Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 916-329-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1st August 2001 - 20th November 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 2.5mmol/l (=250 mg/l Ca)
- Test temperature:
- 20-22oC
- pH:
- 7.9 +/-0.3
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Saturated with oxygen
- Conductivity:
- Alkalinity: 0.9 mmol
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations were: 0.038, 0.12, 0.38, 1.2 abd 3.8 mg/l.
Measured concentrations were: for nominal concentrations 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l were 75-81% at the start which decreased to 29-58% before renewal based on test media without food. It was shown that in the media with food the concentrations dropped below the LoQ and therefore it was assumed that the substance adsorbed to the food particles. - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The sum of the sixfold geometric mean of the two day period (day 12-14) plus the threefold geometric mean of the three days period (day 16-19) divided by 9.
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The sum of the sixfold geometric mean of the two day period (day 12-14) plus the threefold geometric mean of the three days period (day 16-19) divided by 9.
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 2.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The sum of the sixfold geometric mean of the two day period (day 12-14) plus the threefold geometric mean of the three days period (day 16-19) divided by 9.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen were in the required range. The surviving adults were 80% in the control.
- Conclusions:
- The reproductive NOEC in the long-term Daphnia study (OECD TG 211) is 0.71 mg/l based on geometric mean measured concentrations.
- Executive summary:
Florhydral is tested in a long-term Daphnia test according to OECD TG 211. The nominal concentrations were 0.038, 0.12, 0.38, 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l. The measured concentrations were lower than nominal and the concentrations in the test vessels with food were lower than without food. Therefore it was assumed that the substance adsorbed to the Daphnia feed and the exposure to Daphnia was via the water phase and via feed. In view of these two exposure routes it was considered justified to calculate the concentrations from the vessels without feed. The concentrations were measured as follows: The sum of the sixfold geometric mean of the two day period (day 12-14) plus the threefold geometric mean of the three days period (day 16-19) divided by 9. The nominal 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l were actual 0.71 and 2.6 mg/l. respectively. Temperature (20 -22oC), pH (7.5 -7.9) and dissolved oxygen (at least 8 mg/l) were in the set boundaries. Survival was not affected in the adult animals. At all concentration survival was >=80% (the 80% survival was found in the control). The total number of juveniles produced for all Daphnia at a certain concentration was not affected up to 0.71 mg/l (nominal 1.2) and resulted in 80 -100% of the number that were produced in the control. At the highest concentration 2.6 the total number was decreased to 12.6%. The number of juveniles per adult was similar (60 -70) in all concentrations up to 0.71 mg/l and decreased to 9 at the highest concentration: 2.6 mg/l. Therefore the NOEC for reproduction (most sensitive endpoint) was 0.71 mg/l. The EC50 for reproduction was 1.7 mg/l.
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- other: Read across from Florhydral
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 2018
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: information retrieved from read across
- Justification for type of information:
- Information is based on the analogue Florhydral. The read across justification and the derived acute chronic ratio is presented in the Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates, the files are also attached there.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Guideline:
- other: The acute chronic ratio from an analogue is used
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: The NOEC is derived based on the acute / chronic ratio found for Florhydral
- Details on results:
- Floralozone and Florhydral have a similar backbone and similar functional group and therefore the acute chronic ratio for Daphnia of Florhydral can be applied to Floralozone. The EC50 Daphnia of Florhydral is 2 and its long-term NOEC is 0.7 mg/l resulting in acute chronic ratio of 2.9. Floralozone has an EC50 Daphnia of 0.87 mg/l and dividing this value with the acute chronic ratio the long-term NOEC for Floralozone is 0.3 mg/l.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Read across information is reliable and adequately documented
- Conclusions:
- Floralozone and Florhydral have a similar backbone and similar functional group and therefore the acute chronic ratio for Daphnia of Florhydral can be applied to Floralozone. The EC50 Daphnia of Florhydral is 2 and its long-term NOEC is 0.7 mg/l resulting in acute chronic ratio of 2.9. Floralozone has an EC50 Daphnia of 0.87 mg/l and dividing this value with the acute chronic ratio the long-term NOEC for Floralozone is 0.3 mg/l.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table: Number of surviving test animals. Concentrations are expressed in nominal concentration. The nominal concentrations 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l result in 0.71 and 2.6 mg/l actual exposure concentrations.
