Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-997-4 | CAS number: 18096-62-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (OECD 471): negative with S. typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 with and without metabolic activation
HPRT (OECD 476): negative in V79 cells with and without metabolic activation
In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
(OECD 487): negative in cultured human lymphocytes with and without
metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13 Aug - 17 Nov 1999
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Directive 92/69/EEC
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 and 2: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA); 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (Danthron)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: approx. 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in two independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Inspection of the bacterial background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- The test material may be considered to be positive in this test system if the following criteria are met:
The test material should have induced a reproducible, dose-related and statistically (Dunnett´s method of linear regression) significant increase in the revertant count in at least one strain of bacteria. - Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In order to select appropriate dose levels for the main study, a preliminary test was carried out in S. typhimurium strain TA 100 to determine the toxicity of the test substance. The dose range for the test substance used was 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate wiht and without metabolic activation. The test substance was non-toxic to strain TA 100 at the tested concentrations. - Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the Ames Assay the substance was not mutagenic in any of the five strains (TA 100, TA 1535, TA 102, TA 98 and TA 1537) tested with and without metabolic activation up to 5000 µg/plate.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 Dec 2014 - 03 Mar 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hess. Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM containing Hank's salts, 10% FBS (except during 4 h treatment), neomycin (5 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (1%)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment:
4 h and 24 h treatment: 13.8, 27.5, 55, 110, 220, 440, 880 and 1760 µg/mL without metabolic activation
4 h treatment: 13.8, 27.5, 55, 110, 220, 440, 880 and 1760 µg/mL with metabolic activation
Experiment 1:
4 h treatment: 55*, 110*, 220*, 440*, 880* and 1760* µg/mL with and without metabolic activation
Experiment 2:
24 h treatment: 110*, 220*, 440*, 880*, 1320 and 1760 µg/mL without metabolic activation
4 h treatment: 110*, 220*, 440*, 880*, 1320* and 1760 µg/mL with metabolic activation
*concentrations chosen for mutation rate analysis - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO (0.5% (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS): 0.15 mg/mL (4 and 24 h, -S9); 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA): 1.1 µg/mL (4 h, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
1st experiment: 4 h exposure with and without S9 mix.
2nd experiment: 4 h exposure with S9 mix and 24 h without S9 mix
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 8 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 15 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 11 µg/mL 6-thioguanine (6-TG)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates each in two independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations of the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory´s historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The numbers of mutant colonies generated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance was considered together.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 1320 µg/mL and higher following the 24 h treatment without S9 mix; at 1760 µg/mL following the 4 h treatment with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH and osmolarity: There was no relevant shift of pH and osmolarity of the medium even at the maximum concentration of the test item.
- Precipitation: Precipitation was noted in Experiment 1 at 1760 µg/mL with metabolic activation and in Experiment 2 at 1320 µg/mL with metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A pre-experiment was performed in order to determine the concentration range for the mutagenicity experiments. The pre-experiment was performed in the presence (4 h treatment) and absence (4 h and 24 h treatment) of metabolic activation. Test item concentrations between 13.8 µg/mL and 1760 µg/mL were used. The highest concentration of the pre-experiment was chosen with regard to the purity (100%) and the molecular weight (176.2 g/mol) of the test item. No relevant toxic effect occurred up to the maximum concentration tested with and without metabolic activation following 4 hours of treatment.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Relevant cytotoxic effects solely occurred in the Experiment 2 with metabolic activation at 1320 µg/mL. Based on the steep gradient of toxicity no relevant cytotoxicity was noted at the maximum analyzable concentration of the other experimental parts. Exceedingly severe cytotoxicity occurred at the next higher concentration even though the individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2 or below. - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of the gene mutation assay the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells with and without metabolic activation.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 Dec 2014 - 20 Feb 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 26 September 2014
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hess. Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Cell proliferation: Blood was collected from healthy non-smoking donors not receiving medication. All donors had a previously established low incidence of micronuclei in their peripheral blood lymphocytes. Human lymphocytes were stimulated for proliferation by the addition of the mitogen PHA to the culture medium for a period of 48 h. The cell harvest time point was approx. 2 – 2.5 x AGT (average generation time).
