Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 277-492-0 | CAS number: 73507-17-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- Experimental data from various test chemicals
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on data from various test chemicals
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 27-02-2018 - 26-03-2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was performed to investigate the potential of Disodium 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulphonatophenyl)azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonate (CAS no. 2783-94-0) to induce gene mutations in comparison to negative control according to the plate incorporation test (Trial I) and the pre-incubation test (Trial II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other:
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced S9 metabolic activation system
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.0 (NC), 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501 mg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: RO water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was solulble in RO water - Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RO water
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA 1537, TA 98, without S9); 2-Aminoanthracene (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102, with S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation- Trial I); preincubation (Trial II)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Trial I: Not applicable Trial II: 60 min
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Each concentration, including the negative, vehicle and positive controls was tested in triplicate in two independent experiments performed
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Not applicable
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen, if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding vehicle/solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative control and vehicle control such an increase is not considered biologically relevant. - Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No precipitation was noted at a dose upto 5 mg/plate in the pre-experiment
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: To evaluate the toxicity of the test item, a pre-experiment was performed with strains TA 98 and TA 100. Eight concentrations (0.0 (NC), 0.002, 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5.0 mg/plate) were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with 3 plates each (triplicates). The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the Trial-I (Plate incorporation test). Toxicity of the test item results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
In the pre-experiment, the concentration range of the test item was 0.002 – 5 mg/plate based on the solubility and precipitation test. There was no reduction in colony count as well as in background lawn in treated concentrations 5 (T8) mg/plate – 0.002 (T1) mg/plate) both in absence and in the presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of pre-experiment following doses were selected for the main study trials: 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5 mg/plate, both in the absence (-S9) as well as in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9).
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: No data
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: No data
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: No data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: No data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: No data
- Other observations when applicable: No data - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
Ames assay was performed to investigate the potential of the test chemical to induce gene mutations in comparison to negative control according to the plate incorporation test (Trial I) and the pre-incubation test (Trial II) using th e Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the negative, positive controls was tested in triplicate. Based on the solubility and precipitation test results eight different concentrations viz., 0.0 (NC), 0.002, 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5.0 mg/plate were selected for pre-experiment.
