaphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
Molecular formula: C58H30Cl2N14Na8O26S8
Molecular weight: 1850.3 g/mol
Smiles Notation: [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].c1(c(cc(cc1)Nc1nc(nc(n1)Cl)Nc1cc2cc(c(c(c2cc1)O)\N=N\c1c(c2cccc(c2cc1)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])c1c(cc(cc1)Nc1nc(nc(n1)Cl)Nc1cc2cc(c(c(c2cc1)O)\N=N\c1c(c2cccc(c2cc1)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-]
InChI: 1S/C58H38Cl2N14O26S8.8Na/c59-53-65-55(61-27-7-11-31-25(19-27)21-45(105(89,90)91)47(49(31)75)73-71-39-17-15-35-37(51(39)107(95,96)97)3-1-5-41(35)101(77,78)79)69-57(67-53)63-29-9-13-33(43(23-29)103(83,84)85)34-14-10-30(24-44(34)104(86,87)88)64-58-68-54(60)66-56(70-58)62-28-8-12-32-26(20-28)22-46(106(92,93)94)48(50(32)76)74-72-40-18-16-36-38(52(40)108(98,99)100)4-2-6-42(36)102(80,81)82;;;;;;;;/h1-24,75-76H,(H,77,78,79)(H,80,81,82)(H,83,84,85)(H,86,87,88)(H,89,90,91)(H,92,93,94)(H,95,96,97)(H,98,99,100)(H2,61,63,65,67,69)(H2,62,64,66,68,70);;;;;;;;/q;8*+1/p-8/b73-71+,74-72+;;;;;;;;
Substance Type: Organic
Physical State: Solid

Target gene:

Histidine

Species / strain / cell type:

S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102

Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):

Not applicable

Additional strain / cell type characteristics:

not specified

Cytokinesis block (if used):

No data

Metabolic activation:

with

Metabolic activation system:

S9 metabolic actiivation system

Test concentrations with justification for top dose:

No data

Vehicle / solvent:

No data

Untreated negative controls:

not specified

Negative solvent / vehicle controls:

not specified

True negative controls:

not specified

Positive controls:

not specified

Positive control substance:

not specified

Details on test system and experimental conditions:

No data

Rationale for test conditions:

No data

Evaluation criteria:

Prediction is done considering a dose dependent increase in the number of revertants/plate

Statistics:

No data

Species / strain:

S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100

Metabolic activation:

with

Genotoxicity:

negative

Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:

not specified

Vehicle controls validity:

not specified

Untreated negative controls validity:

not specified

Positive controls validity:

not specified

Additional information on results:

No data

Remarks on result:

other: No mutagenic potential

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: "Gene mutation"
Estimation method: Takes highest mode value from the 10 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