- Type and identity of media: DMEM/F12, mixture 1:1 already supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMAX. Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 µg/mL), the mitogen PHA (3 µg/mL), 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10 mM HEPES and the anticoagulant heparin (125 U.S.P.-U/mL)
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment / Experiment 1:
4 h treatment: 11.4, 20, 35, 61.3, 107.2, 187.7, 328.4, 574.7*, 1005.7* and 1760* µg/mL with and without metabolic activation
Since the cultures fulfilled the requirements for cytogenetic evaluation, this preliminary test was designated Experiment 1.
Experiment 2:
20 h treatment: 11.4, 20, 35, 61.3, 107.2, 187.7, 328.4, 574.7*, 1005.7* and 1760* µg/mL without metabolic activation
4 h treatment: 187.7, 328.4, 574.7*, 1005.7* and 1760.0* µg/mL with metabolic activation
*evaluated for cytogenetic damage - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO (0.5% (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: demecolcin
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 and 20 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 4 h treatment: 40 h; 20 h treatment: 40 h
ACTIN POLYMERISATION INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): cytochalasin B, 4 µg/mL
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 binucleated cells per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) - Evaluation criteria:
- The micronucleus assay will be considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The rate of micronuclei in the solvent controls falls within the historical laboratory control data range.
b) The rate of micronuclei in the positive controls is statistically significant increased.
c) The quality of the slides must allow the evaluation of a sufficient number of analyzable cells.
A test item can be classified as non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed in comparison to the respective solvent control.
A test item can be classified as clastogenic and aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase in three test groups or a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Chi square test (p < 0.05)
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 1760 µg/mL following the 20 h treatment without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH and osmolarity: No relevant influence on osmolarity or pH value was observed.
- Precipitation: In all experimental parts no precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A preliminary cytotoxicity test was performed to determine the concentrations to be used in the main experiment. Test item concentrations ranging from 11.4 to 1760 µg/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. In the pre-experiment for toxicity, no precipitation of the test item was observed. Since the cultures fulfilled the requirements for cytogenetic evaluation, this preliminary test was designated Experiment 1.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In Experiment 1 in the absence and presence of S9 mix and in Experiment 2 in the presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment 2 in the absence of S9 mix clear cytotoxicity was observed at the highest evaluated concentration. - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of the in vitro micronucleus test the test substance did not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Test Results of Experiment 1
Experiment 1 |
|||||
S9-Mix |
Without |
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
Solvent control (DMSO) |
30 ± 4 |
124 ± 18 |
299 ± 20 |
28 ± 7 |
18 ± 4 |
50 |
30 ± 5 |
123 ± 7 |
286 ± 4 |
20 ± 6 |
11 ± 0 |
150 |
26 ± 8 |
122 ± 10 |
301 ± 14 |
23 ± 6 |
15 ± 3 |
500 |
31 ± 7 |
145 ± 13 |
297 ± 27 |
27 ± 9 |
19 ± 3 |
1500 |
25 ± 4 |
110 ± 14 |
287 ± 26 |
30 ± 6 |
16 ± 1 |
5000 |
20 ± 6 |
128 ± 5 |
307 ± 35 |
33 ± 2 |