Based on the pre-experiment results, the test item was tested with the following concentrations 0.0 (NC), 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501 mg/plate for main study, both in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9) and in the absence of metabolic activation (-S9).
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers in any of the tester strains were observed following treatment with the test chemical at any dose level in both the confirmatory trials, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
The spontaneous reversion rates in the negative, positive controls are within the range of our historical data.
The positive controls used for various strains showed a distinct increase in induced revertant colonies in both the methods i.e. Plate incorporation method and Pre-incubation method.
In conclusion, it is stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test chemical did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the strains used.
TABLE1- REVERTANT COUNT FOR PRE-EXPERIMENT
Dose (mg/plate) |
R |
Without metabolic activation (-S9) |
With metabolic activation (+S9) |
||
TA100 |
TA 98 |
TA100 |
TA 98 |
||
NC (0.00) |
R1 |
110 |
26 |
124 |
28 |
R2 |
106 |
24 |
122 |
26 |
|
R3 |
104 |
25 |
126 |
24 |
|
T1 (0.002) |
R1 |
91 |
14 |
86 |
16 |
R2 |
84 |
13 |
82 |
18 |
|
R3 |
87 |
13 |
88 |
16 |
|
T2 (0.005) |
R1 |
86 |
14 |
90 |
19 |
R2 |
92 |
17 |
88 |
21 |
|
R3 |
85 |
18 |
86 |
17 |
|
T3 (0.016) |
R1 |
90 |
16 |
102 |
19 |
R2 |
96 |
14 |
98 |
20 |
|
R3 |
84 |
16 |
106 |
21 |
|
T4 (0.050) |
R1 |
90 |
18 |
106 |
21 |
R2 |
88 |
16 |
98 |
23 |
|
R3 |
98 |
16 |
90 |
19 |
|
T5 (0.158) |
R1 |
95 |
18 |
104 |
20 |
R2 |
88 |
19 |
100 |
18 |
|
R3 |
96 |
18 |
108 |
22 |
|
T6 (0.501) |
R1 |
94 |
20 |
108 |
18 |
R2 |
101 |
21 |
110 |
20 |
|
R3 |
98 |
19 |
114 |
24 |
|
T7 (1.582) |
R1 |
96 |
20 |
112 |
18 |
R2 |
104 |
23 |
116 |
22 |
|
R3 |
98 |
20 |
118 |
24 |
|
T8 (5) |
R1 |
102 |
23 |
118 |
23 |
R2 |
98 |
25 |
114 |
25 |
|
R3 |
100 |
24 |
120 |
24 |
|
PC |
R1 |
1232 |
896 |
1458 |
1242 |
R2 |
1280 |
944 |
1432 |
1180 |
|
R3 |
1296 |
936 |
1488 |
1208 |
NC = Negative control
PC = Positive control
R = Replicate
T = Test concentration (T8: Highest, T1: Lowest)
4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine [10μg/plate]: TA 98
Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA 100,
2-Aminoanthracene [2.5μg/plate]: TA98, TA100
TABLE 2 - REVERTANT COUNT IN PLATE
INCORPORATION METHOD
(TRIAL I)
Dose (mg/plate) |
R |
In the Presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9) |
||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||
NC (0.00) |
R1 |
8 |
15 |
28 |
124 |
284 |
R2 |
8 |
14 |
26 |
122 |
278 |
|
R3 |
6 |
16 |
24 |
126 |
284 |
|
T1 (0.005) |
R1 |
6 |
10 |
19 |
90 |
228 |
R2 |
5 |
11 |
21 |
88 |
238 |
|
R3 |
5 |
12 |
17 |
86 |
232 |
|
T2 (0.016) |
R1 |
7 |
12 |
19 |
102 |
227 |
R2 |
5 |
11 |
20 |
98 |
244 |
|
R3 |
6 |
12 |
21 |
106 |
236 |
|
T3 (0.050) |
R1 |
6 |
13 |
21 |
106 |
242 |
R2 |
7 |
12 |
23 |
98 |
254 |
|
R3 |
6 |
12 |
19 |
90 |
236 |
|
T4 (0.158) |
R1 |
6 |
14 |
20 |
104 |
254 |
R2 |
5 |
13 |
18 |
100 |
260 |
|
R3 |
5 |
12 |
22 |
108 |
262 |
|
T5 (0.501) |
R1 |
7 |
14 |
18 |
108 |
268 |
R2 |
5 |
15 |
20 |
110 |
274 |
|
R3 |
6 |
15 |
24 |
114 |
270 |
|
PC |
R1 |
172 |
398 |
1242 |
1458 |
1336 |
R2 |
186 |
408 |
1180 |
1432 |
1384 |
|
R3 |
190 |
440 |
1208 |
1488 |
1344 |
Dose (mg/plate) |
R |
In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9) |
||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||
NC (0.00) |
R1 |
7 |
16 |
26 |
110 |
272 |
R2 |
6 |
15 |
24 |
106 |
296 |
|
R3 |
8 |
14 |
25 |
104 |
268 |
|
T1 (0.005) |
R1 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
86 |
226 |
R2 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
92 |
231 |
|
R3 |
5 |
11 |
18 |
85 |