Exposure days |
Control |
0.038 mg/l |
0.12 mg/l |
0.38 mg/l |
1.2 mg/l |
3.8 mg/l |
0 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
2 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
14 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
16 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
19 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
21 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
% Surviving on Day 21 |
80 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
100 |
90 |
Table: Total number of alive, young daphnids reproduced by all adults (cumulative values). Concentrations are expressed in nominal concentrations.
The nominal concentrations 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l result in 0.71 and 2.6 mg/l actual exposure concentrations.
Exposure day |
Control |
0.038 mg/l |
0.12 mg/l |
0.38 mg/l |
1.2 mg/l |
3.8 mg/l |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
9 |
110 |
69 |
71 |
105 |
109 |
0 |
12 |
214 |
182 |
156 |
219 |
226 |
18 |
14 |
214 |
227 |
178 |
219 |
226 |
20 |
16 |
431 |
403 |
385 |
407 |
447 |
43 |
19 |
635 |
584 |
550 |
539 |
599 |
52 |
21 |
635 |
648 |
589 |
539 |
625 |
80 |
% of control (based on the last exposure day) |
100% |
102.0 |
92.8 |
84.9 |
98.4 |
12.6 |
Table: The number of alive offspring reproduced per surviving adult within 21 days of exposure. Concentrations are expressed in nominal concentrations.
The nominal concentrations 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l result in 0.71 and 2.6 mg/l actual exposure concentrations.
Replicate number |
Control |
0.038 mg/l |
0.12 mg/l |
0.38 mg/l |
1.2 mg/l |
3.8 mg/l |
0 |
71 |
70 |
63 |
50 |
73 |
24 |
1 |
* |
71 |
70 |
40 |
61 |
3 |
2 |
60 |
71 |
78 |
71 |
54 |
17 |
4 |
52 |
67 |
65 |
74 |
79 |
16 |
5 |
72 |
86 |
* |
42 |
68 |
9 |
6 |
70 |
85 |
58 |
59 |
64 |
0 |
7 |
75 |
69 |
73 |
* |
74 |
0 |
8 |
68 |
72 |
59 |
78 |
54 |
6 |
9 |
69 |
54 |
62 |
50 |
53 |
* |
10 |
* |
* |
61 |
74 |
45 |
5 |
Mean +/- SD |
67.1 (+/- 7.5) |
71.7 (+/-9.5) |
65.4 (+/- 6.8) |
59.8 (+/-14.8) |
62.5 (+/- 11.0) |
8.9 (+/-8.4) |
N |
8 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
CV% |
11.2 |
13.3 |
10.4 |
24.8 |
17.6 |
94.2 |
STAT |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
s |
CV%: coefficient of variation in %; STAT: results of a William-test with the mean values of alive offspring (one-sided smaller, alpha = 0.05); n.s.: not significant; s: significant; * test animal died during the test period.
Description of key information
Floralozone has a long-term Daphnia NOEC of 0.3 mg/l based on the acute chronic ratio found for Florhydral, which is an analogue of Floralozone. Florhydral acute chronic ratio is derived from the results from the OECD TG 202 (acute) and 211 (long-term), respectively.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 0.3 mg/L
Additional information
For Floralozone the long-term Daphnia can be derived from the acute chronic ratio form Florhydral. The acute Daphnia toxicity is presented in the short-term section. The long-term Daphnia toxicity of Florhydral will be presented first. Thereafter the justification for read across and using the acute chronic ratio will be presented.