9 ± 1 |
ENNG (3) |
- |
539 ± 64 |
- |
- |
- |
ENNG (5) |
- |
- |
- |
222 ± 39 |
- |
9-AA (80) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
784 ± 251 |
4NQO (0.2) |
160 ± 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MMC (0.5) |
- |
- |
751 ± 185 |
- |
- |
S9-Mix |
With |
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
Solvent control (DMSO) |
44 ± 6 |
143 ± 21 |
330 ± 24 |
24 ± 4 |
22 ± 2 |
50 |
50 ± 17 |
129 ± 16 |
313 ± 26 |
13 ± 5 |
22 ± 1 |
150 |
48 ± 11 |
138 ± 8 |
321 ± 9 |
18 ± 7 |
23 ± 3 |
500 |
56 ± 14 |
144 ± 5 |
331 ± 22 |
20 ± 1 |
24 ± 1 |
1500 |
37 ± 5 |
131 ± 17 |
316 ± 19 |
16 ± 5 |
22 ± 3 |
5000 |
38 ± 5 |
127 ± 3 |
289 ± 12 |
17 ± 5 |
20 ± 1 |
2-AA (1) |
- |
2057 ± 428 |
- |
- |
- |
2-AA (2) |
- |
- |
- |
274 ± 43 |
814 ± 11 |
DAN (10) |
- |
- |
813 ± 53 |
- |
- |
BP (5) |
814 ± 11 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EENG: N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidin 4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide 9-AA: 9-Aminoacridine MMC: Mitomycin C 2-AA: 2-Aminoanthracene BP: Benzo(a)pyrene DAN: 1,8-Dihydroxyanthraquinone |
Table 2: Test Results of Experiment 2
Experiment 2 |
|||||
S9-Mix |
Without |
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
Solvent control (DMSO) |
27 ± 4 |
119 ± 11 |
352 ± 4 |
25 ± 2 |
16 ± 4 |
50 |
29 ± 3 |
123 ± 4 |
338 ± 5 |
20 ± 3 |
16 ± 5 |
150 |
29 ± 7 |
137 ± 15 |
331 ± 15 |
25 ± 7 |
17 ± 3 |
500 |
23 ± 6 |
135 ± 6 |
350 ± 12 |
23 ± 1 |
14 ± 2 |
1500 |
27 ± 7 |
121 ± 7 |
323 ± 56 |
24 ± 2 |
11 ± 3 |
5000 |
22 ± 8 |
124 ± 16 |
324 ± 17 |
32 ± 3 |
15 ± 5 |
ENNG (3) |
- |
481 ± 25 |
- |
- |
- |
ENNG (5) |
- |
- |
- |
167 ± 15 |
- |
9-AA (80) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
926 ± 324 |
4NQO (0.2) |
168 ± 14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MMC (0.5) |
- |
- |
955 ± 75 |
- |
- |
S9-Mix |
With |
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
Solvent control (DMSO) |
39 ± 2 |
127 ± 15 |
311 ± 20 |
15 ± 7 |
20 ± 1 |
50 |
34 ± 3 |
112 ± 11 |
308 ± 17 |
14 ± 1 |
19 ± 5 |
150 |
40 ± 8 |
157 ± 18 |
318 ± 25 |
18 ± 1 |
22 ± 3 |
500 |
31 ± 4 |
132 ± 29 |
317 ± 3 |
16 ± 3 |
17 ± 4 |
1500 |
29 ± 7 |
119 ± 11 |
317 ± 3 |
17 ± 4 |
14 ± 2 |
5000 |
38 ± 7 |
138 ± 19 |
269 ± 18 |
14 ± 1 |
12 ± 1 |
2-AA (1) |
- |
1484 ± 94 |
- |
- |
- |
2-AA (2) |
- |
- |
- |
279 ± 41 |
551 ± 35 |
DAN (10) |
- |
- |
875 ± 204 |
- |
- |
BP (5) |
257 ± 6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EENG: N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidin 4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide 9-AA: 9-Aminoacridine MMC: Mitomycin C 2-AA: 2-Aminoanthracene BP: Benzo(a)pyrene DAN: 1,8-Dihydroxyanthraquinone |
Table 1: Experiment 1 - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Rel. cloning efficiency I |
Rel. cell density |
Rel. cloning efficiency II |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Induction factor |
Culture I |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
11.8 |
1.0 |
55 |
97.6 |
101.3 |
83.0 |
23.3 |
2.0 |
110 |
94.0 |
131.0 |
87.1 |
14.9 |
1.3 |
220 |
94.8 |
115.9 |
78.8 |
19.2 |
1.6 |
440 |
95.4 |
100.3 |
93.2 |
9.0 |
0.8 |
880 |
62.2 |
112.3 |
108.7 |
7.4 |
0.6 |
1760 (P) |
22.9 |
Culture was not continued# |
|||
EMS, 150 |
95.9 |
78.3 |
91.4 |
77.1 |
6.5 |
Culture II |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
17.2 |
1.0 |
55 |
106.1 |
90.5 |
100.3 |
8.2 |
0.5 |
110 |
108.7 |
81.0 |
106.7 |
30.3 |
1.8 |
220 |
103.5 |
79.9 |
107.1 |
23.2 |
1.3 |
440 |
122.0 |
106.8 |
105.2 |
33.9 |
2.0 |
880 |
103.1 |
108.1 |
102.7 |
34.1 |
2.0 |
1760 (P) |
43.9 |
Culture was not continued## |
|||
EMS, 150 |
117.2 |
93.3 |
92.5 |
148.7 |
8.6 |
DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
EMS: Ethylmethanesulphonate
(P): Precipitation
#: Culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects.