218 |
|
T2 (0.016) |
R1 |
5 |
13 |
16 |
90 |
226 |
R2 |
6 |
12 |
14 |
96 |
234 |
|
R3 |
5 |
10 |
16 |
84 |
232 |
|
T3 (0.050) |
R1 |
6 |
14 |
18 |
90 |
242 |
R2 |
6 |
13 |
16 |
88 |
238 |
|
R3 |
6 |
11 |
16 |
98 |
250 |
|
T4 (0.158) |
R1 |
6 |
14 |
18 |
95 |
244 |
R2 |
6 |
15 |
19 |
88 |
252 |
|
R3 |
5 |
13 |
18 |
96 |
260 |
|
T5 (0.501) |
R1 |
7 |
14 |
20 |
94 |
268 |
R2 |
7 |
16 |
21 |
101 |
274 |
|
R3 |
6 |
14 |
19 |
98 |
284 |
|
PC |
R1 |
168 |
1218 |
896 |
1232 |
1624 |
R2 |
183 |
1230 |
944 |
1280 |
1688 |
|
R3 |
175 |
1170 |
936 |
1296 |
1680 |
NC= Negative Control,T=Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest),R= Replicate
PC=
Positive
control 2-Aminoanthracene
[2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA1535, TA 98, TA 100
2- Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]:TA
102 Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA
1535, TA 100
4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate], TA 98[10μg/plate] Methyl methanesulfonate [4μl/plate]: TA 102
TABLE 3 - REVERTANT COUNT IN PRE-INCUBATION METHOD (TRIAL II)
Dose (mg/plate) |
R |
In the Presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9) |
||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||
NC (0.00) |
R1 |
8 |
17 |
28 |
121 |
278 |
R2 |
6 |
16 |
27 |
119 |
262 |
|
R3 |
7 |
16 |
27 |
120 |
272 |
|
T1 (0.005) |
R1 |
5 |
12 |
19 |
104 |
234 |
R2 |
5 |
12 |
21 |
98 |
240 |
|
R3 |
4 |
11 |
22 |
102 |
230 |
|
T2 (0.016) |
R1 |
5 |
13 |
23 |
106 |
240 |
R2 |
6 |
13 |
22 |
110 |
236 |
|
R3 |
5 |
12 |
24 |
104 |
242 |
|
T3 (0.050) |
R1 |
5 |
12 |
20 |
112 |
250 |
R2 |
6 |
15 |
21 |
108 |
240 |
|
R3 |
4 |
13 |
23 |
112 |
258 |
|
T4 (0.158) |
R1 |
5 |
14 |
23 |
114 |
266 |
R2 |
6 |
13 |
23 |
108 |
260 |
|
R3 |
6 |
14 |
24 |
112 |
258 |
|
T5 (0.501) |
R1 |
7 |
15 |
26 |
117 |
260 |
R2 |
7 |
14 |
25 |
115 |
272 |
|
R3 |
6 |
14 |
23 |
118 |
258 |
|
PC |
R1 |
179 |
398 |
1360 |
1518 |
1736 |
R2 |
158 |
418 |
1384 |
1448 |
1704 |
|
R3 |
184 |
376 |
1328 |
1480 |
1712 |
Dose (mg/plate) |
R |
In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9) |
||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||
NC (0.00) |
R1 |
`7 |
16 |
28 |
114 |
264 |
R2 |
7 |
15 |
26 |
112 |
256 |
|
R3 |
6 |
13 |
26 |
118 |
274 |
|
T1 (0.005) |
R1 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
102 |
229 |
R2 |
4 |
10 |
22 |
108 |
237 |
|
R3 |
4 |
11 |
18 |
110 |
240 |
|
T2 (0.016) |
R1 |
6 |
12 |
21 |
104 |
242 |
R2 |
4 |
11 |
23 |
110 |
246 |
|
R3 |
5 |
14 |
22 |
108 |
256 |
|
T3 (0.050) |
R1 |
5 |
13 |
19 |
106 |
260 |
R2 |
4 |
13 |
23 |
110 |
252 |
|
R3 |
5 |
12 |
22 |
111 |
254 |
|
T4 (0.158) |
R1 |
5 |
11 |
25 |
116 |
262 |
R2 |
5 |
12 |
20 |
112 |
250 |
|
R3 |
6 |
13 |
23 |
108 |
260 |
|
T5 (0.501) |
R1 |
6 |
13 |
26 |
116 |
266 |
R2 |
6 |
14 |
23 |
112 |
252 |
|
R3 |
7 |
12 |
21 |
114 |
258 |
|
PC |
R1 |
187 |
1208 |
928 |
1086 |
1608 |
R2 |
178 |
1160 |
894 |
1164 |
1656 |
|
R3 |
182 |
1224 |
952 |
1128 |
1568 |
NC= Negative Control,T =Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest), R= Replicate
PC=
Positive
control 2-Aminoanthracene
[2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA1535, TA98, TA100
2-Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]:TA
102 Sodium azide
[10μg/plate]: TA 1535, TA
100,
4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate] TA 98[10μg/plate] Methyl methanesulfonate [4μl/plate]: TA 102
TABLE 4 - MEAN REVERTANT COUNT IN PLATE INCORPORATION METHOD (TRIALI)
Dose (mg/plate) |
In the presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9) |
|||||||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||||||
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
|
NC (0.00) |
7.33 |
1.15 |
15.00 |
1.00 |
26.00 |
2.00 |
124.00 |
2.00 |
282.00 |
3.46 |
T1 (0.005) |
5.33 |
0.58 |
11.00 |
1.00 |
19.00 |
2.00 |
88.00 |
2.00 |
232.67 |
5.03 |
T2 (0.016) |
6.00 |
1.00 |
11.67 |
0.58 |
20.00 |
1.00 |
102.00 |
4.00 |
235.67 |
8.50 |
T3 (0.050) |
6.33 |
0.58 |
12.33 |
0.58 |
21.00 |
2.00 |
98.00 |
8.00 |
244.00 |
9.17 |
T4 (0.158) |
5.33 |
0.58 |
13.00 |
1.00 |
20.00 |
