Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-775-5 | CAS number: 110-52-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://chesar.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation:
The dermal irritation potential of test chemical was assessed in various experimental studies conducted on rabbits. Based on the available data for the key and supporting studies, it can be concluded that the test chemical is unable to cause skin irritation and thus considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Eye irritation:
An ocular irritation potential of target chemical was assessed in various experimental studies conducted on test animals. Based on the available data for the key and supporting studies, it can be concluded that the test chemical is not able to cause eye irritation and thus can be considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not classified (Not irritating)”.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EWG Directive 84/449/EWG
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Pnimary skin irritation study with test chemical In rabbits (4-hour semi occlusive application)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Remarks:
- KFM (SPF quality)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Kleintierfarm Madoerin AG
CH 4414 Fuellinsdorf/ Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: 14-15 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3-2.7 kg
- Housing:Individually in stainless steel cage eqiipped with an automatic cleaning and drinking system.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted stardand Kuba 341, Batch 17/86 rabbit maintenance diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Community tap water from ltingen. ab Libitum.
- Acclimation period:Three days under trest conditions after veterinary examination.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):22±3°C
- Humidity (%):relative humidity 40-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): Air-conditioned with 10-15 air changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours artificial fluorescent light/12 hours dark, music/light period.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 8 August 1986 to 25 August 1986 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution): No data
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): No data
- Concentration (if solution): No data
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): No data
- Concentration (if solution):No data - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- The skin irritation was observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hrs and at 7 and 14 days intervals after removing the dressing.
- Number of animals:
- 3 animals:
1 male
2 females - Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsal area
- % coverage: 100 square cm (10cm x10cm)
- Type of wrap if used: 3.0cm x 3.0 cm patch of surgical gauze, gauze was covered with semi occlusive dressing, the dressing was anchored with elastic bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing : Washing done with lukewarm water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS : 1, 24, 48 and 72 hrs and at 7 and 14 days intervals after removing the dressing.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: EEC Council Directive 83/467/EEC, - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hr to 14 days
- Score:
- 0.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hr to 14 days
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Mild erythema was observed in all three animals but the signs were reversible within 14 days.
- Other effects:
- No data available.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not irritating
- Conclusions:
- In a skin irritation study, a maximum score of 0.9 out of 4 was observed. Slight irritant effects were observed which were fully reversible in 14 days. Therefore the test chemical can be considered to be not irriotant to the rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
A skin irritation study was performed on 1 male and 2 female New Zealand White KFM (SPF quality) rabbits. The test chemical was applied undiluted at a concentration of 0.5 ml to the intact shaved skin semiocclusively for four hours. The skin irritation was observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hrs and at 7 and 14 days intervals after removing the dressing. Body weight was measured at day 1 and at termination of the study. Rabbits were observed for mortality daily. All the observations were terminated 14 days after the application of the test chemical. Rabbits were killed by an intraveneous injection of T61 into the ear vein. The skin reaction like irritation score, colouration, corrosion and toxic symptoms waere assessed according to the OECD guideline 404. The test chemical showed primary irritation score of 0.9 when applied to the intact rabbit skin. Local signs consisted a grade 0.9 erythema and grade 0.0 edema. The skin reactions were reversible until day 14. Slight coloration was observed, no corrosive and toxic symptoms were observed in the test animals.
Based on obove observations and at a score of 0.9, the test chemical can be classified as "Not irritant" according to the CLP regulation.
Reference
Table 5: Primary skin irritation index
Selected observations |
Mean cumulative |
24 hrs |
1.0 |
48 hrs |
1.3 |
72 hrs |
1.3 |
7 days |
0.7 |
14 days |
0.0 |
Table 6: Mean scores per animal
Animal |
Erythema |
Edema |
412: Male |
1.2 |
0 |
413: Female |
0.6 |
0 |
413: Female |
0.8 |
0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EWG Directive 84/449/EWG
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Determination of primary eye irritation study test chemical in rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Remarks:
- KFM (SPF quality)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Kleintierfarm Madoerin AG
CH 4414 Fuellinsdorf/ Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: 14-15 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3-2.7 kg
- Housing:Individually in stainless steel cage eqiipped with an automatic cleaning and drinking system.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted stardand Kuba 341, Batch 17/86 rabbit maintenance diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Community tap water from ltingen. ab Libitum.