Table 2: Experiment 1 - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Rel. cloning efficiency I |
Rel. cell density |
Rel. cloning efficiency II |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Induction factor |
Culture I |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
11.5 |
1.0 |
55 |
101.0 |
110.2 |
93.2 |
17.0 |
1.5 |
110 |
97.2 |
107.0 |
90.8 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
220 |
95.1 |
107.8 |
90.9 |
12.0 |
1.0 |
440 |
94.4 |
109.0 |
86.6 |
15.6 |
1.4 |
880 |
92.6 |
94.9 |
76.5 |
12.0 |
1.0 |
1760 (P) |
0.0 |
2.3 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
DMBA, 1.1 |
96.1 |
81.5 |
79.7 |
125.1 |
10.9 |
Culture II |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
12.7 |
1.0 |
55 |
73.2 |
135.6 |
Culture was not continued## |
||
110 |
88.7 |
127.1 |
93.7 |
15.7 |
1.2 |
220 |
108.6 |
136.7 |
87.0 |
5.7 |
0.4 |
440 |
88.7 |
144.5 |
68.3 |
28.4 |
2.2 |
880 |
72.4 |
129.2 |
81.2 |
22.6 |
1.8 |
1760 (P) |
0.0 |
15.8 |
78.6 |
3.2 |
0.3 |
DMBA, 1.1 |
75.9 |
115.8 |
82.3 |
127.3 |
10.1 |
DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
(P): Precipitation
#: Culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects.
##: Culture was not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required.
Table 3: Experiment 2 - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Rel. cloning efficiency I |
Rel. cell density |
Rel. cloning efficiency II |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Induction factor |
Culture I |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
23.4 |
1.0 |
110 |
98.9 |
117.0 |
104.5 |
4.5 |
0.2 |
220 |
97.1 |
107.4 |
97.5 |
12.2 |
0.5 |
440 |
96.1 |
105.6 |
109.8 |
8.1 |
0.3 |
880 |
79.2 |
81.8 |
116.8 |
17.0 |
0.7 |
1320 |
0.1 |
6.6 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
1760 (P) |
0.0 |
1.3 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
EMS, 150 |
88.2 |
107.0 |
97.4 |
271.8 |
11.6 |
Culture II |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
19.4 |
1.0 |
110 |
100.8 |
125.6 |
96.0 |
7.8 |
0.4 |
220 |
100.4 |
120.7 |
100.8 |
15.4 |
0.8 |
440 |
100.0 |
115.1 |
95.0 |
23.9 |
1.2 |
880 |
88.0 |
81.8 |
109.5 |
20.5 |
1.1 |
1320 |
0.3 |
8.2 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
1760 (P) |
0.0 |
2.1 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
EMS, 150 |
94.2 |
115.0 |
92.5 |
285.2 |
14.7 |
DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
EMS: Ethylmethanesulphonate
(P): Precipitation
#: Culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects.