2.00 |
104.00 |
4.00 |
258.67 |
4.16 |
T5 (0501) |
6.00 |
1.00 |
14.67 |
0.58 |
20.67 |
3.06 |
110.67 |
3.06 |
270.67 |
3.06 |
PC |
182.67 |
9.45 |
415.33 |
21.94 |
1210.00 |
31.05 |
1459.33 |
28.02 |
1354.67 |
25.72 |
Dose (mg/plate) |
In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9) |
|||||||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||||||
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
|
NC (0.00) |
7.00 |
1.00 |
15.00 |
1.00 |
25.00 |
1.00 |
106.67 |
3.06 |
278.67 |
15.14 |
T1 (0.005) |
4.67 |
0.58 |
10.67 |
0.58 |
16.33 |
2.08 |
87.67 |
3.79 |
225.00 |
6.56 |
T2 (0.016) |
5.33 |
0.58 |
11.67 |
1.53 |
15.33 |
1.15 |
90.00 |
6.00 |
230.67 |
4.16 |
T3 (0.050) |
6.00 |
0.00 |
12.67 |
1.53 |
16.67 |
1.15 |
92.00 |
5.29 |
243.33 |
6.11 |
T4 (0.158) |
5.67 |
0.58 |
14.00 |
1.00 |
18.33 |
0.58 |
93.00 |
4.36 |
252.00 |
8.00 |
T5 (0501) |
6.67 |
0.58 |
14.67 |
1.15 |
20.00 |
1.00 |
97.67 |
3.51 |
275.33 |
8.08 |
PC |
175.33 |
7.51 |
1206.00 |
31.75 |
925.33 |
25.72 |
1269.33 |
33.31 |
1664.00 |
34.87 |
NC= Negative Control,T =Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest),SD= Standard Deviation
PC= Positive control
2-Aminoanthracene [2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100 Methyl methanesulfonate [4μl/plate]: TA 102
2-Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]:TA 102
Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA 1535, TA 100
4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate], TA 98 [10μg/plate]
TABLE 5 - MEAN REVERTANT COUNT IN
PRE-INCUBATIONMETHOD
(TRIAL II)
Dose (mg/plate) |
In the presence of Metabolic Activation (+S9) |
|||||||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||||||
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
|
NC (0.00) |
7.00 |
1.00 |
16.33 |
0.58 |
27.33 |
0.58 |
120.00 |
1.00 |
270.67 |
8.08 |
T1 (0.005) |
4.67 |
0.58 |
11.67 |
0.58 |
20.67 |
1.53 |
101.33 |
3.06 |
234.67 |
5.03 |
T2 (0.016) |
5.33 |
0.58 |
12.67 |
0.58 |
23.00 |
1.00 |
106.67 |
3.06 |
239.33 |
3.06 |
T3 (0.050) |
5.00 |
1.00 |
13.33 |
1.53 |
21.33 |
1.53 |
110.67 |
2.31 |
249.33 |
9.02 |
T4 (0.158) |
5.67 |
0.58 |
13.67 |
0.58 |
23.33 |
0.58 |
111.33 |
3.06 |
261.33 |
4.16 |
T5 (0501) |
6.67 |
0.58 |
14.33 |
0.58 |
24.67 |
1.53 |
116.67 |
1.53 |
263.33 |
7.57 |
PC |
173.67 |
13.80 |
397.33 |
21.01 |
1357.33 |
28.10 |
1482.00 |
35.04 |
1717.33 |
16.65 |
Dose (mg/plate) |
In the Absence of Metabolic Activation (-S9) |
|||||||||
TA 1537 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
||||||
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
|
NC (0.00) |
6.67 |
0.58 |
14.67 |
1.53 |
26.67 |
1.15 |
114.67 |
3.06 |
264.67 |
9.02 |
T1 (0.005) |
4.33 |
0.58 |
10.33 |
0.58 |
20.00 |
2.00 |
106.67 |
4.16 |
235.33 |
5.69 |
T2 (0.016) |
5.00 |
1.00 |
12.33 |
1.53 |
22.00 |
1.00 |
107.33 |
3.06 |
248.00 |
7.21 |
T3 (0.050) |
4.67 |
0.58 |
12.67 |
0.58 |
21.33 |
2.08 |
109.00 |
2.65 |
255.33 |
4.16 |
T4 (0.158) |
5.33 |
0.58 |
12.00 |
1.00 |
22.67 |
2.52 |
112.00 |
4.00 |
257.33 |
6.43 |
T5 (0501) |
6.33 |
0.58 |
13.00 |
1.00 |
23.33 |
2.52 |
114.00 |
2.00 |
258.67 |
7.02 |
PC |
182.33 |
4.51 |
1197.33 |
33.31 |
924.67 |
29.14 |
1126.00 |
39.04 |
1610.67 |
44.06 |
NC= Negative Control, T =Test concentration (T5: Highest, T1: Lowest),SD= Standard Deviation
PC= Positive control
2-Aminoanthracene [2.5μg/plate]: TA 1537, TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100
2-Aminoanthracene [10μg/plate]: TA 102
Sodium azide [10μg/plate]: TA 1535, TA 100
4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine: TA 1537[50μg/plate] TA 98[10μg/plate]
Methyl methanesulfonate: [4μl/plate]: TA 102
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- Including Prival modification
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Ames Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity test including the Prival modification was conducted to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system: Liver S9 homogenate was prepared from Syrian golden hamsters that had been injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight. The components of the S9 mix were 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADP, 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), and the appropriate S9 homogenate at a concentration of 0.1 mL/mL of mix