- Acclimation period:Three days under trest conditions after veterinary examination.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):22±3°C
- Humidity (%):relative humidity 40-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): Air-conditioned with 10-15 air changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours artificial fluorescent light/12 hours dark, music/light period.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 8 August 1986 to 25 August 1986 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 ml of test chemical was applied per animal.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- No data
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The eyes of each animal were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, after administration.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 animals
1 male and 2 females - Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No data available
- Time after start of exposure: No data available
SCORING SYSTEM: No data available
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No staining of the conjuctiva and cornea and no corrosion was observed in the rabbits.
- Other effects:
- - Lesions and clinical observations:
No data
- Ophthalmoscopic findings: No data
- Histopathological findings: No data
- Effects of rinsing or washing: No data
- Other observations:No data - Interpretation of results:
- other: Not irritating
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical was found to cause a primary irritation score of 1.1 when applied to the rabbit eye mucosa. No sever effects were observed in 72 hours. Thus, the test chemical was considered to be not Irritating to the eyes.
- Executive summary:
An eye irritation study was performed on 1 male and 2 female New Zealand White KFM (SPF quality) rabbits. The test chemical was applied undiluted at a concentration of 0.1 ml in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test article. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control. The eyes of each animal were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, after administration. Body weight was measured at day 1 and at termination of the study. Rabbits were observed for mortality daily. Rabbits were killed by an intraveneous injection of T61 into the ear vein. The irritation was assessed according to the OECD Guidelines for testing of Chemicals, Section 4, number 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion". Slight coloration was observed, no corrosive and toxic symptoms were observed in the test animals. Based on obove observations and a primary irritation score of 1.1, the test chemical can be classified as "Not irritant" to the rabbit eye according to the CLP regulation.
Reference
Table 3: Primary irritation score
Selected observations |
Mean scores |
1 hr |
2.7 |
24 hrs |
1.3 |
48 hrs |
0.3 |
72 hrs |
0.0 |
Table 4: Mean scores per animal
Animal & Sex |
Cornea opacity |
Iris |
Conjunctivae |
|
Redness |
Chemosis |
|||
415 M |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
146 F |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
417 F |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Selected observations for mean: 24 hrs, 48 hrs and 72 hrs
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin Irritation (In-vivo):
Various studies were performed on rabbits and rats to assess the dermal irritation potential of test chemical which have been summarized as follows:
A skin irritation study was performed on 1 male and 2 female New Zealand White KFM (SPF quality) rabbits. The test chemical was applied undiluted at a concentration of 0.5 ml to the intact shaved skin semiocclusively for four hours. The skin irritation was observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hrs and at 7 and 14 days intervals after removing the dressing. Body weight was measured at day 1 and at termination of the study. Rabbits were observed for mortality daily. All the observations were terminated 14 days after the application of the test chemical. Rabbits were killed by an intraveneous injection of T61 into the ear vein. The skin reaction like irritation score, colouration, corrosion and toxic symptoms waere assessed according to the OECD guideline 404. The test chemical showed primary irritation score of 0.9 when applied to the intact rabbit skin. Local signs consisted a grade 0.9 erythema and grade 0.0 edema. The skin reactions were reversible until day 14. Slight coloration was observed, no corrosive and toxic symptoms were observed in the test animals.
Based on obove observations and at a score of 0.9, the test chemical can be classified as "Not irritant" according to the CLP regulation.
Another skin irritation study was carried out according to OECD 404 “SKIN IRRITATION” to evaluate the irritation potential of the test chemical. 0.5 ml of test chemical was applied to the flank of 3 rabbits semi occlusively. Observations were made at 24, 48 and 72 hrs after application of test chemical. The scoring was done according to the Draize method. Erythema was observed in all 3 animals, edema was not observed. The primary irritation score of test chemical was 0.89. Based on the classification of chemicals, the test chemical can be considered as "Not irritating" to rabbit skin.
All these studies lead to a conclusion that Test chemical is indeed not irritating to skin. Hence, comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, Test chemical can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Similarly, another skin irritation study was carried out according to OECD 404 “SKIN IRRITATION” to evaluate the irritation potential of the test chemical. 0.5 ml of test chemical was applied to the flank of 3 rabbits semi occlusively. Observations were made at 24, 48 and 72 hrs after application of test chemical. The scoring was done according to the Draize method. No erythema and edema was observed. The primary irritation score of test chemical was 0. Based on the classification of chemicals, the test chemical can be considered as "Not irritating" to rabbit skin.