Table 4: Experiment 2 - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Rel. cloning efficiency I |
Rel. cell density |
Rel. cloning efficiency II |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Induction factor |
Culture I |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
22.9 |
1.0 |
110 |
99.2 |
102.0 |
100.0 |
19.9 |
0.9 |
220 |
101.1 |
94.7 |
98.6 |
17.0 |
0.7 |
440 |
98.6 |
93.1 |
99.1 |
27.3 |
1.2 |
880 |
88.0 |
122.0 |
101.0 |
41.5 |
1.8 |
1320 (P) |
20.4 |
12.3 |
102.2 |
21.8 |
1.0 |
1760 (P) |
0.6 |
0.7 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
DMBA, 1.1 |
98.3 |
105.4 |
100.1 |
452.8 |
19.7 |
Culture II |
|||||
0 (DMSO) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
13.6 |
1.0 |
110 |
101.1 |
62.4 |
117.7 |
12.6 |
0.9 |
220 |
100.3 |
50.4 |
104.1 |
15.3 |
1.1 |
440 |
100.8 |
37.8 |
104.0 |
20.1 |
1.5 |
880 |
87.9 |
38.3 |
103.3 |
7.8 |
0.6 |
1320 |
19.0 |
8.9 |
94.4 |
14.0 |
1.0 |
1760 (P) |
1.3 |
1.0 |
Culture was not continued# |
||
DMBA, 1.1 |
101.1 |
58.0 |
108.0 |
222.1 |
16.3 |
DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
(P): Precipitation
#: Culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects.
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10E6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency did not exceed the historical range of solvent controls.
No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of < 0.05 was determined in any of the experimental groups.
EMS and DMBA were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies.
Table 1: Results of Experiment 1.
Test item |
Concentration in µg/mL |
Proliferation index CBPI |
Number of cells with MN in % |
Exposure period 4 h, fixation time 40 h, without S9 mix |
|||
DMSO |
0.5% (v/v) |
1.79 |
0.75 |
MMC |
2.0 |
1.19 |
12.25# |
Test substance |
574.7 |
1.87 |
0.60 |
1005.7 |
1.84 |
0.20 |
|
1760 |
1.72 |
0.70 |
|
Exposure period 4 h, fixation time 40 h, with S9 mix |
|||
DMSO |
0.5% (v/v) |
1.80 |
0.75 |
CPA |
15.0 |
1.35 |
6.50# |
Test substance |
574.7 |
1.70 |
0.90 |
1005.7 |
1.71 |
0.45 |
|
1760 |
1.72 |
0.80 |
CPA: Cyclophosphamide
DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
MMC: Mitomycin C
#: The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values.
Table 2: Results of Experiment 2.
Test item |
Concentration in µg/mL |
Proliferation index CBPI |
Number of cells with MN in % |
Exposure period 20 h, fixation time 40 h, without S9 mix |
|||
DMSO |
0.5% (v/v) |
1.76 |
0.65 |
Demecolcin |
50.0 ng |
1.49 |
4.15# |
Test substance |
574.7 |
1.61 |
0.75 |
1005.7 |
1.54 |
0.20 |
|
1760 |
1.14 |
0.90 |
|
Exposure period 4 h, fixation time 40 h, with S9 mix |
|||
DMSO |
0.5% (v/v) |
1.95 |
0.55 |
CPA |
17.5 |
1.70 |
6.30# |
Test substance |
574.7 |
1.97 |
0.35 |
1005.7 |
1.88 |
0.70 |
|
1760 |
1.84 |
1.15# |
CPA: Cyclophosphamide
DMSO:Dimethylsulfoxide
#: The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values.
In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item. The micronucleus rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.20 – 1.15% micronucleated cells) exceeded the range of the solvent control values (0.55 – 0.75% micronucleated cells), but were within the range of the laboratory historical control data.
However, in Experiment 2 in the presence of S9 mix, one single statistically significant increase in micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with 1760 µg/mL (1.15%). Since the value is clearly within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data (0.15 – 1.70% micronucleated cells), the finding has to be regarded as biologically irrelevant.