- source of S9 : Liver S9 homogenate was prepared from Syrian golden hamsters
- method of preparation of S9 mix : The postmitochondrial (microsomal) enzyme fractions were prepared as described by Ames et al.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : Uninduced hamster liver S9 (30% v/v), cofactors (FMN, NADH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate),
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): No data - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO - Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- congo red
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 mins without shaking. Nitrogen was blown over the preincubation tube to keep the atmosphere reduced.
- Exposure duration: 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data available
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data available
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Cytotoxicity was checked in preliminary dose range finding study
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other: No data available
OTHER: No data available - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- The criteria used to evaluate a test were as follows: for a test article to be considered positive, it had to induce at least a doubling (TA98, TA100) in the mean number of revertants per plate of at least one tester strain. This increase in the mean revertants per plate had to be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test chemical.
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The doses that were tested in the mutagenicity assay were selected based on the levels of cytotoxicity observed in a preliminary dose range-finding study using strain TA100. Ten dose levels of the chemical, one plate per dose, were tested in both the presence and the absence of induced hamster S9. If no toxicity was observed, a total maximum dose of 10 mg of test chemical per plate was used. Ten dose levels of the chemical, one plate per dose, were tested in both the presence and the absence of induced hamster S9. If no toxicity was observed, a total maximum dose of 10 mg of test chemical per plate was used.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: No data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No data - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 both in the presence and absence of hamster S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a genotoxic in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Ames mutagenicity test with Prival modification was conducted as per OECD 471 for the test chemical to evaluate its genetoxic effects when exposed to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 with dose concentration of 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 µg/plate in pre-incubation assay. The doses for the main study were based on preliminary dose range study conducted. The bacteria, uninduced hamster liver S9 (30% v/v), cofactors (FMN, NADH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate), and test chemical were added, mixed, and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min without shaking. Nitrogen was blown over the preincubation tube to keep the atmosphere reduced. At the end of the incubation period, 2 mL of molten top agar was added to each sample tube and the mixture was poured on a minimal agar plate containing 0.5% glucose rather than the 2% glucose specified by Ames et al.. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The positive control in all FMN experiments was Congo red. All plates were counted with an Artek automated colony counter or Minicount colony counter, which was calibrated prior to use. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 both in the presence and absence of hamster S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a genotoxic in vitro.