Skin Irritation (In-vitro):
The dermal irritation potential of test article was determined according to the OECD 439 test guideline for this study. The MatTek EpiDerm™ model was used to assess the potential dermal irritation of the test article by determining the viability of the tissues following exposure to the test article via MTT. Tissues were exposed to the test article and controls for ~one hour, followed by a 42 hour post-exposure recovery period. The viability of each tissue was determined by MTT assay. The MTT data show the assay quality controls were met and passed the acceptance of criteria. The Mean % tissue viability compared to negative control (n=3) of the test substance was determined to be 4.8%. Hence, under the current experimental test conditions it was concluded that test substance was considered to be irritating to human skin.
Though the in vitro results for the target indicates that test chemical can be irritating to skin, but the estimated in-vivo results imply that test chemical is not irritating to skin. These results are aptly supported by the results of rabbit study for the test chemical.
Thus, based on above observations, the test chemical be determined as "Not irritating" to skin of rabbits.
Eye Irritation (In-vivo):
Various studies were performed on test animals to assess the ocular irritation potential of test chemical which have been summarized as follows:
An eye irritation study was performed on 1 male and 2 female New Zealand White KFM (SPF quality) rabbits. The test chemical was applied undiluted at a concentration of 0.1 ml in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test article. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control. The eyes of each animal were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, after administration. Body weight was measured at day 1 and at termination of the study. Rabbits were observed for mortality daily. Rabbits were killed by an intraveneous injection of T61 into the ear vein. The irritation was assessed according to the OECD Guidelines for testing of Chemicals, Section 4, number 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion". Slight coloration was observed, no corrosive and toxic symptoms were observed in the test animals. Based on obove observations and a primary irritation score of 1.1, the test chemical can be classified as "Not irritant" to the rabbit eye according to the CLP regulation.
Another eye irritation study was carried out according to OECD 405 “EYE IRRITATION” to evaluate the irritation potential of the test chemical. 0.1 ml of test chemical was instilled into the conjunctival sac of 3 New Zealand White rabbits. Observations were made after 1 hour, 4 hours and then 1, 2, 3 days after instillation of test chemical. The scoring was done according to the Draize method. Conjunctival redness and chemosis was observed in all 3 animals after 1 day of observation. The MMAS (Maximum Modified Average Score) of test chemical was 4.0 after 1 day of observation. Based on the classification of chemicals according to MMAS scores, the test chemical can be considered as "Not irritating" to rabbit eyes.
Similarly another eye irritation test was conducted on rabbits according to Directive 84/449/EEC, B.5 "Acute toxicity (eye irritation)" to evaluate the irritation potential of test material. Three rabbits were each administered a single ocular dose of 0.1 ml test substance and observed over a 7 day period. Effects were temporary corneal opacity (one animal), transient dulling of the cornea (1 animal), transient iridial inflammation (one animal) and slight to well defined conjunctival irritation. All reactions had resolved in 7 days. Hence, the test chemical can be considered as "Not irritating" to rabbit eyes.
Eye Irritation (In-vitro):
The ocular irritation potential of test article was determined according to the OECD 492 test guideline for this study. The MatTek EpiOcular™ model was used to assess the potential ocular irritation of the test articles by determining the viability of the tissues following exposure to the test article via MTT. Tissues were exposed to liquid test articles and controls for ~30 minutes, followed by a ~12 minute post-soak and approximately 2 hour recovery after the post-soak. The viability of each tissue was determined by MTT assay. The MTT data show the assay quality controls were met, passing the acceptance criteria. The mean % tissue viability of test substance was determined to be 19.7%. Hence, under the experimental test conditions it was concluded that test substance was considered to be irritating to the human eyes and can thus be classified as ‘’Irritating to eyes in Category 2" as per CLP Regulation.
Though the in vitro results for the target indicates that test chemical can be irritating to eye, but the estimated in-vivo results imply that test chemical is not irritating to eye. These results are aptly supported by the results of rabbit study for the rtest chemical.
The results obtained from these studies lead to a conclusion that Test chemical is indeed not irritating to eye. Hence, comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, Test chemical can be classified under the category “ Not classified (not irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria”.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin and eye irritation potential of test chemical were observed in various studies. The results obtained from these studies indicates that the chemical is unlikely to cause skin irritation and eye irritation. Hence the test chemical can be classified under the category “Not Classified” for skin and eye irritation as per CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)