Florhydral long-term Daphnia study
Florhydral is tested in a long-term Daphnia test according to OECD TG 211. The nominal concentrations were 0.038, 0.12, 0.38, 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l. The measured concentrations were lower than nominal and the concentrations in the test vessels with food were lower than without food. Therefore it was assumed that the substance adsorbed to the Daphnia feed and the exposure to Daphnia was via the water phase and via feed. In view of these two exposure routes it was considered justified to calculate the concentrations from the vessels without feed. The concentrations were measured as follows: The sum of the sixfold geometric mean of the two day period (day 12-14) plus the threefold geometric mean of the three days period (day 16-19) divided by 9. The nominal 1.2 and 3.8 mg/l were actual 0.71 and 2.6 mg/l. respectively. Temperature (20 -22oC), pH (7.5 -7.9) and dissolved oxygen (at least 8 mg/l) were in the set boundaries. Survival was not affected in the adult animals. At all concentration survival was >=80% (the 80% survival was found in the control). The total number of juveniles produced for all Daphnia at a certain concentration was not affected up to 0.71 mg/l (nominal 1.2) and resulted in 80 -100% of the number that were produced in the control. At the highest concentration 2.6 the total number was decreased to 12.6%. The number of juveniles per adult was similar (60 -70) in all concentrations up to 0.71 mg/l and decreased to 9 at the highest concentration: 2.6 mg/l. Therefore the NOEC for reproduction (most sensitive endpoint) was 0.71 mg/l. The EC50 for reproduction was 1.7 mg/l.
Floralozone (Cas no 67634-15-5) and its long-term Daphnia toxicity using the Acute Chronic ratio of the analogue Florhydral (125109-85-5)
Introduction and hypothesis for the analogue approach
Floralozone is aphenyl-propyl aldehyde. For this substance acute aquatic toxicity information is available and chronic algae information. Further long-term Daphnia information is needed to present safe use for the terrestrial environment using the Equilibrium Partition Method. In accordance with Article 13 of REACH,lacking information can be generated by means of applying alternative methods such asin vitrotests, QSARs, grouping and read-across. For assessing the long term Daphnia toxicity for Floralozone the analogue approach and the analogue acute chronic ratio is selected.
Hypothesis: The long term Daphnia NOEC for Floralozone can be derived from its acute Daphnia value (0.87 mg/l) and dividing this value by the Daphnia acute chronic ratio of Florhydral (2.9), resulting in a NOEC for Floralozone of 0.3 mg/l.
Available experimental information:The target Floralozone and the source Florhydral both have aquatic toxicity for algae, Daphnia and fish according to OECD TG 201, 202 and 203, respectively. The acute Daphnia EC50s of Floralozone and Florhydral are 0.87 and 2 mg/l, respectively. Florhydral (source) also has a NOEC from a long-term Daphnia according to OECD TG 211, Kl1 of 0.7 mg/l. The acute chronic ratio of Florhydral is 2.9 (EC50 of 2/NOEC of 0.7 mg/l) and therefore the NOEC of Floralozone is 0.3 mg/l (EC50 / 2.9 (acute chronic ratio of Florhydral).
Target chemical and source chemical(s)
Chemical structures of the target chemical and the source chemical are shown in the data matrix. Also physico-chemical properties thought relevant for aquatic toxicity are listed in there.
Purity / Impurities
The purity and impurities of the target chemical do not indicate other aquatic toxic potential and/or the acute/chronic ratio. The impurities are all below < 10%.
Analogue approach justification
According to Annex XI 1.5 read across can be used to replace testing when the similarity can be based on a common backbone and a common functional group. When using read across the result derived should be applicable for C&L and/or risk assessment and it should be presented with adequate and reliable documentation.
Analogue selection:Florhydral is selected as an analogue because of similarities in chemical structure for which long-term Daphna information is available.
Structural similarities and differences:The target and the source chemicals both have a phenyl propyl backbone to which an aldehyde functional group is attached. Floralozone has a quaternary carbon to which the aldehyde is attached while Florhydral has a secondary carbon at the same spot. The phenyl group is substituted with an ethyl group in Floralozone at the para or ortho-position, while Florhydral has an isopropyl group attached to the phenyl group at the meta-position.