Mutagenic response of the test chemical:
Prival Modification |
Doses ug/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
Negative |
Negative |
||
DMSO |
24 ± 6 |
139 ± 24 |
|
10ug |
33 ± 7 |
142 ± 19 |
|
33ug |
24 ± 4 |
166 ± 52 |
|
100ug |
39 ± 13 |
124 ± 19 |
|
333ug |
31 ± 4 |
161 ± 13 |
|
1000ug |
27 ± 4 |
193± 9 |
|
Positive 1 |
190 ± 24 |
368 ± 50 |
|
Positive 2 |
522 ± 67 |
1150 ± 55 |
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- secondary literature
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from secondary source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine for Salmonells strains and Tryptophan for E. coli strains
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The S9 liver microsomal fraction was obtained from the livers of 8 - 12 weeks old male Wistar rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 or 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in water - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Water
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (TA1537, TA98, -S9); 2-aminoanthracene (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, WP2 uvrA + S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): No data
- Test substance added : in agar (plate incorporation) (experiment 1); preincubation (experiment 2)
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method, e.g.: background growth inhibition
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- The plates were observed for the an increase in the number of revertants
- Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: No data
- Data on osmolality: No data
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No data
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable): The pre-experiment was performed with strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and WP2 uvrA. Eight concentrations were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with three plates each. The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the experiment I (plate incorporation test). Toxicity of the test article results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn. Based upon the results of the pre-experiment the concentrations applied in the main experiments were chosen. According to the dose selection criteria the test article was tested at the following concentrations: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate The results of the pre-experiment ate included are reported as a part of the main experiment I.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments.
- Individual plate counts : No data
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation : No data - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The test chemical dissolved in water was used at dose level of 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 or 5000 µg/plate. The doses for the main study was based on pre-experiment conducted. Main study was performed as per plate incorporation and pre-incubation assay in two independent experiments with triplicate concentrations used. Concurrent untreated, solvent and positive control plates were also included in the study. The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments. No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with the test chemical at any dose level, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens used as positive controls showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. Based on the details of the study, the test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- WoE of gene mutation in vitro toxicity study for CAS no 73507-17-2
- Author:
- Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB
- Year:
- 2 019
- Bibliographic source:
- WoE report, Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB, 2019
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- Including Prival modification / 3
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE for the target CAS is summarized based on data from various test chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrogen tetrasodium bis[2-[[6-[[4-chloro-6-[3-sulphoanilino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]benzoato(4-)]chromate(5-)
- EC Number:
- 277-492-0
- EC Name:
- Hydrogen tetrasodium bis[2-[[6-[[4-chloro-6-[3-sulphoanilino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]benzoato(4-)]chromate(5-)
- Cas Number:
- 73507-17-2
- Molecular formula:
- C52H28Cl2CrN14O18S44Na
- IUPAC Name:
- Hydrogen tetrasodium bis[2-[[6-[[4-chloro-6-[3-sulphoanilino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]benzoato(4-)]chromate(5-)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of the test chemical: Hydrogen tetrasodium bis[2-[[6-[[4-chloro-6-[3-sulphoanilino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]benzoato(4-)]chromate(5-)
- Molecular formula: C52H28Cl2CrN14O18S4.H.4Na
- Molecular weight: 2693.61 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine for Salmonella strains and Tryptophan for E. coli strains
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Remarks:
- 2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- No data
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100
- Remarks:
- 3 / 5
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- No data
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Remarks:
- 4
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- No data
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- 4
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- No data
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 2. Aroclor 1254 induced S9 metabolic activation system
3/5. Type and composition of metabolic activation system: Liver S9 homogenate was prepared from Syrian golden hamsters that had been injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight. The components of the S9 mix were 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADP, 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), and the appropriate S9 homogenate at a concentration of 0.1 m L/mL of mix
- source of S9 : Liver S9 homogenate was prepared from Syrian golden hamsters
- method of preparation of S9 mix : The postmitochondrial (microsomal) enzyme fractions were prepar ed as described by Ames et al.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : Uninduced hamster liver S9 (30% v/v), cofactors (FMN, NADH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate)
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): No data
4. The S9 liver microsomal fraction was obtained from the livers of 8 - 12 weeks old male Wistar rats - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 2. 0.0 (NC), 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501 mg/plate
3. 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 µg/plate
4. 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 or 5000 µg/plate