In both experiments, either demecolcin, MMC or CPA were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with micronuclei.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutation in bacteria
A bacterial gene mutation assay with the test substance was performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP (1999). In two independent experiments, the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 were exposed to the test substance using the plate incorporation method. Based on the results of a pre-experiment, test substance concentrations of 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate were selected for the incubation with and without metabolic activation in both experiments. The test substance showed no bacterial toxicity at any dose in both experiments with or without metabolic activation. No biologically relevant increase in revertant numbers was observed after treatment with the test substance in any bacterial strain and at any concentration tested in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The revertant frequencies of the vehicle control were within the expected range and the positive control chemicals induced marked increases in revertant colonies, demonstrating the effective performance of the experiments. Under the conditions of this experiment, the test substance is considered non-mutagenic in the selected S. typhimurium strains in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
Gene mutation in mammalian cells
The mutagenic activity of the test substance was evaluated in an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test according to OECD Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP (2015). The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster. A pre-experiment was performed in order to determine the concentration range for the mutagenicity experiments. The pre-experiment was performed in the presence (4 h treatment) and absence (4 h and 24 h treatment) of metabolic activation. Test substance concentrations between 13.8 and 1760 µg/mL (equal to 10 mM) were used. No relevant toxic effects occurred up to the maximum concentration tested in the presence and absence of metabolic activation after 4 h treatment. Based on the results of the pre-experiment, cells were exposed to the test substance for 4 h in the first experiment with and without metabolic activation up to concentration of 1760 µg/mL. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 h with and 24 h without metabolic activation up to concentration of 1760 µg/mL, respectively. Precipitation was noted in the first experiment at 1760.0 μg/mL with metabolic activation and in the second experiment at 1320 μg/mL with metabolic activation.The maximum concentration of 1760 μg/mL was solely analysable in culture II of the first experiment with metabolic activation. In all other experimental parts, exceedingly severe cytotoxicity did not permit analysis of the mutation frequency. Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% in both parallel cultures solely occurred in the second experiment with metabolic activation at 1320 μg/mL. Based on the steep gradient of toxicity no relevant cytotoxicity was noted at the maximum analysable concentration of the other experimental parts. Exceedingly severe cytotoxicity occurred at the next higher concentration even though the individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2 or below. No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10E06 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency did not exceed the historical range of solvent controls. A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of < 0.05 was determined in any of the experimental groups. Appropriate reference mutagens, used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. In conclusion, the test substance did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells under the experimental conditions reported. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells
The potential of the test substance to induce mirconuclei was investigated in an in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes performed according to OECD Guideline 487 and GLP (2015). The test substance was dissolved in DMSO and two independent experiments were performed. A preliminary cytotoxicity test was performed to determine the concentrations to be used in the main experiment. Test substance concentrations ranging from 11.4 to 1760 µg/mL (with and without metabolic activation) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. Since the cultures fulfilled the requirements for cytogenetic evaluation, this preliminary test with an exposure period of 4 h was designated as Experiment I. In Experiment II, cultures were exposed to the test substance for 4 h with and 20 h without metabolic activation up to a concentration of 1760 µg/mL. The cells were prepared 40 h after start of treatment. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed and at least 1000 binucleated cells per culture were evaluated for cytogenetic damage. No precipitation of the test substance in the culture medium was observed. No relevant influence on osmolarity or pH was observed. In Experiment I with and without metabolic activation and in Experiment II with metabolic activation, no cytotoxic effects were observed up to highest dose tested. In Experiment II clear cytotoxicity was observed without metabolic activation at the highest evaluated concentration. No relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test substance with or without metabolic activation in Experiment I. However, in Experiment II, one single statistically significant increase in micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with 1760.0 μg/mL (1.15 %) with metabolic activation. Since the value is clearly within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data (0.15 - 1.70% micronucleated cells), the finding has to be regarded as biologically irrelevant. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls and induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei. In conclusion, the test substance did not induce micronuclei in the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions reported. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on genetic toxicity of the test substance do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.