Bioavailability:The source chemical Floralozone likely has a slightly higher bioavailability compared to Florhydral based on the measured log Kow (4 and 3.1, respectively) and the slightly lower acute Daphnia toxicity value (0.87 and 2 mg/l). The water solubility in the aquatic toxicity test of Floralozone is also somewhat lower compared to Florhydral because for Floralozone the algae and fish toxicity are above the water solubility while for Florhydral these toxicity values are between 1-10 mg/l. Other characteristics are very similar. The molecular weight of both substances is 190. They are both liquids. Floralozone and Florhydral have similar vapour pressures 0.43 and 0.65, respectively. The position of the Floralozone’s ethyl group on the ring versus the isopropyl group of Florhydral does not change the bioavailability significantly (similar log Kow are predicted in ECOSAR: 3.9).
Mode of Action:Floralozone and Florhydral have a similar backbone and similar aldehyde functional group, which will present a similar mode of action. The quaternary carbon of Floralozone versus the secondary carbon attached at the aldehyde group is not expected to significantly change the reactivity of the aldehyde. This is supported when calculating the pKa of the respective acids of these substances. Floralozone has a pKa of 4.62 and Florhydral of 4.64 (SPARC calculations). The difference in log Kow between these two cannot fully explain the slightly higher toxicity of Floralozone (0.87 versus 2 mg/l). Therefore it is considered more appropriate to apply the acute chronic ratio found for Florhydral to Floralozone.
Uncertainty of the prediction: There are two acute Daphnia results for Florhydral. One from 1991 and one from 2016: 5.48 and 2 mg/l, respectively. Limited analytics are done in the first study and therefore the second study with an EC50 of 2 mg/l better reflects the actual EC50. This latter EC50 of Florhydral is also closer to the 0.87 mg/l of Floralozone. There are no other remaining uncertainties.
Data matrix
The relevant information on physico-chemical properties and toxicological characteristics are presented in the data matrix below).
Conclusions per endpoint
When using read across the result derived should be applicable for C&L and/or risk assessment and be presented with adequate and reliable documentation. Floralozone and Florhydral have a similar backbone and similar functional group and therefore the acute chronic ratio for Daphnia of Florhydral can be applied to Floralozone. The EC50 Daphnia of Florhydral is 2 and its long-term NOEC is 0.7 mg/l resulting in acute chronic ratio of 2.9. Floralozone has an EC50 Daphnia of 0.87 mg/l and dividing this value with the acute chronic ratio the long-term NOEC for Floralozone is 0.3 mg/l.
Final conclusion: Floralozone has a long-term Daphnia NOEC of 0.3 mg/l.
Data matrix: Characteristics of Floralozone and Florhydral for assessing the long-term Daphnia NOEC for Floralozone using the acute chronic ratio of Florhydral
Common names |
Floralozone |
Florhydral |
|
Target |
Source |
Chemical structures |
||
REACH registration |
Registered for 2018 deadline |
Registered |
Cas no of the main isomer Cas no of the minor isomer |
67634-15-5 67634-14-4 |
125109-85-5 |
EINECS |
266-819-2 266-819-7 |
412-050-4 |
Molecular weight |
190 |
190 |
Physico-chemical data |
IFF measured |
ECHA dissemination site |
Physical state |
Liquid |
Liquid |
Vapour pressure Pa (measured) |
0.43 |
0.65 |
Water solubility mg/l (measured) |
40 |
40 |
Log Kow (measured) |
4 |
3.1 |
Log Kow (calculated - ECOSAR) |
|
|
Acute Aquatic toxicity |
|
|
Fish mg/l |
> 0.7 (OECD TG 203) |
1.15 (OECD TG 203) |
Daphnia mg/l |
0.87 (OECD TG 202) |
2.0* (OECD TG 202) |
Alga mg/l |
>=1.2 (OECD TG 201) |
11/8.4 (OECD TG 201) |
Long-term Aquatic toxicity |
|
|
Fish mg/l |
No data available) |
No data available |
Daphnia mg/l |
0.3 Read across and acute chronic ratio (2/0.7) |
0.7 OECD TG 211 |
Algae mg/l |
> =1.2 |
3.2 |
* On the ECHA website a value of 5.48 is presented from a 1991 study (ECHA dissemination site). The EC50 of a 2016 study is used here.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