5. 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 or 10000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- 2. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: RO water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was solulble in RO water
3. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO
4. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in water
5. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in water
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RO water
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA 1537, TA 98, without S9); 2-Aminoanthracene (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102, with S9)
- Remarks:
- 2
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- congo red
- Remarks:
- 3
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Water
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (TA1537, TA98, -S9); 2-aminoanthracene (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, WP2 uvrA + S9)
- Remarks:
- 4
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- congo red
- Remarks:
- 5
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 2. METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation- Trial I); preincubation (Trial II)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Trial I: Not applicable Trial II: 60 min
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Each concentration, including the negative, vehicle and positive controls was tested in triplicate in two independent experiments performed
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Not applicable
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data
3/5. METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 mins without shaking. Nitrogen was blown over the preincubation tube to keep the atmosphere reduced
- Exposure duration: 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data available
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data available
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Cytotoxicity was checked in preliminary dose range finding study
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other: No data available
OTHER: No data available
4. NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): No data
- Test substance added : in agar (plate incorporation) (experiment 1); preincubation (experiment 2)
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method, e.g.: background growth inhibition
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- 2. A test item is considered as a mutagen, if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding vehicle/solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative control and vehicle control such an increase is not considered biologically relevant.
3. The criteria used to evaluate a test were as follows: for a test article to be considered positive, it had to induce at least a doubling (TA98, TA100) in the mean number of revertants per plate of at least on e tester strain. This increase in the mean revertants per plate had to be accompanied by a dose res ponse to increasing concentrations of the test chemical.
4. The plates were observed for the an increase in the number of revertants - Statistics:
- No data
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Remarks:
- 2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100
- Remarks:
- 3
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100
- Remarks:
- 4
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Remarks:
- 4
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- 2. TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No precipitation was noted at a dose upto 5 mg/plate in the pre-experiment
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: To evaluate the toxicity of the test item, a pre-experiment was performed with strains TA 98 and TA 100. Eight concentrations (0.0 (NC), 0.002, 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5.0 mg/plate) were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with 3 plates each (triplicates). The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the Trial-I (Plate incorporation test). Toxicity of the test item results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
In the pre-experiment, the concentration range of the test item was 0.002 – 5 mg/plate based on the solubility and precipitation test. There was no reduction in colony count as well as in background lawn in treated concentrations 5 (T8) mg/plate – 0.002 (T1) mg/plate) both in absence and in the presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of pre-experiment following doses were selected for the main study trials: 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5 mg/plate, both in the absence (-S9) as well as in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9).
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: No data
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: No data
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: No data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: No data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: No data
- Other observations when applicable: No data
3. TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The doses that were tested in the mutagenicity assay were selected based on the levels of cytotoxici ty observed in a preliminary dose range-finding study using strain TA100. Ten dose levels of the ch emical, one plate per dose, were tested in both the presence and the absence of induced hamster S9. If no toxicity was observed, a total maximum dose of 10 mg of test chemical per plate was used. Ten dose levels of the chemical, one plate per dose, were tested in both the presence and the absence of induced hamster S9. If no toxicity was observed, a total maximum dose of 10 mg of test chemical per plate was used.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: No data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No data
Remarks on result
other: No mutagenic potential
4. TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: No data
- Data on osmolality: No data
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No data
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable): The pre-experiment was performed with strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, and WP2 uvrA. Eight concentrations were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with three plates each. The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the experiment I (plate incorporation test). Toxicity of the test article results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial ba ckground lawn. Based upon the results of the pre-experiment the concentrations applied in the main experiments were chosen. According to the dose selection criteria the test article was tested at the following concentrations: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate The results of the pre-expe riment ate included are reported as a part of the main experiment I.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments.