(((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" )  and ("e" and ( not "f") )  )  and ("g" and ( not "h") )  )  and ("i" and "j" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Anion OR Aromatic compound OR Azo compound OR Cation OR Halogen derivative OR Hydroxy compound OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, two aromatic attach [-N-] OR Amino Triazine/Pyrazine/Pyrimidine  OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Aromatic Nitrogen OR Azo [-N=N-] OR Chlorine, aromatic attach [-Cl] OR Chlorine, olefinic attach [-Cl] OR Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] OR Sym-Triazine ring  by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aromatic heterocyclic halide OR Aryl OR Aryl halide OR Azo OR Biphenyl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Overlapping groups OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aromatic heterocyclic halide OR Aryl OR Aryl halide OR Azo OR Biphenyl OR Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid OR Triazine by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> P450 Mediated Activation to Isocyanates or Isothiocyanates OR Acylation >> P450 Mediated Activation to Isocyanates or Isothiocyanates >> Formamides OR Michael addition OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> 5-alkoxyindoles OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Alkyl phenols OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Arenes OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Hydroquinones OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Polycyclic (PAHs) and heterocyclic (HACs) aromatic hydrocarbons-Michael addition OR Michael addition >> Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition OR Michael addition >> Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition >> Alpha, beta- unsaturated ketones OR Michael addition >> Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals OR Michael addition >> Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Quinones OR Schiff base formers OR Schiff base formers >> Direct Acting Schiff Base Formers OR Schiff base formers >> Direct Acting Schiff Base Formers >> Alpha-beta-dicarbonyl OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation >> Allyl benzenes OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation >> Hydrazine OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation >> N-Nitroso (alkylation) OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation >> Polycyclic (PAHs) and heterocyclic (HACs) aromatic hydrocarbons-SN1 OR SN1 >> Carbenium Ion Formation >> Triazenes OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic nitro OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Primary (unsaturated) heterocyclic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Primary aromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Secondary aromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary aromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Unsaturated heterocyclic nitro OR SN1 >> Nitrosation-SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrosation-SN1 >> N-Nitroso-SN1 OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Direct Acting Epoxides and related OR SN2 >> Direct Acting Epoxides and related >> Aziridines OR SN2 >> Direct Acting Epoxides and related >> Epoxides OR SN2 >> Epoxidation of Aliphatic Alkenes OR SN2 >> Epoxidation of Aliphatic Alkenes >> Halogenated polarised alkenes OR SN2 >> Nitrosation-SN2 OR SN2 >> Nitrosation-SN2 >> Nitroso-SN2 OR SN2 >> SN2 at an sp3 Carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 at an sp3 Carbon atom >> Sulfonates by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, MW>500 by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, NH2 group OR Moderate binder, OH grooup OR Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, non cyclic structure OR Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, OH group OR Very strong binder, OH group OR Weak binder, OH group by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log BCF max which is >= 0.961 log(L/kg wet)

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log BCF max which is <= 1.85 log(L/kg wet)

Conclusions:

1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo [1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis-, octasodium salt was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

Executive summary:

Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo[1,1'-biphenyl] -4,4'-diyl) bis [imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl) azo]]bis-, octasodium salt. The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with S9 metabolic activation system. 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo [1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis-, octasodium salt was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

 

Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to be not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Additional information

Gene mutation in vitro:

Prediction model based estimation for the target chemical and data from read across chemicals have been reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of. The studies are as mentioned below:

Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo[1,1'-biphenyl] -4,4'-diyl) bis [imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl) azo]]bis-, octasodium salt. The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo [1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis-, octasodium salt was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

The above mentioned predicted data is further supported by the data from read across chemicals as mentioned below:

In a study by Gregory et al (Journal of Applied Toxicology, 1981), gene mutation toxicity study was performed for 50 -60% structurally and functionally similar read across chemical Acid red 97 (RA CAS no 10169 -02 -5) to evaluate its mutagenic nature. The study was performed as per the standard plate incorporation protocol using Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100 and TA98 both in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The plates were incubated for 72 hrs before the evaluation of the revertant colonies could be made. Acid red 97 did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100 and TA98 both in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

In another study by Venturini and Tamaro (Mutation Research, 23211 -47 -4), Bacterial gene mutation test was performed to evaluate the mutagenic response for the functionally similar read across chemical Red H3B (C.I. reactive red 3; RA CAS no 23211 -47 -4). The test was performed using Salmonella typhimurium strainsTA1535, TA100, TA1538, and TA98 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The test compound was dissolved in DMSO and used at dose levels of 100, 500 or 1000 µg/plate. Concurrent positive control chemicals were also included in the study. Red H3B (C.I. reactive red 3)did not induce reversion of mutation when applied to Salmonella typhimurium strainsTA1535, TA100, TA1538, and TA98 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.

 

Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across, 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo[1,1'-biphenyl] -4,4'-diyl) bis [imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl) azo]]bis-, octasodium salt does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likelt to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across, 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulfo[1,1'-biphenyl] -4,4'-diyl) bis [imino (6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl) azo]]bis-, octasodium salt (CAS no 68110 -30 -5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likelt to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.