- Individual plate counts : No data
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation : No data
Remarks on result other: No mutagenic potential - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli strains in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
Data available for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The summaries are as mentioned below:
Ames assay was performed to investigate the potential of the test chemical to induce gene mutations in comparison to negative control according to the plate incorporation test (Trial I) and the pre-incubation test (Trial II) using th e Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the negative, positive controls was tested in triplicate. Based on the solubility and precipitation test results eight different concentrations viz., 0.0 (NC), 0.002, 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501, 1.582 and 5.0 mg/plate were selected for pre-experiment. Based on the pre-experiment results, the test item was tested with the following concentrations 0.0 (NC), 0.005, 0.016, 0.050, 0.158, 0.501 mg/plate for main study, both in the presence of metabolic activation (+S9) and in the absence of metabolic activation (-S9). No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers in any of the tester strains were observed following treatment with the test chemical at any dose level in both the confirmatory trials, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. The spontaneous reversion rates in the negative, positive controls are within the range of our historical data. The positive controls used for various strains showed a distinct increase in induced revertant colonies in both the methods i.e. Plate incorporation method and Pre-incubation method. In conclusion, it is stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test chemical did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the strains used.
Ames mutagenicity test with Prival modifications was also conducted as per the OECD 471 guideline for the test chemical to evaluate its genetoxic effects. In the FMN-modified assay, the test chemical was exposed toSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA98 and TA100 at dose concentrations of 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 µg/plate. The doses for the main study were based on preliminary dose range study conducted. The bacteria, uninduced hamster liver S9 (30% v/v), cofactors (FMN, NADH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate), and test chemical were added, mixed, and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min without shaking. Nitrogen was blown over the preincubation tube to keep the atmosphere reduced. At the end of the incubation period, 2 mL of molten top agar was added to each sample tube and the mixture was poured on a minimal agar plate containing 0.5% glucose rather than the 2% glucose specified by Ames et al.. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The positive control used for the experiment was Congo red. All plates were counted with an Artek automated colony counter or Mini-count colony counter, which was calibrated prior to use. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 both in the presence and absence of hamster S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a genotoxic in vitro.
In another study, Bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed usingSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, andEscherichia colistrain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The test chemical dissolved in water was used at dose level of 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 or 5000 µg/plate. The doses for the main study was based on pre-experiment conducted. Main study was performed as per plate incorporation and pre-incubation assay in two independent experiments with triplicate concentrations used. Concurrent untreated, solvent and positive control plates were also included in the study. The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments. No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with the test chemical at any dose level, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens used as positive controls showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. Based on the details of the study, the test chemical did not induce gene mutation inSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100, andEscherichia colistrain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In the same study as mentioned above, Ames mutagenicity test with Prival modification was conducted as per OECD 471 guideline for the test chemical to evaluate its genetoxic effects when exposed to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 with dose concentration of 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 or 10000 µg/plate in pre-incubation assay. The doses for the main study were based on preliminary dose range study conducted. The bacteria, uninduced hamster liver S9 (30% v/v), cofactors (FMN, NADH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glucose-6-phosphate), and test chemical were added, mixed, and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min without shaking. Nitrogen was blown over the preincubation tube to keep the atmosphere reduced. At the end of the incubation period, 2 mL of molten top agar was added to each sample tube and the mixture was poured on a minimal agar plate containing 0.5% glucose rather than the 2% glucose specified by Ames et al.. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The positive control in all FMN experiments was Congo red. All plates were counted with an Artek automated colony counter or Minicount colony counter, which was calibrated prior to use. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 both in the presence and absence of hamster S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a genotoxic in vitro.
Based on the data available and applying the weight of evidence approach, the test chemical did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli strains in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.